Emmanuel Adegboye

3.2K posts

Emmanuel Adegboye banner
Emmanuel Adegboye

Emmanuel Adegboye

@EMIXwrites

HR Generalist ( in view). Meta & Google Ads Specialist. Talent Strategist.

Lagos Katılım Aralık 2021
661 Takip Edilen507 Takipçiler
Emmanuel Adegboye
Emmanuel Adegboye@EMIXwrites·
This is accurate, this is my stand as well. I am working on a video with this. You have to put in structure before making demands.
Ajoje⚽⚖️@israel_ajoje

My thoughts on the NPFL and the licensing requirements. Earlier this year, I was invited to speak at the African Football Convention in Morocco, and during one of the sessions the conversation turned, as it always does, to regulating football finance in Africa. Someone asked me what new regulations we needed to bring order to the domestic game. My response was simple: we do not need new laws. We need to ensure that the laws that exist are actually followed. Laws are not shiny toys or spoils of war that you display to tourists. The purpose of a regulation is seen when it is live, when it is enforced, and when it is used as a means to an end, whether that end is justice or order. A law that exists only on paper is decoration, and African football has had enough decoration. Let's bring this back home. I am in support of rigorous club licensing in the NPFL. A system that tolerates failure guarantees it, and we have been tolerating failure for long enough that it has started to feel like the standard. Hon. Bukola Olopade's position on limiting the 2026/27 season to only compliant clubs is the right instinct. But the conversation cannot start and stop at the ₦2 million minimum monthly salary and other requirements without first examining whether the environment has been made genuinely conducive for clubs to meet that standard. Let me give you a concrete example of how far we are from even enforcing what already exists. When I went through the NLO framework, I found that players in the Nationwide League One are supposed to have insurance coverage covering mild injuries, career-threatening injuries, and death. The life insurance cover mandated for players in the NLO is ₦1 million. One million naira. That is the value Nigerian football has placed on the life of a player at that level. And the more revealing part is not even the amount. It is the fact that the majority of clubs do not carry out this insurance policy at all and are still allowed to participate in the NLO season after season without consequence. That is the enforcement problem in its most human form. That's where I think we should start. The NFF Club Licensing Regulations, adopted in 2014 in line with FIFA and CAF directives, already cover six key areas: sporting criteria, infrastructure, personnel and administration, legal, financial, and business and commercial requirements. Clubs are supposed to have written player contracts, qualified medical and technical staff, approved home grounds, CAC registration, and proof of financial sustainability before they are granted a license to compete. These standards exist. The framework is there. What has been consistently absent is the will to apply it without fear or favour, which is exactly what Ibrahim Gusau directed the new NPFL board to do when he addressed the NFF Executive Committee in Asaba recently. Clubs treat these regulations as mere suggestions rather than rules that they MUST follow. However, there has to be a balance. Enforcement alone, without first creating the conditions for compliance, is punitive rather than developmental. And here is the mathematics that Hon. Olopade's office needs to sit with before the ₦2 million minimum salary becomes a hard requirement. According to some NPFL Adminsitrators that I have spoken to, running an NPFL club currently costs approximately ₦500 million per year, and that is on salaries that range an average of ₦300,000 to ₦800,000 per player. If the minimum salary is raised to ₦2 million per month across a squad of 25 players, clubs are now looking at ₦50 million per month in player wages alone, which is ₦600 million per year before a single operational cost is accounted for. By the time you calculate electricity, transport, medical staff, stadium maintenance and administration, the actual running cost will soar comfortably above ₦1 billion per year per club once you include wages at the new minimum. If we take a look at "saner climes", we would see that clubs across Europe operate on a squad cost ratio of approximately 60 to 70 percent of total annual revenue. That is the UEFA benchmark, and it is the model that keeps clubs financially sustainable. At ₦600 million in player wages alone, the recommendation is that clubs should be generating at least ₦1 billion in annual revenue. In England, France, and Germany, that revenue comes from matchday income, broadcast rights, sponsorship, merchandise, and commercial activity driven by fans who have enough disposable income to spend on football. In Europe, citizens spend between 9 and 16 percent of their income on discretionary items, which includes tickets, jerseys, fan merchandise, and subscriptions. In Nigeria, that discretionary spending capacity exists for approximately 1 to 3 percent of the population. The commercial ecosystem that funds European clubs simply does not exist at the same scale in Nigeria yet, and raising salary minimums without first building that commercial base puts the financial burden entirely on club proprietors, most of whom are already subsidising Nigerian football from their personal resources with minimal to no return. What Hon Olopade needs to put in place before the salary demand becomes enforceable is a commercialisation strategy that actually generates revenue for clubs. The ₦2.5 billion prize pool announced for the 2026/27 season is a meaningful step. The ₦2 billion broadcast and data deal signed in 2025 is another. But broadcast revenue needs to be distributed in a way that reaches all clubs, not just the title challengers. Sponsorship frameworks need to be created at league level and not left entirely to individual clubs to negotiate. Matchday infrastructure needs investment so that attending an NPFL game becomes a genuine commercial proposition for fans and not an act of loyalty to a broken experience. The licensing framework is not wrong. The salary ambition is not wrong. What would be wrong is demanding compliance from clubs in an environment that has not yet been built to support it, and then calling it reform. My name is Ajoje and I am a FIFA Licensed Agent and International Sports Lawyer. I talk about the Law and Business of Football, a lot. Repost and Follow me if you want to read more posts like this.

Ikeja, Nigeria 🇳🇬 English
0
0
1
38
Ajoje⚽⚖️
Ajoje⚽⚖️@israel_ajoje·
Yesterday, I promised to tell you guys about the ruling that MAY change the Football Agency Industry. And I will. But I want to give you guys a background first so you can get the context of the issues involved. In August 2016, Paul Pogba moved from Juventus to Manchester United for a world record fee of €105 million. One agent, Mino Raiola, represented all three parties in that transaction simultaneously. He represented Pogba the player, Manchester United the buying club, and Juventus, the selling club. Football Leaks documents later reported that Raiola earned approximately €49 million from that single deal. €27 million from Juventus, €19.4 million from Manchester United, and a further €2.6 million from United paid on Pogba's behalf. That is not the main issue but I believe it is the world FIFA's Football Agent Regulations were designed to end. I hope I have not lost you. Now you may ask- What exactly was the FFAR trying to fix? FIFA approved the Football Agent Regulations in December 2022 and brought them into force on 9 January 2023. Before then, what had existed was the FIFA Regulations on working with Intermediaries(RWWI). The RWWI had been in existence since 2015 and the main thing it did was to deregulate the Football Agency Industry. Anyone could become an Agent (or intermediary as they then were) as all they had to do was register with their National Association. However, as at 2022, the system became highly unregulated and opaque, with FIFA estimating that roughly 70-75% of global transfers were completed by individuals who weren't formally licensed agents. So FIFA had issues with 1) Multiple Representation- where an intermediary could represent more than one party in a transaction, thereby breeding room for conflicts of interests. 2) A lack of salary cap as some Agents were charging as much as 40-45% of players' salaries cos there was no regulation prohibiting it. 3) Lack of Identification as there was no unified standardized way of knowing who was and was not an Agent. And so on. Just stay with me please. FIFA then introduced the FFAR to deal with these issues. Article 12 of the FFAR introduced the multiple representation prohibition, the rule that says an agent cannot simultaneously represent more than one party in the same transaction. Under Article 12, what Raiola did in the Pogba deal is no longer permitted. Now, you have to pick your client and represent them. The rule has slight exceptions tho but this is not about that. Article 15 introduced the service fee cap, the provision that limits an agent representing a player to a maximum of 3% of that player's annual salary if the salary is above $200,000, or 5% if below that threshold. For a buying club, the cap is 3% of the transfer fee. For a selling club, 10% of the transfer fee. In dual representation cases, which I stated earlier that FIFA permits under very specific conditions, the maximum doubles. On paper, this sounds reasonable. In practice, on a €50 million transfer with a player earning €3 million a year, the agent representing the player earns a maximum of €90,000. The agent on the selling club side earns a maximum of €5 million. The disparity between those two numbers tells you exactly why player agents pushed back so hard. That is not even the biggest deal with the rule in my opinion. The biggest deal is that generally speaking, Agents rarely complete deals alone. They usually work wioth at least one other Agent. Sometimes, even two. It is even worse that most of the football transactions that happen are worth less than 1m Euros. So if three Agents come together to rep a player on a 1m Euro deal, based on the 3% rule, they earn €30,000 together and €10,000 each. That may be the only deal they complete in that window! And that is assuming that the deal is worth up to a million. A lot are worth less than that. In fact, the vast majority are. Article 16 introduced the client pays rule, which states that only the party an agent actually represents can pay their fees. So if you represent the player, only the player or his club can pay you on his behalf. Not both clubs. Not the selling club as a side arrangement. Just your client. Article 14(12)(a) introduced the pro rata payment rule, which ties agent fee payments to the duration of the contract they helped negotiate, paid in instalments over the life of that contract rather than in one lump sum upfront. This sounds quite fair. And Article 19 introduced mandatory transparency provisions, requiring the FIFA Clearing House to publish sanctions imposed on agents and detailed data on every transaction involving an agent. The Agents kicked backed against this lol. Of course there was pushback. The pushback was immediate and it came from multiple directions at once. Agents took FIFA to court over some of these provisions of the FFAR. In Germany, the District Court of Dortmund issued a preliminary injunction in May 2023 targeting the fee cap, the mandatory Clearing House, and the multiple representation rules. The Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf upheld that injunction in March 2024. In England, four of the world's largest agencies, CAA Base, Wasserman, Stellar, and ARETÉ, commenced FA Rule K arbitration proceedings in June 2023 challenging the implementation of the FFAR through the FA's National Football Agent Regulations. On 30 November 2023, the Tribunal, presided over by Lord Collins of Mapesbury, Christopher Vajda KC, and Lord Dyson, found that the fee cap and the pro rata payment rule would breach the UK Competition Act 1998 if implemented, and that they constituted a restriction of competition by both object and effect. The client pays rule and the multiple representation prohibition were upheld as lawful in England and can be implemented. By December 2023, the legal pressure across Europe had become so significant that FIFA suspended implementation of the key FFAR provisions for all transfers linked to the EU through Circular 1873 (pzpn.pl/public/system/…), and then extended that suspension worldwide to prevent uneven application. What this meant was that the Global Transfer system went back to being unregulated and Agents- and people pretending to be Agents went back to doing as they pleased. But there was a judgment that was made yesterday. It may change the whole thing. That's where we are at now. The cases that made it to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) were RRC Sports v FIFA, ROGON v German Football Association, and Tondela v Autoridade da Concorrencia. The core question was whether the FFAR violates Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the provisions that prohibit cartels and abuse of dominant position. They Claimants alleged that FIFA had abused its use of dominant position in perpetuating some of the provisions of this regulation. The court confirmed that the licensing requirement, the service fee cap, the multiple representation prohibition, the client pays rule, and the pro rata payment rule can all be justified in principle. But the court simultaneously declined to rule definitively on whether specific provisions breach competition law, passing that question back to national courts to assess on a case by case basis. Two provisions were found to restrict competition by effect. Article 14(12)(a), the pro rata rule that strips an agent of fees already earned if a player moves to a new club even when that agent had no involvement in the new transfer, was ruled harmful to competition on its face. And on Article 19, two GDPR provisions were struck down: the public disclosure of sanctions imposed on agents, and the publication of detailed transaction data involving agents. That second one matters more than it sounds. Because if not, every deal made wold have been published in a FIFA Clearing House report showing exactly how much you earned, who your client was, and what the full transaction involved, your commercial relationships and your client list would have effectively been public information. The court said that crosses a line under European data protection law. So where do things actually stand? The fee caps remain suspended in England following the Rule K Tribunal ruling. They remain suspended across most of Europe pending national court decisions that the ECJ has now effectively sent back down the chain. FIFA has until 1 January 2027, when the new transfer system enters into force, to reach a consensual agreement with agent representatives. They have confirmed they are inviting agents to a meeting in the coming weeks. The summer transfer window is open right now. There is no binding global fee cap in operation. Multiple representation, while prohibited in principle under the FFAR, is being contested and is not uniformly enforced. And the transparency provisions that would have given the public full visibility of what agents earn in every deal have been partially dismantled by a GDPR ruling. Now what do I think? I am not exactly sure of what to expect. But I know the service fee cap will surely end up being more than 5%. It should end up around 10. and the mandatory licensing requirements and the prohibition on multiple representation will continue. There will be more definitely. But I think these will be the most evident changes. My name is Ajoje and I am a FIFA Licensed Agent and International Sports Lawyer. I talk about the Law and Business of Football, a lot. Repost and Follow me if you want to read more posts like this.
Ajoje⚽⚖️@israel_ajoje

A judgment that will/may shake the whole football Agency industry was passed today.

English
21
67
277
35.9K
Ayanpoju Ayanyemi Ayanpoju
Ayanpoju Ayanyemi Ayanpoju@Ay4292Ayanyemi·
Despite been lower than us, they will defeat any NPFL team on the continent. Last season Asante Kotoko defeat Kwara united home amd away. Ghana premier league is doing thing on a low
Olodo sporting Lagos fan@Big_zecret

@Ay4292Ayanyemi Lol not really, Nigeria league is still ranked ahead of Ghana at the moment based on CAF club rankings

English
4
0
2
132
Haaland_Rodri
Haaland_Rodri@HaalandRodri·
@Filom25 @Obeyamark @EMIXwrites It does. It's the greatest tournament of all time. bronze, silver all matters. your rapist idol has zero medal and featured zero times in team of the tournament
English
1
0
0
22
M. O., What A Guy!
M. O., What A Guy!@Obeyamark·
Spain had never made it to world cup Semis until Jesus Navas played for them and they got to the semis and then won the cup. Portugal had won a world cup medal before Ronaldo. Ronaldo has zero world cup medals with Portugal. Jesus Navas did more for Spain than Ronaldo for Portugal.
UG@UgwunnaEjikem

Context is important: Messi plays for a super Argentina team that had 2 WC titles before he was born, now 3 Ronaldo plays for a barren Portugal that had 0 titles before he was born, now 3 Question: who did more for his country?

English
8
29
148
11K
SCOREpion 🦂⚽🔥
SCOREpion 🦂⚽🔥@Hakeem_Onitolo·
A self-contained room at Saka Lane, Abule Ijesha, is available for lease for 10 months at ₦900k (total payment). It has an AC, a bed with frame, a washing machine and a fridge in good condition. There is also a microwave (condition unknown). The owner has traveled and wants to lease out his remaining 10 months on the premises. The lessee can use the items for the duration of the lease. A student in the area is most preferred due to the lease duration, but it is open to anyone interested. Send me a DM if interested.
Lagos, Nigeria 🇳🇬 English
10
32
105
15K
Emmanuel Adegboye
Emmanuel Adegboye@EMIXwrites·
@Legbetiofficial I do that. A lot of people I follow give a lot of valuable engagement.... I don't think I am leaving the platform soon.
English
0
0
1
37
Oyindamola🌸🤎
Oyindamola🌸🤎@Oyinsopretty·
The only thing i will miss about this school is groove.
Oyindamola🌸🤎 tweet media
English
5
1
42
1.1K
Emmanuel Adegboye
Emmanuel Adegboye@EMIXwrites·
This is the peak of a Referee's career. It's only meant for the best 0.0000000000001%. Time and chance is a big deal, you might be qualified, but might be restricted due to external factors. I am happy for him, at the same time, jealous. Only one African referee did this.
English
0
0
0
27
Olamide Awoyinfa
Olamide Awoyinfa@DPundit28·
🚨 Confirmed: Pelumi Abiara has been appointed as the Team Manager of Ekiti United. ✅ Excellent appointment! A very smart and positive move that deserves the full support of all stakeholders alongside the technical team.
Olamide Awoyinfa tweet media
Olamide Awoyinfa@DPundit28

If Ekiti United is fully committed, the club needs serious reform. @abispelumi10 should hold a key position. My brother has a Diploma in Sports Management (FIFA/CIES, Cairo, Egypt) & should be leading the charge! We need to get serious. I don’t usually speak out, but this matters

English
13
12
24
4.4K
M. O., What A Guy!
M. O., What A Guy!@Obeyamark·
Luka Modric has 2 world cup medals. Ronaldo has zero.
English
18
55
356
9.2K
M. O., What A Guy!
M. O., What A Guy!@Obeyamark·
@EMIXwrites Who compared it to gold? Ronaldo tried to win that same medal and failed WOEFULLY at it. Simple.
English
2
0
8
403
Michael Olorunfemi
Michael Olorunfemi@Saint_Mickael·
We'll be talking why one player is greater than the other based on the game, Ronaldo fans will be giving points like: "he played in different leagues" 😩😩. Adapting to different FOOTBALL (not another sport) environments is now a special ability for a football player? 😩😩😩😩
English
2
0
1
86
Emmanuel Adegboye
Emmanuel Adegboye@EMIXwrites·
@Obeyamark Thank you for the answer. They won it in 1966. A bronze medal, but you compared it to winning the actual trophies for them. It's different. Gold will always outclass Bronze.
English
2
0
0
419
Emmanuel Adegboye
Emmanuel Adegboye@EMIXwrites·
@omolewa_jr @mrwedeofficial @jon_d_doe True, but it's not only peculiar to the female nature though. But there is a quest for disrespect that needs to be studied immediately there's a bit of familiarity to the opposite sex.
English
0
0
1
54
kenny
kenny@omolewa_jr·
@EMIXwrites @mrwedeofficial @jon_d_doe U think some of them actually learn? Many of my friends talk and play with a lot of the young girls in my area except me. Some of them even find it hard to greet me and i dgaf. Na see finish i no dey like for my life.
English
1
0
1
19
Bùkúnmi Samuel ODÉYEMÍ
Bùkúnmi Samuel ODÉYEMÍ@theboybukunmi·
Oga, rest. You’re really using pure sentiment to fight an academic and job-market battle. ​First of all, you can call it 'exile,' but it's more of a serene environment compared to the noise and 'cultists' wahala you face daily. ​Bringing up a personal scandal to judge a whole federal university’s academic strength is funny and will forever be. If we want to start listing the wild, undocumented things that happen in Poly Ibadan, we won’t leave here today ​Also, saying Poly Ibadan has 'more active Aluta' as a flex is wilddd. That’s just a fancy way of saying 'we love constant protests, school closures, and spending 6 years to get a 2-year ND.' 😭 Who Aluta help? ​Call it 'Forestry' all you want, but those 'forest' graduates are the ones securing the remote roles, winning national hackathons, and clearing in the corporate space while you're still holding onto 1970 glory. At the end of the day, a University degree from a fast-rising Federal school is a different league entirely. Again, rest abeg😭🤣💔
Bólúwatifẹ́ 🥷🏾@tifemmy_

Lol… 1. Polyibadan is not in an exile state like fuoye 2. Polyibadan didn’t have their SUG 001’s nude leaked like Fuoye 3. Polyibadan has more active Aluta than FUOYE😂. 4. Polyibadan is more recognized than FUOYE😂 I’ll rather attend NOUN or Jeleosinmi than that Forestry

Victoria Island, Nigeria 🇳🇬 English
3
11
53
3.4K