A-PLUS 🇳🇬🇳🇬🇳🇬

2.7K posts

A-PLUS 🇳🇬🇳🇬🇳🇬 banner
A-PLUS 🇳🇬🇳🇬🇳🇬

A-PLUS 🇳🇬🇳🇬🇳🇬

@EmupenneP

Microbiologist || Creative thinker || Result oriented || Fashion Expert || Man United fan

Nigeria Katılım Nisan 2020
1.8K Takip Edilen1.7K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
A-PLUS 🇳🇬🇳🇬🇳🇬
There’s no way we are going to do it that there won’t be challenges in life but don’t let challenges of life break you but build you. Gather every stone life thrown at you to build not just anything but something beautiful. The worst you can do is to give up. Remember the man that invented electric bulb; his success came at the 100th attempt. Imagine if he had given up after 99th attempt. Every disappointment is a step to success Enjoy your day
English
4
5
25
489
A-PLUS 🇳🇬🇳🇬🇳🇬
@festus1501 I just wish someone so close are loving to you should be killed very soon by bandits so that you can feel the pain of victims of insecurity in Nigeria
English
0
0
0
17
Ojo Festus Olanrewaju
Ojo Festus Olanrewaju@festus1501·
Well, he might not know the meaning of useless, if not, he won't say a government that sorted ASUU issues that lingered for over two decades useless, if he knows the meaning of that word, he won't call a government that initiated student loan a useless government, if he knows the meaning, he would have known that the government that has turned all regions to construction site as a result of road revolution is not useless. Yes, there are killings but the government is not quiet about it, has killing just started in Jos? Has terrorism just started? Making it look like all these started after Tinubu came to power is irresponsible. @mrmacaroni, you can write all the epistle you want, it won't change the fact that Tinubu will be reelected in 2027
Ojo Festus Olanrewaju tweet media
English
3K
316
1.5K
294.5K
abuja stylist✰
abuja stylist✰@drharveee·
I know Lagos, I'm from Lagos. Where's this?.
abuja stylist✰ tweet media
English
335
95
562
32K
A-PLUS 🇳🇬🇳🇬🇳🇬 retweetledi
Adex smith
Adex smith@adex_smithjr·
The reason for poor electricity supply in Nigeria right now, especially in states like Ogun, kwara, oyo, Osun, and somw part of Kogi. (Yoruba Language)
English
41
379
702
44.7K
Jewel 🌗
Jewel 🌗@OfficialJoel4_·
No words start with 'O' and ends with 'O' Prove me wrong !
Jewel 🌗 tweet media
English
1.1K
26
187
40.4K
A-PLUS 🇳🇬🇳🇬🇳🇬 retweetledi
Olóyè Somorin Osifeso
Olóyè Somorin Osifeso@OloyeSomorin·
A young Nigerian females heartfelt message to her government about her struggles. I wonder if an SA or SSA can contact her and field her grievances. @NGRPresident @BayoAdelabu
English
48
193
310
18.9K
Arojinle
Arojinle@arojinle1·
At what point did you see the snake?
English
183
76
608
52.3K
A-PLUS 🇳🇬🇳🇬🇳🇬 retweetledi
RobLogic
RobLogic@RobLogic·
Extremely Relaxing drawing,
English
131
2.2K
19.6K
2.7M
AndyJnr ° Umaru 
AndyJnr ° Umaru @AndyjnrUmaru·
Grade the performance of NEPA in your area Right now.. Be honest A1 B2 B3 C4 D7 F9
English
3.1K
239
1.9K
184K
A-PLUS 🇳🇬🇳🇬🇳🇬
@arva61138 @BRICSNews This war may be long like Russia-Ukrainia war. Even USA did not expect Iran to still be standing and be fighting back at this time and the effects of the war is hitting every countries of the world
English
0
0
0
4
Blondelady2024
Blondelady2024@arva61138·
JUST IN: 🇮🇱🇮🇷 Video shows Iranian ballistic missile fragment striking Jerusalem's Old City. @BRICSNews
English
1
2
4
240
A-PLUS 🇳🇬🇳🇬🇳🇬 retweetledi
AKÍNKÚNMI 👑𓃶
AKÍNKÚNMI 👑𓃶@eetz_naheem·
Kamilu Kompo dey always overdo when dem send am message… Nawa! I like as Londoner and his son no gree for am
English
31
276
1.5K
30.4K
Max Red
Max Red@Utd__max10·
If you don’t get this combination, you’re not a true Manchester United fan.
Max Red tweet mediaMax Red tweet media
English
92
208
2.7K
38.9K
unique A'wears
unique A'wears@AdageorgeA·
"I am a man of 35 years old, but today,I feel like a stranger in my own house. I live in a one-room apartment with my wife. Last year, when my wife gave birth to our first son, my mother and my younger sister moved in to help with "Omugwo" (postpartum care). I was so happy. My mother is a widow; she sacrificed everything to send me to school, so having her around felt like a blessing. But it has been 14 months. They haven't left. Every night, my wife and I sleep on the bed with the baby, while my mother and my 22-year-old sister spread their mat on the floor right next to our bed. We are all breathing the same air in that small room. I'm frustrated, my mind is burning like fire inside & can't hold this to myself anymore. For one year, I have become a "celibate" man in my own marriage. Anytime I touch my wife at night, she jumps like a snake has bitten her. She will whisper, "Are you mad? Your mother is right there! Your sister is watching!" I got frustrated and did something I now realize might be strange. I went to meet my mother and sister to talk to them "man to man."My mother laughed and said, "My son, don't mind her. I am your mother. I have seen it all. Just do your thing, I will cover my ears. It doesn't bother me." My sister even joked about it, saying she would put on her headphones so she wouldn't hear anything. I was relieved! I went back to my wife and told her the "good news" i explained things to her, i told her mom & my sister says they wouldn't mind and besides they're not kids Instead of being happy, my wife looked at me with pure disgust. She said, "You went to discuss our private life with your mother? Have you lost your shame?" Now, she won't even let me hold her hand. She has turned her back to me for 3 months straight. She says if I want "action," I should rent a separate house for my mother. But how can I throw my widowed mother out when she has nowhere to go in this Lagos? Is it wrong for a mother to stay with her son? Why is my wife making this look like a crime? My mother says she is comfortable on the floor, so why is my wife the one complaining? I feel like my wife is using this "shyness" as an excuse because she secretly hates my family and wants them to suffer. Am I supposed to choose between my mother’s comfort and my wife’s "shyness"? this is exactly how women push a man out to another woman yet start complaining! I love my wife and i honestly don't want to cheat on her but the way things are going i might have no choice " Husband from temu
unique A'wears tweet media
English
543
43
203
66.2K
Rossy
Rossy@ImRossyRibon·
Genius need only 0.2 second.
Rossy tweet media
English
44
40
49
635
KING OF ALL SPORTS
KING OF ALL SPORTS@Emmanuel_Tips·
If your phone is Original copy & paste this 😹 ╱◥██████◣ │∩│🌄▤│▤▤│
English
21.4K
1.3K
17.1K
1.7M
Ọ̀gbẹni Tọm
Ọ̀gbẹni Tọm@Ogbenitom·
A particular Yoruba city's panegyric/eulogy in pictures. Study these pictures carefully and tell us the name of this city #YorubaCulture
Ọ̀gbẹni Tọm tweet mediaỌ̀gbẹni Tọm tweet mediaỌ̀gbẹni Tọm tweet mediaỌ̀gbẹni Tọm tweet media
English
78
38
193
20.3K
A-PLUS 🇳🇬🇳🇬🇳🇬 retweetledi
Ajoje⚽⚖️
Ajoje⚽⚖️@israel_ajoje·
CAF's Appeal Board ruled yesterday that in application of Article 84 of the AFCON Regulations, the Senegal National Team is declared to have forfeited the 2025 AFCON final, with the result recorded as 3-0 in favour of Morocco. But there are at least four serious legal arguments that suggest this ruling is not as clean as CAF wants you to believe. I am an International Sports Lawyer. Let me walk you through all of them. Are you still with me? Good. But first, let us be fair to Morocco because their case deserves to be understood properly before we interrogate it. Articles 82 and 84 of the AFCON Regulations state clearly that if a team refuses to play or leaves the ground before the regular end of the match without the authorisation of the referee, it shall be considered the loser and eliminated from the competition, with the result recorded as 3-0 against them. On January 18, coach Pape Thiaw ordered his players off the pitch after two consecutive decisions went against Senegal in the space of ninety seconds. First, a Senegal goal was disallowed for a foul by Abdoulaye Seck on Achraf Hakimi, despite replays showing minimal contact. Then, immediately after, a VAR review awarded Morocco a penalty. The players left. Only Sadio Mane stayed. The match was suspended for around fifteen minutes. The regulation does not say "unless you come back." It says without the referee's authorisation. Senegal left without permission. Morocco read the rule, applied it, and appealed on that basis. On a textual reading, that case is solid. And here is the extra layer Morocco will lean on heavily. What precedent does it set if a team can walk off a pitch for fifteen minutes in protest over a refereeing decision in an AFCON final, return, and still keep the trophy? Every team in every future tournament now knows that if they disagree with a decision, they can walk off, regroup, come back, and face zero sporting consequence for it. The regulation exists precisely to prevent that kind of leverage over match officials and the integrity of competition. You cannot run a tournament if teams can temporarily abandon matches without consequence. That is the strongest version of their case. Now let us talk about why it is not the full story. The first argument Senegal can make is “qui approbat non reprobat”. It is a Latin principle that means you cannot approbate and reprobate at the same time. You cannot accept the benefit of a situation and then challenge the basis of it. After Senegal returned to the pitch, Morocco participated fully in the resumption. They contested the penalty. They played thirty minutes of extra time. They accepted the sporting outcome of that period without walking off themselves. By continuing to play after Senegal returned, Morocco accepted the resumption as legitimate. They cannot now argue the match should be treated as abandoned when they were active participants in its conclusion. That tension will not be lost on a CAS panel. The second argument is proportionality, and this is arguably the strongest one Senegal has. This ruling is without precedent in the history of AFCON and indeed the highest level of international football. The regulation was designed for teams that abandon matches entirely. Teams that refuse to take the field. Teams that do not return. A fifteen minute protest followed by a full return, a completed penalty, thirty minutes of extra time, and a winner determined through sporting competition is not abandonment in any meaningful sense of the word. Applying a forfeit provision designed for total withdrawal to a completed match, where both teams participated in the full ninety minutes plus extra time, is a disproportionate application of a rule to circumstances it was never designed to cover. CAS has consistently held that sanctions must be proportionate to the actual harm caused. The match was completed. That distinction matters enormously in proportionality analysis. The third is Law 5.2 of the IFAB Laws of the Game, which states that the referee's decisions regarding facts connected with play are final. Referee Jean-Jacques Ndala chose to wait for Senegal's return. He chose to resume the match. He administered the penalty, oversaw extra time, and brought the fixture to its conclusion. In doing so, he made a decision connected with the conduct of play. The question Senegal's lawyers should be asking is whether the referee's decision to resume constitutes a final decision that CAF's administrative bodies cannot retrospectively override. This however is not a settled question in football law. FIFA has never fully resolved the boundary between referee authority under the Laws of the Game and governing body authority under competition regulations. That unresolved tension is exactly the kind of legal crack a well-argued CAS appeal exploits. The fourth argument goes beyond Senegal entirely. The CAF Appeal Board set aside the earlier CAF Disciplinary Board decision, which had opted for light sanctions and allowed the result to stand. Two separate bodies in one governing organisation had the same set of facts and polar opposite rulings. That internal contradiction is not just a procedural embarrassment. It is evidence that the application of Articles 82 and 84 to these specific facts was genuinely contested even within CAF itself. CAF's own rulings confirmed that Morocco's federation was sanctioned for ball boy misconduct involving interference with the towel of Senegal goalkeeper Edouard Mendy, and for laser use by the home crowd, conduct that directly contributed to the environment that caused Senegal to walk off. A competent legal team will and should use all of that. Finally,  here is the consequence that stretches far beyond this one final. Every federation under CAF's jurisdiction, every club in the CAF Champions League, every national team in every AFCON qualifier, now has to reckon with a new reality. A result confirmed on a pitch, validated by a referee, and celebrated by a nation is no longer necessarily final. If a governing body can strip a champion two months after the trophy was lifted, on the basis of conduct that did not prevent the match from reaching its conclusion, then every result in African football is now theoretically contestable in a boardroom long after the final whistle. The losing side in any match where a protest or walkout occurred, however brief, however resolved, now has a legal template to point at. It means one can file a complaint, escalate to the Appeal Board and cite Articles 82 and 84. The CAF Appeal Board has just demonstrated that the outcome is not guaranteed to be what happened on the pitch. That is not a stable foundation for any football competition to operate on. It does not just affect Senegal and Morocco. It affects every federation that competes under CAF's umbrella, because all of them now know that the boardroom is open for business long after the referee has blown the final whistle. FIFA will be watching this CAS appeal very closely. Because if CAS upholds it, the template may not stay in Africa. The Senegalese Football Federation Secretary General Abdoulaye Seydou Sow has already stated they will appeal to CAS, calling the ruling a travesty with no legal foundation. He is not wrong to go there. The internal contradiction between CAF's two bodies alone gives them a genuine platform. CAS operates independently of CAF and has overturned governing body decisions before when the proportionality and procedural arguments are strong enough. Senegal lifted a trophy, celebrated a nation and went home as champions. Two months later, a boardroom took it away. Whether the rule was correctly applied or not, one question African football cannot avoid is this: if two separate bodies within the same organisation cannot agree on what the rule means, on what basis should a nation lose a title they won on the pitch? That is the question CAS will have to answer. And how they answer it will shape the boundaries of what football administrators can do to results that were already decided by sport. My name is Ajoje. I am a FIFA Licensed Agent and International Sports Lawyer. I write on the Law and Business of Football, a lot. Repost and Follow if you want to read more posts like this.
Ajoje⚽⚖️ tweet mediaAjoje⚽⚖️ tweet mediaAjoje⚽⚖️ tweet media
English
72
223
496
73.9K
A-PLUS 🇳🇬🇳🇬🇳🇬 retweetledi
Cardio Arena
Cardio Arena@CadioArena·
Do this 60 times before bed… your body will thank you.
English
304
9K
34.9K
2.9M