Dustin Ashe

5.4K posts

Dustin Ashe banner
Dustin Ashe

Dustin Ashe

@DustinAshWrites

Catholic convert from Presbyterianism. Mother of God apologetics. Dad & Husband. Tech, improv, & writing. Mother of God conversion memoir incoming.

Katılım Mayıs 2024
293 Takip Edilen2K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Dustin Ashe
Dustin Ashe@DustinAshWrites·
Wes, taking this seriously because you take it seriously. The framing assumes Catholic doctrine is works-righteousness. Trent Session 6 and the 1999 Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification (signed by Catholics, Lutherans, Methodists, Anglicans) settled that the Reformation dispute on sola fide rested significantly on mutual misunderstanding. Justification is by grace through faith. Works are fruit, not cause. The actual difference is downstream. Catholics teach justification is an infused condition that can be lost through mortal sin and restored through reconciliation. Reformed Baptists teach perseverance of the saints, that authentic faith cannot be lost. Both positions take Christ’s finished work seriously. They differ on whether justification is a single completed forensic declaration or an ongoing infused condition. You are not wrong that we teach salvation can be lost. We are not wrong that Christ’s grace is the cause throughout. The “in spite of” frame misses that we believe what we believe is the Gospel, not its contradiction. On Reformation as retrieval. The Didache (50-110 AD, contemporary with the New Testament) calls the Eucharist a sacrifice and requires confession of sins before communion. Ignatius of Antioch (110 AD), a disciple of John, calls the Eucharist “the medicine of immortality” and centers the bishop in ecclesial unity. Justin Martyr (150) describes the Mass recognizably. Irenaeus (180), two generations from John through Polycarp, defends apostolic succession explicitly. The Fathers are not inspired scripture. They are historical witnesses to what the apostles taught the men they personally trained. If the Reformation retrieved the true Gospel, the Gospel got lost almost immediately after the apostles died, because the apostles’ own disciples are teaching what the Catholic Church teaches now. Newman, examining this evidence, concluded that to be deep in history is to cease to be Protestant. The conventional-not-convenient distinction you drew is right. The question is what the principled examination of the historical evidence reveals. Many of us have done that examination and arrived at Rome. Respectfully, the receipts are in the apostles’ own disciples. Start with the Didache. Then Ignatius. Then Irenaeus. The Gospel they preach is the Gospel the Catholic Church preaches now. Mary, Mother of God, pray for our unity in her Son.
English
4
6
19
891
Dustin Ashe
Dustin Ashe@DustinAshWrites·
@OrdinariateUSA They performed miracles and their words were tested against scripture
English
0
0
0
186
𝔃𝔞𝔠𝔥𝔞𝔯𝔦𝔞𝔰 𝔰
The prophets performed miracles to prove they were sent by God Jesus performed miracles to prove he was sent by God The apostles performed miracles to prove they were sent by God The reformers were not able to perform miracles to prove they were sent by God, and their sects have been devolving and fracturing ever since
English
4
4
106
3K
𝔃𝔞𝔠𝔥𝔞𝔯𝔦𝔞𝔰 𝔰
During the reformation, there were so many Catholic miracles that the Protestants couldn’t explain, that they were forced to become cessationists and automatically label any miracle, vision or apparition as demonic. This worked well for them because the Protestants themselves had basically no miracles.
chiara 🇲🇽🇻🇦✨@catholichiara

Why would a so called “demonic entity” appear to a non Christian civilization and then that said civilization convert in mass to Catholicism?

English
28
154
2K
64.2K
Dustin Ashe
Dustin Ashe@DustinAshWrites·
Wes, on the Reformation as restoration and the multiplicity of denominations as strength. I will concede the first half. The Reformation applied real pressure to real Catholic abuses, and the Catholic Church responded. The Council of Trent (1545-1563) reformed indulgence practices, mandated seminary education for clergy, addressed clerical concubinage and absenteeism, standardized liturgy, and reaffirmed doctrines that had been muddled by late-medieval popular practice. Many of these reforms were overdue and the Reformation forced the timeline. A Catholic in 2026 should be able to say plainly that Luther was right about Tetzel, that the 95 Theses raised real problems, and that Trent’s reforms were genuine reforms rather than mere reaction. The Catholic Church has acknowledged this in its own documents, including the 1999 Joint Declaration. But the second half is where I cannot follow you. The argument that multiple denominations is a strength because people are different rests on a category error. Catholic universality already includes radical multiculturalism. The Catholic Church in Toronto includes Ethiopian, Filipino, Mexican, Vietnamese, Polish, Lebanese, and Anglo-Saxon Catholics worshipping the same Mass with the same sacraments under the same Magisterium. The differences are real and honored within one Church. There are 24 sui iuris Catholic Churches in communion with Rome, with different liturgies (Maronite, Chaldean, Coptic, Byzantine, Syro-Malabar, and more) all sharing the same faith. Diversity of culture inside doctrinal unity is what the Catholic Church already is. What Protestant denominations have is doctrinal diversity, which is different. Baptists and Presbyterians do not just have different cultural expressions. They have different doctrines of baptism, different ecclesiologies, different soteriologies, different sacramentology. They cannot worship at one another’s communion tables in good conscience because they do not share what is being done at those tables. The 30,000+ denominations problem is not cultural variety. It is doctrinal contradiction, and it is what sola scriptura produces when there is no Magisterium to settle disputes. Christ prayed for unity in John 17:21, “that they may all be one… so that the world may believe that you have sent me.” He grounded the credibility of the Gospel in visible unity. Doctrinal fragmentation is not the strength Protestantism claims. It is the wound Christ named before it happened. The Reformation forced needed reforms. Yes. The price was a fragmentation Christ explicitly prayed against. That trade is the question.
English
0
2
8
157
Dustin Ashe retweetledi
Dustin Ashe
Dustin Ashe@DustinAshWrites·
The man deep into history ceases to be Protestant
Dustin Ashe@DustinAshWrites

Wes, taking this seriously because you take it seriously. The framing assumes Catholic doctrine is works-righteousness. Trent Session 6 and the 1999 Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification (signed by Catholics, Lutherans, Methodists, Anglicans) settled that the Reformation dispute on sola fide rested significantly on mutual misunderstanding. Justification is by grace through faith. Works are fruit, not cause. The actual difference is downstream. Catholics teach justification is an infused condition that can be lost through mortal sin and restored through reconciliation. Reformed Baptists teach perseverance of the saints, that authentic faith cannot be lost. Both positions take Christ’s finished work seriously. They differ on whether justification is a single completed forensic declaration or an ongoing infused condition. You are not wrong that we teach salvation can be lost. We are not wrong that Christ’s grace is the cause throughout. The “in spite of” frame misses that we believe what we believe is the Gospel, not its contradiction. On Reformation as retrieval. The Didache (50-110 AD, contemporary with the New Testament) calls the Eucharist a sacrifice and requires confession of sins before communion. Ignatius of Antioch (110 AD), a disciple of John, calls the Eucharist “the medicine of immortality” and centers the bishop in ecclesial unity. Justin Martyr (150) describes the Mass recognizably. Irenaeus (180), two generations from John through Polycarp, defends apostolic succession explicitly. The Fathers are not inspired scripture. They are historical witnesses to what the apostles taught the men they personally trained. If the Reformation retrieved the true Gospel, the Gospel got lost almost immediately after the apostles died, because the apostles’ own disciples are teaching what the Catholic Church teaches now. Newman, examining this evidence, concluded that to be deep in history is to cease to be Protestant. The conventional-not-convenient distinction you drew is right. The question is what the principled examination of the historical evidence reveals. Many of us have done that examination and arrived at Rome. Respectfully, the receipts are in the apostles’ own disciples. Start with the Didache. Then Ignatius. Then Irenaeus. The Gospel they preach is the Gospel the Catholic Church preaches now. Mary, Mother of God, pray for our unity in her Son.

English
0
1
1
75
Dustin Ashe
Dustin Ashe@DustinAshWrites·
Jews celebrate Hanukkah to this day. The feast commemorates the rededication of the Temple in 164 BC, an event recorded in 1 and 2 Maccabees, the books you say Jews never regarded as authoritative. Jesus himself attended the Feast of Dedication in John 10:22. But the deeper issue is the history of the canon, and the direction of the change runs opposite to what you said. The Septuagint, the Greek scriptures used by Greek-speaking Jews across the Mediterranean and quoted constantly by the New Testament authors, included the deuterocanonical books. The Qumran community kept copies of Tobit and Sirach. The wider canon was in Jewish use before the rabbinic consolidation. The narrower Hebrew canon Protestants follow was fixed by rabbinic Judaism after 70 AD, after Christianity had already emerged using the Septuagint. The Reformers in the 1500s chose to follow that later rabbinic canon over the canon the apostolic Church actually used. And Trent did not add the deuterocanonical books. The Councils of Rome (382), Hippo (393), and Carthage (397, 419) all listed the same canon including them. Augustine defended them. They were in Jerome’s Vulgate. They were in every Christian Bible for over a thousand years before the Reformation. Trent reaffirmed them in response to the Reformers removing them. The “addition” was the subtraction. The Reformers removed books that had been canonical since the fourth century. Trent defined what had always been there.
English
2
6
23
871
Dustin Ashe retweetledi
Dustin Ashe
Dustin Ashe@DustinAshWrites·
Wes, taking this seriously because you take it seriously. The framing assumes Catholic doctrine is works-righteousness. Trent Session 6 and the 1999 Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification (signed by Catholics, Lutherans, Methodists, Anglicans) settled that the Reformation dispute on sola fide rested significantly on mutual misunderstanding. Justification is by grace through faith. Works are fruit, not cause. The actual difference is downstream. Catholics teach justification is an infused condition that can be lost through mortal sin and restored through reconciliation. Reformed Baptists teach perseverance of the saints, that authentic faith cannot be lost. Both positions take Christ’s finished work seriously. They differ on whether justification is a single completed forensic declaration or an ongoing infused condition. You are not wrong that we teach salvation can be lost. We are not wrong that Christ’s grace is the cause throughout. The “in spite of” frame misses that we believe what we believe is the Gospel, not its contradiction. On Reformation as retrieval. The Didache (50-110 AD, contemporary with the New Testament) calls the Eucharist a sacrifice and requires confession of sins before communion. Ignatius of Antioch (110 AD), a disciple of John, calls the Eucharist “the medicine of immortality” and centers the bishop in ecclesial unity. Justin Martyr (150) describes the Mass recognizably. Irenaeus (180), two generations from John through Polycarp, defends apostolic succession explicitly. The Fathers are not inspired scripture. They are historical witnesses to what the apostles taught the men they personally trained. If the Reformation retrieved the true Gospel, the Gospel got lost almost immediately after the apostles died, because the apostles’ own disciples are teaching what the Catholic Church teaches now. Newman, examining this evidence, concluded that to be deep in history is to cease to be Protestant. The conventional-not-convenient distinction you drew is right. The question is what the principled examination of the historical evidence reveals. Many of us have done that examination and arrived at Rome. Respectfully, the receipts are in the apostles’ own disciples. Start with the Didache. Then Ignatius. Then Irenaeus. The Gospel they preach is the Gospel the Catholic Church preaches now. Mary, Mother of God, pray for our unity in her Son.
English
4
6
19
891
Dustin Ashe
Dustin Ashe@DustinAshWrites·
@OrdinariateUSA Yeah a lot of it is documented in Unhumans where they always say it was good that Christianity was being destroyed
English
1
0
2
114
𝔃𝔞𝔠𝔥𝔞𝔯𝔦𝔞𝔰 𝔰
In 1945, eight Catholic priests in Hiroshima survived the atomic blast. Fathers Lassalle, Schiffer, Kleinsorge, Cieslik and their cohort were known for their daily prayer and Rosary devotion. They lived in a Jesuit rectory under a mile from ground zero of the Little Boy atomic bomb. Their building remained standing even as the entire surrounding city was totally leveled. None of the priests were seriously injured or showed any short- or long-term signs of radiation sickness. They all lived long lives and spoke publicly of their stories. The dioceses of Hiroshima and Nagasaki had the highest concentration of Catholics in all of Japan, numbering over 80,000 total between them.
𝔃𝔞𝔠𝔥𝔞𝔯𝔦𝔞𝔰 𝔰 tweet media
English
9
87
365
27.3K
Dustin Ashe
Dustin Ashe@DustinAshWrites·
@BishopJaxi They believe in accepting everyone as they are and they can hold whatever beliefs they want as long as they aren’t Catholic
English
0
0
5
139
Bishop
Bishop@BishopJaxi·
Same Bible. Different doctrines. Different churches. Different moral teachings. Different "gospels." The fruit of sola Scriptura is chaos, anarchy, and disunity. The one true Church is not found in Protestantism, because Protestantism is the antithesis of "one."
Bishop tweet media
English
115
115
750
14.6K
Dustin Ashe
Dustin Ashe@DustinAshWrites·
@creation247 You’re saying they must cast a blasian trans man as Jesus Christ is resurrection of the Christ This is what you’re saying and you are right
GIF
English
0
0
0
37
𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐀𝐫𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐏𝐮𝐫𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐞 🇺🇸
Racially diverse casting resuscitates frozen images of antiquity. Representation empowers modern viewers to access classical myth and experience its emotional resonance. The Odyssey dates to a period where people then didn’t look like us now. So in order to protect its timeless relevance, enlightened filmmakers now realize that themes like exile, danger, longing, temptation, and the ache to return home do not belong to one race or one sexual orientation or gender identity. Therefore, a progressive Odyssey reimagining depicts us all because it must. As but one example, a truly representative major motion picture Odyssey adaptation could not have been accurately cast prior to 2020—only Elliot Page can star ... not "Ellen" Page. Subverting expectations of whiteness is absolutely an erasure, to agree with the Muskovitian trolls, but yet it is a necessary, consumer-friendly, interpretative approach that allows an old story to feel relevant, universal, and newly alive.
𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐀𝐫𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐏𝐮𝐫𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐞 🇺🇸@creation247

Can you spot the difference?

English
11
3
30
5.2K
The Honey Badger
The Honey Badger@Nance726·
Bottom line: America First Conservatives have woken up & chosen to reject Zionism. “There are ‘Daily Wire’ YouTube videos that now, after a few days online, have less than 10,000 views, a catastrophically small number for a channel with more than 3 million subscribers. The top comments all mock the low view counts.”
New York Magazine@NYMag

There was a time, not very long ago, when Ben Shapiro could reasonably call himself the king of all conservative media. That’s all over now, writes political columnist Ross Barkan. Shapiro’s company, ‘The Daily Wire,’ is instituting significant layoffs. Its YouTube channel’s subscriber base is starting to shrink, and its website has emerged as one of the great traffic losers in conservative media. There are ‘Daily Wire’ YouTube videos that now, after a few days online, have less than 10,000 views, a catastrophically small number for a channel with more than 3 million subscribers. The top comments all mock the low view counts. “If a variety of poor business decisions can be blamed, in part, for the ‘Daily Wire’’s fall from grace — ill-fated investments in feature films, an epic fantasy series, and peculiar merchandise — the greater story is the collapse of Shapiro’s constituency,” writes Barkan. “There are two realities to Shapiro conservatism in 2026: It retains a significant foothold among Republican elites, and it is fast being rejected by the future grassroots of the party.” Read more: nymag.visitlink.me/KtpIKV

English
11
12
72
2.1K
Geeks + Gamers
Geeks + Gamers@GeeksGamersCom·
Pedro Pascal Promotes The Mandalorian and Grogu by Kissing Stephen Colbert On The Mouth "For many online, the moment immediately became meme material. But it also raised another question entirely: how exactly is this helping promote The Mandalorian and Grogu to mainstream Star Wars audiences?"
Geeks + Gamers tweet media
English
2.1K
445
5.1K
1.6M
Anthony
Anthony@Catholicizm1·
Holy shit. He can’t be serious. They’ll talk to literal sex trafficking perverts before a traditional Catholic. I’m done with all of them. Fradd, Trent, Barron. They’re disgusting.
Anthony tweet mediaAnthony tweet media
English
142
106
1.6K
86.2K
Dustin Ashe
Dustin Ashe@DustinAshWrites·
@Nance726 Evangelicals believe Isaiah 53 is about Jewish people and they will send them more and more money because they believe they are suffering for the whole world
English
1
0
2
48
Dustin Ashe
Dustin Ashe@DustinAshWrites·
@creation247 You would be unhappy too if you had to watch Pedro Pascal
English
1
0
3
250