🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

187.1K posts

🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋 banner
🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

@DeepBlueCrypto

Truth, Liberty, Freedom, Rights, Memes, Humor, Peace matters more than ever in the world now. CBDCs are evil. Bitcoin is money. Blockchain & Crypto enthusiast.

Satoshi Heights Katılım Haziran 2009
530 Takip Edilen61.3K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋
There’s not a single dead child because of Elon Musk… they’re just reaching But there’s millions of dollars in Ro Khanna and other politicians like Nancy Pelosi insider trading And then there’s trillions of dollars is government waste, fraud and abuse found by @DOGE
🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋 tweet media
Elon Musk@elonmusk

@XFreeze There is not even a single dead child! If there were, it would be worldwide headline news!

English
1
18
42
4.3K
🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋
🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋@DeepBlueCrypto·
SPACEX $SPCX MADE ITS HISTORIC IPO TODAY ELON MUSK BECAME THE FIRST TRILLIONAIRE IN THE WORLD… AND HE CREATED OVER 4400 MILLIONAIRES AND OVER 400 PEOPLE WORTH OVER $100 MILLION AND MORE BILLIONAIRES In 2002, Elon Musk founded Space Exploration Technologies (SpaceX) with a singular, audacious vision: to make humanity multi-planetary by slashing the cost of space travel and ultimately colonizing Mars. Armed with significant personal capital from his PayPal exit, Musk assembled a small team in El Segundo, California, and bet everything on reusable rocket technology. The early years were brutal. Three consecutive Falcon 1 launch failures between 2006 and 2008 brought the company to the brink of bankruptcy. Yet on September 28, 2008, the fourth Falcon 1 flight succeeded, becoming the first privately developed liquid-fueled rocket to reach orbit. This triumph secured vital NASA contracts, validated reusable rocketry, and ignited a revolution that would challenge government-dominated spaceflight for decades. SpaceX’s ascent accelerated dramatically with the reusable Falcon 9, which landed boosters like something out of science fiction, the Dragon spacecraft that resupplied the International Space Station, and the Starlink satellite constellation that brought high-speed internet to millions worldwide. Starship development pushed the boundaries further, aiming for Mars missions and beyond. Private valuations exploded from the modest $27 million level in 2002 to over a trillion dollars, fueled by relentless innovation, record launch cadence, and massive government and commercial contracts. This momentum culminated in one of the most anticipated events in financial history: SpaceX’s IPO on June 12, 2026. Priced at $135 per share, the offering raised a record-breaking $75 billion by selling 555.6 million shares on Nasdaq under the ticker SPCX, initially valuing the company at approximately $1.77 trillion—making it the largest IPO ever. Shares surged nearly 20% on debut day, closing around $161 and pushing the valuation above $2 trillion. Beyond Elon Musk becoming the world’s first trillionaire, the IPO created unprecedented wealth across the ecosystem, minting thousands of new millionaires and multiple new billionaires. More than 4,400 current and former employees—from engineers and executives to welders and even cafeteria workers who traded lower salaries for equity—stood to become millionaires, with roughly 400 expected to reach $100 million or more. Early backers and key figures also saw life-changing gains. One striking example is David Sacks, the PayPal co-founder and investor who wrote a $50,000 check in 2002 at SpaceX’s $27 million valuation; that stake is now worth approximately $3.14 billion. This historic liquidity event rewarded risk-takers at every level, transforming ordinary contributors into multimillionaires and underscoring how bold innovation paired with employee ownership can generate extraordinary, broad-based prosperity on a scale rarely seen in modern business.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ A continued thread on Elon Musk👇
🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋 tweet media🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋 tweet media
English
12
64
263
65.3K
Wall Street Apes
Wall Street Apes@WallStreetApes·
The money being sent from USAID wasn’t for humanitarian efforts. USAID money was being LAUNDERED TO GEORGE SOROS to pay for protests Mike Benz exposes USAID has been sending money to George Soros NGOs, he then uses that money to FUND AND TRAIN PROTESTERS USAID paying for street protest handbooks to be printed “USAID gave $5 million to Open Society Foundation — USAID is actually funding George Soros and Soros is passing those funds to the people on the ground.” “USAID paid to have Saul Alinsky Street protest handbooks printed.” “The local politicians, the local judges, the local prosecutors, the local anti-corruption NGOs, the local media outlets, the local trade labor, labor groups and unions.” This is 100% true and it’s publicly available information In 2001, the Soros foundations network was listed USAID among its “donor partners” alongside other government aid agencies. There have been many documented collaborations We funded these protests handbooks USAID provided 5+ million noted in the Government Accountability Office reports for projects involving OSF-linked groups. These trained hundreds of young Macedonians in activism
English
444
5.2K
12.7K
3M
Pirate Wires
Pirate Wires@PirateWires·
Saturday, Silicon Valley Congressman Ro Khanna sat down with left-wing podcaster Jennifer Welch — who previously cheered on those celebrating the murder of Charlie Kirk — to discuss the future of “progressive” governance. In a now viral clip, Khanna claimed Elon Musk “possibly sentenced to death” 4.5 million children by dismantling USAID, and demanded he be subpoenaed once Democrats retake power. The number traces back to a Lancet study published last summer projecting 14 million deaths by 2030 from USAID cuts. But the study assumes a fake world: one where DOGE’s cuts stay frozen through 2030, where the State Department’s lifesaving waiver doesn’t exist (it does), where Congress never refunds AIDS relief (it did), where two decades of clinics and supply chains vanish the second a grant lapses. It also conveniently ignores some former USAID functions (like funding gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology). Meanwhile, NYU statistician Aaron Brown notes the study credits USAID with preventing 11 million more deaths than the entire global mortality decline over two decades. @planetmaxwell interrogates the claim that Elon and DOGE single-handedly killed millions of children, and explains why Silicon Valley’s congressman is now laundering this as settled fact (when it’s really just propaganda). Full story 👇
Pirate Wires tweet media
English
482
725
3.2K
17M
🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋
DOGE IS STILL QUIETLY SAVING HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS They're requiring 2 tiny fields on every federal payment: 1. A proper congressional authorization code 2. A comment field that requires a reason And suddenly fraud & waste just... stops.
English
7
52
213
15.8K
🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋
USAID funded wars, regime changes and conflicts all around the world killing over 500,000 people Elon Musk helped the world make peace by defunding USAID and its lethal operations Elon Musk deserves a Nobel Peace Prize 🏆
🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋 tweet media
Tom Elliott@tomselliott

How many people has Elon Musk personally murdered via his work helping defund USAID? I've run the numbers. USAID, as people outside of CNN's viewership already know, operates largely as a CIA cutout, placing assets on the ground in countries where the U.S. govt is intervening politically. USAID was instrumental is helping seed the following revolutions/coup d'états/civil wars: Serbia — Bulldozer Revolution (Oct. 2000) Venezuela — coup attempt + sustained OTI funding (April 2002) Georgia — Rose Revolution (Nov. 2003) Ukraine — Orange Revolution (2004) Haiti — Ouster of Aristide (Feb. 2004) Lebanon — Cedar Revolution (2005) Belarus — opposition funding, "Jeans Revolution" and after — attempted, failed (2006) Honduras — Coup against Zelaya (Jun. 2009) Cuba — ZunZuneo / "Cuban Twitter" — attempted, failed (2010–12) Tunisia — "Arab Spring" (2011) Egypt — "Arab Spring" (2011–12) Ukraine — Euromaidan / Revolution of Dignity (2014) Bolivia — anti-Morales funding; 2013 expulsion; 2019 ouster Kyrgyzstan — Tulip Revolution (March 2005) Without U.S. intervention, it's hard to see how any of these would have gotten off the ground. Some back-of-the-envelope math on these conflicts' bodycount: Venezuela (2002): 19 Haiti (2004): ~300 Maidan event (2014): ~100+ killed. Bolivia (2019): 36 Donbas war (2014–2022): 14,200–14,400 military & civilian deaths. Ukraine full-scale war (2022–present), deaths, both sides, mil + civ: roughly 350,000–500,000 killed. So far we're up to somewhere north of 365,000 deaths, more likely north of 500K. What else do we have? USAID also helped fund poppy (heroin) farmers in Afghanistan. Unfortunately I haven't seen estimates of how many have died as a result of this taxpayer funded drug dealing, but I'm assuming they're not small numbers. USAID also worked with groups sexually abusing/trafficking children in Kenya (2021), and the Central African Republic (2013). Much earlier, during Vietnam, USAID helped the CIA arm & feed Hmong guerrillas fighting communist forces (not the worst thing). USAID also helped the Hmong militia & other warlords smuggle opium (a far less forgivable thing). While the final tally is hard to properly calculate, if past is predicate, in helping shutdown USAID, @elonmusk could be saving hundreds of thousands of lives, thousands of African children, & millions of people around the world susceptible to opiate addiction. Get this man a Peace Prize, @NobelPrize

English
3
27
69
11.2K
I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸
Democrats aren’t going after Elon Musk because of “dying children.” They are pissed off that DOGE cut their USAID slush fund used to manipulate information and tilt elections in our country and foreign countries. Notice the pattern? Since the 2025 USAID cuts, 7 conservative candidates swept presidential elections across Latin America: Ecuador, Bolivia, Honduras, Chile, Costa Rica, Colombia, and Peru. If USAID was still in place, Lula most likely wouldn’t have won in Brazil. Here, Samantha Power, the former administrator of USAID, proudly highlighted the agency’s role in influencing what she called “strategically important elections” through the Democratic Elections Fund. She also discussed how USAID funded journalists not only to report the news, but also to “fact-check” incoming information. USAID directed nearly $500 million to the Internews Network, a little-known NGO funded by the U.S. government. The organization worked with 4,291 media outlets, produced 4,799 hours of broadcasts in a single year, reached as many as 778 million people, and trained more than 9,000 journalists by 2023. Internews also supported social media censorship initiatives. USAID also funded and trained thousands of lawyers, judges, and election workers, conducted polls that questioned election legitimacy, published reports alleging fraud, and participated in overseeing new elections both in the United States and abroad, among many other activities. On the contrary, Elon Musk and DOGE actually saved millions of children. By cutting USAID influence, they let parents freely reject leftist failures on crime, economy, and socialism at the polls without manipulation.
Elon Musk@elonmusk

All DOGE required was contact information of the recipients to confirm that funding was not fraudulent. No validated medical funding was stopped. Anything that appeared to be legitimate lifesaving funding continued and is now administered by the State Department. If anyone had actually died as a result of DOGE, their names would be worldwide headline news! On the other hand, USAID did help fund the Wuhan Virology Institute, which caused the deaths of millions, and the revolution that started the Russia-Ukraine war.

English
361
2K
7.2K
2.8M
ALX 🇺🇸
ALX 🇺🇸@alx·
This is the real reason they’re mad at Elon Musk and DOGE for shutting down USAID.
ALX 🇺🇸 tweet media
English
281
2.3K
8.7K
3.1M
Rothmus 🏴
Rothmus 🏴@Rothmus·
The open society and its enemy, Soros. While he named his Open Society Foundations after Karl Popper’s “The Open Society and Its Enemies,” his project stands as a philosophical inversion of everything Popper defended. Popper’s open society rested on critical rationalism, the recognition that no one possesses final truth, that institutions must remain open to criticism and piecemeal reform, and that democracy functions as a method for removing rulers without bloodshed. He rejected historicism, the belief in iron laws of history that justify sacrificing present generations for a utopian future, and warned that such thinking inevitably produces closed, authoritarian societies. Soros has repurposed the label to advance a grand project of engineered demographic transformation. Through mass immigration, multiculturalism as official policy, and diversity mandates that prioritize group identity over individual merit and assimilation, his foundations actively dissolve the cultural continuity and social trust that make rational criticism and incremental change possible. Popper understood that openness requires a stable framework, a shared language of reason, basic cohesion, and institutions citizens feel they collectively own. Soros treats those foundations as obstacles to be overcome in the name of an abstract, borderless openness. The concrete results are visible. Parallel societies that operate under different norms, public spaces where debate on the scale and selection of immigration is treated as illegitimate, and the rise of identity based hierarchies that close off dissent in the name of equity. These are certainly not expansions of the open society, but new forms of closure, tribal in character, enforced through institutional capture rather than overt dictatorship, yet hostile to the very critical spirit Popper placed at the center of civilized life. Philosophically, Soros replaces Popper’s falsification and humility before reality with a new historicism, the conviction that global multiculturalism and open borders represent inevitable moral progress, and that resistance from actual existing communities constitutes the new enemy. The machinery funded in the name of openness does not test its own assumptions against evidence, it suppresses the questions. Those who still value the ideal of an open society should read Popper on their own terms. They will find that Soros has not extended the open society, but has supplied its most sophisticated contemporary enemies.
Rothmus 🏴 tweet mediaRothmus 🏴 tweet media
English
522
2.7K
10.4K
7.9M
The British Patriot
The British Patriot@TheBritLad·
I used to be bothered about being called a racist. Now I do not give a flying shit. Anyone else feel the same?
English
2.6K
3.4K
37.9K
18.8M