ًً

@NameLikeAnother Thats an existential threat you created in your imagination. France is not some weak country. They do possess nuclear arsenal too.

Navré mais il a raison. Leur programme balistique, couplé à leur programme nucléaire, représente une menace existentielle pour l’occident tout entier. Ne laissez pas votre haine de Trump biaiser votre jugement sur ce conflit.

@aaboom16 M23 is robbing their recourses as we speak 😂😂😂

Congo just qualified for the World Cup. But instead of celebrating they were busy chanting Somali insults. But if Somalis clap back… they’ll cry racism. Everyone is obsessed with Somalis. It’s wild.

@esjesjesj Rip health care rip handsout

What the fuck does this mean

@WarMonitor3 😂😂😂😂😂

BREAKING: Trump wants to switch to a war economy in 2027-Bloomberg

@yashar Yashar, are you iranian?

So many people are scared to. I get DMs all the time about this. They don’t want to deal with the online harassment and some of them don’t want to deal with attacks from their family and friends.

@yashar Hes bombing random bridges for political purposes 💀

BREAKING President Trump confirms that the United States has bombed the B1 bridge in Karaj. This is civilian infrastructure, a major transportation artery. Where are the MIGA people now? How’s your Amoo (Uncle) Lindsey Graham doing?

@EGYOSINT Doesn’t Iran use chinese made drones?

Iranian air defenses have shot down a Chinese-made Wing Loong II UCAV over Shiraz in southwestern Iran. This marks the first clear evidence of direct involvement by a GCC state in the conflict, most likely Saudi Arabia or the UAE, both of which operate this drone.

@sneako Youre so obsessed. Just stop. Youre doing harm to the nation

Bosnia is with the resistance 🇧🇦

@Geoff00102 @Sijilmaasan @omar_dddg Absolutely not. Israel bombed Syria right after Al sharaa took into power. Just like assadists, the israelis still see him as a terrorist.

@Sijilmaasan @omar_dddg Israel loves him; hes an obedient puppet.

Is Ahmed Al Sharaa a product of the CIA, Mossad, or MI6? Attributing every unexpected political outcome to shadowy intelligence agencies, is uncle analysis that needs to die. It’s a very lazy shortcut that replaces complexity with conspiracy which consistently fails to explain how the world actually works. There is no credible evidence that Ahmed Al Sharaa is a manufactured asset of Western intelligence. What does exist is a well-documented trajectory: he rose through jihadist networks, became a leading figure in Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), consolidated power locally, and repositioned himself politically when circumstances demanded it. That evolution is not unusual and mirrors patterns seen in multiple conflict zones where armed actors transition into political ones when survival requires it. Lebanon is a great example. Relying on statements like Donald Trump claiming he “made” Al Sharaa president only weakens the argument. Trump has a long record of making exaggerated or contradictory geopolitical claims, such as declaring total victories or assigning credit without basis. Trump also said: Turkey won in Syria when Al Sharaa won. The truth is, nobody in the West likes the outcome of Syria, especially not Israel, their internal media doesn’t lie, they hate him and want him gone. So why is the West engaging with Al Sharaa at all? Because they have limited options. The comparison to the Taliban is instructive. The West spent two decades fighting them, only to end up negotiating and ultimately accepting their control of Afghanistan. Not because they supported them but because they couldn’t replace them with anything more viable. Power on the ground matters more than ideological preference. The same logic applies in Syria. HTS is not a conventional state actor that can be easily coerced through bombing or sanctions alone. Groups like this are decentralised, ideologically driven, and often operate with minimal infrastructure. Military pressure can weaken them, but it rarely produces stable alternatives. In fact, history shows the opposite: destroying one dominant faction without a political plan often creates space for something more extreme,ISIS being the clearest example. Al Sharaa appears to have recognised this reality from the other side. By softening his posture and signaling willingness to engage, he is attempting to move from isolation toward legitimacy because sanctions, economic collapse, and perpetual war are unsustainable. That’s not proof of foreign control but it’s just proof of political adaptation. What we are seeing isnt an alliance but convergence of necessity. The West does not trust Al Sharaa. Al Sharaa does not align ideologically with the West. But both sides understand that continued chaos in Syria benefits no one: it fuels extremism, destabilises the region, and prolongs humanitarian disaster. Engagement, however uneasy, becomes the least bad option. Geopolitics is not a story of heroes and villains and puppets and puppet masters. It’s a constant negotiation between constraints, risks, and grey choices. States don’t get to pick ideal partners, they deal with whoever holds power and can influence outcomes. Right now, the West’s objective is limited: prevent Syria from collapsing further, avoid the resurgence of transnational jihadist threats, and, if possible, nudge the country toward a more stable and economically viable trajectory. That doesn’t require belief in Al Sharaa, it only requires acknowledging reality.

Drew, you have adopted the third world mentality subconsciously. Instead of the west being the permanent oppressor, you have replaced the west with anyone that doesnt aligh with Americas interest as oppressors. Youre no better than those people

@1chapesque His obsession stems from his audience tellinh him that islam is a brown religion. To disprove that claim, Sneako regularly visits Bosnia a white majority muslim country to show that islam isnt a brown religion.

i swear dis nigga is dickriding bosnians just because theyre white😂😂😂

And it's precisely people like you - whose ideology is, unfortunately, that of the majority of European elites - who did immense, irreparable harm to Europe. It's now beyond painfully obvious that if Europe had at least applied basic common-sense precautionary principles and told itself that maybe, just maybe, it was insanely dangerous to bet the prosperity and security of 450 million Europeans on the assumption that the most aggressive, interventionist power in modern history would forever make an exception for Europe - we might still have some sovereignty left. This isn't an "extreme left" vs others thing (and the fact you think it is shows you still don't get it at all), it's just a logic vs dumb thing: how can you observe a country systematically destroying anyone who gets in its way over decades and conclude "yes, let's make ourselves entirely dependent on these people, what could possibly go wrong?" That's not liberal sophistication. That's the dumbest bet in the history of geopolitics.

@BrodiiKDB It isnt ok to rape you spaniard

Islam is a strange religion. It is ok to rape women but not to shake hands.

Why are so obsessed with Bosnians? Is it that you use bosnians as political tool to score points against your opponents? Youre a weirdo fr

Are they twins raised in different countries

@whenitjakes That aint world cup then

Concacaf should only have 5 slots

@Ihavebraib @15Redstones @YIMBYKieran 52% is not “majority”

@15Redstones @YIMBYKieran minority shouldn't rule over the majority

One of the worst features of referendums is how the winners act as if it’s permanent and any change to it is a betrayal of democracy and the losers act as if it doesn’t matter and we can have a second referendum a few years later

@PunishedFredda Crazy density. How do people live with minimal space

Trondheim, Norway