Doctor≠Provider

2.1K posts

Doctor≠Provider banner
Doctor≠Provider

Doctor≠Provider

@DontSayProvider

Dedicated to helping all Physicians fix this mess. And yes, I'm a real MD in private practice. My views are those shared by healers, not providers.

Doctors Lounge Katılım Eylül 2015
1.5K Takip Edilen1.4K Takipçiler
Doctor≠Provider
Doctor≠Provider@DontSayProvider·
“Healthcare Providers” He doesn’t mean physicians. He means hospice companies. But since the term “healthcare provider” isn’t defined, his statement is misleading. Let’s stop using that term for physicians and clinicians. Ok? @JDVance @DrOz
Andrew Kolvet@AndrewKolvet

UNBELIEVABLE. Vice President Vance just did a double take after hearing this wild stat dropped by Dr. Oz: "You're saying that we kicked off 800 fraudulent healthcare providers off of the Medicare system and not a single one of them called the government and said, 'hey, you made a mistake?'" "It's just completely insane."

English
0
1
2
200
Doctor≠Provider retweetledi
Mark Cuban
Mark Cuban@mcuban·
If you think all we need to do in healthcare is let people shop for prices and they will fall, is ridiculous The number of hospitals and insurance comps walking away from each other, particularly for Med Adv, tell us everything That the entire HC system is designed to make it IMPOSSIBLE to price shop Hospitals don't know their costs and can't set prices to insurance companies  Insurance companies do their best to manipulate transactions (latelq, underpay, deny, etc)  All of MA is an attempt by the carriers at arbitrage   They bet that they can break the law, and never adhere to reporting regs  and the worse that can happen is they might get fined   They bet that hospitals don't know their margins or profits on a per plan or carrier basis and they will make stupid decisions  That is starting to change   Now they are using AI to manipulate prices and costs in real time, knowing providers use consultants for Rev mgt, making them unable to respond in months, let alone real time They bet that by gaming MLR with subsidiaries, they can further break the law and not get caught  Bottom line , it's not an efficient market , due to zero transparency at the transaction level ,and the concept that individuals can shop based on price , when neither hospitals or insurance companies know what their actual costs and prices are , is insane  Carriers manipulate and obfuscate every number they can with the goal of making it impossible to know actual prices Good luck shopping for prices on all bu the simplest, most obvious services
English
312
409
2.5K
255.6K
Doctor≠Provider retweetledi
Doctor≠Provider retweetledi
Mark Cuban
Mark Cuban@mcuban·
Everything is working so well right now. People hate the economics of healthcare. They are terrified they won’t be able to afford what they need and they already can’t afford their deductibles. Employers have to pay 30k a year and it impacts their hiring and firing decisions. The big vertically integrated companies game MLR, game managed Medicaid. Under pay, over charge , year apart independent pharmacies and physicians It’s the furthest thing from an efficient market. And you think breaking them up would be worse ? How could it possibly get worse
Anish Koka, MD@anish_koka

Republicans will screw these things up just as often as Democrats. Which is why breaking up the health systems or the big health insurance companies would be a bad idea. We should go after the regulatory drivers of these monopolies (there are many) rather than use the big brother government cudgel to break them up.

English
190
173
1.5K
360.9K
Doctor≠Provider retweetledi
PhRMA
PhRMA@PhRMA·
On the Hill this week, we heard how insurers are standing between patients and care. New data shows 70% of patients are initially denied coverage for a prescribed medicine, delaying or preventing treatment. Patients should not face red tape. It is time to put them first. phrma.org/blog/briefing-…
PhRMA tweet mediaPhRMA tweet mediaPhRMA tweet mediaPhRMA tweet media
English
7
21
37
214.1K
Doctor≠Provider retweetledi
Mark Cuban
Mark Cuban@mcuban·
Most insurers aren’t insurers. They are holding companies that arbitrage capitated systems and self insured employers, looking for weaknesses and lack of contract enforcement in state, federal and commercial organizations
Larry Levitt@larry_levitt

Insurers are not directly the primary cause of health spending growth. But, with major insurers posting strong profits as health care costs grow, it’s reasonable to ask what value they provide for the overhead they consume.

English
96
169
1.2K
402.5K
Doctor≠Provider retweetledi
Anthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA
Anthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA@DrDiGiorgio·
Doctors should be leading healthcare to eliminate that friction. Too often it has been placed there by committees and bureaucrats who never practiced medicine. Doctors get assigned “just another few clicks” and, a decade later, the discharge process requires an hour on the computer. There’s another good point here about needing to stay on top of people to get stuff done. Too often, a doctor’s order is interpreted as a suggestion. A CT scan doesn’t get done with just an order, it requires multiple phone calls and, occasionally, the doctor wheeling the patient down themselves. Of course, if the doctor raises their voice in frustration, they are labeled as disruptive. The doctor gets disciplined and the friction remains in place. This doesn’t happen when the people creating these processes are the same ones delivering care.
Leah Pierson@leah_pierson

One of the hardest things about practicing medicine is something doctors get virtually no formal training in: navigating friction in advancing patient care. Our health care system is a massive, complex bureaucracy; doing things that seem relatively straightforward—like discharging a patient—require checking dozens of boxes. There are lots of people in the hospital who facilitate this, but as the doctor, you’re the point person; you need to get the paperwork done, orders in, prescriptions delivered, insurance sorted, follow ups arranged, right people looped in, and so on. For every task you’re not directly in charge of, you have to ensure that the person who is in charge is on the ball. Doing this well requires having incredible organizational/management skills. But no one ever formally teaches you these skills; you learn (or fail to learn) them on the job. Having never gotten formal training in this, my prior is that these skills are hard to teach well. But if they *were* taught well to doctors, I suspect our health care system would run better and that health care workers would be less stressed out.

English
4
7
65
4.9K
Doctor≠Provider
Doctor≠Provider@DontSayProvider·
Wow!
Anthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA@DrDiGiorgio

Imagine your surgeon preparing for your operation. They see you in pre-op, answer your questions, calm your fears, examine you, confirm the plan, and go get ready for the case. They review the imaging and think through the critical parts of the operation. Then a nurse interrupts them: “Doctor, your pre-op documentation isn’t good enough. You can’t just say you discussed the risks and benefits. You need a full H&P.” The surgeon points out that the H&P was already done in clinic. The note is right there in the chart. “No. That note is 31 days old. It has to be within 30 days. But it’s fine if you just copy and paste that old note.” Think about how insane that is. There is no new clinical information. There is no patient benefit. There is no improvement in safety or quality. The only thing being demanded is duplication. A pointless bureaucratic ritual to satisfy the machine. So now you have a frustrated surgeon, a delayed case, a bloated chart, and one more example of modern medicine confusing clerical box-checking with patient care. This is exactly what is wrong with the system. Endless note bloat. Pointless duplication. Administrative nonsense dressed up as professionalism. If there are no changes, there are no changes. Forcing a doctor to re-paste an unchanged H&P adds absolutely nothing for the patient. And the most insulting part is the tone. That smug, condescending “of course you have to do it this way” attitude, as if this is self-evidently necessary instead of obviously stupid. At this point, a lot of doctors would probably take a substantial pay cut to never touch a computer again. Cut the salary and use the savings to hire people to do the computer garbage. Epic. CDI queries. Coding queries. H&P updates. Order entry. Case booking. Inbox nonsense. All of it. Never touch Epic again. Never answer another coding query. Never update another unchanged H&P. Never place another order that a clerk or protocolized team could enter. Never do another ounce of hospital data-entry cosplay. Just let us be goddamn doctors instead of highly trained documentation technicians.

QST
0
0
0
100
Doctor≠Provider retweetledi
Bradford Holland MD MBA FACS
Bradford Holland MD MBA FACS@DrBradHolland·
Shame on @NBCNews for having a “Doctor of Optometry” who has her own line of eye cosmetics as the medical expert for eye and facial rejuvenation. Dr. Tsai is not a medical doctor and should not be interviewed as one. Get an ophthalmologist or Oculoplastic physician!
Bradford Holland MD MBA FACS tweet media
English
20
14
166
19.8K
Doctor≠Provider retweetledi
Adam Bruggeman, MD
Adam Bruggeman, MD@DrBruggeman·
One Point of Failure: Why Consolidation Made the Change Healthcare Attack Worse At the April 2024 Energy and Commerce Health Subcommittee hearing, Rep. Larry Bucshon made it clear that the FTC needs to look at healthcare sector consolidation. The Change Healthcare attack was catastrophic not just because it was a sophisticated ransomware operation, but because the entire country’s claims infrastructure had been routed through a single entity controlled by the largest health insurer in the United States. UnitedHealth Group, through Optum, acquired Change Healthcare over the formal objection of the AHA, which had urged DOJ to block the deal years earlier. One company now processed an estimated 50 percent of all medical claims while simultaneously running the nation’s largest commercial insurer and aggressively acquiring physician practices. John Riggi, the AHA’s National Advisor for Cybersecurity and Risk and a former senior FBI Cyber Division executive, testified at the same hearing that it took CMS 18 days to begin allowing providers to apply for accelerated payments. For practices with weeks of cash on hand, 18 days is an eternity. I raised a point in my own testimony that has received less attention than it deserves. Some practices whose cash flow was completely cut off and whose reserves were exhausted were subsequently acquired by Optum during the crisis. There were reports of Optum using the financial emergency caused by the cyberattack on its own subsidiary as legal justification to expedite those acquisitions. Optum had the data to know exactly what each practice billed in a typical week. There was no structural reason UHG could not have continued weekly payments based on historical billing and reconciled on the back end. Insurers receive premiums in advance. They had the money. They just chose not to release it and then purchased the practices that ran out of runway waiting for help. Beyond the competitive dynamics, there is a technical problem I outlined for the committee. Physicians do not choose their clearinghouse. We do not independently select which EHR to use separate from which clearinghouses that EHR supports. Switching EHRs costs tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars and months of productivity loss. We are structurally dependent on agreements between EHR vendors and clearinghouses, and when those agreements fail, we bear the cost. After the attack, some alternative clearinghouses charged higher fees specifically because practices had nowhere else to go. Cybersecurity and consolidation are not separate policy problems. Concentrating more of our healthcare spending and infrastructure around single points of failure makes every future attack more severe, more costly, and harder to fix.
Adam Bruggeman, MD tweet media
English
4
3
5
313
Doctor≠Provider retweetledi
Doctor≠Provider retweetledi
salaryDr
salaryDr@SalaryDr·
The average nonprofit hospital CEO earns $3.5M a year. The average primary care physician earns $260K. One of them sets your doctor's salary.
English
24
57
568
23.8K
Doctor≠Provider retweetledi
Kevin Pho, M.D.
Kevin Pho, M.D.@kevinmd·
You can't hold hospital privileges without taking call. Call isn't compensated. That's not a calling. That's coercion. Internal medicine physician Corinne Sundar Rao names something physicians have absorbed for decades without ever being able to articulate it cleanly: call is labor. Not a professional obligation. Not a rite of passage. Labor. And it has been either unpaid or minimally compensated for as long as it has existed. The mechanism is worth understanding. To practice what you trained to do, you need hospital privileges. To keep hospital privileges, you take call. There is no opt-out. The work is tethered, undefined, and endless. One day runs into the next. You carry a full patient load after an overnight on call and you are expected to keep going. No other profession works this way. Pilots have mandatory rest periods because fatigue at high stakes is a patient safety issue. The argument applies equally to surgeons making complex decisions after 30 hours without sleep. The hospitalist model is the clearest proof that the old system stopped working. Nobody decided philosophically that hospitalists were a good idea. The system just broke down until it had to adapt. Defined shifts replaced open-ended obligation. The word hospitalist was first coined in a 1996 New England Journal of Medicine article, and the model has been expanding ever since. The laborist model in obstetrics followed the same logic. High-volume hospitals recognized that asking one physician to manage clinic, elective surgeries, GYN, and overnight deliveries was not a sustainable structure. So they separated the labor floor from the rest of the work. Call hasn't made that transition yet across most of medicine. And the cost is becoming visible. Physicians are quietly leaving. Not dramatically. They are going part-time, shifting to direct care or concierge models, or stepping away from clinical medicine entirely. Physician compensation accounts for only 8 to 8.6% of total U.S. healthcare costs. This is not a compensation problem. It is a structural one. Call is not an infinite resource. It is labor. Labor must be compensated, defined, and protected with rest. Corinne Sundar Rao on The Podcast by KevinMD. Listen link in the first comment.
Kevin Pho, M.D. tweet media
English
45
83
382
78.2K
Doctor≠Provider retweetledi
salaryDr
salaryDr@SalaryDr·
In 2012, 76% of physician practices were doctor-owned. Today it's 37%. In one decade, physicians went from running medicine to working for it. Private equity. Health systems. Insurance companies. Everyone's extracting value except the people seeing patients.
English
31
60
437
15.3K
Doctor≠Provider retweetledi
Anthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA
Anthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA@DrDiGiorgio·
Stark law is a great example of “rules for thee but not for me.” If you’re an independent doctor who owns an MRI, you can’t refer your own patients to that MRI. If you work for a corporate health system that also owns an MRI, you can refer your patients to that MRI.
Dutch Rojas@DutchRojas

Everyone thinks Stark Law prevents corruption. It does not. It prevents independent physicians from operating integrated clinical delivery models. Hospital-employed physicians face no such constraint. The law does not ban self-referral. It bans self-referral by the wrong kind of physician…

English
14
112
948
32K
Doctor≠Provider retweetledi
Dutch Rojas
Dutch Rojas@DutchRojas·
Everyone thinks Stark Law prevents corruption. It does not. It prevents independent physicians from operating integrated clinical delivery models. Hospital-employed physicians face no such constraint. The law does not ban self-referral. It bans self-referral by the wrong kind of physician…
English
15
59
365
40K
Doctor≠Provider retweetledi
Waseem Ullah, MD
Waseem Ullah, MD@wuchau·
Dr. Mitchell Katz (CEO of NYC Health + Hospitals) just said he wants to replace “a great deal of radiologists” with AI right now. The only thing stopping him? The FDA. My response: Replace yourself first, Dr. Katz. Here’s why. 🧵 @CrainsNewYork @RadiologyBiz @NYCHealthSystem
English
19
21
168
25.6K