DarkMatter

Secret to success is giving up timely.

@MarinStrade @admirim @hududhura You still look sick and ass-like, so the dudes were probably just looking to buy drugs.

@admirim @hududhura I visited Serbia on the last State Dept. work trip I agreed to go on because my dad was dying and I didn’t want to leave home anymore. I was sick, looked like ass, and didn’t want to be there. I got approached by no less than 3 dudes at the hotel bar. Sure, guys. 😂

25 years in prison sought for Serbian spy Jelena Djukanovic. The trial revealed she spied on senior OSCE official 🇺🇸 Jeff Bieley, passed sensitive information to Serbian intelligence and manipulated OSCE reports to undermine Kosovo's institutions.

@IMarijin @StjepoBartulica Bar se mucio kao pseto 2.5 godine od metka u kicmi, od cega je na kraju i skapao.

@DarkMatters23 @StjepoBartulica Da, ali 14 godina zakasnio...

Ubijeni hrvatski emigranti 1946.-1989. Ubijeni: 1.) Dr. Ivan Protulipac 1946. u Italiji 2.) Ilija Abramović 1948. u Austriji 3.) Dinka Domančinović 1960. u Argentini – stara 3 godine 4.) Mate Milićević 1973. u Kanadi 5.) Marijan Šimundić 1967. u SR Njemačkoj 6.) Jozo Jelić 1967. u SR Njemačkoj 7.) Mile Jelić 1967. u SR Njemačkoj 8.) Petar Tominac 1967. u SR Njemačkoj 9.) Vlado Murat 1967. u SR Njemačkoj 10.) Anđelko Pernar 1967. u SR Njemačkoj 11.) Hrvoje Ursa 1968. u SR Njemačkoj 12.) Đuro Kokić 1968. u SR Njemačkoj 13.) Mile Rukavina 1968. u SR Njemačkoj 14.) Krešimir Tolj 1968. u SR Njemačkoj 15.) Vid Maričić 1968. u SR Njemačkoj 16.) Ante Znaor 1968. u Italiji 17.) Josip Krtalić 1968. u Italiji 18.) Nedjeljko Mrkonjić 1968. u Francuskoj 19.) Pere Čović 1968. u Australiji 20.) Mirko Čurić 1969. u SR Njemačkoj 21.) Nahid Kulenović 1969. u SR Njemačkoj 22.) Vjekoslav Luburić 1969. u Španjolskoj 23.) Mijo Lijić 1970. u Švedskoj 24.) Mirko Šimić 1971. u SR Njemačkoj 25.) Ivo Bogdan 1971. u Argentini 26.) Maksim Krstulović 1971. u Engleskoj 27.) Drago Mihalić 1972. u SR Njemačkoj 28.) Josip Senić 1972. u SR Njemačkoj 29.) Dr. Branko Jelić 1972. u SR Njemačkoj 30.) Stjepan Ševo 1972. u Italiji 31.) Tatjana Ševo 1972. u Italiji 32.) Rosemarie Bahorić 1972. u Italiji – imala 9 godina 33.) Josip Buljan-Mikulić 1973. u SR Njemačkoj 34.) Mate Jozak 1974. u SR Njemačkoj 35.) Ilija Vučić 1975. u SR Njemačkoj 36.) Ivica Milošević 1975. u SR Njemačkoj 37.) Nikola Martinović 1975. u Austriji 38.) Matko Bradarić 1975. u Belgiji 39.) Vinko Eljuga 1975. u Danskoj 40.) Stipe Mikulić 1975. u Švedskoj 41.) Nikola Penava 1975. u SR Njemačkoj 42.) Ivan Tuksor 1976. u Francuskoj 43.) Ivan Vučić 1977. u SR Njemačkoj 44.) Jozo Oreč 1977. u JAR 45.) Bruno Bušić 1978. u Francuskoj 46.) Križan Brkić 1978. u SAD 47.) Marijan Rudela 1979. u SAD 48.) Zvonko Šimac 1979. u SAD 49.) Goran Šećer 1979. u Kanadi 50.) Cvitko Cicvarić 1979. u Kanadi 51.) Nikola Miličević 1980. u SR Njemačkoj 52.) Mirko Desker 1980. u SR Njemačkoj 53.) Ante Kostić 1981. u SR Njemačkoj 54.) Mate Kolić 1981. u Francuskoj 55.) Petar Bilandžić 1981. u SR Njemačkoj 56.) Ivan Jurišić 1981. u SR Njemačkoj 57.) Mladen Jurišić 1981. u SR Njemačkoj 58.) Stanko Nižić 1981. u Švicarskoj 59.) Ivo Furlić 1981. u SR Njemačkoj 60.) Đuro Zagajski 1983. u SR Njemačkoj 61.) Franjo Mikulić 1983. u SR Njemačkoj 62.) Milan Župan 1983. u SR Njemačkoj 63.) Stjepan Đureković 1983. u SR Njemačkoj 64.) Slavko Logarić 1984. u SR Njemačkoj 65.) Franjo Mašić 1986. u SAD-u 66.) Damir Đureković 1987. u Kanadi 67.) Ante Đapić 1989. u SR Njemačkoj - Hvala im i slava! Neuspjela ubojstva: 1.) Mate Frković 1948. u Austriji 2.) Dr. Ante Pavelić 1957. u Argentini 3.) Dr. Branko Jelić 1957. u SR Njemačkoj 4.) Obitelj Deželić 1965. u SR Njemačkoj 5.) Ante Vukić 1968. u SR Njemačkoj 6.) Mirko Grabovac 1969. u SR Njemačkoj 7.) Dr. Branko Jelić 1970. u SR Njemačkoj 8.) Vlado Damjanović 1970. u SR Njemačkoj 9.) Dr. Branko Jelić 1971. u SR Njemačkoj 10.) Gojko Bošnjak 1972. u SR Njemačkoj 11.) Nikola Vidović 1972. u Francuskoj 12.) Dane Šarac 1973. u SR Njemačkoj 13.) Gojko Bošnjak 1973. u SR Njemačkoj 14.) Dane Šarac 1974. u Francuskoj 15.) Stipe Bilandžić 1975. u SR Njemačkoj 16.) Stipe Bilandžić 1977. u SR Njemačkoj 17.) Franjo Goreta 1980. u SR Njemačkoj 18.) Luka Kraljević 1982. u SR Njemačkoj 19.) Luka Kraljević 1983. u SR Njemačkoj 20.) Danica Glavaš 1986. u SAD-u 21.) Ante Tokić 1988. u Australiji 22.) Tomislav Naletilić 1988. u SR Njemačkoj 23.) Nikola Štedul 1988. u Škotskoj Otmice: 1.) Drago Jelik 1949. iz Italije 2.) Krunoslav Draganović 1967. iz Italije 3.) Vjenceslav Čižek 1977. iz Italije 4.) Ivica Novaković 1987. iz SR Njemačke Neuspjele otmice: 1.) Dr. Branko Jelić 1950. iz SR Njemačke 2.) Franjo Mikulić 1979. iz Francuske Nestali: 1.) Zlatko Milković 1949. u Francuskoj 2.) Zvonimir Kučar 1963. u Francuskoj 3.) Geza Pašti 1965. u Francuskoj 4.) Stjepan Crnogorac 1972. u Austriji

@IMarijin @StjepoBartulica Ne boj se, svi su likvidirani, naveo je samo neuspele pokusaje (mada su neki od tih “neuspesnih” bili i uspesni, npr na pavelica, samo je krepao od povreda kasnije).

@StjepoBartulica Žalim, da je lista neuspjelih ubojstava tako duga...

@StjepoBartulica “Neuspela” :)) Svi su likvidirani, samo neki ne iz prvog pokusaja. 💪🏻

@JovanBilbi270 @ArnoGujon @sandrogozi Srbija bukv nema nista od tvog skolovanja i zakletve, zato odjebi. Jebo te zvalavi peder koji ti sluzi kao izgovor za blacenje Srbije.

@ArnoGujon @sandrogozi Alo degenu,kada sam se ja za tu Srbiju školovao i i polagao vojničku zakletvu, ti nisi znao da Srbija postoji, sad si došao ovde u Srbiju plaćen od onog žvalavog smrada da vredjaš Srbe!

Проблем са пљувачима Србије је да, док их пуштате, они настављају да пљују. Зато сам позвао европског политичара @sandrogozi на ТВ дебату која би се одржала у Паризу или Бриселу. На сваку лаж коју је изговорио о Србији и Србима ћу да одговорим тамо где их је пропагирао. Надам се да ће имати храбрости да прихвати мој отворен позив на дебату.

@Jedinoistina Ne uzrujavaj se. Ako ih priznaje vecina, dobice stolicu u UN i nece traziti da ih i Srbija prizna.

I ranije smo znali da su nam istočni susjedi posvađani s realnošću, ali mislim da ih većina ipak nije smatrala posvađanima i sa zdravim razumom. Međutim, dovoljno je pogledati što pišu na SM i kako se obrušavaju na one koji ih pobijaju argumentima (redovito tako da ga izvrijeđaju i onemoguće komentar) pa da shvatimo s kakvim ljudima imamo posla. Ovo ste sami tražili pa ćemo stavku po stavku, taksativno. 1) Kosovo je u očima većine država svijeta samostalna država: Posljednji podaci, dostupni na Wikipediji (onoj globalnoj, na engleskom jeziku, gdje je sve potkrijepljeno fusnotama i popisom literature), pokazuju da je Kosovo krajem prošle godine imalo priznanje 110 država svijeta od ukupno 193 članice UN-a. E sad, izvan UN-a je nekoliko država (Vatikan, Palestina..., samo su promatrači, ali ne i članice), ali to ne mijenja na podacima da više od 50 posto zemalja - dakle, više od polovice njih, priznaje Kosovo kao samostalnu državu. Ili možda tvrdite da više od 50 posto nije većina?! Zadnje države koje su priznale neovisnost Kosova, i to 2025. godine, su Kenija, Sudan, Sirija i Bahami. (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internati…). 2) "Puno država je povuklo priznanje Kosova": Ne, više država je najavilo da će povući priznanje Kosova nakon pritiska ruske diplomacije, koja je odrađivala taj posao za srbijansku diplomaciju. Rekli su da hoće, ali nisu to napravili. Ili neki jesu, a onda su ponovno priznali Kosovo. I taj dio vam je dobro obrađen na svjetskoj Wikipedji. Koliko je poznato, priznanje Kosova stvarno je povuklo samo osam zemalja (afričke države Burundi, Srednjoafrička Republika, Togo i Madagaskar i pacifičke države Papua - Nova Gvineja, Solomonski Otoci i Nauru plus karipska državica Dominika). I to je sve. Slobodno provjerite na stranicama ministarstva vanjskih poslova bilo koje zemlje priznaje li Kosovo ili ne. 3) "Kosovo je po Ustavu Srbije dio Srbije": Papir svašta trpi, u Ustav ste mogli zapisati i da Sunce izlazi na zapadu, a zalazi na istoku, ali to ništa ne mijenja u stvarnosti. Ako je Kosovo dio Srbije, možete li tamo slobodno otputovati? Ono, sjednete za volan, natankate benzin i krenete, recimo, u Prištinu ili Prizren? I sami znate odgovor. 4) "Oslobodili smo Kosovo od turske okupacije": Jeste, ali nakon 550 godina (1389.-1912.). Možete li opet toliko čekati? I što će vam to značiti kad vas više neće biti? 5) "Ni svi u EU ne priznaju Kosovo": To je istina, 5 članica EU-a (Španjolska, Slovačka, Rumunjska, Grčka i Cipar) ne priznaju Kosovo, ali zato priznaju kosovske dokumente. Kao što u WW2 Vichy i Švicarska nisu priznavale NDH, ali su zato priznavale dokumente NDH. Osim toga, u Uniji jača inicijativa da i preostalih 5 članica prizna neovisnost Kosova. 6) "Nećemo u EU ako to znači priznanje Kosova": Ne, ulazak u EU nije vam uvjetovan de jure priznanjem Kosova, ali de facto priznanje je ili, kako se to kaže, "normalizacijom odnosa". Nitko od Srbije ne traži da prizna Kosovo kao samostalnu državu, budući da ni sama EU nema jednoglasan stav o tome, Traži, međutim, da s vlastima u Prištini normalizirate odnose i da ne radite probleme, među ostalim, oko kosovskih dokumenata i automobilskih tablica, kao ni oko simbola. Treba reći da se i sama Srbija Bruxelleskim sporazumom iz 2013., na kojeg se u Beogradu toliko često pozivaju, obvezala da Kosovu neće raditi probleme na putu prema EU (čl. 14.). Tako da taj sporazum nije samo o Zajednici srpskih općina nego je malo širi od toga. I nije da samo Priština nije ispunila svoje obveze, nego nije ni Beograd. Evo vam original tekst (hr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruxelles…. 7) "Kosovo je srce Srbije": Je, bilo je nekad "srce Srbije", kao što je i Carigrad (Istanbul) bio "srce Grčke", kao što je Kijev bio "srce Rusije", kao što je Vilinus bio "srce Poljske", kao štoje Ohrid bio "srce Bugarske", a Subotica (Szabadka) "srce Mađarske". Bilo je kroz povijest puno takvih "srca", ali eto, vrijeme nije stajalo, pa su se i pozicije ovog ili onog "srca" mijenjale. Umjesto što se bavite bližom ili daljom, a pogotovo jako dalekom prošlošću, možda bi vam pametnije bilo da se zapitate zašto ste Kosovo izgubili u ratu s NATO-om 1999.? Uostalom, u ratu 1912. ste ga i dobili, a u nekom sljedećem ratu ste ga i izgubili. Tako to ide. Isto tako, zapitajte se kako vidite eventualnu reintegraciju Kosova u sastav Srbije? 93 posto stanovnika Kosova nisu Srbi i ne žele natrag u Srbiju. Kako zamišljate povratak svoje vojske, policije i uprave tamo? Želi li Srbija postati binacionalna država, po uzoru na Sjevernu Makedoniju, pa kosovskim Albancima osigurati, recimo, mjesto predsjednika države ili vlade, 1/4 ministara u vladi i mjesto predsjednika parlamenta i Ustavnog suda? Želi li uvesti albanski kao drugi službeni jezik? Dakle, saberite se i prihvatite konačno realnost. Kosovo ste izgubili u ratu prije 27 godina (zapravo ga je izgubila propala SR Jugoslavija). Malo tko tamo čeka da se vratite. Naprotiv, s izuzetkom onih 7 posto Srba, ako ih ima i toliko, ostali bi na vas gledali kao na sve samo ne "osloboditelje". Ljutili se vi ili ne...

@JovanBilbi270 Dace valjda i neku garanciju za tebe da odjebes vise u tri picke materine i prestanes da kmecis za lajk

Garanciju da se neće usrati.

@inickdc @BalkanRealism Keep your knickers on, I’m not interested in humiliating you any further.

It’s remarkable how quickly the script flips—one moment history is complicated, the next it’s been edited down to a one-sided tragedy with a very selective memory. The archives of Kosovo and Bosnia and Herzegovina don’t quite cooperate with your narrative, though—they tend to remember more than the storyteller would prefer. Blood is on your hands. At some point, the performance of permanent victimhood starts to sound less like history and more like a carefully rehearsed genre—one where responsibility is always written out of the script. Call me a hypocrite if you like—it doesn’t carry much weight outside your own frame of reference. Your labels don’t travel far, and they don’t define me. I’m not particularly concerned with how you choose to characterize me, especially when the substance of the argument is left untouched.

Nice try—but Bosnia and Herzegovina isn’t a “pile of parts,” it’s one country, full stop; its internal divisions don’t make new states any more than rooms make separate houses, and it belongs to all its people—Bosniaks and Herzegovinians—every single day, not just when it’s convenient to pretend otherwise. No, I specifically did not want to say Serbs and Croats. Bosniaks and Herzegovinians, pet.

@inickdc @BalkanRealism No amount of deflection will change the fact that a sovereign part of Serbia was allowed to secede, while the same is being denied to RS in Bosnia, a sub-state administrative unit, in the same way Kosovo was. Supporting both Bosnia and Kosovo makes you a hypocrite.

You’re not actually addressing what I said—you’re angrily replacing it with a label. Calling Bosnia and Herzegovina a “Frankenstein state” isn’t an argument; it’s a low EQ rhetorical shortcut that avoids the legal and historical reality I laid out. Bosnia and Herzegovina did not come into existence as a loose confederation—it maintained its international legal continuity from 1992 and was internally restructured by the Dayton Agreement. Your “double standards” point doesn’t hold either. Territorial integrity is not selectively applied—it’s a general principle that applies equally to Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and every other recognized state. Supporting it in one case while supporting it in another is not hypocrisy—it’s consistency. The actual double standard, good sir, would be arguing that Serbia’s borders must be respected while Bosnia’s can be treated as negotiable. In which world is this acceptable? Serbian, apparently. And your underlying assumption—that Bosnia’s internal complexity somehow delegitimizes it—doesn’t follow. States can be decentralized, asymmetrical, even messy. That doesn’t make them any less sovereign. Under Dayton, entities like Republika Srpska and the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina derive their authority from the state—they didn’t create it, and they don’t stand above it. So what I gave you was a legal and constitutional argument. What you gave back is a label. Those are not the same thing. Some truths are not easy to take. I understand your conflict but I do not accept it.

@inickdc @BalkanRealism Definition of double standards - promoting territorial integrity of a Frankenstein state, while denying the same to Serbia.

Your framing is rhetorically punchy but legally inaccurate. The modern state of Bosnia and Herzegovina did not come into existence as a confederation of pre-existing sovereign units; it continued its already recognized statehood (internationally affirmed in 1992) and was constitutionally restructured by the Dayton Agreement to end the Bosnian War. Under Annex 4 of Dayton—the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina—the entities, namely Republika Srpska and the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, are not sovereign states that “entered” into a union; rather, they are sub-state administrative units created or recognized within a single, continuous sovereign state. The constitution explicitly preserves Bosnia and Herzegovina’s international legal personality, territorial integrity, and continuity, while allocating significant internal competencies to the entities. So, while the country is highly decentralized—arguably one of the most complex federal-type arrangements in the world—it is not, in legal terms, a confederation nor a “pile of parts.” It is a sovereign state with two entities exercising delegated powers under a single constitutional and international framework.

@MiaZagica @SamaHoole @Heathcliff48858 I doubt you’d leave the 3rd place podium again nowadays, that much I know.

@DarkMatters23 @SamaHoole @Heathcliff48858 You haven't got a clue what you're talking about. 🙄

In 2022 a team of Czech and Montenegrin anthropologists published the most comprehensive height survey ever conducted in the Western Balkans. They measured 47,158 people across Bosnia, Herzegovina, Croatia, Montenegro, Albania, and Kosovo. The result overturned an assumption that had stood for fifty years. The tallest 18-year-olds in the world are not Dutch. They are from Montenegro. The average 18-year-old male in Montenegro is 182.9 cm. In Dalmatia, 183.7 cm. There is a continuous belt running from the Adriatic coast through Herzegovina into central Montenegro where average male height exceeds 184 cm. In some towns it is over 187 cm. This is the highest mean stature ever documented in any human population. The strange part is that the Balkans are not rich. GDP per capita in Montenegro is roughly a fifth of the Netherlands. Protein intake is well below Western European levels. By every conventional metric, the Western Balkans should be producing average heights similar to Bulgaria or Romania. Instead they are producing the tallest men on earth. The explanation is genetic. Y-chromosome haplogroup I-M170, present in over 70% of men in Herzegovina, correlates with male height across all 55 European and Near Eastern populations the researchers tested. Wherever the haplogroup is common, the men are tall. The haplogroup is descended from the Gravettian culture of the Upper Palaeolithic. The Gravettians were big-game hunters. They specialised, for roughly 15,000 years, in killing mammoth, bison, reindeer, and aurochs across Europe. They ate, in caloric terms, almost exclusively animal products. The most meat-heavy diet documented in the European archaeological record. Hundreds of generations of selection pressure for converting animal protein into skeletal stature. When the megafauna disappeared, most Gravettian populations dispersed and intermarried with incoming farmers from the Near East, who carried different haplogroups associated with shorter stature. The Western Balkans, isolated by the Dinaric Alps, retained an unusually high proportion of the original hunter genetics. The men of Herzegovina are the genetic descendants of mammoth hunters who spent the Ice Age eating fat and meat in quantities no modern population approaches. They are still tall, on a sub-optimal modern diet, because the genes were selected for height by 15,000 years of animal-based eating. If their nutrition reaches Northern European levels, the prediction is that average male height in central Herzegovina will reach 190 cm within two generations. Six foot three. As an average. The Dutch built their height in 150 years on dairy. The men of the Dinaric Alps built theirs over 15,000 years on mammoth. And the variable, in both cases, was the animal.

@SamaHoole @Heathcliff48858 Pity they’re not very good at it…

@Heathcliff48858 No wonder you guys love basketball.

@Falcone545 @mnepopravljiva @DachaOstojic Ja bojkotujem Ostoju, ne klub. Ti kako hoces.

@mnepopravljiva @DachaOstojic Na apsolutni bojkot kluba, kao što je uradjeno sa FK, gde nije bio ni deseti deo ovakve sramote.

KK Partizan je danas umro kad je dozvolio da govno odrzi govor. Toliko.

@ostroumni @BowesChay Jebali te i zvalavi peder i ceo Brisel

@BowesChay Nothing says 'fearless journalist living in Russia' like rage-tweeting about Brussels threatening Serbia for the 47th time this month. Groundbreaking stuff, mate.

Politico: Brussels is threatening Serbia again. EU dictatorship might pull up to €1.5B in aid. Anonymous official says Serbia's friendship with Russia is the real problem. So the Commission is tightening the screws. Western “democracy” in its full glory.

@leica407 @etfblokada Posejao Ćokija.

@etfblokada Rekao čovek koji je posejao jedno od najvećeg zla u našem narodu!

Svako zlo ima svoj kraj. I ovo će se lane zvati. - Duško Vujošević

@My_Marig0ld @Joey_Filipponi @BowesChay @FalkTG It was the middle 20-25%

@Joey_Filipponi @BowesChay @FalkTG And? The last 20-25% was accomplished by Americans, Canadians,,, etc.

I repeat: The U.S. sent thousands of its 19 years old soldiers to die in Normandy, to free Europe and to end the biggest crime against humanity ever commited - by Europeans. It was just 81 years ago. The whole reason, France, Benelux etc. 🇫🇷 exist today is because of this heroism. My grandparents could grow up in a liberal democracy. Without the U.S. they would be raised at the H*tler Youth. We Europeans would still be in wars again and again, like 1914, 1866, 1870, 1795 etc. They brought peace, democracy, liberty and human rights. They invested billions of U.S. Dollars into Europe with the Marshall Fund. They gave us more than we ever had in our history before. They protected us for 7 decades with hundreds of thousands of soldiers against the cruelties of the Soviet Union. The terror we can see nowadays in Donetsk, would have happened in Bavaria, Bourgogne or the Netherlands in 1950 if there wasn’t the U.S. 🇺🇸 Who do we Europeans think we are to let that nation down, act like bad allies, calling their President names every day on television - and have full confidence we stand better alone. All of instagram is just about, why we’re better than the U.S. We owe them so much. We Europeans are most arrogant species on earth. And to cure this we have to face the truth.

@elonmusk Can’t they find a place to hang the camera without the view being obstructed by some piece of equipment?

NASA Artemis passing close to the Moon

@Bad_Guests Vesna Covic.

Да ли је неко до сада сазнао како се зове ова камењарка?

@BarryESharp @georgegalloway You really are retired as fuck when you have time to write all that bullshit…

George Galloway, your claim that NATO's 1999 campaign in Yugoslavia "paved the way" for endless Western imperialism, now supposedly repeating in the US-Israel strikes on Iran, is the same narrative inversion you've trafficked in for decades. The facts are clear and they demolish your version of history. In 1998-99, Slobodan Milosevic's regime ran Operation Horseshoe: a documented ethnic-cleansing operation in Kosovo that killed thousands of ethnic Albanians, raped civilians, and drove nearly 850,000 people into exile. UN reports, ICTY indictments, and Human Rights Watch records laid it out in black and white. NATO's 78-day air campaign was launched after Rambouillet talks collapsed; it targeted military command centers, supply lines, and dual-use infrastructure, including bridges used to move Serb troops and armor, precisely to stop the atrocities and prevent wider Balkan war. That was not "dismemberment for imperialism." It was deterrence against a butcher who had already carved up Bosnia. Contrast that with Iran in 2026. On February 28, the regime crossed every red line: near-weapons-grade uranium enrichment, JCPOA violations, and an imminent breakout window measured in months. Operation Epic Fury was not unprovoked aggression. It was precision self-defense. US and Israeli strikes hit over 1,700 targets: nuclear facilities at Natanz, Isfahan, and Fordow; missile production sites; IRGC command nodes; and naval assets at Bandar Abbas. Leadership decapitation removed Khamenei and senior IRGC commanders. Independent assessments from IAEA and CENTCOM confirm Iran's nuclear breakout timeline was reset by more than 21 months. The Tehran-Karaj B1 highway bridge was struck because it served military logistics for missile transport and IRGC movement, exactly the dual-use calculus NATO applied in 1999. Your selective outrage ignores Iran's actual record: shooting down PS752 in January 2020 and killing 57 Canadians; arming Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis to attack civilians and global shipping; supplying Shahed drones to Russia for the Ukraine slaughter; and fueling the Sudan civil war with weapons that prolong famine and chaos. When Iran retaliates by mining or harassing the Strait of Hormuz, 20 percent of global oil flow, Canadian gas prices spike. That is the direct cost of CRINK aggression, not Western "imperialism." Your larger project, Galloway, is not principled anti-imperialism. It is Lord Haw Haw propaganda for the 21st century. You have spent your career on RT and PressTV platforms, defending Saddam Hussein, inverting victim and aggressor in Syria and Ukraine, and now cheerleading the theocrats who arm terrorists and threaten energy lifelines. You are determined to erode Western resolve, weaken public support for deterrence, and hand strategic victories to the CRINK axis, China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea, coordinated revisionist powers working to dismantle the rules-based order that keeps Canadians safe and prosperous. Here at home your worldview makes our self-inflicted vulnerabilities worse. Net-zero ideology, Bill C-69 regulatory sabotage, and UNDRIP implementation have stalled over $670 billion in energy projects. Canada sits on the world's third-largest oil reserves yet imports 40 percent of its crude while Alberta sends $285 billion-plus in equalization transfers to the rest of the country. When Hormuz chokes or CRINK proxies escalate, we pay first, because Ottawa chose Davos virtue-signaling over energy abundance and sovereignty. The pattern is not "Western imperialism forever." It is repeated aggression by authoritarian regimes met, eventually, by necessary force. Your anti-imperialist pose is the fig leaf that enables the real imperialists in Beijing, Moscow, Tehran, and Pyongyang. Evidence over excuses. Precision over propaganda. Citizens first. Canada First.

This all began with Yugoslavia. I said at the time the dismemberment of the former Yugoslav state and then of Serbia would pave the way for imperialist war after war. And so it did. And would until it was stopped. And so it now is being in Iran. #Yugoslavia #Serbia #Iran