🔋 David 🔋🦊

@albertoortegana @dr_manish_ydv @Dr_Shiv_kumar_ @DrMedica_13 @drobiy12 @hemo_shk This 😅

What is this patient's diagnosis? ❓❓ What caused it? @dr_manish_ydv @Dr_Shiv_kumar_ @DrMedica_13 @drobiy12 @hemo_shk

@UnpluggedTesla @mgirard They look fantastic! 😍

@mgirard 19’s 👌

Canyon Carvers, the UP way ⛰️

@wgrobb @DominicBRNKMN @cybertruck Totally worth it 👌

@DominicBRNKMN @cybertruck And spend a lot of time looking for a parking spot big enough 😝

If Tesla launches @cybertruck in Europe, I will order it on day one and get the triangular silhouette tattooed on my body. 😀

@visegrad24 @Grok what could be the power output of a photovoltaic proyect of a similar amount of money in this region?

Romania has announced that it’s investing €20 billion into new nuclear power. Two nuclear reactors, units 3 and 4 at the Cernavodă nuclear power plant, are scheduled to be completed by 2030. In addition to the nuclear reactors at Cernavodă, Romania is also planning to develop a small modular reactor (SMR) power plant at Doiceşti.

EVs are already making your air cleaner, research shows. Across nearly 1,700 ZIP codes, the analysis showed that, for every increase of 200 electric vehicles, nitrogen dioxide emissions decreased by 1.1 percent.

@CuriousPejjy @TeslaBoomerMama GREAT explanation! Looking forward to see what happens. Amazing job putting all this crumbles together. Thank you so much.

IT'S UP! EXCLUSIVE: How Tesla & SpaceX/xAI Merger Is About To Change EVERYTHING with @TeslaBoomerMama youtu.be/Mf7DmiAn3is

@Jongonzlz Así es como funcionan los impuestos al patrimonio en casi todas las regiones de España y donde no, el ITSGF del gobierno.

Me he estado informando sobre el nuevo impuesto "viral" a las ganancias no realizadas en Países Bajos... Realmente no es nuevo nuevo, aunque sí me parece un precedente peligroso. A ver si lo explico. No es un IRPF como tal, sino una reforma del impuesto sobre el patrimonio financiero (la llamada 'Box 3'). Los holandeses no gravaban el patrimonio como nosotros, pero sí tenian algo parecido, gravando los rendimientos de ese patrimonio. Hasta ahora pagaban un 36% sobre una rentabilidad ficticia que calculaba el Estado sobre cada tipo de instrumento financiero, no sobre la real. El Tribunal Supremo tumbó ese sistema y ahora quieren pasar a gravar, por el mismo tipo del 36%, la rentabilidad real cada año (como hacemos nosotros en el IRPF por aprox. el 20%). ¿Dónde está la novedad? En que no solo se gravarán intereses, dividendos o ganancias realizadas (ventas con beneficio), sino también las revalorizaciones positivas aunque no vendas. Es decir, si tu cartera sube 10.000€, pagarías 3.600€ ese año aunque no hayas convertido esa ganancia en dinero efectivo (en realidad 2.952€, que los primeros 1.800€ estarán exentos de tributar). Si al año siguiente pierdes, esa pérdida se puede compensar en los años siguientes. No es que pagues para siempre aunque luego baje. Pero el problema es que pagas antes de materializar la ganancia, lo que elimina el diferimiento fiscal y puede generar tensiones de liquidez. Esto cambia bastante la lógica tradicional de tributar solo cuando vendes. Y como precedente, puede abrir la puerta a que otros países estudien modelos similares... Siempre que no empiecen a sufrir fugas masivas de capitales en cuanto de implante en 2028.

La mejor forma de detectar un Estado totalitario es cuando sus ciudadanos empiezan a necesitar una VPN para navegar por internet.

🇲🇹Malta: "We've naturalized a few hundred thoroughly vetted major investors." 🇪🇺EU: "Security concerns! Stop selling EU access!" 🇪🇸Spain: "We're giving EU residency for free to 500k illegal immigrants with minimal paperwork." 🇪🇺EU: *crickets*

Barbacid necesita 30M para aplicar en humanos su exitosa investigación para curar el cáncer de páncreas. Sánchez prefiere darle 31,5M a Broncano para publicidad y propaganda. Yo me pregunto, no es retórica, ¿puedo hacer algo para q mis impuestos vayan a Barbacid y no a Broncano?

If your government has enough money to send “foreign aid” to other countries … you are being taxed too much.

EU: *publishes 1000-page productivity strategy with 47 action items and a mid-term review scheduled for Q2 2027* 1.5% GDP growth Texas Republicans: "We just don't tax folks too much and stay outta their way" 4.8% GDP growth

@Scobleizer They can sell you the hardware and force you to pay rent in the software or brick it.

If I was Elon Musk, I would never sell the CyberCab or the Optimus robot. I would force everybody to rent it, either by the mile, the hour, or the week. That way, you can optimize the use of these things for the goals of Tesla, which is still to bring us into a sustainable, abundant world. For the last eight years, I've been a Silicon Valley housewife doing a lot of laundry, washing dishes, and a little bit of cooking. The truth is, it's going to be hard for the typical American family to afford one of these robots in their homes. However, if you could rent one to do your laundry, it would be much more affordable. A $100,000 robot could be rented to you for around $20 an hour, while the wholesale cost of operation would only be about $4 or $5 an hour. Maintenance issues (such as broken hands, worn-out batteries, or actuators that need replacing) would be covered by the rental fee. This model also allows the government or Tesla to adjust prices based on regulation. Eventually, we may see robots regulated to help pay for everyone's housing and food. If you sell the robots outright, it's difficult to recoup costs from new regulations, but if you rent them, you can simply increase the price to cover those costs as they arise. A rental model offers several advantages: 1. Resource Sharing: A single robot could be shared among neighbors or different businesses. A company might only need a robot for eight hours a day to perform a specific job; after that, it could be returned to the network to work as a security guard overnight. 2. Maximized Utility: This ensures each individual robot is used to its full potential, preventing wealthy individuals from buying them up just to let them sit idle in a garage or only use them for parties. 3. Continual Revenue: This would provide Tesla with a steady revenue stream, which investors prefer. Tesla seems to be signaling this shift already by moving away from selling Full Self-Driving (FSD) outright. Starting in February, they are reportedly only renting the software for $100 a month. We are heading into a world where everything is rented based on your immediate needs, and I wouldn't be shocked if this is the path Elon Musk takes going forward. The big question for the CyberCab is: (a) Does Elon want customers to fund the financing of the Robotaxi network so he doesn't have to put up as much money upfront? (b) Or does he want to own all the revenues from the network himself? I can see why he would want all of it. If I were Tesla or Elon, that's exactly how I would be looking at the world. How about you? By the way, I'm on Highway 101 in the fast lane, following two Teslas and writing this by talking to Typeless (which I love) and using my voice to write these posts. If you're in an autonomous car, get a good voice system. I like Typeless, but there are others that are really good too—just make sure you get one of them!

@MichaelAArouet Yes, but without the € we would have devaluated our coin so much that the salaries would be half what they are now.

Eye-opening chart: real wages in Italy and Spain have stagnated for three decades. Seriously, why is it so difficult for politicians to admit that the euro, based on a common monetary policy but no common fiscal policy, is a failed experiment?

@TeslaLarry This is the most fair way for Tesla shareholders to invest in Space X

My argument that Tesla should acquire a stake in SpaceX

The fleet will wake up via over-the-air software update

@LimitingThe x.com/i/status/12257…

Side quest

Dear Mr. EU Commissioner, It brings the following: 1. Industrial production in Europe will decline, jobs will disappear 2. The same products will be manufactured in Asia with higher emissions 3. They will be shipped to Europe, generating even more emissions Congratulations!

The problem with millionaires leaving the UK is not just the lost tax revenue, but also the countless jobs that disappear with them. But hey, why not introduce a wealth tax and see what happens next?