EissaMo🇵🇸🇳🇿

@ReemEb96 Shut up retard. Nobody cares what your stupid opinion is.

@Jih407 أنت كيف بتفهم! مشكلة اوروبا معكم مو مين محتاج لجوء، المشكلة مين بمخه صرماية، يعني متلك، واقصائي ومتطرف. حفيت لأخدت الجنسية وطالع تتفلسف! انت سامع بشي اسمو سحب جنسية، لما تكون بفكر اره١ابي كل جنسيات الدني ما تنفعك لأن النتيجة وحدة

على الحكومة الألمانية أن تبدأ بترحيل الدروز والأكراد والعلويين لسوريا، لأن مناطقهم ما انقصفت ولا تضررت وبيوتهم مازالت قائمة والبنى التحتية عندهم جاهزة، وهم أصلاً ما كانوا معارضين للأسد الحقيقة إنهم استغلوا مأساة السنة بس مشان يحصلو لجوء ورواتب ولأسباب اقتصادية بس.

@Dark_Rider911 Nobody wanted Assad out retard And yes it will be as threat to Israel

@TalAbdulrazaq this is exactly why they wanted Assad out cus he rejected this pipeline project years ago and Europe won't do anything harming to Israel and you expect this is going to be a threat to Israel lol

This is shrewd messaging from Sharaa, playing off anxieties over Iran & Hormuz. However, expect any investments from the Gulf Arabs to create a pipeline to Syria's Mediterranean coast to be viewed as a direct threat to Israel who will do everything in their power to see it fail.

@JayAlfons1 you won't hear a word because we're not interested in refuting your falsehoods and because repeating lies doesn't make them true. that black flag is the flag of the Shahada. You're essentially an islamophobe

@CraigMurrayOrg You will certainly hear no words from any of the Syria dirty war supporters. Once the West succeeded in getting the black flag up over Damascus (aka 'the Syrian revolution') it was job done as far as that lot were concerned.

al-Jolani allowed the IDF to pass through Syrian territory to attack Hezbollah from the East around Mount Hermon. The Syrian government gave the Israelis logistic support. There are no words sufficient.

@emptyhallowed nobody is dreaming to visit your shithole of a nation

@ahmadovichz اكتر مدعاه للسخرية ان مفيش حد متفق معاك غير عايش ف بؤرة خرا ابنمتناكة من أوسخ بقاع الأرض و دول العالم الخامس اللي كل يوم بينام يحلم بالڤيزا لماما أمريكا كسم الضحك بجد

اكبر تجمعات ملهاش فايدة فى الحياة الشعب الامريكى ده ازنى بشرية واعرص مخلوقات على الارض، من يمينهم ليسارهم كلهم مستفيدين من وضع نظامهم الاستعمارى القائم ومحدش منهم عنده استعداد يغير فيه ولو سنتي واحد. نخف بقى اوهام اكبر تظاهرة واكبر تحمع انتخابى وكل الهراء ده

@muqawim14 yes apparently thats too hard to understand.

I want our people in Syria, Yemen, and Iraq to understand this clearly: when resistance leaders praise or show solidarity with Iran, Hezb, Houthis, and others, it is for one reason only: resisting Israel. It doesn’t mean Palestinians support any ظلم committed against you.

@AJABreaking حكومة الكويت الغبية وضعت البلد بموقف صعب لعن الله الدلاخه

@mouradaly @AJABreaking no sympathy for Kuwait. You brought the Americans here and now are feeling the consequences of them abandoning you

@AJABreaking x.com/mouradaly/stat…

عاجل | وزارة الكهرباء الكويتية: قتيل وأضرار مادية جسيمة في هجوم إيراني على محطة للكهرباء وتقطير المياه

If you want an indication of the current state of the discourse Israel is accusing Syria of assisting Hezbollah whilst Hezbollah is accusing Syria of assisting Israel.

@RashmanTheHorse Agreed. Siding against Israel and benefiting from Iran is the right position here. Whether they are insincere or not is more difficult to determine but should not matter in this particular case given the enemy is Israel

Safar al Hawali is a major preacher in the Salafist International. He isn't alone in his relatively supportive view of Iran, though most wouldn't be so open about it.

@RBlue91223 McGurk is a grade A moron

@Shack_Rat @mehdirhasan Brett McGurk has been an advisor for 4 other presents because of his experience, that does not mean they follow his course of action. Why do you think Biden refused to attack Iran when Netanyahu tried to get him to do it? Kamala also wanted to rejoin the Iran deal.

I didn't ask you to support anyone. Nor do I have an issue with you opposing "BOTH" parties. I have an issue with people like you claiming Harris would be "worse" & more "dangerous" than Trump, which was an absurd thing to say at the time, & today is even more absurd of course.

No comparison between the journalists in Gaza like Anas & Co and the ones that posed for pictures with Soleimani in Syria or cheered on barrel bombs dropping on Syrian civilians. Let's not insult them by putting them together with morally corrupt journalists.

@andfogle The balance is incorporating their lived experience into your work. The true view of things isn't held by experts and their own work depends on other people's lives experience

@Roa_emm the balance is bringing ordinary people around one way or another to the true view of things, not giving them blank epistemic checks for their lived experience

The "local voices" thing is just part of a global reactionary-populist trend to dethrone credentialed expertise and objective analysis in favor of views that are idiotic and suicidal (see MAGA or Iranian monarchists). People who have devoted their lives to systematic comparative study absolutely *do know better* about economics, international relations, military strategy, etc. than the average embedded ideological subject. Some of you handle the standpoint epistemology stuff with kid gloves when you should be unsparingly vanguardist.

@atMeshki Chances are you do. To claim it clouds people's judgement is basically to dismiss their experience and pretend that experts don't cloud and distort their work and research for their own agenda

@andfogle Also suffering doesn’t give you special insight. Just because you lived under the repression of the IR doesn’t mean you know better. Chances are your personal grievances cloud your judgment.

@SmithVarta21845 It does actually. You can be angry and spiteful and still objective. The two are not mutually exclusive

@atMeshki @andfogle Bingo. If anything it produces a complex and makes them angry and spiteful. So much so that they become incapable of objective, impartial analysis on the subject.

@KubrickTal Because the West are idiots

@chariotracer_a @MouinRabbani So why is everything i hear from Muslims about dogs negative? Even Mouin's tweet really doesn't paint a glowing picture. Apparently, it's divided at best. Well, that's still not meshing with the west where they are universally beloved.

Fact-free far-right bigot once again claims unparalleled expertise in Islamic jurisprudence because he lived in Lebanon until age 10. In this case, he repeats the demonstrable falsehood that "dogs are haram in Islam". Dogs are mentioned several times in the Quran. One passage relates a parable in which a dog serves as the faithful guardian of a group of believers who hid in a cave to escape persecution. The other specifies that it is permissible to eat animals that have been hunted by dogs and falcons (and thus retrieved in their mouths). There is no Quranic passage that describes dogs as "haram" or forbids keeping them. Islamic clerics have issued multiple views on dogs. Based on the above Quranic references, they are agreed that it is permissible to keep dogs that serve a purpose – such as hunting, herding, and guarding. There is also consensus that dog saliva is impure (“najis”), requiring the special cleaning of utensils that come into contact with it. The clerics are however divided on whether it is also permissible to keep dogs within the confines of the home. Three of the four schools of Islamic jurisprudence consider dogs impure (najis), a concept that is quite different than haram, which entails categorical prohibition. None consider dogs haram. Najis primarily means that if one comes into contact with a dog, ritual purification is required prior to the performance of religious duties such as prayer. Ablutions, for example, are considered invalidated by physical contact with a dog. But the physical contact itself is not forbidden. Basing themselves on different sayings of the Prophet Muhammad, as well as other forms of reasoning, Islamic clerics have generally forbidden keeping dogs as companions, and offered various reasons for doing so. Others only discourage it, and others still permit it. In other words, there is no doctrinal position on the issue across the faith, as there is for example with respect to the consumption of pork or carrion. To claim that "dogs are haram in Islam", or that "Islam hates dogs", is at best a profession of ignorance, and in this case also clearly an exercise in fact-free bigotry for the sole purpose of promoting bigotry. In the example below, fact-free far-right bigot Gad Saad believes he has definitively demonstrated that "dogs are haram in Islam" by reposting a fellow fact-free far-right bigot's account of a single incident. Rather than presenting a legal opinion by a Muslim cleric or conclusions of a study by scholar of Islamic jurisprudence, the incident concerns a statement by a grocery shopper in France. As with so much posted by this pair, it is unclear if the incident is genuine or distorted to amplify the bigotry. If it is real, it changes nothing about Islamic jurisprudence with respect to dogs, no more than it would if a Muslim kept a dozen dogs as indoor pets after receiving a fatwa expressly prohibiting it. Saad’s post is however not without value. It provides - yet again - a valuable insight into his fact-free approach to substantiating his bigotry, as well as into his standards of – for lack of a better term – scholarship.

@CommieMigrant Lol they're citizens of both countries. Why wouldn't they enjoy democracy in Citizens and prefer something else for their home country And the guy isn't an Al Qaeda murderer either

@SyrianShabab Enjoying secularism and democracy in the west but supporting al-qaida murder in Syria without intention of going back to live under his rule. Typical Islamist hypocrisy

This person is talking about Syrians being “shipped back” as if they were animals. Hundreds of thousands of Syrians who came to Germany as refugees now hold German citizenship, and a majority of Syrians there are employed. So Mohammad doesn’t get to decide their political preferences regarding Syrian matters, even if they seem to bother him deeply.

@mashabani We read it and you're clearly a big sharmoota. It's a shame you have that first name

@SyrianShabab Read my tweet carefully

@KyleHil01590047 Stop repeating lies and making shit up. They were prosecuted by the former government and thanks to Assad the majority of the population ended up in mass graves or tents Nobody prosecuted Christians. A brawl between two group isn't a prosecution

@mashabani They can all fuck off. They all lied about being persecuted by the former government, and now celebrating the persecution of Christians by Sunni extremists. Assad’s gov’t “persecuted” child abusers and Sunni crazies, and they fled West. And must be removed NOW.

This kind of footage is a joy for the German government. If Syrians in Germany are so happy about Sharaa's rule, the argument will likely go, surely they can be shipped back to where they came from.

@JohnnySmitmpzc It's pretty obvious that you're a dumb kunt who needs to shut the fuck up and not talk about Syrians or Lebanon

All the Tankie asses are burning. They are suddenly anti-immigration because Syrian people actually like Sharaa more than Assad 🤣

@pashadelics They should have paid off Egypts debt and got them to protect them instead of getting US bases