Simone Da Re

247 posts

Simone Da Re banner
Simone Da Re

Simone Da Re

@DareSimone

Developer & Consultant #Bitcoin #coding #libertarianism PGP: 07239DF4EA088241060B4BFE4B0F3BFE92574932

Italy Katılım Mart 2013
1.1K Takip Edilen345 Takipçiler
Spunky
Spunky@realspunky_eth·
@AlpinaBG @Rabby_io Yeah don’t think my keys has been leak. The attack created not to be obvious to anyone, no one could suspect a thing till it’s late
English
1
0
0
241
Spunky
Spunky@realspunky_eth·
DO NOT use the "Convert Dust" feature on @Rabby_io wallet right now I made the mistake of initiating an approval through that feature, and it silently got a WALLET DRAINER approved in the process.
English
7
2
34
14.5K
Class CNBC
Class CNBC@classcnbc·
Trade Republic supera un milione di correntisti in Italia: a un anno dal lancio dell'Iban italiano, la fintech tedesca raggiunge un milione di clienti e introduce un servizio clienti attivo 24/7, offrendo supporto telefonico e chat con oltre 1.000 agenti: tinyurl.com/2ezuhccd
Class CNBC tweet media
Italiano
3
1
29
2.1K
Simone Da Re
Simone Da Re@DareSimone·
@RiccardoTrezzi Commenti allucinanti da sindrome di Stoccolma. Lavoreranno tutti nella PA o in una qualche software house parastatale che gestisce SPID, non si spiega altrimenti.
Italiano
0
0
2
84
Riccardo Trezzi
Riccardo Trezzi@RiccardoTrezzi·
🇮🇹 Provo a spiegare il tweet qui sotto. Lo faccio con un esempio. Ho chiesto stasera a mia moglie (cittadina 🇨🇭) “quando hai dovuto fare l’ultimo log-in su un sito della PA 🇨🇭 e per cosa?”. Ebbene, non lo ricordava. E sapete negli ultimi 7 anni quante volte ho dovuto farlo io? Non lo ricordo, credo zero a parte per richiedere documenti per la naturalizzazione (generalmente arrivati nella casella della posta il giorno dopo). Ed ho un’azienda e non ho bisogno della PEC. Etc… La cosa più sconvolgente però è vedere gli italiani che difendono il sistema. Un cortocircuito totale.
Riccardo Trezzi@RiccardoTrezzi

🇮🇹 Sono a trovare mia mamma per Pasqua. Le ho dato una mano con alcuni siti della PA italiana. Mi hanno colpito due cose: lo SPID (livello idiozia 9/10) e UX/UI (livello di imbarazzo 11/10). Potete metterci tutti i soldi che volete ma penso sia chiaro che il primo, devastante problema è il livello del capitale umano. Occorrono 30 anni per sistemare il Paese.

Italiano
71
31
370
52.4K
Simone Da Re
Simone Da Re@DareSimone·
@maxkarpis That's been my experience working in fintech/crypto and talking with other founders in the space for years. It's a racket.
English
0
0
1
18
Simone Da Re
Simone Da Re@DareSimone·
@maxkarpis Welcome to the Italian financial regulator mafia. They don't care about the reason for the fine they hit everyone randomly to fund their activities and keep competitors away from their friends. Lawyers in Italy just tell you to pay so the regulator doesn't get more aggressive.
English
1
0
2
102
Max Karpis
Max Karpis@maxkarpis·
Revolut has just been hit with a $13.3M (EUR 11.5M) fine in Italy - but the case already looks shaky. The AGCM claims Revolut’s "commission-free" investment ads were misleading because they didn’t spell out every cost and fractional-share limitation from the very first click. It is also called account restrictions, which are required by regulations, and also do not allow explanations to customers labelled "aggressive", and the Italian IBAN migration is unclear. Revolut’s counter is simple and strong: The exact same products, ads, and procedures are used across the rest of the EEA without similar sanctions. Account reviews are mandatory under AML/KYC rules everywhere. Disclosures sit in the app, terms and pre-contractual docs - exactly where MiFID II expects them. No widespread consumer harm has been proven. The weakest point in the alleged mis-selling? The investment claim hinges on a strict "first-point-of-contact" standard that the rest of Europe does not appear to enforce. If the product is identical in Vilnius and Lisbon, why is Italy alone suddenly outraged? One can only imagine the regulatory joy of spotting the same app screen that regulators elsewhere have quietly accepted for years. This looks less like a consumer win and more like a classic national institutional overreach on an aggressive challenger. The appeal will test whether Italian courts agree that the AGCM stretched the Consumer Code too far. Fair call or protectionism in disguise?
Max Karpis tweet media
English
4
0
19
4.8K
Simone Da Re
Simone Da Re@DareSimone·
@Gianluigi_Mnz Io su BPM ultimo acquisto di etn bitcoin (blackrock e wisdomtree) 21/11/2025 però profilo privato, non business
Italiano
0
0
2
649
Simone Da Re
Simone Da Re@DareSimone·
@bc1nuno I usually tend to use "transaction queue" instead of "mempool", I don’t like to force new terms on people😁
English
0
0
1
34
Nuno
Nuno@bc1nuno·
Playing with this idea, how to make the mempool useful inside a wallet?
English
13
8
117
5.7K
Simone Da Re
Simone Da Re@DareSimone·
@EconXFin ti basta aprire un conto bpm, dopo le 19.00 al 99% non riesci a fare un bonifico. ma hai mai usato un broker/banca?
Italiano
0
0
3
118
Leonardo Dorini
Leonardo Dorini@dorinileonardo·
Mi pare interessante
Leonardo Dorini tweet media
Italiano
77
2
164
80.2K
Simone Da Re
Simone Da Re@DareSimone·
@dafacto why should the user's balance be visible at the pos?
English
0
0
0
30
Matt Henderson
Matt Henderson@dafacto·
+1. And some things Jay didn’t mention: - I suppose your wallet balances will display on the POS terminal, and if not, they will to the random dude standing next to you. - This whole dance is likely 180x slower than just swiping your device over an NFC terminal. Just imagine the payment queues if this becomes popular. - “Sir this isn’t working; I’ll need your seed phrase to re-sync your wallet.” Prediction: This is dead on arrival.
Jay Yu 🐟@0xfishylosopher

this is a huge moment for onchain assets + offchain spending. but lets be real - this isn't going to kill crypto cards. this flow comes with several caveats: from my understanding, what is added is an extra "tab" or extra "app" into the existing (typically android) POS systems. for you as a customer to use "walletconnect checkout", you must: (1) literally tell the cashier "yo do yalls accept walletconnect stablecoins". the cashier might look at you in confusion, be like "wtf are you on about", and you say "hey hand me the POS terminal i think its here" (2) you pick up the terminal, choose "walletconnect pay", finally get the QR code. (3) then, pick up your phone (already with metamask/phantom etc.), then scan the QR code, choose the right wallet to log in, choose the right chain (eg. SOL/Base/ETH mainnet) and sign in MetaMask your transaction. meanwhile, you awkwardly smile at the cashier, who thinks you're nuts. (4) once tx is complete, you triumphantly tell the cashier "hey look i paid in USDC on SOL". meanwhile, the poor cashier has to figure out how to tell accounting what happened, while you walk away smug about "using stablecoins in the real world permissionlessly" the question - how many net new users of stablecoins will there be from this flow? probs not all that many. yes, vs. the stablecoin card flow, these QR codes are technically more "permissionless". but this thought experiment highlights how in practice, these "real world integrations" bite you in consumer habit, in process knowledge, and worker training - all of which are hidden costs to adoption. on the other hand, crypto cards don't require ANY of this additional worker training etc. you tap, you go. no awkward smile as the shopper behind you curses. again, we shouldn't underestimate the breakthrough here - putting POS directly onchain rather relying on Visa/MC card networks is HUGE unlock. but this is just the first step - we need stickers like "stablecoin payments accepted here", active worker training, and brainless UX that taps into habits to really get the ball rolling on real world adoption. so back to work folks. the future is bright.

English
5
0
5
941
Simone Da Re
Simone Da Re@DareSimone·
@EnricoPassaniti @crisreed @saylor @grok Eh immagino tempi tecnici🙈 ma aiutami se hai voglia a capire un secondo STRC. Che ruolo dovrebbe avere dentro un portafoglio? Una piccola % della parte bond? Per aumentare un po’ lo yield generale? Alla fine bitcoin mi farà più del 10%/anno
Italiano
2
0
0
28
Enrico
Enrico@EnricoPassaniti·
@DareSimone @crisreed @saylor @grok Ciao Simone, sì compro anche io STRC regolarmente su Fineco, ma i dividendi li accreditano (almeno a me) 3-4 giorni lavorativi dopo. Forse BG Saxo, ma ha commissioni nettamente più alte. Al momento non ho trovato altre piattaforme
Italiano
1
0
3
78
Michael Saylor
Michael Saylor@saylor·
Stretch goes to 11% in January 2026. $STRC
English
682
797
8.5K
965.1K
Simone Da Re
Simone Da Re@DareSimone·
@TraderStatham @valfurla @shen_lei @Radio24_news non capiscono proprio che sono loro quelli strani. devono rovinare lo spirito calvinista-svizzero con la follia italiana. acceso ora per sbaglio la tv, tg5 con la piantina della discoteca😂 follia
Italiano
0
0
0
12
Valentina Furlanetto
Valentina Furlanetto@valfurla·
"A Crans Montana ho visto ragazzi ustionati che correvano fuori e famiglie disperate, ma oggi già gli impianti funzionavano, i turisti sono andati avanti con la loro vacanza come nulla fosse. Inquietante" dice il giornalista del corriere del Ticino Mattia Sacchi a @Radio24_news
Italiano
205
123
1.8K
217.9K
Mobitz
Mobitz@m9QD6L4IgW·
@duren_matto Si parla addirittura di 70/30 ad oggi, comunque bond solo emergenti ormai danno un po' di guadagno. Alti e bassi è relativo, VWCE and chill, guardi una volta l'anno e macini se c'è un crollo metti sopra anche le mutande.
Italiano
1
0
0
116
Simone Da Re
Simone Da Re@DareSimone·
@EconXFin Studiare un po' prima di parlare di un argomento non va più di moda, mannaggia
Italiano
2
0
7
541
Economia X Finanza
Economia X Finanza@EconXFin·
Ovviamente, aveva ragione Buffett sul Bitcoin. È la "Greater Fool theory". 1/2
Italiano
37
15
120
21K
Simone Da Re
Simone Da Re@DareSimone·
@rexzh0u No way I’ll update my node to support this crap
English
0
0
1
153
Rex Zhou
Rex Zhou@rexzh0u·
You are totally wrong about Post-Quantum Bitcoin. They tell you to be afraid. They tell you that quantum computers are the end of Bitcoin. They tell you that one day, a machine will crack the code, steal the keys, and send the price to zero. They are lying. Or rather, they are too mid to see the board. Quantum computing isn't the death of Bitcoin. It is the catalyst for the most violent, face-melting supply shock in human history. It is the moment we finally scrub the ledger clean. Here is the reality they don't want to talk about. First, let’s kill the FUD. The argument goes: "Shor’s Algorithm will crack elliptic curve cryptography (ECDSA), allowing a quantum computer to derive your private key from your public key." Technically true. Practically irrelevant for you. The faster the quantum computing develops, the earlier we will reach the post-quantum consensus. Most of your public keys are not on the blockchain. It is hashed. It is hidden behind SHA-256. A quantum computer is a beast at factoring large numbers, but it is useless at reversing a hash function. As long as you haven't reused an address (don't be lazy), you are invisible to the machine. You are safe. And you can move your bitcoin to post-quantum addresses sooner than you think. But you know who isn't safe? The ghosts P2PK. In 2009, Satoshi didn't use P2PKH. He used P2PK (Pay to Public Key). In those early blocks, the public keys were not hashed. They were pasted directly onto the blockchain. Naked. Exposed. This includes the "Patoshi Pattern" - the estimated 1.1 million BTC mined by Satoshi himself. It includes the early miners who lost their hard drives in landfills. It includes the zombies. There are roughly 3 to 4 million Bitcoin sitting in these vulnerable, legacy addresses. They are the "lost coins" we all talk about. Right now, we assume they are gone forever. But on Q-Day, they wake up. Picture the scenario. Google or IBM announces a stable, fault-tolerant Quantum Computer. A thief could theoretically sweep those 1.1 million Satoshi coins and market-dump them. Do you think the network is going to sit there and let that happen? Do you think miners, nodes, BlackRock, Strategy, and the millions of plebs are going to watch their net worth evaporate because of a ghost from 2009? Zero chance. The "Ossification" debate ends instantly. The consensus will be ruthless. Give bip360 a read, P2QRH, it's elegantly built on top of the P2TR, with only disabling the vulnerable script path while keeping all the battle tested security and infrastructure based on P2TR. Active users - you, me, the exchanges - will sign a transaction and move our stack to the new format. Easy. But the dead cannot sign. Satoshi cannot sign. The lost keys cannot sign. So what happens at Block Height X? We sunset the old legacy addresses. We cut off the limb to save the body. The network stops recognizing the old P2PK signature scheme. In that split second, the "lost" coins go from "effectively lost" to mathematically destroyed. They are burned. Deleted from the ledger. Gone. Do the math. Total Supply: 21,000,000. Minus Satoshi’s Stash: 1,100,000. Minus Early Lost Coins: ~2,500,000. On the day the upgrade goes live, the Max Supply of Bitcoin doesn't stay at 21M. It drops to 17M. Or 16M. Instantaneously. Permanently. Stop fearing the tech. Fear is for people who don't understand incentives. The incentives here are aligned for survival, and survival requires the burn. The Quantum "Threat" is actually the final hardening of the asset. It is the fire that burns away the dead wood, leaving only the hardest, most scarce money the universe has ever seen. "The software would be programmed to start using a new hash after a certain block number. Everyone would have to upgrade by that time. The software could save the new hash of all the old blocks to make sure a different block with the same old hash can’t be used." - Satoshi "Lost coins only make everyone else's coins slightly more valuable. Think of it as a donation to everyone." - Satoshi Bring on Q-Day. I want the upgrade. I want the supply shock. I want the burn. Q-day to quadrillions.
English
93
36
278
23K
Matteo Salvini
Matteo Salvini@matteosalvinimi·
Mi ripropongo, non da ministro ma da genitore, da padre e da italiano, di seguire direttamente la vicenda di questa famiglia. Trovo vergognoso che lo Stato si occupi delle scelte di vita personali di due genitori che hanno trovato nell’Italia un paese ospitale e che invece gli toglie i bambini. Sono stato nel campo rom di Giugliano alle porte di Napoli la settimana scorsa, con centinaia di bimbi in età scolare e non a scuola, sporchi, senza insegnanti, senza luce gas e acqua e con genitori che in molti casi campano rubando. Lì dove sono gli assistenti sociali? Dov’è la procura, il tribunale dei minori, lo Stato? Ho firmato la petizione online in loro favore e invito chi è d’accordo a fare altrettanto: change.org/p/salviamo-la-…
Matteo Salvini tweet media
Italiano
1.1K
1.1K
5.3K
179.6K
Simone Da Re
Simone Da Re@DareSimone·
@EconXFin "Fonte: Oxfam, A European agenda to tax the super-rich"
English
0
0
9
772
Economia X Finanza
Economia X Finanza@EconXFin·
Ogni volta che vedo un grafico Will, mi viene da piangere. 5,7 milioni dovrebbe essere sopra la la linea dei 5 milioni. E 2,4 milioni sopra quella del 2.
Economia X Finanza tweet media
Italiano
18
15
451
22K