"Some times I wonder if you got with me just to stare at me constantly. I mean im naked infront of you with no one around and your still fully clothed are you gonna change that love~"
Unghh~ ur massive white DICK is about to widen my throat like... 3x the size~
*I press my tatted titties together* I NEED you to STUFF it down my EAGER FUCKING THROAT~
I- ill get more tats if you want daddy~ just keep stuffing me~ <3
#Loona
Welcome to Bowerstone!
The beating heart of Albion, where there are more opinions per square foot than anywhere else you'll visit on your adventure.
#Fable#FableTheGame
@ItsGamerDoc@Trainwreckstv Hey doc, I thought you would say this exact line and do the whole tos fallback shtick so here’s a rebuttal: if the players were boosting, previously banned for it too at that, then why was train only banned for this? Why put the blame on the one person NOT breaching tos?
Clarifying the @Trainwreckstv ban:
This wasn’t just a 5-stack with friends on their own accounts.
An Immortal player (with prior boosting bans on their main) was swapping between MULTIPLE lower-rank smurfs/shared accounts they did not own. That group ran ~80% winrate across ~50 games.
This directly violates ToS section 15a (a): “playing on another person’s account or otherwise engaging in activity intended to “boost” an account’s status or rank.” riotgames.com/en/terms-of-se…
Quick note on the leaked screenshot: I typed “account he doesn't know” by mistake I meant “doesn’t own”. Typo on my end, my bad. I had already said multiple times in the conversation that there were people in that stack using accounts they didn’t own, so I didn’t think I needed to re-clarify it. That part got taken completely out of context.
5-stacking is completely fine if everyone is on accounts they personally own and hand-leveled. We’ve been actioning the shared-alt + deliberate MMR lowering version for over a year (probably longer). We even made public announcements about it: x.com/ItsGamerDoc/st…