刀盾🛡

@jadoodoo_ long eth！

GM! Happy Sunday 🌞 I’m getting ready to upload a long-form New York vlog! 👀

小和尚讲的有道理

@MemeticMonk_ 我的刀盾

@Daodun9527 把你这刀盾阉了

@richpeach888 @JYdmnLFG 那我还是喜欢桃桃这样的

@JYdmnLFG 挖槽好美

新来的粉对我的真实的实力一无所知

@MemeticMonk_ 小狗不可以瑟瑟

我要色色

@kunkunyu510 叽里咕噜说啥呢

Been scrolling X all day. Half are calling for a massive rally, the other half are screaming a huge crash. I’m completely torn on which side to stand on.🙄

送大家，两句七字箴言 有钱不入北上广， 落难必空以太坊、 @VitalikButerin @ethereumfndn

@MemeticMonk_ 狗子你悟了

今天又领悟了不少， 每次深度思考都感觉维度、空间穿透了 今天学到了 「空性」 对进入人生下一个阶段的重要性。 一切事物都没固定、独立、永恒的本质，它们都是依赖『因缘』而生灭的。 看似简单，但要分离自己的分析思考， 关闭大脑回路，放弃定义，不被捆绑， 了解及执行是很困难的。 不小心跟ai聊了一个凌晨… 才对「空性」等多一点感悟， 执行上还需努力 有时候研究得太开心了.. 现在只好补眠1、2小时.. 🫠

@Meta8Mate @BitMNR 那年不是狗屎

似乎好久没人聊ETH/BTC的汇率， 而ETH/BTC比率逼近0.0288， 又是周内新低，距离最近一年新低也不远了， 可以说ETH今年的走势就两个字：狗屎。 X上也很少看到E卫兵了， 现在除了Tom的 @BitMNR ， 似乎也没人买E，全是抛售的消息， 好奇10年之后，ETH会归零还是To the Moon。🫡

@xukego 这段文字写的和你一样漂亮

@ken_fxh AAA需要个领路人，博士

你现在处于哪个阶段？ A. 还在看，搞清楚再说 B. 已经入场，还在摸索 C. 跑起来了，在找同路人 回复一个字母就行。（我看回复）

@mimijieweb3 直接拍

这个视频是Ai的吧？ 前段时间看好像不是这个人 来个高手把我P上去试试 我拿去骗骗网恋男友

@MrWaveMann 畜牲啊93万u，手续费够我活半年的了

bitcoin:native 好了就这么多，不会再加。

@MrWaveMann 我都看傻了，而且什么时候都能掏出盈利单

我发现有一类KOL是这样的，他们永远说对的话。 涨的时候，他会讲，不要追多。 跌的时候，他会讲，不要追空。 涨的狗都知道牛回的时候，他会讲：回踩哪里，可以考虑做多。但是牛回的时候，根本不会有什么回踩。 跌的时候也是一样。 害🤷

@0xVeryBigOrange @EnHeng456 舔学实习生好好学好好看，下次舔孙割jj不要那么生硬 给孙割看的脚趾扣除二里地

行行行，你们奶到这程度了是吧。

@MrWaveMann 要命，我是中毒了吗

@Daodun9527 这条回复我又没看到

我选择全军出击

@Web3_Silvia 好好看啊，乌俺婉情

上班惹，各位老师五一去哪里潇洒啦~😝

@MrWaveMann 是没开蓝v的问题吗，这就安排上

@Daodun9527 你帐号有点问题的，这个@我都没有看到，你还多给我的评论都是折叠起来的

@xukego 问就是想你

退网两天，在打比赛。 占有欲上来了，告诉我这两天你干嘛去了？

@VitalikButerin 看我两个中文缩写 CS kl

Keyed nonces are not just a way to add stronger in-protocol support for privacy solutions. They are also a potential first foray into a new state scaling strategy for Ethereum: create new types of storage that are more optimized for handling categories of use cases that we care about, with restrictions on their use that make them usable at extreme scale while preserving the protocol's decentralization. Let's zoom in on this case (in-protocol nullifiers). Let's say we get to 2000 TPS of privacy-preserving transactions onchain, for eight years. Then we get 2^11 tx/sec * 2^25 sec/year * 2^3 years = 2^39 [ie. 500 billion] nullifiers stored onchain (the challenge with nullifiers is that they are fundamentally not possible to prune). It's actually far easier to keep Ethereum decentralized if we have 500 billion nullifiers onchain in a dedicated nullifier store, than if we just let them grow in the current state. The reason is that the more restrictive structure of nullifiers (only used to check validity, and we can require the nullifier ID to be explicitly specified in the tx) enables more decentralized ways of handling them. This includes: * Sharding: each node (incl builders) can hold a small percentage of nullifiers, and make sure to have a connection to an honest peer in each other shard * Bloom filters: see this somewhat wacky idea here for reducing the VOPS requirement for nullifiers to ~8 bits per nullifier: #k=UT7Btd6tyqHgOj47t-TX06F8D6OpcpM_2PKdf7s4tGE" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">docs.fileverse.io/d/020001fc0012… Both techniques are not possible to use for dynamically accessible state. And so builders would have to download the full 16 TB to become viable (not just optimal, viable!), and privacy protocol users would not be able to use FOCIL without providing a Merkle branch proving that their nullifier is unspent, and there would be very few nodes capable of providing such a branch... Zooming back out, the moral of the story is that fully dynamic state is much harder to handle at extreme scale (tens to hundreds of TB) than state that is more controlled and restricted in how it can be used. And so if we can move the majority of usage into these more specialized forms of state (which we can make much cheaper in terms of gas), then we can keep Ethereum decentralized, and highly scalable, and keep the fully dynamic state available for applications (eg. defi) that really need its full functionality.