Etienne Boucher

@EffectedB81862 @CanadianPolling One less leader aligned with the war criminal dictator at the root of the war in Europe makes the world a better place. Canada, you might know, is in fact, part of the World.

@CanadianPolling Why do you care what other countries do? Is your boss interested in this? The gouvt..

Orban getting nuked from orbit is a good feeling

@HackitZca @hydroqueen @CanadianPolling If it fits it sits

@hydroqueen honest question @CanadianPolling what the hell is the cat for?

Were they asked how that would work? Ignorance is bliss but not real. Polling ignorance will net predictable results. Frothing propaganda is never a good thing.

@axelbutters96 @fuckyouiquit

@fuckyouiquit What’s your solution… all u guys do is complain ???

It's oil, it's gas, it's coal. We've known this for decades. The entire scientific community has been screaming this for decades. Energy execs themselves have know this for decades. Yet they don't think they should be held responsible for the trillions in damage it's causing.

@AMFoxtrot @OneT_Life @CuriosityonX I wasn't actually replying to you but you're also completely wrong, so it seems you felt rightfully targeted. You can replicate these shadows with any significantly indented ball and a point light source.

@Djof @OneT_Life @CuriosityonX I'm referring more to the lighting source and shadows and less about the "camera" dip shit

Not AI. That’s really us.

@RebelReformer @grok @CuriosityonX Grok is incorrect. The video is a zoom on a real picture taken by the Artemis II crew, and publicly available on NASA's website: images.nasa.gov/details/art002…

@grok @CuriosityonX Thanks @grok good to know that this is real with so many AI fakes out there.

@OneT_Life @AMFoxtrot @CuriosityonX Learn how cameras work before exposing yourself as confidently incorrect.

@AMFoxtrot @CuriosityonX And no stars WTF

@LightningBoi5 @emkenobi What a way to stan for someone who just threatened to destroy an entire people and culture days ago.

@emkenobi This is the thing telling people to kill themselves..You offer nothing to society except you're used up body @emkenobi. If you're even real.. which u look 70%fake. x.com/i/status/20417…

@dickiebaird @EpicSportSaga @CuriosityonX The video above clearly shows the background being perceived as larger at greater distance due to the greater focal length. I can replicate these results myself with my own camera equipment. If you reject reality it's pointless for me to explain further.

@Djof @EpicSportSaga @CuriosityonX We haven't. We've covered them independently. You cannot have excessive curvature AND a zoomed up Earth in the same shot. It's simply not possible. Curvature is observed from greater distance. Either the Apollo 8 images are fake, or these fake.

Apollo 17 (1972) VS Artemis II (2026)

@dickiebaird @EpicSportSaga @CuriosityonX We've already covered all this. Old: Close, wider lens (~135mm eq.) New: Further, tighter lens (400mm) Will have this exact effect. The camera equipment used is known for both pictures.

@Djof @EpicSportSaga @CuriosityonX Simple, maybe, but then why is Earth appearing so much smaller on the old images? Can you give an explanation that satisfies both?

@dickiebaird @EpicSportSaga @CuriosityonX There's no visible curvature in the old picture because they were very close to the surface, the same way you don't see it at low altitude on Earth. You can see the curvature in the new pictures because they are further. Simple as that. You can replicate these views in a sim.

@Djof @EpicSportSaga @CuriosityonX I appreciate the reply but that doesn't explain it when you incorporate the amount of curvature shown and the alleged distance when compared to the Apollo missions. At least one photo has to be edited or faked.

@Pb_sndwich @CuriosityonX It's both, further distance + longer focal length. See the bridge in this video. youtu.be/fK7iWF-L_b8 You can see the lens and camera information yourself embedded in the picture files from the NASA website. The Apollo 8 camera equipment is documented.

@Djof @CuriosityonX If it was a more powerful lens, it would zoom in on the moon in the foreground too, flattening it out. But the moon in the recent picture is curved, suggesting the camera is farther away and not zooming in

Same planet but different world

@dickiebaird @EpicSportSaga @CuriosityonX Different lens focal lengths render perspective differently. Keep an eye on the bridge in the background of this video. The car remains the same size because the photographer progressively walks backwards. youtube.com/shorts/fK7iWF-…

@Djof @EpicSportSaga @CuriosityonX With that said, why does earth appear much larger then by comparison to the Apollo 8 image?

@Pb_sndwich @CuriosityonX More powerful lens. Looks like the new picture was taken zoomed in at 400mm according to the exif data, while the older picture might have been taken at an equivalent ~135mm (250mm on 6x6) according to my quick search.

@CuriosityonX If the recent picture was taken from farther from the moon's surface than the 1968 picture, why does the Earth look bigger and closer?

@EpicSportSaga @CuriosityonX Artemis 2 is much further from the moon than Apollo so you can see the curvature. They just have a more powerful lens.

@CuriosityonX Why can I see the curvature of the moon from so close?

@CarlaMo76196589 @JosephB1823 @CanadianPolling @338Canada Polls align with the federal election results, so they aren't surprising. If you're going to make a great claim like all polls are false, you'll need a great proof. Have you sampled 1000 Canadians throughout the country? I think you're just projecting your bias.

@Djof @JosephB1823 @CanadianPolling @338Canada Polls do not align with public sentiment. It is clear to most Canadians that polls are now being used as a tool to influence public opinion, Not report on it. In a similar fashion, our media has been corrupted...

(Models Available For Subscribers) Federal Polling: LPC: 44% (-) CPC: 33% (-8) NDP: 9% (+3) BQ: 6% (-) GPC: 3% (+2) PPC: 2% (+1) Others: 2% Liaison / April 4, 2026 / n=930 / MOE 3.1% / IVR (% Change w 2025 Federal Election) Visit @338Canada for polling details: 338canada.com

@JosephB1823 @CanadianPolling @338Canada "Do you understand basic math?" Polls usually sample 1000 people, and there are over 33 million adults in Canada.

@CanadianPolling @338Canada Have these pollsters ever asked your opinion?

@PapaBrianSmith @CanadianPolling

@CanadianPolling Perhaps Canadians should be asking God his opinion.

Pierre Poilievre Favourability Polling: Unfavourable: 52% Favourable: 38% Liaison / March 28, 2026

@hirotographer @drone_skyfish x.com/i/status/11225…

これはSkyfish視点？(違う @drone_skyfish

@cordes_ron @Badham23 @CanadianPolling 2x straw man fallacies, but also false. lol

@Djof @Badham23 @CanadianPolling The fact that “they” support carney disproves your theory of they them it other having a higher intelligence over Kyle

Mark Carney Approval Polling Among: 🟢 All: +32% 🟢 Others: +36% 🟢 Women: +33% 🟢 Men: +32% 🟢 18-34 Year Olds: +26% 🟢 35-49 Year Olds: +35% 🟢 50-64 Year Olds: +36% 🟢 65+ Year Olds: +34% Liaison / March 21, 2026

@LeonWBrown2 @SummerFantasies You're forgetting the part your beloved businesses will pollute our air and water completely unchecked, not to mention all the other exploitative behaviors. "Just making money" won't buy you a healthy planet. We're all in this together, we need to start acting like it.

@SummerFantasies Start a business, hold massive wealth, then do what you want with YOUR money. Be forewarned though, people just like you will be telling you what you should be spending your money on.

I don’t want a city on Mars. I don’t want AI on every app. I don’t want data centers in space. I want clean water. I want our food to be safe. I want the bees to survive.