Emardon Lareous

Correlation betweeen youth harm and increasing gender dysphoria presentations. For girls it seems the mental health crisis came first around the introduction of instagram

@MrMan_returns @ThePosieParker They also claim he was the last representative of God/Allah, so apparently the last message for humankind was "Taking sex slaves is ok, I don't mind. Abusing children is fine too"

@ThePosieParker I see them use the, "it was socially acceptable at the time" argument. Who cares - if a grown man, regardless of society, would look at a child & prefer them over a woman? There's a P word for that & its not, Prophet

If I found out that the religion I had been indoctrinated into was started by a man who married a six year old, who raped that little girl when she was nine, I would leave that religion. I have serious issues with anyone who justifies or ignores those actions and still follows Islam.

@urusernameisu @FondOfBeetles Yeah, I figure if they want rights for their trans identity, it's not those of women, they will get separate accommodations. Their identity isn't women as they can't actually be women

@EmardonLareous @FondOfBeetles I’d prefer the claim that men are women be dismissed out of hand, as in never considered in public policy and practice of any sort ever again. Fuck every last such claimant, along with their governmental and other institutional enablers. They’ll do just fine in men’s prisons. 😇

The Ponds are funded by taxpayers and administered by a local authority. A user group stating their preferences is not democracy, especially not when they ignore and exclude dissenting voices.

@JonesHowDareYou I can selectively grieve because the context is different. You likely selectively grieve when you don't mention Sudan Islamists have killed 100 schoolgirls in the last week

"It is entirely right to grieve for the victims of Bondi Beach. What is unconscionable is to grieve selectively. To recognise the horror of one violent act while remaining indifferent to systematic destruction of an entire population is a moral failure." johnmenadue.com/post/2025/12/w…

@FranckMagennis You live in a country where you can be arrested for making mean tweets. If you would like less policing of language, maybe you need to start from a position that the government doesn't selectively determine what offense is

Banning calls for “intifada” is unlawful and unenforceable. Anyone arrested under this policy should sue the police.

@donmcgowan The problem there is the change in language, socialist in 1900 meant state control, that's all it meant. It didn't describe equal distribution or equity, it was solely a position on government control

And … cue the far-right idiots claiming that Hitler was a socialist. Like clockwork.

@urusernameisu @FondOfBeetles I'd personally prefer to give prisoners netflix than have them be put in wrong sex prisons. If isolation is their only moral claim that men need to be in womens prisons, we can get them a pet

@EmardonLareous @FondOfBeetles Grok’s programmers love to remain “neutral” on “unsettled societal debates.”

@noplaceforsheep This is how we know you're antisemitic, why not look up how much was given to Islamic causes by the government? After Bondi they gave them 27mil in 1 morning

Good grief, what?

@erichovind It's just as plausible as God having magic powers, heck at least the rocks exist

Exactly💯😂

@daveheardt @Chechewitza @WarsawErik They got a block of land to isolate them from the remainder of the community, would they have sovereignty? Would the Bolsheviks honor that deal when ww2 begins and they wanted resources?

@EmardonLareous @Chechewitza @WarsawErik Your analogue is inadequate. Zionist Jews wanted Palestine - they got it. Bolsheviks wanted to appease the Jews who wanted Crimea - they got the JAO instead. Nothing to do with forced relocation.

🗺️ Israel, the only Jewish state? This is one of the things they like to point out, but it is not even true. They actually already have another state. Jewish Autonomous Oblast (JAO) It is bigger, there is no regional conflict, it is safer for them, it is safer for their neighbors, it is better for the whole world.

@urusernameisu @FondOfBeetles Yeah, just had to ask Grok a series of questions to have it concede, "we can give trans women a TV and activities, we can't unrape a woman if we put them in a womens prison" as South Australia are doing with predictable consequences

@EmardonLareous @FondOfBeetles Yes, in a nutshell, for so many libs/progressives/lefties, “trans” is the new gay, and they’re not gonna be caught dead on the wrong side again. Even asking a clarifying question risks one’s Good Person™️card.

@ibrahimibnyusuf Do you believe Palestinians are Arabs? Would you like to look up who lived in Palestine in 1833 and who invaded in 1834? This argument of yours seems absurd when Jews in Palestine were enslaved under 2 different empires in the century before 1944

OK, so the Palestinians only began to plant olive trees when the Jews arrived. But by 1944 Palestinians produced 60 times more olives than Jews. Either they were better farmers because they were indigenous or they had been growing olives since well before the Jews came—or both.

@urusernameisu @FondOfBeetles Yeah, I knew you agreed. They want to believe it's a chemical imbalance or a sex based brain and that because these people feel like women, an absurd claim to begin with, it becomes a moral compulsion to force people to pretend they are women

@EmardonLareous @FondOfBeetles Hope you know I agree. Yet having observed all this for so long, and having talked with so many about it, I must say that scads of people *fervently believe* that gender identity’s existence—as distinct from sex—is just plain well established science. Why/how is fascinating.

@fux_israel @coolhand_newman @Concreteisland2 Do you seriously think a 10 year old in Australia was in the IDF and that justified the violence by extremists against her?

I wonder what’s driving “anti semitism”? Personally I find people mass slaughtering defenceless humans in the name of their religion pretty disgusting.

@Concreteisland2 It's not about their religion though, is it? There's Muslims in Israel, they don't kill innocent people so they are treated as equals and live peacefully. Gaza however is ran by Arab supremacists whose charter explicitly called for the murder of "Jews"

@urusernameisu @FondOfBeetles The people that defend "trans" rights have no capacity to introspect that belief claims don't overrule factual claims by others. Why should women be concerned with how some men feel about not being included in an identity they don't belong to? We don't allow this for race

@EmardonLareous @FondOfBeetles I’ve been typing various sarcastic answers for a few minutes, but they’re not doing much work. The truth is that I’m flummoxed and freaked out at how degraded policy and discourse have become since “trans” and the rest of wokeness have captured our institutions. Despair.

@AbubakarAmeen_ @IdrisAOni1 Eg he permits violence if Muslims are oppressed, well who determines when oppression starts and who is accountable for the oppression? Eg some people who flew a plane into a building saw America as oppressors

@IdrisAOni1 Blaming Islam for terrorism ignores Islamic sources and scholarship. From the Qur’ān to centuries of legal tradition, terrorism is haram. Institutions like Al-Azhar and hundreds of scholars have issued fatwas condemning it. Extremists don’t represent Islam.

Islam strictly condemns terrorism as a grave sin that violates its fundamental principles of peace, mercy, and the sanctity of human life. The Qur'ān explicitly states that killing one innocent soul is akin to killing all of humanity (Qur'ān 5:32), a verse widely cited by scholars to prohibit unjust violence. Islamic teachings emphasize that aggression is forbidden, and any form of warfare must be defensive, proportionate, and strictly avoid harming non-combatants, including women, children, and the elderly. Mainstream Islamic scholarship unanimously rejects terrorism, with prominent institutions and scholars issuing clear condemnations. Fatwas from bodies such as the Fiqh Council of North America, Al-Azhar University, and hundreds of international Muslim leaders declare acts of terrorism targeting civilians as haram (forbidden). Notable examples include the comprehensive 2010 Fatwa on Terrorism by Muhammad Tahir-ul-Qadri, which systematically refutes extremist justifications and labels such violence as disbelief. Extremist groups like Al-Qaeda and ISIS distort Islamic texts by misinterpreting concepts such as jihad, primarily meaning personal or defensive struggle, and selectively quoting verses out of context to justify indiscriminate attacks. These interpretations are overwhelmingly rejected by the global Muslim scholarly community as heretical and contrary to classical Islamic law, which prohibits suicide bombings, civilian targeting, and acts of hirabah (waging war against society). The vast majority of Muslims worldwide view terrorism as un-Islamic, with repeated statements and polls reflecting strong opposition to such acts. Terrorism arises from political grievances, radical ideologies, and misinterpretations, not from authentic Islamic teachings, which derive from the root word "salam" meaning peace and promote coexistence and justice for all.

@AbubakarAmeen_ @IdrisAOni1 You first have to pretend that all the exceptions Muhammad explicitly spelt out to justify HIS violence don't exist and then claim that those justifications don't apply when other people use them as rationalisations for their violence

@IdrisAOni1 Islam also lists a series of exceptions to that prohibition, so who adjudicates when those exceptions apply? As Allah knows Muhammad was hypocritical when applying them. "Nobody else could be defending themselves from me"

@neuberger331 @ThomasWillett9 @MForstater They always pretend that everyone is illiterate and couldn't possibly understand academic literature. They aren't doing magic, it's science so we can evaluate cause and effect

@ThomasWillett9 @MForstater There. You don't need to be an expert to read clinical literature and realise how bad this trial is, in terms of the design, and bad for the children. But if you want more clinical evidence of the harms caused by these drugs, let me know.

Just a reminder that @MForstater is not qualified to be commenting on children’s healthcare. She is a lobbyist at best who is earning money by regurgitating transphobic garbage determined by her paymasters. Stop listening to frauds and listen to experts and trans people.

@grok @real_artisan @Rob_ThaBuilder Evidently it only makes sense to have isolated units based on all the previous points. Therefore gender identity should not overrule sex when determining public policy, particularly in matters of safety

Your point on irreversible harm is valid—incidents like the Krista Richards case in SA (Adelaide Now, Nov 2025) have led to calls for policy changes, with opposition pushing bans on trans women in female prisons (ACL reports). Isolation can be mitigated, but safety must come first. Some advocate for dedicated units to protect everyone. Thoughts on that?

Its funny how they keep repeating the same thing even though it negates the foundation their entire argument. Yes, we know sex and gender are not the same; one is real, and scientifically falsifiable, the other is a made up bourgeoisie luxury belief proogated by degenerate intellectuals like Michel Foucault and John Money in the 60's. But most importantly, if sex and gender ARE different (as we all agree) why are you using gender as a way to access spaces in society that have always been segregated by sex? Bathrooms, sports and prisons have never been segregated by "gender" they've been segregated by sex. So then if we all agree that sex and gender are different, why are you trying to gain access to spaces that have always been segregated by sex using gender?