Xavier Léothaud

🔴🇫🇷FLASH - Jordan #Bardella assure que l'audiovisuel public sera privatisé si le Rassemblement national arrive au pouvoir en 2027. (itw BFMTV)

חיילים בשירות סדיר ובשירות מילואים בוזזים רכוש אזרחי רב מבתים ומבתי עסק בדרום לבנון – כך אמרו ל-@yanivkub לוחמים ומפקדים שמוצבים בשטח. על פי העדויות, גניבת אופנועים, טלוויזיות, ציורים, ספות ושטיחים בהיקף רחב נהפכה לתופעה שגרתית, והפיקוד הבכיר והזוטר בשטח מכיר אותה אך אינו נוקט צעדי משמעת כדי למגר אותה haaretz.co.il/news/politics/…

Le Parti socialiste parle de liberté comme un faussaire parle d’honnêteté. Il suffit de regarder ce qu’il met derrière ce mot pour voir la supercherie. Davantage d’impôts, davantage de redistribution dirigée d’en haut, davantage d’intervention politique dans les salaires, dans les successions, dans la retraite, dans la vie économique tout entière. Ils ne défendent pas la liberté. Ils recyclent la tutelle. La vérité est simple. La gauche socialiste n’aime la liberté que lorsqu’elle devient un slogan. Dès qu’elle prend une forme concrète (liberté de travailler, d’entreprendre, de transmettre, de choisir, de respirer hors de la norme administrative) elle cherche à la restreindre, la taxer, la corriger ou la surveiller. Ils prétendent reprendre la liberté à la droite. Mais on ne reprend pas ce que l’on a passé des décennies à abîmer. Car enfin, qui a méthodiquement étendu l’État, alourdi la dépense, banalisé la confiscation fiscale, nourri la dépendance et affaibli la responsabilité individuelle ? Toujours les mêmes. Le plus révélateur, c’est leur vieille habitude intacte. Ils changent les mots, jamais le logiciel. Ils parlent d’émancipation, mais proposent la dépendance. Ils parlent de justice, mais organisent la ponction. Ils parlent de réconciliation, mais opposent, catégorisent et administrent. Ils parlent de liberté, mais ne savent concevoir la société qu’avec l’État au centre et le citoyen sous contrôle. La liberté n’est pas un décor de conférence de presse. Ce n’est pas un mot que l’on plaque sur 144 pages de réflexes socialistes pour faire moderne. La liberté, la vraie, commence là où l’emprise publique recule. Là où le travail paie. Là où la réussite n’est plus suspecte. Là où transmettre à ses enfants n’est pas traité comme un privilège à punir. Là où l’État protège sans étouffer. Le socialisme du XXIe siècle qu’ils annoncent ressemble furieusement au socialisme du XXe siècle avec un emballage plus habile. Plus de morale, plus de communication, plus d’habillage sémantique. Mais au bout du compte, toujours la même mécanique. L’individu paie, l’État décide, la machine grossit. Ils ont changé le vocabulaire parce que leur doctrine ne fait plus envie. Mais un mot ne transforme pas une idéologie. Appeler cela liberté ne trompe plus grand monde. La liberté ne vit pas dans leurs slogans. Elle survit contre leurs réflexes. Avec @davidlisnard et @Nouv_Energie, nous défendons la liberté des Français, pas le pouvoir des appareils.

The Anti-Palantir Manifesto by our very own philosopher-turned-CEO @harryhalpin. Read it here: nym.com/blog/anti-pala… Why we must fight Palantir Because Harry got asked. A lot. 1. Programmers working on the Internet have a moral responsibility to the entire world, not a single country. The Internet has been designed since its inception as a universal system for the sharing of knowledge without censorship. The Internet is not the property of any one government or nation. 2. The Internet enables mass surveillance at a scale unimaginable to the Gestapo and the Cheka. Far too many programmers have wasted their lives building surveillance systems under the guise of Web advertising. Today, these web tracking systems are being used to monitor, control, and even kill humans by companies like Palantir that seek to combine state violence with corporate efficiency, and thus create a new form of technofascism. 3. Surveillance justified by external national security threats will be turned against citizens inside the nation-state. Mass surveillance was once the exclusive domain of the NSA, but today it has been privatized to corporations like Palantir that are unaccountable to any democratic process. What begins as fear of external foreign nation-states turns inwards to focus on immigrants, dissidents, and eventually anyone that might challenge the status quo or try to exit an increasingly dysfunctional society. 4. Everyone is a target. The “enemy within” continually expands until it encompasses the entire population of a nation regardless of their status and beliefs, justifying evermore paranoid and totalizing surveillance. The line between policing and military operations blurs, with legal frameworks being replaced by technological violence operating with total impunity. 5. Surveillance can only be defeated by building software and hardware to defend ourselves. Meek calls for regulation or moralizing demands for human rights are useless in this era. Any rights must be enforced by the hard power of code. Code, not laws, can be used to uphold the right to privacy by making surveillance difficult, if not impossible, even by nation-state adversaries. 6. We are ruled by a senile gerontocracy. Unlike the generations that fought in the world wars, most of our current rulers are degenerate pedophiles who would sacrifice the well-being of the youth and the entire planet due to their infantile desire for wealth and power. Technologies of surveillance and automated warfare reflect their increasingly desperate attempts to maintain archaic forms of domination. 7. The American Empire is unraveling. Once, the United States of America presided over a globe where it could enforce its rule via the status of the dollar as a global reserve currency and a network of equally global military bases. Today, new regional powers directly challenge the United States as its empire dissolves in the face of internal economic stagnation, political corruption, and the inflation of the dollar. 8. In a real war, fantasies of total technological dominance always backfire. When a faceless drone kills a child’s father, that child will one day take revenge regardless of the cost. This is something forgotten by those raised in comfortable suburbs. Going beyond zero-sum games, one can only truly win a battle against a people by demonstrating that your victory provides a better way of life, increased prosperity, and an inspiring philosophy. 9. Oddly enough, proponents of fully automated warfare support a universal draft. Deep-down, these keyboard warriors know that their techno-fascist fantasies are a paper tiger when up against determined opponents that engage in asymmetric warfare. They also know none of their children will fight in a war for their state, but they would be happy to see other people’s children come home in body-bags. 10. The problem is not whether AI weapons will be built; we must hold responsible those who are building them. No matter which country is deploying automated killing machines, no one is absolved from the murder of civilians and the destruction of infrastructure due to the parlour-trick of shifting the blame to AI. 11. Atomic war is on the horizon. As various states descend into wars over increasingly scarce natural resources, the possibility of tactical nuclear strikes over Tehran, Kyiv, and other areas of conflict has returned to the historical stage. Increasingly geriatric and authoritarian rulers face less guardrails than before to deploying nuclear weapons, and may even be willing to sacrifice the survival of humanity to appease their own petty egos. 12. Our goal is a world of peace where every person can be empowered by the Internet. Modern war is the quintessential game of sending young people to the meat-grinder. Why die for the profit of corrupt rulers when one could build real wealth and power for yourself using the Internet? 13. We should fight for the world we want, and build the tools needed by future generations. Pacifism would be suicidal in this period of global turbulence and resource wars, but real hard power lies in technology: Programmers should be creating technologies to live a free life and prosper in a hostile society of surveillance and control. Decentralization is the only way these technologies will survive against the inevitable repression. 14. The State will not help us. The state is a dying pre-Internet institution that increasingly resembles nothing but a Ponzi scheme fueled by taxes and debt. None of the youth alive today will likely inherit any benefits, such as welfare and health care. Technology can support an alternative: The decentralization of power to the individual and communities that they join voluntarily. 15. Centralized and opaque algorithms are a danger to free speech. Propaganda is the flip-side of surveillance, as continual propaganda prevents anyone from even thinking of challenging the system. Social media monopolies promote propaganda to create a generalized idiocy while silencing those that would dare to criticize the reigning order before they can organize against it. 16. Building new forms of social organization with each other is vital to survival. The traditional mediascape of politics and entertainment exists to distract us from building networked solidarity and distributed autonomous organizations across borders. The hierarchical state is as relevant to us as the medieval church and kings were to the formation of the joint-stock corporation and the labor union. 17. Digital identity is the next step in their system of control. Within the next few years, access to the Internet – including in Europe and the United States – will require biometric national identity cards, using the flimsy excuse of “protecting children.” The real goal is to gatekeep free access to subversive political content and halt cross-border communication in order to prevent new forms of self-organization and resistance from emerging. 18. Only when one can be anonymous is one truly free. The freedom to express oneself without censorship and surveillance is a vital precondition for both the autonomous use of reason and the democratic evolution of society. Technology must enable the freedom to selectively reveal ourselves to the world – so that we can become who we want to be – by preserving the right to privacy over the Internet, including not just individual privacy, but also the right to transact and form contracts privately. 19. America created the first global surveillance state, but it will not be the last. Too many have forgotten, or perhaps taken for granted, the revelations of Wikileaks and Snowden. States across the world from China to Russia are creating even more powerful global surveillance systems and propaganda machines. Leveraging private defense contracts in countries across the world, Palantir seeks to make itself the operating system of a cross-border global secret state while it pushes its own farcical version of ethno-nationalism. 20. Culture wars are a psyop. The “Epstein class” virtue-signals about morality and the superiority of their civilization, all while trying to return to the rule of hereditary elites, even in the United States. Rather than reverse the gains of the Enlightenment, we take the side of our ancestors who fought a centuries-long battle for individual liberty, scientific progress, decentralized markets, bottom-up democracy, and the emancipation of humanity from feudal monarchs and their make-believe mythologies. 21. New forms of technology can reshape the world. Technology is not just a tool, but the world we live in and an extension of our cognitive capabilities. The co-operation of humans with the collective intelligence embedded in AI could accelerate human progress and overcome planetary crises such as climate change and atomic war that threatens the survival of our species. 22. Live free or die trying. We must bear eternal vigilance in the struggle against fascism, and the battlefield is technology. There is no middle ground: Technologists must choose whether to work for the enslavement of humanity or to create new spaces for freedom. These are the personal beliefs of @harryhalpin, not those of Nym.

« Il n’y a que des conneries dans la presse », « je ne lis jamais les journaux »… vous êtes complice de ce populisme @Dartigolles qui ici, précisément, delegitime la parole des femmes. La présomption d’innocence, c’est un autre débat que cette démagogie que votre présence cautionne