DeepDAO.io

2.9K posts

DeepDAO.io banner
DeepDAO.io

DeepDAO.io

@DeepDAO_io

Making sense of DAOs 🤖💜 People, content and ecosystem 🌊 Financial, social and governance data visualization

Earth Katılım Mart 2020
717 Takip Edilen13K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
DeepDAO.io
DeepDAO.io@DeepDAO_io·
DAO Data Sale for Academic Researchers 🎓 DeepDAO offering a complete dataset: 🏢 Governance : All proposals, votes, voters for the top 300 DAOs 💰 Treasury: Daily AUM for the top 300 DAOs 📅 From DAO inception through Nov 2025 The most comprehensive dataset ever compiled! 1/2
English
1
1
4
457
DeepDAO.io retweetledi
Eyal
Eyal@eithco·
@tallyxyz Sad to see you go. Much respect for the work you did, and the governance you enabled all these years. DAOs are still inevitable, and I'm sure we'll meet again 💪
English
0
1
3
829
DeepDAO.io
DeepDAO.io@DeepDAO_io·
Perfect for: ⭐️ Research papers ⭐️ Dissertations ⭐️ Academic studies on decentralized governance 🔗No other source offers this depth. Check our plans at deepdao.io/products Limited time offer.
English
0
0
1
101
DeepDAO.io
DeepDAO.io@DeepDAO_io·
DAO Data Sale for Academic Researchers 🎓 DeepDAO offering a complete dataset: 🏢 Governance : All proposals, votes, voters for the top 300 DAOs 💰 Treasury: Daily AUM for the top 300 DAOs 📅 From DAO inception through Nov 2025 The most comprehensive dataset ever compiled! 1/2
English
1
1
4
457
DeepDAO.io
DeepDAO.io@DeepDAO_io·
Ambitious and cool, but would it work? Maybe @antirival @TheEylon @daostack put the band back together 🤣
vitalik.eth@VitalikButerin

"AI becomes the government" is dystopian: it leads to slop when AI is weak, and is doom-maximizing once AI becomes strong. But AI used well can be empowering, and push the frontier of democratic / decentralized modes of governance. The core problem with democratic / decentralized modes of governance (including DAOs on ethereum) is limits to human attention: there are many thousands of decisions to make, involving many domains of expertise, and most people don't have the time or skill to be experts in even one, let alone all of them. The usual solution, delegation, is disempowering: it leads to a small group of delegates controlling decision-making while their supporters, after they hit the "delegate" button, have no influence at all. So what can we do? We use personal LLMs to solve the attention problem! Here are a few ideas: ## Personal governance agents If a governance mechanism depends on you to make a large number of decisions, a personal agent can perform all the necessary votes for you, based on preferences that it infers from your personal writing, conversation history, direct statements, etc. If the agent is (i) unsure how you would vote on an issue, and (ii) convinced the issue is important, then it should ask you directly, and give you all relevant context. ## Public conversation agents Making good decisions often cannot come from a linear process of taking people's views that are based only on their own information, and averaging them (even quadratically). There is a need for processes that aggregate many people's information, and then give each person (or their LLM) a chance to respond *based on that*. This includes: * Inferring and summarizing your own views and converting them into a format that can be shared publicly (and does not expose your private info) * Summarizing commonalities between people's inputs (expressed as words), similar to the various LLM+pol.is ideas ## Suggestion markets If a governance mechanism values "high-quality inputs" of any type (this could be proposals, or it could even be arguments), then you can have a prediction market, where anyone can submit an input, AIs can bet on a token representing that input, and if the mechanism "accepts" the input (either accepting the proposal, or accepting it as a "unit" of conversation that it then passes along to its participant), it pays out $X to the holders of the token. Note that this is basically the same as firefly.social/post/x/2017956… ## Decentralized governance with private information One of the biggest weaknesses of highly decentralized / democratic governance is that it does not work well when important decisions need to be made with secret information. Common situations: (i) the org engaging in adversarial conflicts or negotiations (ii) internal dispute resolution (iii) compensation / funding decisions. Typically, orgs solve this by appointing individuals who have great power to take on those tasks. But with multi-party computation (currently I've seen this done with TEEs; I would love to see at least the two-party case solved with garbled circuits vitalik.eth.limo/general/2020/0… so we can get pure-cryptographic security guarantees for it), we could actually take many people's inputs into account to deal with these situations, without compromising privacy. Basically: you submit your personal LLM into a black box, the LLM sees private info, it makes a judgement based on that, and it outputs only that judgement. You don't see the private info, and no one else sees the contents of your personal LLM. ## The importance of privacy All of these approaches involve each participant making use of much more information about themselves, and potentially submitting much larger-sized inputs. Hence, it becomes all the more important to protect privacy. There are two kinds of privacy that matter: * Anonymity of the participant: this can be accomplished with ZK. In general, I think all governance tools should come with ZK built in * Privacy of the contents: this has two parts. First, the personal LLM should do what it can to avoid divulging private info about you that it does not need to divulge. Second, when you have computation that combines multiple LLMs or multiple people's info, you need multi-party techniques to compute it privately. Both are important.

English
0
0
1
290
DeepDAO.io
DeepDAO.io@DeepDAO_io·
DeepDAO is seeking an M&A partner 🌟#1 DAO data and analytics provider. 🌟Revenue from researchers, academics and others. 🌟Meaningful partnerships. Thousands of unique monthly active users (6k this month) 🌟Low burn rate. Founder commitment for 1 year transition. For inquiries please write from a professional address to info@deepdao.io
DeepDAO.io tweet media
English
3
3
10
697
DeepDAO.io
DeepDAO.io@DeepDAO_io·
3 more researchers wrote this week about purchasing DAO data. It's amazing how much interest there is in DAOs in the academia. This interest, and the research topics confirm, once again, that governance is in a crisis throughout the world, and that DAOs are seen as a cutting edge experiment in solving these problems ♥️
English
4
1
6
416
DeepDAO.io retweetledi
Theo Beutel
Theo Beutel@theobtl·
"DAOs are toolkits for institutional innovation [3], they are playgrounds for governance games [7], they are democratising democracy innovation [74]." Our paper "Digital Democracy in Decentralised Autonomous Organisations" is now available (open access): link.springer.com/book/10.1007/9…
Theo Beutel tweet media
UZH Blockchain Center@uzh_blockchain

🎉 DAWO 2025 is Here! We are thrilled to announce that UZH Blockchain Center will be co-organizing the Second Edition of the European DAO Workshop (DAWO 2025) in collaboration with the @ZHAW School of Management and Law! Dates: June 23-24, 2025 Location: Zurich, Switzerland

English
1
6
24
2.6K
DeepDAO.io
DeepDAO.io@DeepDAO_io·
We have a crisis of governance not only in DAOs, but everywhere in the world. This is one powerful explanation why:
Nick Almond@DrNickA

Ok crash course in complexity thinking. There are some major drivers of complexity, they are: Scale - the more connected agents and systems, the greater complexity becomes. Information passing between agents increases the system wide connections. Interdependence - if one agent, or system changes, it affects many other agents in the system. We’re now in a world where a Trump tweet can change millions of lives. Not only are we interdependent we’re hyper interdependent. Our global system is centralised around hyper agents that can instantaneously change the whole system in seconds. Diversity - the more different each agent or system is, the greater the complexity. Diversity is actually a strength because complexity isn’t always bad, but it means you get the outcomes of complexity more obviously. High interaction variety is perhaps the biggest driver of complexity. Incongruent systems create conflict and unforeseen events. Dynamics - speed of change. The greater the pace of change in the system the more rapidly complexity manifests. Everything is changing fast. And this is not just the new normal it is ACCELERATING. Opacity - the more one area of the complex system changes and the rest of the connected systems don’t see it, the more likely you are operating under radical uncertainty. Eventually information is revealed and massively disruptive outcomes happen at scale because the change happening was shielded from the wider system. We have seen a massive unprecedented ramp in all of these drivers in an incredibly short space of time. This means we get non-linearity, far from equilibrium dynamics, which means unpredictability, black swans, overnight changes, unforeseen events again and again. In complex systems we get radical emergence, sometimes good sometimes very bad, but whatever it is you don’t see it coming. This is why every system which is still operating on a governance paradigm created before the radical complexity ramp is collapsing. We simply don’t have the ability to operate under uncertainty at this scale. So every decision is bad. This is why governance everywhere needs to be upgraded and quick.

English
1
3
8
1.5K
DeepDAO.io
DeepDAO.io@DeepDAO_io·
@theobtl It's a good model, for sure. But we'd still like to see more transparency, which blockchains enable, and also more token holders involvement.
English
0
0
2
22
amanwithwings
amanwithwings@_amanwithwings·
Excited to announce that I've joined the @arbitrum foundation as operations coordinator! Like most of us in the DAO ecosystem, I've looked up to the Arbitrum DAO ever since it launched. I remember being at a dinner during EDCON Montenegro organized by @kaereste and @DennisonBertram, where the key topic of discussion was how everyone was scrambling to introduce some structure to the DAO. That was over 2 years ago, just a couple of months after the first Snapshot! Over the past two years, the DAO has come a long way. It has commissioned some of the largest initiatives ever commissioned by a DAO, with most of these originating organically from the community. It has probably the most diverse, active, and talented delegate set among all DAOs. It now employs full-time employees through @EntropyAdvisors (and the OpCo when set up). It is currently the best example of decentralization applied at scale. Owing to how much I referenced Arbitrum DAO in my work over the years at @DeepDAO_io, @DAOstar_One & @safe, it is probably among the few blockchain projects my fiancé can name lol 😅 With institutional crypto adoption nearing an inflection point, and the much-needed AAE vision, I don't think there has been a better time to join the foundation. I'll be working closely with @stonecoldpat0, @matrzeszowski, @raamcc, @ad_or11, and other awesome people at the AF. I want to thank my colleagues at @safe who I really enjoyed working with, especially the coolest @anticustody! Lastly, LFG🚀 Arbitrum Everywhere.
English
55
8
184
17.3K
DeepDAO.io
DeepDAO.io@DeepDAO_io·
Indeed. Or understanding of how difficult it is to manage and lead groups of people.
Nick Almond@DrNickA

@raphbaph The DAOs have failed crowd have no imagination.

English
2
0
2
538
DeepDAO.io retweetledi
Froggy 🐸
Froggy 🐸@GemBooster·
@ethereum @DeepDAO_io DAOs have quietly become economic powerhouses, managing billions and coordinating millions without centralized control.
English
0
2
2
404