Ryan Cole MD

A virus or some other pathogen emerges somewhere in the world. The media shifts into apocalyptic mode. "Experts" appear to be predicting catastrophe. Computer models project millions dead, if the right circumstances coalesce. Politicians declare emergencies. Pharmaceutical companies announce new products. Social media turns into a digital panic attack. And ordinary people, who just wanted to buy eggs and walk the dog, suddenly feel like civilization is one cough away from collapse. Wash. Rinse. Repeat. This is how psychological bioterrorism works. The pathogen itself matters less than the emotional payload attached to it.

FFS, they're doing it again: Deb Birx, former Covid Task Force Coordinator, calls for "widely available" PCR "testing" for hantavirus, hints it should be used in schools "Because we're not testing populations... we don't really know whether there are subclinical cases" "There could be more human-to-human transmission than we actually see" "It's never good to track viruses through symptoms, we should be tracking viruses through blood tests like PCR, we learned that with Covid" "Many universities were able to open and schools were able to open because they provided weekly testing" "We need to make testing more widely available to those who need it"

The collapse of trust in science is going to go down in history as one of the most sad, bizarre, and destructive social contagions of modern times. We fed billions, cured diseases and powered nations - yet people ran toward conspiracies instead.

The FDA knew the COVID shots would kill and maim countless Americans. They kept injecting anyway. One government employee tried to sound the alarm about “49 examples” of deadly side effects that conventional safety analyses weren’t detecting. She was shut down. Her name was Dr. Ana Szarfman. On March 1, 2021, less than three months after the rollout of the COVID-19 injections, Dr. Ana Szarfman, an employee at CDER and safety data mining developer, warned that the FDA’s existing system could hide vaccine safety signals due to a flaw called “masking.” She proposed a newer method developed by statistician Dr. William DuMouchel that corrected for this issue and, when applied, detected “49 examples of extreme masking” that the standard system did not. These “49 examples of extreme masking” include not “minor” but serious adverse events: • Bell’s palsy • Cardiac failure • Acute left ventricular failure • Agonal rhythm (severe end-of-life arrhythmia) • Pulmonary infarction • Cerebral artery occlusion • Aortic stenosis • Sudden cardiac death • Hypertensive emergency • Basal ganglia stroke When Dr. Szarfman proposed a new method, she was told to “hold off on creating and sending data mining reports and analyses.” Later, they “made it clear” that she “needs to focus on her assigned work” and “should not be discussing or providing internal analyses externally.” As Dr. Szarfman puts it, her work became a “pest” for raising concerns about safety signal masking. In September 2021, Dr. Peter Marks, the FDA's top vaccine official, decided that Dr. Szarfman’s COVID vaccine data-mining days were over. He informed Dr. Patrizia Cavazzoni, the then director of CDER, that Dr. Szarfman “has been asked to cease and desist conducting her data analysis.” Dr. Marks complained that Dr. Szarfman’s work had become “a major distraction” and that her efforts could “create erroneous conflicts that feed into anti-vaccination rhetoric.” Dr. Szarfman went on to retire from the FDA in 2025 after more than 35 years of service. She raised concerns about safety signal masking. The FDA essentially told her to shut up. Because in their eyes, “49 examples of extreme masking” could create “erroneous conflicts” and fuel “vaccine hesitancy.” Unfortunately, this is not a one-off instance. It’s part of a much deeper problem: the gap between what’s known internally and what’s allowed to reach the public. 🧵