Jerry Boggs

White people: -Didn’t invent slavery -Were themselves enslaved too -Put an end to slavery worldwide And yet, only White people are blamed for slavery.

@khnh80044 Soooo cute!

He’s acting asleep just to prank everyone . So cute😂

@InterstellarUAP 79 years on, there's still no publicly verifiable, physical evidence of an extraterrestrial craft or bodies at Roswell. It's a great story, but until something concrete is produced it's just that, a story.

@InterstellarUAP No. Here’s why: “Have extraterrestrials ever visited Earth?” relevantmatters.wordpress.com/2021/08/11/has…

The 1947 Roswell UFO Crash: "It was a round disc shaped UFO - There were 4 Alien Beings" 👽 “There was so much of it. It was not anything from this earth.” They found four beings at the crash site. One creature backed away in fear as they approached, then turned and looked straight at a witness. “It was just like an explosion of things in my head.” The military quickly surrounded the area. A direct warning followed: “Never tell anybody, because the government can always find you.” What so you think happened at The Foster Ranch that day? Was Roswell a real UFO crash?

@InterstellarUAP It’s BS. Here’s why: “Have extraterrestrials ever visited Earth?” relevantmatters.wordpress.com/2021/08/11/has…

Rep. Tim Burchett: "A member of our government has told me that extraterrestrial beings have visited our planet and made contact with humans." 👽🛸 In a direct interview, the Tennessee Congressman confirmed what a high ranking official shared with him in a secure briefing including non human life and otherworldly machinery that interacted with people. Pressed for details, he replied: "It's pretty wild. I'm just telling you, I'm not going to lie to you. This is what the guy told me." He recalled the source pulling him close before leaving through a side door and saying: "Tim, they're real." What do you make of this? Do you think Congress is finally getting closer to real answers on UAPs and non human intelligence or will the biggest secrets stay buried?

Une nouvelle étude révèle que le « récit dominant » sur les biais contre les femmes en sciences est faux. Les professeurs surestiment massivement les discriminations contre les femmes, qui en général sont inexistantes, voire dans le sens inverse. Les auteurs de cette étude ont par exemple constaté que dans les embauches en tenure-track (USA + Europe), les femmes sont clairement préférées aux hommes aux qualifications égales.

To any community who believe skeptics dismiss your evidence out of hand: I want to address that directly, because the “closed-minded” and “lacking imagination” accusations misunderstand what is actually happening. First, the closed-minded part. I am actively looking. I want evidence of life beyond Earth to exist. When a promising signal appears or something unusual shows up in the data, I feel that excitement too. What brings me back is not closed-mindedness. It is a grounding in science and a requirement for proof. Those are not the same thing. The imagination accusation falls apart just as quickly, because science is imagination. Science takes what we know to be true and asks: what could follow from this? What could be built, extended, improved? What becomes possible? There are serious researchers pursuing ideas many colleagues consider far-fetched. The difference is that they begin with reality and expand outward from there. What serious researchers reject is not bold thinking. It is starting with a desired conclusion and deciding that violating established physics is acceptable collateral damage because the answer feels emotionally satisfying. Now, to be fair, you are not entirely wrong that unfamiliar physics plays a role in skepticism. If something genuinely appears to violate our understanding of the physical world, that naturally raises the bar. But that is the key point: The more extraordinary the claim, the stronger the evidence must be. If you are asking us to redirect our attention away from an enormously successful working model of reality toward something radically different, the evidence has to justify that shift. It has to be validated. It has to hold up under scrutiny. And to be clear, most skeptics are not demanding a complete technical explanation from an alleged advanced civilization. If something appears indistinguishable from magic because the underlying science is vastly beyond ours, fine. We can sit with that possibility. What we cannot do is accept blurry footage, ambiguous imagery, anecdotes, or uncorroborated testimony as sufficient evidence for claims that would fundamentally rewrite physics and our understanding of reality. That is not arrogance, it’s proportionality. The evidence simply has not yet justified the conclusion being demanded of it.

@SpencerHakimian women would rather slave 8 hours a day for their boss than make a sandwich for their husband

@Johnny4ppleweed @SteveStuWill Italy has a seperate category for murder of women, which is considered to be a much more severe crime than the murder of a man.

@SteveStuWill A women will also be arrested less, charged less, tried less, sentenced less, and will serve less of her sentence than a man committing the same crime, with the same criminal history. To the tune of about 1/5th the punishment.

@SteveStuWill What the chart shows: Woman kills man -------> 3 year sentence Woman kills woman ----> 4.5 year sentence Man kills man -----------> 4.7 year sentence Man kills woman --------> 10.4 year sentence. You get punished more if your victim is female.

@SteveStuWill The worst part is that if a female driver killed a man, the mean prison sentence was 3 years: if a male driver killed a female, the mean was 10.4 years.

"Drivers who killed women received substantially longer sentences than those who killed men. As we see in the table below, the average sentence for killing a woman was 9.7 years, whereas the average sentence for killing a man was 4.4 years." stevestewartwilliams.com/p/bias-in-the-…

@SteveStuWill Men have always generally been valued less.

@MHuntington7 It's more than okay, it is absolutely necessary and important.

I spoke with two senior UN officials in New York City, in town for the UN General Assembly in September, who revealed a troubling reality: the UN’s obsession with one-sided gender equality has morphed into systemic discrimination—against men. Within the organization, hiring and promotion decisions right up to the top are increasingly driven by identity rather than merit. If you're a young man today hoping to secure a job in the UN, there's no doubt that it will be difficult. Gender parity has already been reached and maintained since 2018 (50% women) in senior-level roles, and 60% of field staff are women today. Yet when there’s a selection process, those hiring must indicate that women have received due consideration and, in the case that a man is preferred, 𝘦𝘹𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘪𝘯 𝘸𝘩𝘺. As a woman myself, I find this infantilizing. It suggests that women need a handicap to compete, undermining the very equality the UN claims to champion. Ignoring men’s issues while mandating justifications for hiring them isn’t equality. That's bias and sexism dressed up in progressive jargon. Read more: eviemagazine.com/post/the-un-is…

@InterstellarUAP Greer is full of shit.

@LisaBritton @dirgros MEN MUST SURGE INTO THE STREETS IN HUGE NUMBERS AND PROTEST. “The Lace Curtain” archive.is/vmUOq See how feminists suppress the voices for men. “A Comprehensive Look at Gender Equality” malemattersusa.wordpress.com/2012/02/16/the… Thanks so much, Lisa!

@LisaBritton Thanks for posting. Yeah, it's funny how the assumption is that the existing system - patriarchy? - looks after men. Yet men die younger, have more preventable diseases, and (in Australia) receive just 2% of gendered services funding. Reality doesn't match beliefs.

We must honor our mothers if we truly want to support our sons. Anything less is not progress. It’s self-destruction. Check out my latest for the Washington Examiner: washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-amer…