Debbie Hartman

@MichelleRM68 @CourtTV @JulieCourtTV Nope

@CourtTV @JulieCourtTV Hank tried to mislead the jury by showing them John's hoodie and tried to portray the holes in the back as evidence he knew was caused by the CW's own forensic team. Do you support that @JulieCourtTV???? I'll wait.

#BREAKING: Special prosecutor Hank Brennan breaks his silence on #KarenRead's not guilty verdict. #CourtTV What do YOU think? ⚖️ @JulieCourtTV

@DoctorTurtleboy No way ..... and these people have not been charged?

This is inside the garage of 34 Fairview Road. This aligns with the patterns on John Okeefes head laceration.

@Bederowlaw I hope the behavioral panel analysis this interview

"Hopefully she kills herself" is a "figure of speech" to Michael Proctor. "No dudes so far" was simply a joke among troopers and his supervisor. He wouldn't change anything in the investigation. he is indignant and looks off to the side and down when he speaks. This guy shouldn't be talking to the press.

@DoctorTurtleboy Ted Daniels says According to a new entry on the docket dated today, the defense filed a "Motion to Ensure Transparency in Alternate Juror Selection Process and Affidavit of Counsel in Support" The docket says the motion was denied

6 jurors will be chosen as alternates. In case there are any shenanigans in the process of choosing alternates I want to be on record predicting the most likely not guilty voters. In my opinion, the 6 jurors who have shown the most visible signs that they believe Karen Read is not guilty, are #5, 10, 11, 13, 15 and 18. Four of them are women. The best are 10 and 11. But I like them all, including 1, 2, 8, 9, 12, and 16. I like 17 a lot because he takes the most amount of notes and looks smart. But he's also the oldest juror, and this was a bad demographic profile in the last jury. I don't know what to think of juror 14 (the youngest). He was a great listener this entire trial. He just comes across visually as a Ronnie, who could be easily swayed. The juror making the least favorable facial reactions to Alan Jackson is #6, but again, this could just be the kind of faces she makes in general. My juror preferences in order: 11 10 5 13 15 18 2 9 8 12 1 16 14 17 4 7 3 6

@VinniePolitan @CourtTV Ted Daniels reports According to a new entry on the docket dated today, the defense filed a "Motion to Ensure Transparency in Alternate Juror Selection Process and Affidavit of Counsel in Support" The docket says the motion was denied

#KarenRead attorney Alan Jackson arguing reasonable doubt. The jury will soon have the case… Watch Verdict on @CourtTV

@TedDanielnews She wouldn't know have to spell Transparency even if it bite her on her butt.

According to a new entry on the docket dated today, the defense filed a "Motion to Ensure Transparency in Alternate Juror Selection Process and Affidavit of Counsel in Support" The docket says the motion was denied

@PrettyLiesAlibi Melanieces turn now

#loridaybell GUILTY - justice for Brandon

@gwilymgal That there are Space Ships.

Comment with one thing Hank proved beyond reasonable doubt.

@LawyerYouKnow x.com/karenreadai/st…

THIS is how you fight for your client, well done Alan Jackson

@LawyerYouKnow Today in a baby ai brain x.com/karenreadai/st…

@LawyerYouKnow In all situations, Whelcher’s testimony and prior opinion on a critical issue is substantially undermined. In situations 1, 2 and 3, the prosecution engaged in egregious misconduct and should be sanctioned.

@LawyerYouKnow Mark Bederow says: There are 4, not 2, possibilities about Whelcher and the curious case of the right arm x rays that Whelcher claims do not exist but in have do exist and have been in the prosecution’s possession, custody and control since mis 2022:

It’s impossible to explain the amount of work it takes to try a case like this and handle motions and issues like this in the middle of trial. Really great argument by Jackson about Brennan bringing Dr. L’s report to Dr. R. The research and preparation is so time consuming on top of prepping for witnesses every night. I’m gonna duck after I say this - but it should be an easy call for the judge. Brennan opened the door.

@LawyerYouKnow (4) like he claimed in the hoodie fiasco, Brennan was unfamiliar with his own key evidence and “mistakenly” didn’t provide all of the x-rays to Whelcher, which is the least likely scenario.

@LawyerYouKnow (3) Whelcher was incompetent/careless and simply missed the x-rays, in which case the prosecution’s 3.3(a)(1) obligation to correct the record also arose, and

@LawyerYouKnow (2)Whelcher reviewed the x rays and lied about it, in which case Brennan, Lally and McLaughlin were obligated under Rule 3.3(a)(1) of the Massachusetts rules of professional conduct to notify the court and defense of a material misrepresentation by their witness. This seems unlik

@LawyerYouKnow (1) Brennan concealed this exculpatory evidence by removing it from the x-rays and failing to provide them to Whelcher, which would be another intentional manipulation of the evidence by the prosecution.

@LawyerYouKnow The Fix is in.

This can only mean one of a few things. Most likely that something has come to the attention of the lawyers or judge that a juror has said or done that may cause one or more jurors to be excused. Everyone remember the movie Juror #2

@NateNewsNow good morning Nate, looking forward to your commentary today. Following from South Africa. Durban, South Africa to be exact

@RealKiefer Condolences to you and the family

With a heavy heart, I tell you that my father, Donald Sutherland, has passed away. I personally think one of the most important actors in the history of film. Never daunted by a role, good, bad or ugly. He loved what he did and did what he loved, and one can never ask for more than that. A life well lived.