Meja
213 posts













- 100k Max allocation is wild, I'm more likely to sell my allocation than hold due to it being so high, hold 10k USD worth of tokens? no problem, 100k? I'm dumping. - I max qualified for hardly any effort LPing AFK for a few months compared to active users who actually used the chain. - No sybil filtering. - Extremely niche criteria that's vastly different to community expectations causing "insider farming" accusations. - Some wallets meet the criteria but aren't eligible with no explanation why. - Long term users with 100k+ volume, years of activity, lite usage, 100s of txs getting no airdrop whilst people who claimed DEGEN chain airdrop randomly qualify? - Activity over time didn't matter at all. - Very few criteria points which overlooks a lot of a users contribution to the network, more criteria/points = better imo. - Community was expecting 1.2 -1.5m wallets to qualify, we got half that, not exactly "giving away the network to the community" is it. - The difference between max allocation and min allocation is so great that from a governance point of view the network is mostly run by insiders. - The actual ZK allocation calculation seems to make no sense, some people have 7 points but only 1,000 allocation whilst others have 3 points with 100k allo. - zkSync team set expectation that this would be a WIDELY distributed airdrop when in reality, it wasn't. - Transaction count, activity & volume didn't count whatsoever in even the most extreme cases. - Better to have 1.5m wallets qualify with ZK trading at $1 per token than 700k wallets qualify with it trading at $0.30 per token and no future for the chain. Honestly as someone who max qualified on multiple wallets I'd have rather got LESS allocation and had this go down in history as one of the biggest airdrops ever, Instead this has been received so poorly by the community that the token price is going to be worth much much less than if they just qualified more users and benefitted from Airdrop marketing, The entire ecosystem is down -40% and as a long term zkSync ecosystem investor, someone that yesterday had 150k worth of zkSync memes in my wallet, I'm considering dumping my airdrop and dumping the memes because I do NOT see a future for a chain that does this to its community. The only explanation I have is that the criteria was designed to benefit insiders who didn't have the foresight to see how much this would effect token price.


Polyhedra, Polygon, and StarkWare issued a joint statement condemning zkSync’s use of ZK as a ticker and demanding that Matter Labs withdraw its application for “zero-knowledge” as the firm’s exclusive intellectual property. Polyhedra announced that it would change its original ticker ZK to ZKJ. cointelegraph.com/news/matter-la…


ask me how bullish I am on @LayerZero_Labs





