@realcj001 @DrewRoachMN How does voting no make it not pass? Are you ignorant or just stupid?
English
Deb Redding
6.2K posts
Deb Redding
@DebRedding2
A strong Woman of FAITH IN CHRIST. Proud mother of 3 sons, and blessed grandmother of 8 grandkids. And a loyal Vikings fan.
Katılım Ocak 2022
602 Takip Edilen170 Takipçiler
@DrewRoachMN Bad move there genius. How does voting against this bill make your argument any more relevant? It’s typical of the “principled “ conservative bs of Thomas Massey and Rand Paul.
English
🚨 PUBLIC SERVICE
ANNOUNCEMENT 🚨
I want to be VERY clear and address some "NEWS" stories written about me that suggest that I voted against a bill making AI generated child pornography or images illegal. These stories are dangerous as they push a false narrative and instill hatred and violence against myself and my family.
No, I do not support child pornography or any form of child exploitation. That's a disgusting and dishonest smear.
I voted against HF1606 the bill aimed at banning access to "nudification" AI tools that create non-consensual deepfake nudes, because it is an ineffective, messaging bill that does little to actually stop determined bad actors.
People intent on creating or accessing this material will simply use a VPN to hide their location and bypass Minnesota's jurisdiction entirely. The bill creates a false sense of security, allowing politicians to claim "Minnesota solved the problem" when it changes almost nothing for those who actually produce or distribute child sexual abuse material (CSAM).
Importantly, the production, possession, and distribution of child sexual abuse material is already strictly illegal under both federal and Minnesota law.
● Federal law: It is a serious felony under 18 U.S.C. § 2251 (sexual exploitation of children), 18 U.S.C. § 2252, and 18 U.S.C. § 2252A (activities relating to child pornography).
uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?hl=…
● Minnesota state law: Prohibited under Minnesota Statutes § 617.247 (possession and dissemination of child sexual abuse material) and § 617.246 (use of minors in sexual performances).
revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/…
These existing laws carry severe penalties, including lengthy prison sentences. My vote was not about supporting harm to children, it was about refusing to support feel-good legislation that distracts from enforcing and strengthening the real, effective laws we already have on the books.
I support actual solutions that protect kids, not theater.
In Liberty
Drew Roach
English
@DrewRoachMN “I voted NO to making rape illegal because people are just gonna hide it anyways!”
what a fucking idiot
English
@JoblessVince Don’t be ignorant. It passed and he knew it would pass and was all for it- he voted no to make a statement that more needs to be done. There are legal laws and moral laws against doing this to children- he wants to make it so they absolutely can’t… ignorance is not a virtue.
English
@DebRedding2 his no vote makes no sense. Of course some people will still get around the law, but it doesn't mean we shouldn't make it more difficult for pedophiles to exist.
Instead this dude is telling them exactly how to sidestep the law
English
To ALL who are accusing him of voting no- but don’t understand why the ‘no’ vote, you could ask him to explain it!!! My goodness
Drew Roach@DrewRoachMN
🚨 PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT 🚨 I want to be VERY clear and address some "NEWS" stories written about me that suggest that I voted against a bill making AI generated child pornography or images illegal. These stories are dangerous as they push a false narrative and instill hatred and violence against myself and my family. No, I do not support child pornography or any form of child exploitation. That's a disgusting and dishonest smear. I voted against HF1606 the bill aimed at banning access to "nudification" AI tools that create non-consensual deepfake nudes, because it is an ineffective, messaging bill that does little to actually stop determined bad actors. People intent on creating or accessing this material will simply use a VPN to hide their location and bypass Minnesota's jurisdiction entirely. The bill creates a false sense of security, allowing politicians to claim "Minnesota solved the problem" when it changes almost nothing for those who actually produce or distribute child sexual abuse material (CSAM). Importantly, the production, possession, and distribution of child sexual abuse material is already strictly illegal under both federal and Minnesota law. ● Federal law: It is a serious felony under 18 U.S.C. § 2251 (sexual exploitation of children), 18 U.S.C. § 2252, and 18 U.S.C. § 2252A (activities relating to child pornography). uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?hl=… ● Minnesota state law: Prohibited under Minnesota Statutes § 617.247 (possession and dissemination of child sexual abuse material) and § 617.246 (use of minors in sexual performances). revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/… These existing laws carry severe penalties, including lengthy prison sentences. My vote was not about supporting harm to children, it was about refusing to support feel-good legislation that distracts from enforcing and strengthening the real, effective laws we already have on the books. I support actual solutions that protect kids, not theater. In Liberty Drew Roach
English
English
English
🚨BREAKING: Minnesota Rep. Drew Roach (R) was the only lawmaker to vote NO on a bill banning the use of AI to create nude and explicit images of children.
The bill (HF1606) passed the Minnesota House 132-1.
Roach has faced widespread backlash after casting the lone "no" vote.
English
@TheSeventhVial @DavidJHarrisJr He did vote ‘no’ and he explains it- when you only see the vote without the explanation you don’t understand the why… he also knew it was going to pass but wanted others to know more needs to be done- there are already laws against this- does it stop it?
English
@DavidJHarrisJr If true, this guy needs to be investigated asap. That’s fckng disgusting 🤢 🤮
English
@DavidJHarrisJr What is wrong with you David? Have you not personally interviewed Drew? And yet now you come here and attack him like others who don’t know any better? He gave the reason why he voted ‘no’, did you ask him or look into why the no vote? You should know better. Just wow! 🤯
English
Deb Redding retweetledi
Deb Redding retweetledi
Deb Redding retweetledi
He pulled them all out of his ass! He needs to be arrested and tried in order for many of us to see true justice being served…
Eric Matheny 🎙️@ericmmatheny
6 feet? 3 feet? No masks? Two masks? Fauci pulled these facts and figures right out of his ass. It was all a lie. None of it was necessary. And the effects will be long lasting.
English
Deb Redding retweetledi
Breaking news should be fast and accurate.
Alpha News delivers both.
Get a free daily newsletter so you never miss a story.
English
English
@killer69786 @DrewRoachMN @DebRedding2 @DavidJHarrisJr @DrewRoachMN went on his alt account to say this 😭😭😭😭
English
Deb Redding retweetledi
Deb Redding retweetledi
Never Forget…
Deborah Birx lied to President Trump and manipulated data about guidelines, lockdowns and vaccines.
Anthony Fauci made Remdesivir and ventilators hospital protocol even though he knew it was killing patients.
They must pay for their crimes.
Pure Evil.
English
Deb Redding retweetledi
Wild timeline…
Obama: “Children should be vaccinated for ‘Covid’…”
Fauci: “It’s safe and effective for children”
Johnson: “They hid the data and children died”
Kennedy: “They’re in a lot of trouble”
Schmitt: “Fauci’s advisor was indicted for destroying evidence”
English
Deb Redding retweetledi
Deb Redding retweetledi
6 years ago, Pathological Liar, Dr. Fauci, demanded everyone wear 2 masks…
6 years ago, Dr. Fauci was caught using a mask only when the cameras were on.
ALL OF IT WAS FRAUD.
English
Deb Redding retweetledi
I want to be VERY clear and address some "NEWS" stories written about me that suggest that I voted against a bill making AI generated child pornography or images illegal. These stories are dangerous as they push a false narrative and instill hatred and violence against myself and my family.
No, I do not support child pornography or any form of child exploitation. That's a disgusting and dishonest smear.
I voted against HF1606 the bill aimed at banning access to "nudification" AI tools that create non-consensual deepfake nudes, because it is an ineffective, messaging bill that does little to actually stop determined bad actors.
People intent on creating or accessing this material will simply use a VPN to hide their location and bypass Minnesota's jurisdiction entirely. The bill creates a false sense of security, allowing politicians to claim "Minnesota solved the problem" when it changes almost nothing for those who actually produce or distribute child sexual abuse material (CSAM).
Importantly, the production, possession, and distribution of child sexual abuse material is already strictly illegal under both federal and Minnesota law.
● Federal law: It is a serious felony under 18 U.S.C. § 2251 (sexual exploitation of children), 18 U.S.C. § 2252, and 18 U.S.C. § 2252A (activities relating to child pornography).
uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?hl=…
● Minnesota state law: Prohibited under Minnesota Statutes § 617.247 (possession and dissemination of child sexual abuse material) and § 617.246 (use of minors in sexual performances).
revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/…
These existing laws carry severe penalties, including lengthy prison sentences. My vote was not about supporting harm to children, it was about refusing to support feel-good legislation that distracts from enforcing and strengthening the real, effective laws we already have on the books.
I support actual solutions that protect kids, not theater.
English