eMBee

1.3K posts

eMBee banner
eMBee

eMBee

@DeepthinkerSB

DiscreetMB

Republic of the Philippines Katılım Mart 2024
55 Takip Edilen6 Takipçiler
eMBee
eMBee@DeepthinkerSB·
@tessgarcia ginawang santo ng gago! bugok!
Filipino
0
0
0
199
Patatas of Mindanao
Patatas of Mindanao@tessgarcia·
Pia, for sure, takot na takot rin si Kian noong binaril sya. Tapos pinakawalan lang ninyo ang pumatay sa kanya.
Filipino
7
237
1.5K
17.7K
jcco
jcco@Jjcruz2·
@luar_407 Maganda SS ‘to. Pag nagruling SC tapos tablado. Sarap isungalngal sa kanya yan ahaha
Filipino
2
0
10
95
Raul Escala Alejandrino
Ayan ha si Atty Claire Castro ng PCO na nagsabi makinig kayo. 😂🤣😂😅
Raul Escala Alejandrino tweet media
Filipino
11
0
10
1.6K
eMBee
eMBee@DeepthinkerSB·
@RyanLingo_ korek! di nila alam kung gaano kagago ginawa nila kay tatay. humanda na lang pasensyahan.
Filipino
0
0
2
82
Ryan Lingo
Ryan Lingo@RyanLingo_·
Once na mamatay sa loob ng ICC detention cell si Digong, HUMANDA kayong mga hayup na kumidnap sa kanya! Gaganti ang mga Diyos sa inyo mga animal!😡
Ryan Lingo tweet media
Filipino
166
44
255
9.5K
eMBee
eMBee@DeepthinkerSB·
@tel07647 @coachjarret gago talaga yan sya. antay antay lang matatahimik din yang gagong yan!
Filipino
0
0
1
4
Coco A. Ine
Coco A. Ine@tel07647·
@coachjarret tangina mo iyakin kang hayup ka. walang tatalo sa mga amo mong bangag. gago pa din mga magulang mong hukluban
Filipino
1
0
2
30
Rep. Perci Cendaña
Rep. Perci Cendaña@RepPerci·
𝗦𝗣 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗦𝗲𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗣𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁? 𝗼 𝗦𝘂𝗽𝗲𝗿 𝗣𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗴𝘂𝗹𝗼? Ginulo ang Senado para patakasin ang isang pugante. At mukhang dadaanin din sa kaguluhan para makalusot si Sara Duterte.
Filipino
70
93
477
6.3K
eMBee
eMBee@DeepthinkerSB·
@asianicecubes nagpadala ka naman. alam mo naman demolition job ginagawa nila. naniwala ka namn sa mga kasinungalingan nla. Lhat yan sia magnanakaw. Ayw nilang makulong. Gagawin at gagawin nila lahat kahit baluktutin ang konstitusyon para lang mapaalis nila ang tatapos sa pagnanakaw nila.
Filipino
2
0
0
408
wildflowerX
wildflowerX@asianicecubes·
goodbye mga kapwa ko dds hindi na gawa gawang kwento ang sumabog sa kongreso, kaya pala pinipigilan nila ito sa Supreme Court, ang tagal ko naging bulag, si Sara pala ay multi bilyonarya, hindi ako lilipat sa kabila pero hindi na ako susuporta sa mga Duterte : (
Filipino
47
23
313
25.5K
eMBee
eMBee@DeepthinkerSB·
@MillAnarchist hahaha kawawang mga kakampwet! tumahimik kau hahaha
Filipino
0
0
0
7
Millennial Anarchist 🟥Ⓐ⬛️
Kung hanggang ngayon sumasamba ka pa rin mga Duterte dapat magpatingin ka na sa sa doctor sa utak!
Millennial Anarchist 🟥Ⓐ⬛️ tweet media
Filipino
4
9
26
367
eMBee
eMBee@DeepthinkerSB·
When strong bias takes over, fact-checking gets pushed aside and even false narratives start to feel believable. That’s why it’s important to stay critical, verify information, and not let emotions cloud judgment. No matter what side you’re on. Kudos ka DDS
Dalagang Pilipina 🇵🇭@fierceLady08

Just imagine, bcoz of ur hatred for the Dutertes, u end up believing whatever lies are thrown at them. You don’t even bother to fact-check anymore bcoz ur judgment is clouded by that hate. That, in itself, is the very definition of being dumb. Then you call us bobo? The nerve.

English
0
0
0
84
NasKT
NasKT@godfatherJK5·
So kung weakest link as a witness si Ramil Madriaga, eh bakit ayaw humarap ni Inday at debunk niya UNDER OATH yung mga binanggit sa supplemental affidavit ni Madriaga. Ganun lang ka simple yon. Pahiya na si Madriaga at na clear pa sana ni Inday ang pangalan at reputasyon niya.🤨
Filipino
26
55
332
9.8K
eMBee
eMBee@DeepthinkerSB·
@chonggo Arguments dont exist in a vacuum, but their validity isnt determined by the person making them. Thats the distinction you keep glossing over. Context can inform interpretation, but it doesn’t substitute for evaluating the reasoning itself. LOL
English
1
0
0
25
The Glittery Glare
The Glittery Glare@chonggo·
@DeepthinkerSB Now you’re being more emotional. I clearly inverted your assertion and now you’re pleadinf guilt by association. Lol. Keep reaching. Arguments are very much tied to the person which they come from. An argument does not exist in a vacuum
English
1
0
0
32
eMBee
eMBee@DeepthinkerSB·
@chonggo How can you engage? The same way you engage anyone by examining the reasoning. Or you can keep relying on labels and avoid the argument entirely. troll ka jan! I'm just someone engages with your points, responds to your reasoning, neither avoids substance. haha! Kataw anan!
English
1
0
0
20
eMBee
eMBee@DeepthinkerSB·
@chonggo You keep equating anonymity with troll as if that’s a given, that’s the flaw in your premise. Equal footing in a discussion comes from engaging arguments on their merits, not from matching levels of personal exposure.
English
0
0
0
7
The Glittery Glare
The Glittery Glare@chonggo·
@DeepthinkerSB you do not expect to be taken seriously if you are not at equal footing. If the person is identified and engaging with an anonymous troll then there is no equal footing. The fact that you are not recognizing this and seeing trolling as an ideal says a lot about you.
English
1
0
0
17
eMBee
eMBee@DeepthinkerSB·
@chonggo That’s a classic case of guilt by association. You’re using a historically charged figure to discredit a general principle, instead of actually engaging with it. The standard still holds. Arguments rise or fall on their own merit. Try harder.
English
2
0
0
20
The Glittery Glare
The Glittery Glare@chonggo·
@DeepthinkerSB “Opinions may be influenced by identity, but they arent validated by it.” Let’s make Germany great again is an opinion that says Germany lost its lustre from the humiliation of WW1. Who said that? Adolf Hitler. Keep reaching.
English
1
0
0
25
eMBee
eMBee@DeepthinkerSB·
@chonggo Calling it trolling without engaging the point is exactly the bias being pointed out. You’ve decided the conclusion before examining the reasoning. LOL
English
1
0
0
16
The Glittery Glare
The Glittery Glare@chonggo·
@DeepthinkerSB Anonymous is the very impetus for trolling and here you are saying it is bias? Lol. Why are you so emotional?
English
1
0
0
14
eMBee
eMBee@DeepthinkerSB·
@chonggo Putting yourself out there is a choice, not a requirement for validity. It doesnt make your arguments stronger, and it doesnt make anonymous arguments weaker. If anything, it just introduces a bias toward who’s speaking rather than what’s being said.
English
1
0
0
11
The Glittery Glare
The Glittery Glare@chonggo·
@DeepthinkerSB The first sentence alone’s oxymoronic. How can it be open when there is a concealment? If i were anonymous like you then we can go at it. But no. I put myself out there to be attacked and yet there you are conveniently cloistered. Once you understand this, then discussion happens
English
1
0
0
15
eMBee
eMBee@DeepthinkerSB·
@chonggo Opinions may be influenced by identity, but they arent validated by it. That’s the leap you keep making. Calling it intellectual charlatanism doesnt fix the fact that you’re still avoiding the argument and focusing on the speaker instead.
English
1
0
0
16
The Glittery Glare
The Glittery Glare@chonggo·
@DeepthinkerSB Because opinions are intricately linked to identiity. The fact that you deflect from this is an act of intellectual charlatanism. At least many of the pundits of the DDS would at least show their names and pundits which the likes of you openly attack while under cover.
English
1
0
0
18
eMBee
eMBee@DeepthinkerSB·
@chonggo Calling anonymity deflection doesn’t make it so it just shifts the focus away from the argument. Objectivity isn’t proven by attaching a name. It’s shown by whether the reasoning holds. If you’re equating anonymity with trolling by default, that’s bias, not analysis.
English
1
0
0
15
The Glittery Glare
The Glittery Glare@chonggo·
@DeepthinkerSB Then you are deflecting. And are you truly objective? The fact that you hide reeks of subjective manipulation because of a refusal to be seen and call it unimportant or not contingent when in this platform, being anonymous is cognizant to trolling which is far from objectivity
English
1
0
0
17
eMBee
eMBee@DeepthinkerSB·
@chonggo Notice how the discussion keeps drifting from the point to accusations about me. That’s not engagement, that’s deflection. The argument is simple: standards should be applied consistently. Calling that shilling doesn’t refute it.
English
0
0
0
4
The Glittery Glare
The Glittery Glare@chonggo·
@DeepthinkerSB That’s the thing, what argument are you supposedly allegedly espousing? You arw ascribing more than arguing. You claim to say that we should not be selective but there you are shilling for the Dutertes. I did not even assign you “fencesitter” because clearly you are a shill.
English
1
0
0
11
eMBee
eMBee@DeepthinkerSB·
@chonggo Ah yes, the classic move! cant refute the argument, so you assign a label and call it a day. Fence-sitter is just a convenient substitute for actual thinking.
English
1
0
0
12
The Glittery Glare
The Glittery Glare@chonggo·
@DeepthinkerSB Oh so you are a fence-sitter? *checks feed and sees kakampwet* and you talk about “selective outrage?”
English
1
0
0
17