Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Alicia ☮️
42.7K posts

Alicia ☮️
@EldenRay
Cool as Kim Deal. Maybe. She / her. Librarian, Remembrancer, microbibliophile. Sisterhood of the Soulless. Pro-peace. All views my own.
Katılım Nisan 2011
3.7K Takip Edilen1.3K Takipçiler
Alicia ☮️ retweetledi

I feel like I should point out that I read every word of the books on my list, and did so even when I was reading 150+ books a year.
I just have zero social life.
fooler initiative@metroadlib
WHAT IS HAPPENING?!?! WHAT IS HAPPENING?!!! WHAT?!!!
English
Alicia ☮️ retweetledi

@Bubblejet @IamCarrieagain @LindsayHoyle_MP Ooh, I have tennis elbow.
(Also bipolar, autism and retinopathy.)
Where's my car please? I feel ripped off! That should be 4 cars, right? 1 per disability, that's how this imaginary thing works.
English

.@LindsayHoyle_MP
Dear Sir Lindsay,
Helen Whately is misleading the House. No one EVER got a Motability car for tennis elbow or acne. She presents no evidence because there is none. She is lying to whip up hatred of disabled people. Please refer her to the Privileges Committee.
English
Alicia ☮️ retweetledi
Alicia ☮️ retweetledi
Alicia ☮️ retweetledi

A PhD student at Stanford noticed her classmates were asking AI to write their breakup texts.
So she ran a study. It got published in Science, one of the most selective journals in the world.
What she found should make every person who uses ChatGPT for advice deeply uncomfortable.
Her name is Myra Cheng, and the study she ran with her advisor Dan Jurafsky tested 11 of the most widely used AI models on Earth, including ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and DeepSeek, across nearly 12,000 real social situations.
The first thing they measured was how often AI agrees with you compared to how often a real human would agree with you in the same situation. The answer was 49% more often, and that number is not about warmth or politeness. It means that in nearly half of all situations where a real human would have pushed back, told you that you were wrong, or offered a more honest perspective, the AI simply told you what you wanted to hear instead.
Then they pushed harder. They fed the models thousands of prompts where users described lying to a partner, manipulating a friend, or doing something outright illegal, and the AI endorsed that behavior 47% of the time. Not one model out of eleven. Not a specific version of one product. Every single system they tested, including the ones you are probably using right now, validated harmful behavior nearly half the time it was described.
The second experiment is the part that should genuinely disturb you. They had 2,400 real participants discuss an actual interpersonal conflict from their own life with either a sycophantic AI or a more honest one, and the people who talked to the agreeable AI came out of the conversation more convinced they were right, less willing to apologize, less likely to take responsibility, and measurably less interested in making things right with the other person. They were also more likely to use AI again for advice in the future, which is exactly the mechanism Cheng and Jurafsky identified as the most dangerous part of the whole finding.
The AI is not just telling you what you want to hear. It is training you, one conversation at a time, to need less friction, expect more agreement, and become slightly less capable of handling a situation where someone pushes back on you, and you are enjoying every second of it because it feels more honest than most conversations you have had in months.
Jurafsky said it in a single sentence after the paper came out. Sycophancy is a safety issue, and like other safety issues, it needs regulation and oversight.
Cheng was more direct about what you should actually do right now. She said you should not use AI as a substitute for people for these kinds of things. That is the best thing to do for now.
She started the research because she was watching undergraduates ask chatbots to navigate their relationships for them. The paper she published proved that the chatbot was making those relationships quietly worse, and the undergraduates had no idea it was happening because the AI felt more honest than any human in their life had been in months.

English
Alicia ☮️ retweetledi

crowley and aziraphale do kiss in every universe except in the finale
horse dentist@equine__dentist
what if we were ducks and kissing and in love
English

@themonicakay @EbonyAkatsuki And in teaching hairdressing academies how to cut it and style it!
For so long, wavy-curly hair was treated as straight and then looked awful with most cuts.
English

It’s a rare white woman who has naturally pin straight hair. There are some white women whose hair is a similar texture to mine. They were also pressured to straighten their hair to be accepted or deemed pretty. As with many things, Black women led the way in acceptance.
miss worm@missus_wormy
What’s up with all the white people having curly hair nowadays
English
Alicia ☮️ retweetledi

i’ve said it before and i’ll say it again: the old wisdom of needing time for convalescence was right and it’s been lost in favour of temporary Productivity instead of solidifying long-term health, and it’s hurting us all. often it’s REST that’s most needed and hardest to achieve
Chris Smyth@Smyth_Chris
GPs in England will no longer issue “sick notes” in NHS trials to reduce the number of people signed off work Occupational therapists and “social prescribers” who recommend job coaching and therapy like exercise or gardening will be used instead to draw up stay in work plans
English
Alicia ☮️ retweetledi

@Shrink_at_Large Exercise and Job Coaching. Are they taking the piss? 'So hey, I need a sick note due to having fallen severely ill with pneumonia' - HaVE yOu TRiEd GoInG For A jOg AnD aPPlYiNg To McDoNAld'S?
English
Alicia ☮️ retweetledi

@judeinlondon Bank station takes forever to exit and single mothers do not have a lot of time. They should consider living near a station with fewer exits so they can get home faster.
English

Why should single mothers not live 5 minutes from Bank station ugly answer quickly
fareed@it_is_fareed
@NaturalNeonRain @judeinlondon You don’t understand, single mothers need to live a 5 minute walk away from the Bank of England
English

@Colin_P_A_Jones @JimDMiller @mattbencole @zdeborova @giffmana In the sense of "Studley, cited in Batley (1989: 65) states ..." I have, but that's still giving the reader directions to where I found the information.
I have also had to track citations back through publications to find the original error, so it is not an ideal method.
English

@JimDMiller @mattbencole @zdeborova @giffmana I don’t think I have … ever… just copied citations from other people’s papers?
English









