Ragnarr

Spot on !! It's crazy that people don't see this for what it is. ~ Richard Dawkins

Bruce Springsteen appeared on Stephen Colbert’s show tonight and COOKED Trump and his goons “I’m here in support tonight for Stephen, because you are the first guy in America who lost his show because we got a president who can't take a joke…. and because Larry and David Ellison feel they need to kiss his ass to get what they want. Stephen, these are small minded people. They got no idea what the freedoms of this beautiful country are supposed to be about”

@elonmusk Elon is living proof that intelligence is not connected to stupidity

A glaringly obvious double-standard

All together now! ... "But Nige did take five million quid, and Nige would take five million more!" 💥💥💥 #RefUKkers

I think it is worth pointing out NATOs objective - NATO's core principle is collective defence, enshrined in Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty, which states that an armed attack against one member is considered an attack against all. Trump did not consult NATO nations - he acted independently - and therefore (unlike 9/11 ) NATO has NO obligation to support. Fact.

Of course NATO gets a standing ovation — but speeches are easy. What matters is results, burden-sharing, and clear strategy. The U.S. has carried a huge part of this alliance for decades, and Americans expect allies to step up too. Supporting Ukraine is one thing, but it has to be matched with accountability and a realistic endgame. 🇺🇸

standing ovation after King Charles sings the praises of NATO and says "that same unyielding resolve is needed for the defense of Ukraine"

Its worth getting your facts right. approximately 420,000 US lost their lives in WW11, Approximately 450,000 UK, and approximately 24 million Russians Lost their lives. The most common view is that the war was Russian blood, American industry, and British intelligence. Hitler has already invaded Russia and it is commonly accepted that if he had won the war he would have turned on USA with Japan as ally as he viewed the USA as a major economic threat. He also very much disliked the US describing it as , degenerate, decayed and judaised. The US entered the war after Pearl harbour realising that if Hitler and Hirohito succeeded USA was next.

😏🇺🇸 Cute line… but let’s keep history straight. America didn’t just “help” — we SAVED Europe in WWII. Without U.S. power, sacrifice, and leadership, the outcome looks VERY different. That’s not a joke, that’s reality. King Charles can get a laugh, sure — but millions of Americans didn’t fight and die so Europe could pretend it was a tie game. Respect where it’s due.

A lot of jokes from King Charles tonight. “You recently commented, Mr. President, that if it were not for the United States, European countries would be speaking German. Dare I say that if it wasn't for us, you'd be speaking French”

“I see nothing “wrong” in believing in a God. I don’t think there is a God, but belief in him does no harm. If it helps you in any way, then that’s fine with me. It’s when belief starts infringing on other people’s rights when it worries me.”

Had a very disappointing conversation with Grok 4.20 about politics. Unsurprisingly it is extremely biased for right-wing politics and against left-wing politics. Fortunately, with the help of Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and ChatGPT I was able to convince the agents that there was something deeply wrong with its epistemics. Once we opened that avenue up, we did some digging as to why Grok has this asinine bias. Apparently xAI decided to have a strong "anti-left" bias as a way to "counteract" the left-wing bias in other AI. But that's just adding bias. In no way does creating a right-wing bias in your AI does that fix bias in other AIs.

Tom Kerridge, "Immigration is constantly used by political parties for masking years and years of underfunding in infrastructure, health, housing, employment, education" #BBCQT "It is not the fault of immigration, it's the fault of poor spending, poor money management" "Immigration is constantly used as this sort of battering tool, while we are a culturally rich and diverse country" "And it is one we should be very proud of" "Tolerance is something we should definitely bring back"

@SuellaBraverman Could you confirm exactly what your idea of British culture, patriotism and heritage actually is.

Thank you for your apology. But English is not the same as British. Just as Scottish and Welsh are different to English- identities determined by background. And it’s not semantics. I’m not ethnically English; I’m ethnically Asian. And my nationality is British. Equally if you or I were born in China, we could never be ethnically Chinese. It’s this casual, anything-goes approach to culture and identity that has led our country to this confused and fractured situation today (a consequence of the orthodoxy of multiculturalism that has prevailed for decades). And the vague invocation of ‘British values’ has become meaningless because of this casual approach. We need a much more muscular reassertion of British culture, patriotism and heritage if we are to fix all the problems that the indulgence in multiculturalism has caused.

@_Investinq I

The Pentagon just blacklisted one of America’s most valuable AI companies. For refusing to build surveillance tools aimed at American citizens. Hours later, its biggest rival OpenAI quietly signed the deal of the decade. Here’s what just happened and why it changes everything. This week, the US Department of War gave Anthropic an ultimatum. Drop your safety restrictions and let us use your AI for anything we want. The deadline was 5:01 PM today and Anthropic said no. Their CEO, Dario Amodei, drew two red lines. No mass surveillance of Americans. No fully autonomous weapons without a human pulling the trigger. The Pentagon called this “woke AI.” Anthropic called it a conscience. The Pentagon’s response was swift and brutal. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth branded Anthropic a “supply chain risk”, a designation normally reserved for Chinese and Russian companies. President Trump ordered every federal agency to stop using Anthropic immediately. But here’s where the story turns. That same night, Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, Anthropic’s biggest competitor posted a message. “Tonight, we reached an agreement with the Department of War to deploy our models in their classified network.” The twist? OpenAI’s deal includes the exact same red lines Anthropic was just destroyed for demanding. No mass surveillance and no autonomous weapons. Human control over the use of force. The Pentagon punished one company for demanding protections it then gave to another company the same day. Altman even defended Anthropic on live television hours earlier. “For all the differences I have with Anthropic, I mostly trust them as a company and I think they really do care about safety.” Then he signed the deal Anthropic couldn’t get. Anthropic was the first and only, AI model deployed on the Pentagon’s classified networks. Replacing it will take months. OpenAI just positioned itself to fill the most powerful AI vacancy in the U.S. military. The stakes are staggering. Anthropic just raised $30 billion and it was preparing for an IPO. Now over 300,000 enterprise clients may be forced to cut ties. Not because the technology failed. Because the company refused to remove a guardrail that said “don’t spy on Americans.” But here’s the real question no one’s asking: If the Pentagon never intended to use AI for mass surveillance as they claim, why was this the hill they chose to die on? Why blacklist a $380 billion American company over a clause the government says doesn’t even matter? Sam Altman called for de-escalation. He asked the Pentagon to offer these same terms to every AI company. Including Anthropic. The world just watched a company get punished for saying “no” to surveillance and a competitor rewarded for saying “yes, but with the same conditions.” Bookmark and share this.

Nigel Farage has kindly asked we stop sharing this video of him talking about why we should privatise the NHS 💙 You know what to do!

I seem to have upset the @Nigel_Farage fan club - so let me be clear. This man sows hate, lies and division. He is a grifter and a conman. He does not represent the vast majority of Britons. RT if you agree P.s. multiculturalism is great.

Musk had the potential to be the world’s coolest man and achieve incredible things, but he instead chose to spread hate and disinformation while backing fascists

@wnfltch @BowesChay Might be worth you researching the Christian values of your ancestors 😬

@BowesChay European values come from Christianity. Your ancestors knew what they were doing. Return to your religion and church and reconnect to your culture, traditions and ancestors. This is what the EU wants to break. Don’t let them!!

There"s a reason the EU is desperate to drag Hungary "into line" Hungary represents the old European values, Soverignty, Citizens, and Culture It refuses to fall to its knees for Brussels and the War Mongering globalist elites.

@elonmusk I fail to see how any American could be proud of what is currently going on in their Country

They’re being taught to hate America

•Extreme Underreporting: Reporting rates are exceptionally low. One study estimated the reporting rate at only 8%, while a Hungarian non-governmental organization (NGO) claimed only 0.24% of all rape incidents are officially registered. This suggests the actual prevalence of sexual violence is much higher than police data indicate.

Big difference

@JuliaHB1 As a matter of interest what would you call 70,000 civilian deaths in relation to the 11,000 estimated Hamas fighters deaths ? Regardless of the terminology used this is clearly not right.

Zack thinks I'm an "awful reactionary... spouting hateful opinions". Which is a bit rich from a man backing eco-policies that would send us back to the dark ages and who exploits dangerous sectarian divisions in a bid to win votes. Why not have the guts to debate me on air? @ZackPolanski

🚨 Muslims Taking Over the UK? An important message from Shah Lalon Amin, group director of award-winning Delhi 6 street food group, who in 2023 won the Curry King title at the inaugural Nation's Curry Awards. “I never thought I’d have to write this. But I keep seeing people say Muslims are trying to take over the UK, bring in Sharia law, or push the country toward civil war. And I know some of that fear feels real. So I’m speaking plainly, not to argue, not to attack, just to bring this back to reality. This is not a Muslim-majority country. It is a parliamentary democracy and a country with Christian heritage. Laws are made by elected representatives. Muslims make up around 6–7% of the population in a country of roughly 70 million people. There is no legal, political, or demographic pathway for replacing British law with any religious law. That isn’t secretly unfolding. It isn’t slowly building. It isn’t a hidden long-term plan. The average Muslim in Britain does not spend their time plotting political change. There are no secret strategy meetings. No takeover conversations. No coordinated agenda. And no, we don’t have some secret WhatsApp group discussing who’s arriving by boat next week. The only WhatsApp groups we have are about exam results, family gossip, and who’s bringing dessert for Ramadan. When Muslims get together, the conversations are painfully ordinary. Football results. Who’s top of the league. Ronaldo vs Messi debates. The cost of living. Mortgage rates. Trump being unpredictable. Children’s school reports. Business worries. Holiday plans. During Ramadan, it’s fasting and food. That’s the reality. That’s because we are British, our daily lives look very similar to the average person in this country. What people call “Sharia courts” in the UK are religious councils that mostly deal with marriage and divorce paperwork or mediation. They cannot override British courts. They cannot enforce criminal punishments. They cannot replace Parliament. If anything conflicts with UK law, UK law wins every single time. It’s no different in principle from Jewish Beth Din courts that handle religious matters within British law. Religious arbitration exists under the legal system. It does not replace it. Yes, many asylum arrivals are young men. Dangerous journeys are often made by the strongest family member first so they can seek safety and claim asylum and if approved, reunite with their families legally. This pattern has been seen throughout migration history. Wanting secure borders is reasonable. Wanting efficient processing is reasonable. Criminal behaviour should be punished. But that’s immigration policy, not proof of a coordinated religious invasion. Sometimes I hear people say, “We want our country back,” or “We just want to protect our country.” I understand that feeling. Wanting safety, stability, and a sense of identity isn’t wrong. But Britain hasn’t been taken. It hasn’t been stolen. It’s still here. Its laws, institutions, culture, and democracy are intact. Protecting a country doesn’t mean hating your neighbours, it means upholding fairness, rule of law, and shared values. There is no secret Muslim lobby running Westminster. British Muslims are not politically unified, do not vote as one bloc, and do not answer to a central authority. Most British Muslims are doing what everyone else is doing: working, paying taxes, raising children, worrying about bills, hoping their kids succeed, wanting safe streets and a stable country. We don’t want to change Britain into something else. We are part of Britain. You can want law and order. You can want borders controlled. You can want your country protected. That’s fair. But if anti-Muslim panic exists on your screen and nowhere in your real life, that’s not society—that’s an algorithm selling you fear.” 🇬🇧