Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Drikus Combrinck
7.8K posts

Drikus Combrinck
@DrieksCombrinck
Redeemed entrepeneur and investor tweeting about investments, markets, philosophy, economics and politics from a Christian worldview.
Pretoria Katılım Ağustos 2011
1.9K Takip Edilen4K Takipçiler
Drikus Combrinck retweetledi
Drikus Combrinck retweetledi

Back in Q3 2023, we highlighted the Strait of Hormuz as a geopolitical risk investors should not ignore.
Not because we knew the timing.
But because in a changing world, portfolios need exposure to energy, real assets and optionality — not just traditional equity/bond diversification.
That is no longer a side issue. It is core portfolio construction.
capicraft.co.za/wp-content/upl…

English
Drikus Combrinck retweetledi

“If anyone is not willing to work, let him not eat. For we hear that some among you walk in idleness, not busy at work, but busybodies. Now such persons we command and encourage in the Lord Jesus Christ to do their work quietly and to earn their own living."
— 2 Thessalonians 3:10–12
hunter@3gpmh
how grotesque is the expression “earn a living”
English
Drikus Combrinck retweetledi

DA's task is to be biggest party in KwaZulu-Natal, says party leader Geordin Hill-Lewis
brnw.ch/21x2kZ0
English

How very Arthur Burns of him
First Squawk@FirstSquawk
FED'S MIRAN SAYS THE FED SHOULD IGNORE ENERGY SHOCKS.
English
Drikus Combrinck retweetledi

Another 100 million barrels will be lost between now and then.
First Squawk@FirstSquawk
Senior US Official: If No Agreement Is Reached With Tehran Before Trump's Return From China Trip, The Military Option Will Be Back On The Table. - Israel's Channel 12
English

While everybody is wating for the art of the deal, let me remind you:
COVID was instant demand destruction with supply still flowing — inventories exploded.
An Iran energy shock is the inverse: demand remains, but supply disruption arrives with a lag as oil already on the water keeps landing.
The danger is that the market reads “no immediate shortage” as “no shortage.”
English

The market seems to treat continued AI improvement as automatically bullish.
I’m not sure that follows.
LLMs may keep improving, but with rising marginal cost and falling marginal returns.
At first, more compute, data and model size buy big capability jumps. Later, the bottlenecks migrate: power, chips, latency, data quality, inference cost, workflow integration, trust and regulation.
So the key question is not: “Will AI get better?”
One should accept that it will.
The better investment question is: “Will the next dollar of AI capex buy enough incremental intelligence to earn attractive returns?”
AI can be transformative and still overcapitalised.
The technology can be real while the extrapolation present in the stock market is wrong.
English
Drikus Combrinck retweetledi
Drikus Combrinck retweetledi

BREAKING: According to our analysis, ~$920 million worth of crude oil shorts were taken 70 minutes before an Axios report claimed the US and Iran were near a "14-point" deal to end the war.
At 3:40 AM ET today, nearly 10,000 contracts worth of crude oil shorts were taken without any major news.
This is equivalent to ~$920 million in notional value, an unusually large trade for 3:40 AM ET.
At 4:50 AM ET, just 70 minutes later, Axios reported that the US is "close" to a "memorandum of understanding" to end the Iran War.
By 7:00 AM ET, oil prices had fallen over -12% with these crude oil shorts gaining approximately +$125 million.
Minutes later, Iran launched the "Persian Gulf Strait Authority" and oil prices surged +8%.
What just happened?

English

@madaboutmarkets Not to mention that Capex cycles are by their very nature cyclical.
English







