eMBee
1.3K posts

eMBee
@DeepthinkerSB
DiscreetMB
Republic of the Philippines Katılım Mart 2024
55 Takip Edilen6 Takipçiler

@RyanLingo_ korek! di nila alam kung gaano kagago ginawa nila kay tatay. humanda na lang pasensyahan.
Filipino

@tel07647 @coachjarret gago talaga yan sya. antay antay lang matatahimik din yang gagong yan!
Filipino

@coachjarret tangina mo iyakin kang hayup ka. walang tatalo sa mga amo mong bangag. gago pa din mga magulang mong hukluban
Filipino


@asianicecubes nagpadala ka naman. alam mo naman demolition job ginagawa nila. naniwala ka namn sa mga kasinungalingan nla. Lhat yan sia magnanakaw. Ayw nilang makulong. Gagawin at gagawin nila lahat kahit baluktutin ang konstitusyon para lang mapaalis nila ang tatapos sa pagnanakaw nila.
Filipino

When strong bias takes over, fact-checking gets pushed aside and even false narratives start to feel believable. That’s why it’s important to stay critical, verify information, and not let emotions cloud judgment. No matter what side you’re on. Kudos ka DDS
Dalagang Pilipina 🇵🇭@fierceLady08
Just imagine, bcoz of ur hatred for the Dutertes, u end up believing whatever lies are thrown at them. You don’t even bother to fact-check anymore bcoz ur judgment is clouded by that hate. That, in itself, is the very definition of being dumb. Then you call us bobo? The nerve.
English

@DeepthinkerSB Now you’re being more emotional. I clearly inverted your assertion and now you’re pleadinf guilt by association. Lol. Keep reaching. Arguments are very much tied to the person which they come from. An argument does not exist in a vacuum
English

I mean, I wouldn’t look down on Trillanes. He is the reason why your tatay Digong is now in karton mode in the Hague. Lol. And the audacity the DDS demanding credibilty when the people they align with are questionable at best, abhorrent at worst.
𝓖 𝓵 𝓪 𝓬 𝓮@glacyforyou
Wala man lang nag-corroborate sa mga statements ni Madriaga. Malamang si Trililing na yan. How credible!🤣
English

@chonggo How can you engage? The same way you engage anyone by examining the reasoning. Or you can keep relying on labels and avoid the argument entirely.
troll ka jan! I'm just someone engages with your points, responds to your reasoning, neither avoids substance. haha! Kataw anan!
English

@DeepthinkerSB How can you engage a point with a troll? I mean, really?
English

@DeepthinkerSB you do not expect to be taken seriously if you are not at equal footing. If the person is identified and engaging with an anonymous troll then there is no equal footing. The fact that you are not recognizing this and seeing trolling as an ideal says a lot about you.
English

@DeepthinkerSB “Opinions may be influenced by identity, but they arent validated by it.”
Let’s make Germany great again is an opinion that says Germany lost its lustre from the humiliation of WW1.
Who said that? Adolf Hitler.
Keep reaching.
English

@DeepthinkerSB Anonymous is the very impetus for trolling and here you are saying it is bias? Lol. Why are you so emotional?
English

@DeepthinkerSB The first sentence alone’s oxymoronic. How can it be open when there is a concealment? If i were anonymous like you then we can go at it. But no. I put myself out there to be attacked and yet there you are conveniently cloistered. Once you understand this, then discussion happens
English

@DeepthinkerSB Because opinions are intricately linked to identiity. The fact that you deflect from this is an act of intellectual charlatanism. At least many of the pundits of the DDS would at least show their names and pundits which the likes of you openly attack while under cover.
English

@chonggo Calling anonymity deflection doesn’t make it so it just shifts the focus away from the argument. Objectivity isn’t proven by attaching a name. It’s shown by whether the reasoning holds. If you’re equating anonymity with trolling by default, that’s bias, not analysis.
English

@DeepthinkerSB Then you are deflecting. And are you truly objective? The fact that you hide reeks of subjective manipulation because of a refusal to be seen and call it unimportant or not contingent when in this platform, being anonymous is cognizant to trolling which is far from objectivity
English

@DeepthinkerSB That’s the thing, what argument are you supposedly allegedly espousing? You arw ascribing more than arguing. You claim to say that we should not be selective but there you are shilling for the Dutertes. I did not even assign you “fencesitter” because clearly you are a shill.
English

@DeepthinkerSB Oh so you are a fence-sitter? *checks feed and sees kakampwet* and you talk about “selective outrage?”
English













