DeppFan For Justice 🏴‍☠️

@KYMaverick1 This case is reminds me of Johnny Depp vs Amber Heard, 3 youtubers were accused for coordinating with JD and his lawyers to “defame” AH, She lost😂 Obviously they are famous!! 🤷‍♀️

🚨 The hot take making the rounds: Karen Read is about to file a motion to sever her defense from Aidan “Turtleboy” Kearney in the massive new civil defamation lawsuit filed yesterday in Barnstable Superior Court. Anti-Kearney corners of the internet are convinced she’ll cut him loose—paint him as the loose cannon, the merch-hawking provocateur, and ride off as the more “reasonable” defendant. On paper it sounds tidy. In reality? It’s extremely unlikely to happen. And once you read the complaint, the reasons become crystal clear. This isn’t two people who happened to say similar things at the same time. The 50-page filing lays out a coordinated, multi-year conspiracy in meticulous detail. Read allegedly recruited Kearney, fed him non-public information through intermediaries and Signal, praised his posts in real time (“Amaze ball sauce!!!!!”), met with him and her lawyers to align strategy, and used him as her public megaphone precisely because she needed plausible deniability. The same blog drafts, leaked filings, 189+ phone calls (over 40 hours in 2023 alone), and real-time texts while her private investigator confronted witnesses are all woven through every allegation. Under Massachusetts law, when two defendants are accused of acting “in concert” through the same acts to achieve the same goal, courts almost never split them up. Severance requires proving a joint trial would cause specific, substantial prejudice that can’t be fixed with instructions or redactions. Here the evidence is inextricably linked—same texts, same meetings, same “Canton Coverup” series, same jury-pool strategy. Trying it twice would be a judicial nightmare: duplicate discovery, duplicate witnesses, double the cost and delay. Judges in high-profile cases hate that. Read’s own incentives cut against severance too. She has never truly disavowed Kearney. The complaint quotes her evolving public spin—first denying contact, later admitting frequent talks but downplaying the timeline—yet in the HBO docuseries she openly discussed building a direct relationship with him after using cutouts. Her criminal defense leaned on the very “McAlberts cover-up” narrative Kearney amplified daily. Filing to sever now would force her to argue, in open court, that the man who helped build the “Free Karen Read” movement she benefited from is too toxic to sit beside. That risks undermining the entire story she’s told for years. Add the money and momentum: both profited—Kearney through merchandise, CashApp, YouTube superchats; Read through the movement that kept her case alive. Their shared financial and reputational stake makes a clean break messy. Kearney’s defense will almost certainly be “truth as absolute defense,” doing the heavy factual lifting on the plaintiffs’ credibility while Read’s team focuses on the bigger narrative. Why give that up? Bottom line: the chatter predicting severance feels satisfying to those who dislike Kearney, but legally and strategically it doesn’t hold water. This case was built as a joint enterprise from day one. Expect Read and Kearney to remain side-by-side in Barnstable Superior Court—two very different personalities bound by one very detailed set of allegations that the plaintiffs say they orchestrated together. The real fight isn’t about who sits at which table. It’s about whether the evidence proves the conspiracy the complaint so painstakingly lays out. Buckle up. This one’s could be a long, loud ride.

@DoctorTurtleboy Beautiful Camille Vazquez will be great for “You know Who” 😂

Just to clear up some misinformation for idiots who watch my show and don’t understand what words mean - Bradl and Bederow aren’t going anywhere and will both be involved in my defense for the McAlbert lawsuit. We (my attorneys and I) will be adding a distinguished civil litigator in the near future with experience in defamation cases, and we are currently in the process of evaluating who that will be. An announcement will be made when counsel is retained.

@RealNurseKim 🕺🏻💃🏻 🤟👊

@CourtTV 🙄

New lawsuit accuses Karen Read and Turtleboy of defamation ift.tt/cBR57rY

@DoctorTurtleboy 🤦🏻‍♀️

The inclusion of Karen Read's Signal messages in the McAlberts desperate lawsuit is only possible because my entire phone extraction was sent out to the supporters of the McAlberts by she who shall not be named. None of these messages prove any sort of defamation, but the intent of releasing them to the bad guys was clearly to hurt Karen Read.

@marcorandazza @Nicola__Maxwell 🤦🏻‍♀️

Gotta love this from the Turtleboy/Karen Read defamation suit. "We aren't gonna tell you right now what statements we are suing over, we'll let you know on the eve of trial."

@LTOW227 Let’s see which science will win in court 😂

The truth is the ultimate defense pt. 2: Science proves that John O’Keefe wasn’t hit by a car!

@TheChauffeurX @solomonradner

Let’s do it!

@boston25 🤦🏻‍♀️

Four people who testified in the Karen Read case announced Thursday they are suing Karen Read and Aidan “Turtleboy” Kearney for defamation.

@LTOW227 @KristinaRex @goawayjd Yesss!! 🔥🔥🔥

@KristinaRex @goawayjd Bring back the crash daddies!!

RE: Defamation suit Kearney's lawyer tells me that "proving the truth of the allegedly defamatory statements is an absolute defense. In essence, the plaintiffs have invited Mr. Kearney to defend the suit by prosecuting them in civil court for the murder of John O'Keefe." #WBZ

@KristinaRex 🩷💚

@DoctorTurtleboy @TheChauffeurX 🤟🩷👊💚

@kreadisinnocent @KristinaRex Are they suing KR for bringing a third party defense to her two trials? Whatever people said were in court filings & streamed in youtube 🤷‍♀️

BREAKING: Jennifer McCabe, Brian Albert, Colin Albert, and Brian Higgins have announced in a press release that they've filed a civil suit against Karen Read and Aidan Kearney for defamation, civil conspiracy, and other claims. via @KristinaRex

@KristinaRex @Norsk2u 🤦🏻‍♀️

New: Jen McCabe, Brian Albert, Colin Albert, and Brian Higgins announce in a press release that they've filed a civil suit against Karen Read and Aidan Kearney for defamation, civil conspiracy, and other claims. #WBZ

@TedDanielnews Sure! 🙄🤦🏻‍♀️ They probably destroyed their phones so Whatever!!

Breaking: Four people who testified in the Karen Read case just announced they are suing Karen Read and Aidan "Turtleboy" Kearney for defamation. The plaintiffs are Jennifer McCabe, Brian Albert, Colin Albert and Brian Higgins. This just went out by email:

@libby_priest323 @SusanJohnsonCl1 I Stand With Johnny Depp #JohnnyDepp #NoJohnnyNoPirates

Can I get 100 replies with I Stand With Johnny Depp #JohnnyDepp #NoJohnnyNoPirates

@Mindabeez82Bee @JBWells_sicem 👀

Whats that you say, YOU had nothing to do with whatever CONSPIRACY THEY HAVE GOING ON? 🤔🧐🧐🧐 Sounds like you know there is a conspiracy going on, yes? 🕑⏰️💥

@justice4kelseyf @products840 🙏💜

Details coming when I get home

@TheEmilySee @products840 @LawGirlsNotAttn

THANK YOU @LawGirlsNotAttn for streaming Kelsey's hearing today. Can we get a message to the judge that Kelsey should be awarded full custody simply based on the fact that this man should not be allowed to pass his fashion sense onto Baby C

@TheEmilySee @findmeauser Love it 😊 😂

The many faces of Judge Treseler