Emil Hundrup Kvist

@Communism_CEO @FugitiveDuck45 @The_Davos_Man So they called for general resistance - but that excludes actual resistance. And Soviet-controlled radio called for Warsaw to join the ranks against the Nazis. How is that not a call to action? And the USSR was imperialist. Which is why it wanted to break the polish resistance.

@EmilKvist @FugitiveDuck45 @The_Davos_Man - the Warsaw Uprising (as in, the military operation by the AK) was not in any way encouraged by the USSR - the USSR wasn’t imperialist until Stalin’s death and the murder of Bierut

-There was a famine in Ukraine in 1946 -Homeless people were rounded up and sent to lunatic asylums -compare your graph of life expectancy in Russia with graphs of life expectancy in Western countries

@Communism_CEO @FugitiveDuck45 @The_Davos_Man Denying attrocities does not actually merit an argument. It just goes to show how you're not actually a serious person.

@EmilKvist @FugitiveDuck45 @The_Davos_Man No argument here.

@Communism_CEO @FugitiveDuck45 @The_Davos_Man Operation Tempest, which Warsaw was part of, was "general resistance". Soviet-controlled radio stations encouraged Warsaw to rise. The goal was liberation of Warsaw, to forestall occupation by the imperialist USSR. That imperial conquest was more important than beating nazis.

@EmilKvist @FugitiveDuck45 @The_Davos_Man - the Soviets encouraged general resistance, the military action executed by the AK wasn’t part of the plan - it was an anti-Soviet action because it was intended to to take the city before the Red Army, you can’t just cry when the Red Army doesn’t do what you want it to

@Communism_CEO @FugitiveDuck45 @The_Davos_Man Ah, you're a Katyn-denier as well. Just completely tankie-brained.

@EmilKvist @FugitiveDuck45 @The_Davos_Man - it was launched so the Red Army couldn’t take Warsaw (and the Red Army wasn’t informed in advance) - the Red Army had other priorities (Balkans, defending more usable bridgeheads across the Vistula) - Molotov-Ribbentrop was signed after 6 years of Litvinov failing

@Communism_CEO @FugitiveDuck45 @The_Davos_Man It had an explicitly anti-Nazi intent. Nice to see ypu dropped the "they simply were too tired to help :("-spiel and went with the truth: the Soviets once again did not want to help the Poles against the Nazis. At least they didn't partner up this time. Unlike in 1939.

@FugitiveDuck45 @The_Davos_Man - the uprising was launched with an explicitly anti-Soviet intent, if they had coordinated with the Soviets, it’d have been successful - it was launched to improve the bargaining position of a right-wing government in continuity with the reactionary Piłsudskiite dictatorship

@breaksya @marxbjrn @LordInquisitor_ @bokoen1 Well done admitting it.

@EmilKvist @marxbjrn @LordInquisitor_ @bokoen1 reading comprehension: 0

Why do the 1st of May events not ban communist parties from participating? It's one of the reason I literally can't take interntional workers day seriously, at least here in Denmark. I walk into the park where they are setting up and instantly see a hammer and sickle...

@Trotskyism1917 @marxbjrn @LordInquisitor_ @bokoen1 That would presuppose marxist views of classes had anything to do with the real world. But funny to claim other people are traitors while arguing for selling out not only the people of the West but also Ukraine, including the supposed "working class" there, to fascism.

@EmilKvist @marxbjrn @LordInquisitor_ @bokoen1 You don’t larp about being a class traitor, you are a class traitor

@Trotskyism1917 @marxbjrn @LordInquisitor_ @bokoen1 If nothing else, it gives you something to larp about.

@EmilKvist @marxbjrn @LordInquisitor_ @bokoen1 You are right, more class traitors is definitely what the world needs right now

@marxbjrn @Trotskyism1917 @LordInquisitor_ @bokoen1 You're the one using the word heroic. And conscription is a normal procedure in times of crises. Many a revolution has been saved by it. Nothing indicates that the Ukranian are not firmly against accepting the maximalist Russian demands.

@EmilKvist @Trotskyism1917 @LordInquisitor_ @bokoen1 Sure okay, I will grant you the composition of the Russian army. But framing the Ukrainian defence as some "heroic" people's initiative when it is driven by the forceful government conscription of poor working Ukrainians, is absurd.

@Trotskyism1917 @marxbjrn @LordInquisitor_ @bokoen1 I would like to say that I'm sure you would some day find something likewise, but I cannot bring myself to lie. Witless commie larpers are just not what the world needs.

@EmilKvist @marxbjrn @LordInquisitor_ @bokoen1 Glad you’ve finally found a field where your expertise matches your output.

@marxbjrn @Trotskyism1917 @LordInquisitor_ @bokoen1 Why do you lie? The rape, torture and murder that the Ukranian soldiers ate trying to keep at bay is not merely territorial integrity. And no, the Russian troops in Ukraine are mostly contract soldiers. Willingly coming to rape and kill.

@EmilKvist @Trotskyism1917 @LordInquisitor_ @bokoen1 The Ukrainian government does not care one iota for anything other than the country's territorial integrity. The Russian government does not care one iota for its people either. This is not a people's war - the majority of the soldiers in both armies are conscripts.

@Trotskyism1917 @marxbjrn @LordInquisitor_ @bokoen1 Yeah, I can spot it miles away.

@EmilKvist @marxbjrn @LordInquisitor_ @bokoen1 I am sure you are an expert on illiteracy.

@Trotskyism1917 @marxbjrn @LordInquisitor_ @bokoen1 Highly unlikely that you can actually read.

@EmilKvist @marxbjrn @LordInquisitor_ @bokoen1 Lmfao, this is just like reading Kautsky, please keep going

@marxbjrn @Trotskyism1917 @LordInquisitor_ @bokoen1 By the way, Ukraine has time and time again been willing to negotiate. Russia has not moved on their maximalist goals. So you can just say you want Ukraine to surrender, as that is apparently your wish.

@EmilKvist @Trotskyism1917 @LordInquisitor_ @bokoen1 The only thing keeping Ukraine from the negotiating table at the moment is the huge military loans from Western powers designed to prolong a stalemate which under zero circumstances will end without Ukraine giving concessions to the militarily superior Russia anyway.

@Trotskyism1917 @marxbjrn @LordInquisitor_ @bokoen1 Not really concerned with idolozing old marxists, or anyone else for that matter. But I bet that would have gotten some high-fives from your fellow larpers.

@EmilKvist @marxbjrn @LordInquisitor_ @bokoen1 No, you are just larping as Kautsky, congrats

@marxbjrn @Trotskyism1917 @LordInquisitor_ @bokoen1 That just isn't true lol. So, how will DKU propose to end the war. You know, the thing not being predicated on revolution. Unlike what you claimed before. Or are you devoted to trying to weasel out of your position of appeasement?

@EmilKvist @Trotskyism1917 @LordInquisitor_ @bokoen1 That just isn't true lol. You are attempting to broaden the definition of appeasement so much that any concessions ever given in any international situation regardless of context becomes an appeasing act, robbing the concept of its meaning.

@Trotskyism1917 @marxbjrn @LordInquisitor_ @bokoen1 I'm not the one pretending larping as Lenin and Trotsky will end the Russian war in Ukraine.

@EmilKvist @marxbjrn @LordInquisitor_ @bokoen1 Delusion is your primary characteristic I see

@marxbjrn @Trotskyism1917 @LordInquisitor_ @bokoen1 No, it is not. Ukraine negotiating a peace, even with concessions is, is not necessarily appeasement. You arguing for the West to sell out Ukraine to Russia is. Lenin taking German money to topple the provisional government and make peace with Germany is.

@EmilKvist @Trotskyism1917 @LordInquisitor_ @bokoen1 In your definition of appeasement, every single surrender or concession is appeasement. Every single instance of this happening. Your definition is thus devoid of any actual meaning and becomes synonymous with "concessions".