Dom
1.7K posts

Dom
@Domtasc
Crypto Trader, father of 3 awesome boys, and a Bills fan through and through.
Katılım Aralık 2021
21 Takip Edilen48 Takipçiler

@Norma5387953815 758¹¹ (758 to the eleventh power) so...
47,463,664,112,147,951,110,247,919,982,592
English

@Craigster2k3_ @Eva_x_2210 @Norma5387953815 Well the whole point was moving only one match stick, you dick bag
English

@DavidFischer @DavidHi43655821 Not only was He there, He is the Creator. John 1:1-3 "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God and the Word was God... without him was not anything made that was made." 1:14 "And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us..." Carpenter wasn't a coincidence ⬆️⬆️
English

@DavidHi43655821 No but Jesus was there during the Creation act and inspired the writings of Genesis so it is indeed all about Jesus and what He has done. 😎
English

@DavidFischer Yes. It couldn't be more clear biblically. "The evening and the morning were the first day" second day... etc
English

@DavidFischer I used to be rabidly pre-trib.... then I read the bible for myself and saw that a secret rapture of the church is NOWHERE to be found in the bible.
English

@greggrosenthal The same guy whose defense allows 33 ppg in playoff losses.... no thanks
English

@Domtasc @MistrunsLA @iam_johnw Go read the rules. Your act common to the game has to happen AFTER control and 2 feet/1 body part down. If Cooks tucked the ball away (I see no evidence he did but ok) it was before 2nd foot/leg hit the ground,
English

@kevin_siracuse Here's the thing. I wanted McD gone, but of ALL the playoff losses so far.... FIVE freakin' turnovers. It's a wonder it wasn't 54-0... Allen shares the blame, but he is also the only reason it was competitive at all. Weird times
English

I don’t know who needs to hear this but:
Sean McDermott’s defense did not hold up in the playoffs again.
And…
Brandon Beane did not give McDermott and Josh Allen enough pieces to work with on either side of the ball this season.
Both are allowed to be true and both are valid reasons as to why the #Bills are not in the Super Bowl, once again.
#BillsMafia
English

@MistrunsLA @iam_johnw So, is one football move more valuable than another football move according to the rulebook? Because "tucking the ball away" is a football move. Cooks did that with full possession before he was down by contact. So if Cooks made a football move, he didn't have to STG either.
English


@DylanVonArxMHH @Zach_Segars Lol. No logical response when the hypocrisy is clear.
English

If the ball never left your hands, there wouldn’t be this controversy
Also, look at Cooks reaction in the moment. He didn’t run to the ref to argue his case
He KNEW he didn’t catch it
Good Morning Football@gmfb
"At the end of the day it was a catch" @brandincooks on the controversial play from last Sunday #BillsMafia | #BroncosCountry
English

@DylanVonArxMHH @Zach_Segars He said it in the locker room interview right after the game. Also, he was hurt on the play and was slow to get up. Probably had his breath knocked out. You guys like to whine about using screenshots to prove points and then share them to prove your own points.
English

@Zach_Segars Also waited close to a week to say anything about it
English

@kurt13warner 3. If you must survive the ground after a football move where you are then down by contact, then the other two "catches" last weekend should've been INTS as well. That's the argument. Not what if he dropped the ball after ground contact w/out a football move.
English

@kurt13warner 1. The actual argument is did he have possession of the ball AND make a football move BEFORE he was DBC? According to the NFL rulebook, "tucking away the football" is a FM. Did the tuck the ball? If he made a football move before he was DBC, STG doesn't apply.
English

So I feel I have a pretty good handle on rule, but maybe I don’t & want to fully understand it, so answer these two scenarios:
1) Same exact scenario with Cooks (no McMillian in sight) - he catches hits ground with possession, as he’s rolling over loses ball - is this catch or no catch?
2) A WR dives for a ball - catches ball but defender has hand in the play, WR hits the ground with ball & defenders arm that’s in play knocks ball out a tick after WR hits ground - catch or no catch?
Michael F. Florio@MichaelFFlorio
Should out to the Network and @gmfb for allowing this I’m moving on after this, but the NFL Films angle literally shows the ball still tucked after they roll. You can see the moment McMillan tugs, Cooks arms then extend and he loses the ball. He had it through the ground
English

@kurt13warner 2. If he had possession and tucked the ball (football move) he doesn't have to survive the ground. If a player has to survive the ground after a FM, then no matter how many steps they take after a catch, they cannot fumble the ball after DBC, or it would still be incomplete/INT.
English

@KelbermanNFL Should've ended on a P.I. in regulation. Bills should've won outright. Even after 4 turnovers.
English

@JDrz16 @Chandler28138 @TheVicMonte "Tucking away the football" is a football move, so you are exactly right. He had clear possession, tucked away the ball, and was then down by contact before the ball came out.
English

@Chandler28138 @TheVicMonte Taking it from a high point catch and bringing it into the body is a football move and makes Cooks a runner at that point. As soon as knee goes down the runner is down by contact. Football move can be a third step, q change in ball position, or a reach with the ball to gain yards
English










