๐๐ก๐ ๐๐ซ๐ญ ๐จ๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ ๐บ๐ธ
46.4K posts

๐๐ก๐ ๐๐ซ๐ญ ๐จ๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ ๐บ๐ธ
@creation247
I am a millionaire educator that is turning X into my personal Art Gallery.






As a non blue check haver, when you get a few big tweets, Elon will put a pop up on your page like, โoh, hey I noticed youโve gotten some engagement lately, would you like to pay me to become a slave to these numbers?โ


This is how the algorithm can completely destroy your reach over night. This is the last: Left: 3 months Right: 2 weeks Super consistent 85-95% drop on all metrics. everything after a viral post going ballistic, I tried everything, cool down, delete low quality posts, block bot accounts. Kept posting after cool down, nothing really breaks through. Short hot takes ๐ Long form with good signal ๐ Viral potential post ๐ Core audience value post ๐ What bothers me here is that 48h after posting a mega viral post I get suppressed back to the Stone Age. This follow previous situations Iโve had with the grok powered algorithm. Where it feels like tweepCred falls far below a certain level, and youโre locked into a low reach prison with every effort to break out is making it harder and harder to do so. Iโm asking for transparency on what we can do as content creators when this happens. I donโt want to spam my way out of this. Iโd like to know, if I did something wrong, how I can address it, take the responsibility of algorithmic suppression for what ever the length is. But this limbo is most likely going to make me leave the platform.

Critique of the ๐ algorithm is welcome. There will be monthly updates of the latest algorithm to GitHub with release notes. As reminder, you can always choose no algorithm via the Following tab.

We interviewed NYT best-seller Joshua Lisec This is what happens when he detects AI: "When someone feels it's AI is a wall goes up. It's because they demonstrate by copying and pasting the output that they don't actually know if what they're saying is true or not."


Your X account can be like a CV and business card rolled into one








"Would you marry someone less intelligent than you?" Outright "no": Women: 45% Men: 8% Women are nearly 6x more likely to rule it out entirely. The single largest gender disparity in our deep-question dataset.






