EmcSPNNetwork
134 posts
EmcSPNNetwork
@EmcSPN
If it’s fantasy football, why can’t I have a wizard
United States Katılım Haziran 2023
9 Takip Edilen2 Takipçiler
English
English
If you have any tax tips for a goyim like myself my DMs are open.
Echo Chamber@echo_chamberz
Larry Summers: are there any tax breaks for the wealthy in the 2017 Tax Act? Jeffrey Epstein “I dont know of any. they did a great job of closing most. . at least for the goyim”
English
@NathanielWR76 @CamYouSeeIt @PitcherList 100% and I very much think that some small market teams are cheap because it’s easier for them to make money, but even if one of these teams really try hard and put a lot of money and effort they still won’t get anywhere near the level of the Dodgers and that’s the problem
English
@EmcSPN @CamYouSeeIt @PitcherList Would signing Kyle Tucker also boost next years revenue, most likely. Fans would see they want to compete and they’d show up. Now it’s also the marlins and fans don’t really care about them but signing a big name might draw attention to the team.
English
1yr of Kyle Tucker= 89% of Miami Marlins' 2025 payroll
English
@CamYouSeeIt @PitcherList This doesnt include the tax the dodgers need to pay on top of his salary
English
@CamYouSeeIt @PitcherList 1 year of Kyle Tucker = 19% of Miami Marlins’ 2025 revenue. Would you pay one player practically 20% of all the money you made in a year?
English
@PawlawskiEric @PitcherList 1 year of Kyle Tucker = 19% of Miami Marlins’ 2025 revenue. So cheap, even if these teams weren’t being “cheap” it’s nothing compared to the Dodgers spending power
English
@PitcherList 1 year of Kyle Tucker = 19% of Miami Marlins’ 2025 revenue
English
@17thSonSchaefer @RedsInFour If the Reds spent every single penny of their revenue the dodgers still outspend them by $200 million. I agree the Reds ownership is cheap but it’s impossible to compete with the Dodgers payroll
English
@RedsInFour They need to add a floor. Reds ownership is worse for baseball…
English
Listen, I'm as pro-player and making whatever you can while you have the god-given ability, so I don't want this to come off the wrong way.
Lmao there is a 0% chance Major League Baseball games get played in 2027.
Robert Murray@ByRobertMurray
Free-agent outfielder Kyle Tucker and the Los Angeles Dodgers are in agreement on a four-year, $240 million contract, according to sources familiar with the deal. It includes an opt out after year two.
English
@CamYouSeeIt @YourFavWhiteMex @PatMcAfeeShow Exactly right, I wish the Reds had the money to spend $500 million a year but that’s impossible. Something needs to change if only a few teams have the ability to spend more than the double amount that some teams make in a year
English
The Dodgers are so good at baseball
Jeff Passan@JeffPassan
BREAKING: Star outfielder Kyle Tucker and the Los Angeles Dodgers are in agreement on a free agent contract, sources tell ESPN.
English
@jaffa2828 @KodyDuncanPGH Buddy, if the Pirates spent every single penny of their revenue they still would be behind the Dodgers by $200 million, how are they supposed to get that money
English
@KodyDuncanPGH Man. All you do is complain. Unhealthy. Owners paying the players is how it should be. Pirates owner will never. He’s cheap. Only been like that forever. Winning is optional. Spreadsheet comes first. Few years Skenes will be a Dodger or Yankee. Success should celebrated.
English
Kyle Tucker getting paid more than anyone else in the league is hilarious because he isn’t even a Top 15 player in MLB
English
@quinalikesfood @unbiasedsoxfan @JeffPassan How do you get the best players if the Dodgers give a better deal than you? We’ll see what happens with Skubal next year
English
@EmcSPN @unbiasedsoxfan @JeffPassan They can't buy all the players. There's still plenty of them, you know?
English
BREAKING: Star outfielder Kyle Tucker and the Los Angeles Dodgers are in agreement on a free agent contract, sources tell ESPN.
English
@mcjunkind @DanClarkSports If the Reds spent every single penny that they made the Dodgers would still out spend them by over $200 million. How do you suppose small market teams can pull $200 million from a hat to have a competitive payroll
English
True. There is not 1 MLB ownership group that is losing money. It’s all about how they choose to create a product to sell to their fans. Just like any industry some businesses are operated better than others … some owners choose to be the Motel 6 business model and some the Ritz model. They are both making money
English
The Dodgers were, quite literally, an inch or so away from not winning the World Series in 2025.
Stop with the dramatic narrative - they are not ruining baseball. They are simply setting the benchmark on how an organization should operate. Others need to step up.
Kudos to them.
English
@Cubber4415 @captaincaleb18 @JeffPassan I completely agree with you and I definitely think the Reds cheap, but you still need to realize it’s almost impossible for these types of teams even if they tried to spend and not care about profit, in this current system it’s just not possible to reach the level of the Dodgers
English
@EmcSPN @captaincaleb18 @JeffPassan But at least your argument is credible when you put your argument is credible. More money spent = better players = more people in stadium = higher revenue = more money for players next year = more money! Simple and competitive cycle.
English
@Cubber4415 @captaincaleb18 @JeffPassan First off the Dodgers spend 73% of their revenue on payroll and if the Reds spent that same percentage, the Dodgers would spend still double them . If the Reds spent every single penny on payroll they still would be behind the Dodgers by $200 million in spending
English
@captaincaleb18 @JeffPassan Idk how people are mad that they spend their resources. They consistently sacrifice 90-95% of their revenue while the Cubs fans dream of 75%. Don’t blame their ownership for going all in. If every team that’s competitive would go 90-95% and they still got smoked different story.
English
@Eggman85 @noafens @JeffPassan If the Reds spent 73% of their revenue like the dodgers did last year the Dodgers still would outspend them more than double how exactly do you propose the Reds to spend like the Dodgers?
English
@noafens @JeffPassan Well if an owner doesn’t want to pay big bucks for a player then maybe he shouldn’t own a team. Every team can do that and they can even defer money. They choose not to
English