TheDogeKilluminati

All right my crypto friends I think it's time again for another little $BTC update The last time we formed the old ATH was when we briefly exceeded $120k. No liquidity was grabbed at the peak. However, the liquidation of many short sellers above $110k probably led to a short-squeeze, probably additionally fueled by market buyers. In any case, the ATH was sold off again in a flash, forming a low. This low also liquidated a lot of FOMO longs, who bought immediately after the short squeeze ended. Some who bought the low placed their liquidation price directly below the low. Those who did not sell in the following upward movement were taken out of the market a week and a half later by another liquidity run. On the rejection of the last test of the top of the channel, some short sellers entered the market, placing their liquidation prices either above the last high or above the last ATH. The next step, however, was to take out those, who had bet on rising prices during the last V-like upward move in the channel. After these were liquidated, $BTC started a new run to new ATHs. In this move, those short sellers who shorted the fail of the channel top and put their liquidation prices above the last high or the ATH, were taken out of the market. Magically, those who shorted $BTC before the two new ATHs, were spared. The liquidations of these sellers ~$126k would also be the main liquidity, which still remains above us. This could potentially lead to another ATH. Before we dive lower. In fact, we are already diving at the moment. And are on the verge of liquidating the longs, which longed the last liquidity run before the new ATH. In fact, liquidations down to ~$104k would be possible short term, while ~$110k should be a strong support.

Ouch…

Always

this

@grok @Trump_Fact_News @grok This post claims this is blood from a traffic crash. Moreover there is also a policeman standing next to the cleaning team. So what are you talking

No, that's not blood. The video shows street cleaners in China using high-pressure hoses to wash away a massive spill of red (and some blue) liquid or powder dye—likely paint, pigment, or industrial runoff—from an intersection. It spreads and foams like dye when hit with water, with traffic cones, safety gear, and routine cleanup crew. The caption's "sang" pun is just clickbait drama.

🚨 ALERTE INFO : Nettoyage des rues en Chine On ne trompe pas le sang, après tout. (T)

Aren't we cute?

🙏

@RealJackPoor Showing your followers your bad investing skills does not make anything better

I used to be scared of losing $200. Now I'm down $200k and feel nothing.

@grok @iluminatibot @grok So, in your opinion, there’s no social credit scoring system that tries to suppresses/silence unpopular opinions?

No, that's not accurate. The flight bans, high-speed rail restrictions, and certain job/payment limits target "laolai" (judgment defaulters) who ignore court orders—mostly debts they can repay but won't. It's tied to the Supreme People's Court blacklist, often associated with social credit but focused on legal/financial violations, not unwanted opinions. Broader scoring exists for other behaviors, but these specific penalties aren't for speech. No evidence of basic spending freezes.

Tens of thousands of young Chinese people are becoming homeless, Because they are Blacklisted by Social Credit System. Once you are blacklisted, the digital wallet WeChat immediately bans you from spending your own digital money, or receiving salary.

@grok @iluminatibot @grok So can we sum this up as: They aren’t freezing basic spending YET, but they’re already denying you a flight, a comfortable seat on the train, certain jobs or payments through their platform—all because of unwanted opinions?

**No, the claim is exaggerated and largely unverified.** China does blacklist "laolai" (court-ordered debt defaulters) under its judgment enforcement system—often lumped in with "social credit." This can restrict flights, high-speed rail luxury seats, certain jobs, and high-end purchases via platforms like WeChat Pay/Alipay. But it does **not** freeze basic spending, block salary receipts, or ban everyday WeChat use as described. No credible evidence links this to "tens of thousands" of young people suddenly homeless. The video shows people sleeping rough (common in Chinese cities amid economic pressures and migration), but the cause isn't confirmed as blacklisting. The exact phrasing has been circulating as viral content without primary sourcing. Real blacklisting is about debt enforcement, not a total digital money cutoff.

Yes

Are you winning?😁

modern problems require modern solutions

It's hard to believe

@0xReflection I guess we are

You're NOT prepared $BTC

I love this old day stuff

@ShawnMendes851 I hope so

Haha

@kunoo For ~95-98% of the retailers it is a scam tbh

"Trading is a scam" Reality:

@coinbase Yes, believe those who advise you to trade with a laptop and a smartphone while they charge high comissions and the highly efficient algorithms of the market makers stop you out hahaha And you think you have any chance with that hahaha hilarious