Trash Panda

@SaraCivian @AvsRobin You'll never take our guns. My husband just bought another one

@AvsRobin Couldn't agree more. It's the guns. Nobody needs one

There is NOT a trend of trans people being mass shooters. It is LARGELY white men. People on the internet are trying to force an untrue narrative. It's jarring and disgusting to watch. It's not true.

@hell_line0 Mothers also do all these jobs. We don't need childless women. Better that we had very few childless women

Friendly reminder: Childless women are also teachers, licensed medical providers, pediatricians, therapists, social workers, guardian ad litems and/or formal child advocates, daycare professionals, etc.

@Zoya_ki_batein Why are women so evil?

When I make a man- hating joke in front of the wrong people and they start lecturing me on how men have feelings too

They don’t ask you. They throw burger meat into your yard laced with rat poison.

The social experiment of taking a 20 something-year-old cocktail waitress and putting her in the United States House of Representatives is going exactly as one would expect

Europeans (and eventually Americans) explored the entire world, mapped and charted every ocean and populated landmass, and then when they got bored in the 19th and 20th centuries decided they might as well go up to the North Pole and down to Antarctica and then up to the highest peak on Earth and down to the deepest depths of the ocean, and when all of that was done they went to space. The greatest indictment of our education system is that most kids will graduate grade school and then college without even the slightest appreciation of this absolutely remarkable story. A story totally unique to western civilization. No other people have ever been as hungry to know and understand the world, and as willing to give up everything, including their lives, in the pursuit.

@prinkasusa Wild animals, starvation, natural disasters.

women: “if men disappeared for one week, we could FINALLY breathe... calm our nervous systems... walk alone at 3 AM, not get creepy comments about our looks constantly... life would be AMAZING, with an incredible sisterhood!” men: “but who would protect you?” women: “protect us… from who?"

@TheAtomicBagel @NataniaMarshall Mothers should be celebrated ten times more than these other things. Without children there is no future. Education and careers only matter if we have a future.

You mistake the absence of applause for the presence of oppression. Feminism fought so those traditional paths wouldn't be mandatory sentences, not to guarantee they'd be celebrated as radical achievements. It is perfectly possible to make a life choice without demanding a parade for it

“Feminism is about giving women choices” until the women chooses: -Not going to college. -Not sleeping around. -Getting married young. -Having multiple children. -Not being career-oriented.

no, it’s the feminism.

I am today launching Restore Britain as a national political party. Join us. restorebritain.org.uk/join_us

@FranziaMom This is really who they identify with. Conservatives can own the culture for one hundred years at least

Can’t say enough about the power of this image. Cocked back, one eye half squinted for aim, about to put his full body weight behind his shoulder as he swings. A cinematic masterpiece

@JillFilipovic Try just having sex. It works great

Most 25-year-olds can’t afford egg freezing. Many 35-year-olds can’t afford IVF. Make these tools affordable + offer universal paid leave and universal childcare. Give women more options instead of complaining about whichever path they didn’t take on a very difficult road.

@vernikowo Lololololol you couldn't possibly have children. So stupid and inaccurate.

the idea that little girls do not want to play and run around is extremely damaging and largely false. the primary reason girls tend to be calmer is because they are punished more harshly by society for acting out. while boys get away with it due to "boys will be boys" mentality

@BrianaRoseLee Ped0fila is defined as attraction to prepubescent children. None of my beauty standards as a millennial woman felt like they were about making me an actual child. You're dumb and probably single

Millennial women are realizing our entire idea of girlhood was crafted by pedophiles. And that’s really hard to settle. We are not ok. On a a large scale. All our stores. Every product we consumed. Our beauty standards. All of it. Through a pedophile gaze.

@RepThomasMassie @HasanKhxnx Theater kid

@HasanKhxnx I am not suicidal. I eat healthy food. The brakes on my car and truck are in good shape. I practice good trigger discipline and never point a gun at anyone, including myself. There are no deep pools of water on my farm and I’m a pretty good swimmer.

Can you, the people, “vote your way out of this?” Honestly, not if you get your news from these folks. The swamp has tricks for deceiving the public, and most even work on congressmen. Here’s an example of how Laura and Greg played along as happy tools of the swamp. Please ask yourself why your own congressman has never talked about this. He either hasn’t gotten this far in the game (80% chance), or he likes the way the swamp obscures what’s going on (10% chance), or he dislikes the system but the price he’d pay for telling you is too high (10% chance). If a congressman sees this post and wants to debate me, I accept! The House has rules we adopt at the beginning of each Congress. Honestly we should just use those - some go all the way back to Thomas Jefferson. Some are like Robert’s Rules of Order which branched from House rules a century ago. But we have a rules committee that modifies the rules every week. I served on the rules committee for two years. When I was on the committee, I refused to vote for rules changes if the purpose was to mislead or obscure. Every week, the rules committee bends the rules to suit the Speaker, but you can’t place the blame just on the committee or the Speaker. Every rules change must be approved by the whole House with a majority vote. Rank and file congressmen are told to vote for these rules modifications each week for the sake of party loyalty because the rules are temporarily modified by the majority to keep the minority from using the permanent rules against us. This is partly true, so most congressmen never question beyond this. Typically, every week the rules committee meets before other committees and writes a rules package to protect bills that will come to the floor that week. Then the whole house votes on this rules package early in the week before significant legislation comes to the floor. The vote is typically on party lines. Sometimes a block of congressmen in the majority will take the rules package hostage and withhold their vote to get something else that has nothing to do with the rules. I’m not a big fan of this, but after 13 years, my hands aren’t completely clean of this tactic. The high-road position that I try to maintain is that if the rules package is bad, you shouldn’t vote for the rules package, and in general you shouldn’t withhold your vote from a rules package if there’s nothing wrong with the rules package… even if you disagree with the policy that is enabled to come to the floor by the rules package. There are more details, but that’s all you need to know to understand what I’m going to explain next. This week the Speaker wanted to do two things outside of our base rules, so he put those inside of the rules package that also had the rules for bringing bills like the popular SAVE Act to the floor, knowing members would be afraid to vote against something associated with SAVE. THIS IS INTENTIONAL. The Speaker wanted to circumvent the National Emergencies Act of 1976 to avoid voting on tariffs and he wanted to turn off the ban on bringing a spending bill to the floor the same day it’s introduced. The first rules package that came to the floor this week failed because myself and other republicans objected to it. The rules committee met again, wrote a new rules package without the tariff-trick, and we voted on the second rules package. I voted no but internet goons, like clockwork, characterized this as a vote against the SAVE Act. The swamp used that second rules package to give them authority to pass a bill before anyone could read it. They hid that authority inside the rule for the SAVE act because they knew people like Laura and Greg would help them disparage anyone who didn’t go along. If you fell for Laura and Greg’s slop you were cheering for the Pelosi doctrine that we should pass bills to see what’s in them. If the rules package had failed, the rules committee would have written a better one and SAVE Act would have still come to the floor.

@taporroJ113 @TPUSA STFU Tom

@TPUSA why does it take so many women to just say "stay home with your children and help your husband"? maybe this would be easier if they just had a man say it. 🤷‍♂️

The first speaker drop for WLS 2026 is HERE! Get ready for a weekend curated for HER—holistic, empowered, and redeemed. ✨ Get tickets for the largest gathering of conservative women in the country: wls2026.com/?utm_source=so…

@avidseries When you understand that education is indoctrination it makes more sense.

@Garnet_2203 Democrats hate women actually. Republicans actually respect and take care of women. I'm a millennial woman two time trump voter. You're Canadian and irrelevant

Serious question. Why do women vote conservative?

@EricLDaugh @SenatorCollins I called!

🚨 BREAKING: Americans are FLOODING the phones of GOP Sen. Susan Collins after she REFUSED to support the SAVE America Act following House passage @SenatorCollins phone line: 202-224-2523 YOU KNOW WHAT TO DO! Get loud! 🔥🔥