Herb Chormley

@MikeFrancoAR501 @L202473203 @KarlWuckert These arguments are terrible and illogical - auper low IQ stuff.

@L202473203 @KarlWuckert Israel kills Palestinian children seeking food. Do you really think they'd hesitate to take out someone they created to support them if they flipped? Those Satanists are worse than mobsters! At least mobsters have a code of conduct not to harm children. You're supporting evil.

JUST IN: Joe Kent again says leads in the Charlie Kirk case existed, but he was blocked from investigating. “There was people posting online before Charlie was even killed that Charlie was going to be killed that day at that location.”

@loveisblonde143 @scipio_nissim @Osint613 It's hilarious how all the podcast-bro bandwagon Republicans unveiled themselves so quickly. You didn't pay any attention before covid and then formed political views based on conspiracy theories and warped history. Low IQ

@scipio_nissim @Osint613 lmao the cope is crazyyy. guess you guys will just learn the hard way, good luck

Woke rights favorite influencer Nick Fuentes: “Pray for Iran, Iran is fighting for the whole world.” Nick is a Traitor to the U.S.

@ballyhoobutcher @aleksthgrt Yea thats what you guys keep saying but it doesn't appear to be happening. The Fuentes narrative is entirely supported by a hypothetical scenario where US ground troops invade Iran to enable Israeli colonization. None of you have paid any attention for the last 20 years

@aleksthgrt Americans will be dying in large scale to make Israel a superpower. It’s all so tiresome

🚨BREAKING NEWS American far-right political commentator Nick Fuentes: Pray for Iran. Iran is currently fighting not only for itself, but for all of humanity. In a way, they are resisting for us too. Because if Iran falls, Israel will gain control over the entire Middle East. I don't think the real target is just Iran. Israel is coming towards you, and Iran is currently just an obstacle in its way.

@legithillbilly @KissaTobacco @cafreiman Gini is serevely limited as a measure economic stability/prosperity, especially for developing countries like India. Actaul income data is only kept in developed nations (US & Euro) - the rest (India, SE Asia, Africa) use consumptikn data which wayyyyyy understates inequality

@KissaTobacco @cafreiman Gini coefficient for India is nearly half the measure for the USA, so your assessment of inequality is not backed by the data. India is the 4th most equal country in the world by this measure.

You can object to a wealth tax even if you aren’t wealthy because you think it’s a bad policy, just as you can object to tariffs even if you aren’t an importer.

@wilson_dunham_f @4TaxFairness Something along this idea - if we're going to tax wealth, it must be earmarked to pay down the debt/reduce deficits along with a clear plan to reign in spending.

@4TaxFairness Here's my plan. Every dime over $100B in wealth gets liquidated and goes directly to paying down the debt. Congress doesn't get a finger on any of it. Only affects about 12 people/families.

The richest 0.1% of Americans hold nearly as much wealth as the bottom 90% of families combined. And yet we keep cutting programs for working people to give more tax breaks to billionaires. We really, really need Elizabeth Warren's Ultra-Millionaire Tax Act.

@singulieroblige @tonyannett Property taxes are far easier to manage given how decentralized it is across thousands of counties combined with relatively low volatility in prices. Completey different from a wealth tax based on public/private equity holdings

Right. They say "oh it's impossible to administer a wealth tax". Oh really? Somehow my rinky dink county in the middle of nowhere can figure out aerial maps of my property and send around tax spies to determine my assessed value. I think we can figure how how to tax the wealth of billionaires.

If I can pay tax on the so-called “unrealized capital gains” on my house every year, the richest man in the world can bloody well do so for his obscene wealth. The deference shown to these oligarchs is breathtaking.

This is a great example of how liberals mistake a fact for a universal/objective truth. Truth/reality of something requires a rational interpretation of all relevant facts, not just the ones that align with your bias. Effective tax rate vs top marginal bracket is a good example of this

@DarthRevanch @happylilttleboy @patrickbetdavid What was the source? I know you guys don't like facts (aka tons of evidence the election wasn't stolen) but a source would be ideal

Top 1% pays 42% of all federal income taxes. Bottom 50% pays 2.3%. And Congress continues to waste tax payers money.

@Canadian_eh14 @happylilttleboy @patrickbetdavid Hahhh what an ironic comment- here are the sources bud. This is a oretty widely understood idea, it's surprising so many people fall for such low IQ misinformation taxfoundation.org/data/all/feder…

@loladze @ArthurBoreman You literally have it backwards. It's not supposed to be like the progressive income tax system , it's more like a forced insurance premium. SS "taxes" are earmarked and put into a separate trust fund-all other types of taxes/levies go into the Treasury General fund.

The 'cap' logic is a way to bypass the progressive tax system we claim to have. By framing SS as a separate 'insurance' fee rather than a tax, we've legalized a system where the wealthy pay a tiny fraction of their income compared to the poor. It’s a regressive structure hidden behind the guise of a contribution limit.

People understand that the reason the taxes are capped is because the benefits are capped too, right? Like there is a very logical reason for why they do not collect over a certain amount and its one of rather basic fairness.

@KyzerBengal @wesblog @CynicalPublius @dogsoftheshire Yup exactly as expected - whenever the low IQ "eat the rich" arguments get destroyed, libs always resort to calling you some variation of billionaire bootlicker. It's literally equivalent to a 5th grade level intellect

@DarthRevanch @wesblog @CynicalPublius @dogsoftheshire Brainwashed would be the middle class dude trying to fight for the poor marginalized billionaire……

The idea of taxes on unrealized capital gains for illiquid assets is the stupidest economic policy ever dreamed up. It would be an economy-destroying measure that would basically eliminate the concept of privately owned companies (i.e., companies with equity not traded on the public markets). The death of private companies would result in the death of the major innovation engine that has made the USA the greatest economy in the world. Had such a scheme existed 50 years ago, Apple, Meta, Google, Tesla, Space-X, etc. etc. would never have come into being because they would never have been able to raise VC start-up capital. If this law were to come to pass, unemployment will skyrocket, innovation will plummet, standards of living will be reduced to third world levels, and capital will flee offshore. The nation will tumble into a decades-long Depression and none of the "social justice" ideas Big Chief Lizzie is speaking about will be affordable or even possible. This is the worst economic idea anyone has suggested in any of our lifetimes. But don't worry, Big Chief Lizzie will still get rich off of campaign contributions from the big banks and publicly-trade companies who will be the few beneficiaries of this nation-destroying idea.

@Vault256Hash @PeterSchiff Man it's so funny to see these types of delusional posts about BTC and USD. Claiming Bitcoin is an inflation hedge is absurd after it lost 64% in 2022 during the inflation spike. The big gains are done forever in BTC - get out sooner rather than later

@PeterSchiff I don't Care & Bitcoin doesn't Care. You're counting the days on a calendar while the Fed is counting the trillions they need to print just to keep the lights on. Bitcoin doesn't have a 'price problem'; the dollar has a 'gravity problem.'"

Bitcoin first hit $69K in Nov. 2021. Today, four years and four months later, Bitcoin is below $67K. This is by far the longest time period in Bitcoin's short history where the price of Bitcoin was below a prior high. It also happened despite record hype and so-called adoption.

@KyzerBengal @wesblog @CynicalPublius @dogsoftheshire I'm saying your argument is hilariously dumb, not the actual purchase/deduction LOL. You seemed to be brainwashed into thinking rich people are avoiding significant taxes by purchasing major luxury items - it's just wrong

@DarthRevanch @wesblog @CynicalPublius @dogsoftheshire If it’s hilariously dumb why do they do it?

@KyzerBengal @wesblog @CynicalPublius @dogsoftheshire You complained about deductions for PJs & yachts which is hilariously dumb; the total amount of tax avoided with these types of purchases is a tiny fraction of a fraction. Most deductions are legit and beneficial tk workers:

@DarthRevanch @wesblog @CynicalPublius @dogsoftheshire I didn’t say they are only spending money on luxury goods. I’m saying they do spend money on luxury goods. They do avoid taxes. Half of them go on YouTube and brag about all the ways they avoid taxes so there’s nothing deranged about it lol

@callmedrlike @No_Mo_Diversity @BladeoftheS Dem wealth tax proposals are strictly intended for propaganda & emotional manipulation of voters. The arguments are all just class envy ideas that have been warped in false morality. The details/mechanics are totally ignored except to project potential new revenue

@DarthRevanch @No_Mo_Diversity @BladeoftheS More importantly, outside of illegal means, it doesn't matter how anyone has their wealth. I don't even understand the argument of how passing wealth down to your family is somehow bad.

We don't need a Wealth Tax, we need a 100% tax on all wealth above a certain amount. Lets say $100m, that's more than enough. We need to outlaw outrageous wealth, not just try reduce it a bit. Billionaires are a danger to everything and everyone. As you can clearly see.

@KyzerBengal @wesblog @CynicalPublius @dogsoftheshire Posing a binary question where a person is either good or bad is just crazy low resolution thinking. It's a totally irrelevant and meaningless question - it's just for you to pretend you're right/morally superior

@KyzerBengal @wesblog @CynicalPublius @dogsoftheshire Your framing is totally irrational and false- you claim Billionaires are just spending money on useless luxury goods that dont contribute to the economy and help them avoid taxes? That's an irredeemably deranged and uneducated premise

You pretended to be robjective at first despite not having any good arguments- but you totally blew it at the end. Your true belief is the same low IQ class warfare nonsense that is driven entirely by envy/disdain for the evil, greedy rich people. Nothing rational, just punish the bad guys as you see them

@jimiuorio I’m fine with smaller gov’t, etc etc but it doesn’t matter the size of the system - wealthiest will always be the hardest taxed. I know it’s so hard being a millionaire or billionaire - taxes make their quality of life so bad… wait… that’s never been the argument. Just whining.

Honest question…the wealth tax is obviously wildly immoral and just terrible policy. For those who support it how do you justify it? Do you pretend that the ultra wealthy “stole thier money” so you have a claim in it?

@happylilttleboy @patrickbetdavid LOL such a classic liberal knee-jerk tactic- usually followed up by "thats not a legitimate source!" or some other excuse to avoid logic

@patrickbetdavid What’s your source pat ?

@No_Mo_Diversity @BladeoftheS This is objectively false- this statement is a shocking example of how easily people fall for manipulation/warped narratives. 75% of billionaires are self-made and the other 25% are their children. The top 1% is even higher- 80-90%

@BladeoftheS My problem with the super-rich is few of them earned their wealth. They are heirs or lawyers or politicians or entertainers or athletes or market speculators. Careers of no value to the country.

@namenumbers6 @MAC_fearsnone @fuckyouiquit Too bad the government is the worst capital allocator of all time & liberals are far too addicted to increasing outlays perpetually. The much better solution is estate tax reform but Dems don't get the same class warfare / eat the rich narrative out of that

@MAC_fearsnone @fuckyouiquit Do you not realize that if funds were allocated properly, wealth taxes would be reducing the debt?

A 2% annual tax on that wealth would cover all of what we currently spend on Medicare without anyone else paying a dime. And that wealth would still continue to grow. We can't afford not to tax them at this point.