Enugras

2.7K posts

Enugras

Enugras

@Enugras

Retired

Verdansk, RU Katılım Ocak 2018
809 Takip Edilen109 Takipçiler
Enugras retweetledi
aaron
aaron@aarondotdev·
feels like AI is 10xing too many -1x developers
English
53
127
3.2K
140.3K
Enugras retweetledi
Enugras retweetledi
MK, Ultra victim
MK, Ultra victim@MKaylaUltra·
Family won’t move our group chat to signal. Had to leave. Here comes the guilt trip 😒
MK, Ultra victim tweet media
English
812
985
26.4K
7.3M
Enugras retweetledi
Buck
Buck@BuckOnTwidder·
there are guys on here who don’t know how to cook themselves eggs trying to trade oil against Citadel
English
227
1.8K
24.5K
698.6K
Enugras retweetledi
Enugras retweetledi
Aakash Gupta
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta·
When building costs drop 90% but distribution costs stay flat, you get a gold rush where everyone digs and nobody sells. That’s what this chart actually shows. New websites up 40%. iOS apps up 50%. GitHub pushes up 35%. Everyone read “barrier to building disappeared” and heard opportunity. The correct read is that 557,000 new apps hit the App Store last year, a 24% spike, flooding a discovery channel that was already dead on arrival. 90% of senior mobile professionals surveyed said organic App Store discovery was effectively over before this wave even hit. Half of all App Store searches are just people typing in brands they already know. The supply side hockey-sticked. The demand side didn’t move. This is why tech layoffs doubled to 264,000 in 2025 while code output simultaneously exploded. Companies don’t need more builders. They need people who can get the thing in front of someone who’ll pay for it. Distribution, positioning, audience, brand. The functions that never got the AI productivity boost. Nicholas nails the conclusion that taste and knowing what to build are what matter now. But taste is only half of it. You also need the channel. The unsexy reality is that a mediocre app with 100,000 newsletter subscribers will outperform a beautiful app with zero distribution every single time. The apps winning in 2026 aren’t the best-built ones. They’re the ones attached to someone who already has an audience. Building software used to be the moat. Now building software is the commodity. Distribution is the new moat, and unlike code, it doesn’t get cheaper with AI.
Nicholas Charriere@nichochar

I think we are witnessing the biggest explosion in software creation in history. New website creation is up 40% year on year. New iOS apps are up nearly 50%. GitHub code pushes in the US jumped 35% and in the UK around 30%. All of these metrics were flat for years before late 2024. The entire graph looks like a hockey stick. You no longer need a six month runway and a dev team to ship something real. We see this in our metrics as well! People who never wrote a line of code are building and launching apps. The barrier to building software just disappeared. What matters now is knowing what to build and the taste to build it right.

English
97
210
2K
345.4K
Enugras retweetledi
Dan Hockenmaier
Dan Hockenmaier@danhockenmaier·
Four types of people at every company now yes, people get 10x better when the go from bottom right to top right but also, people get 10x worse when they go from bottom left to top left
Dan Hockenmaier tweet media
English
157
431
4.4K
664.3K
Enugras retweetledi
Dimitri Dadiomov
Dimitri Dadiomov@dadiomov·
This is an incredible essay that hits on something I’ve never understood but often observed. The time that people put into setting up tools often surpasses any output they get. This is Notion, Linear, Claude. Setting them up is 80% of what people do with them. Amazing framing 🎯
Will Manidis@WillManidis

x.com/i/article/2021…

English
37
68
1.4K
313.8K
Enugras retweetledi
Mel Andrews
Mel Andrews@bayesianboy·
A new study from Anthropic finds that gains in coding efficiency when relying on AI assistance did did not meet statistical significance; AI use noticeably degraded programmers’ understanding of what they were doing. Incredible.
Anthropic@AnthropicAI

AI can make work faster, but a fear is that relying on it may make it harder to learn new skills on the job. We ran an experiment with software engineers to learn more. Coding with AI led to a decrease in mastery—but this depended on how people used it. anthropic.com/research/AI-as…

English
76
748
7.7K
637.6K
Enugras retweetledi
Frontier Indica
Frontier Indica@frontierindica·
> be me, 28m wagie living in Delhi > wake up at 8 AM for my IT coolie job > look out window, can’t see anything except a Grey haze > neighbhourhood looks like the inside of a tandoor that hasn't been cleaned since 1947 > chest feeling heavy, congestion built up in lungs > must be the weather changing > check phone > open IQAir app (Western propaganda tool) > screen is deep purple > AQI 650: "Hazardous. Do not breathe. Just die." > panic.jpg > am I being gaslit by the atmosphere? > turn on nationalist TV news channel > see senior Minister > looks calm, composed, probably breathing filtered Himalayan air in the studio > “Global rankings are not official. WHO guidelines are just suggestions.” > “India sets its own standards based on geography.” > realization hits me > foreign AQI is a colonial construct > Westoid lungs are weak, cannot handle the texture of Desi air > they need ‘clean air’ because they lack civilizational immunity > delete IQAir immediately > install ‘Sarkari Vayu Sewa’ app > refresh location > AQI is 45: “Satisfactory” > it’s not PM2.5, it’s ‘Atmanirbhar Particles’ > it’s not smog, it’s ‘Viksit Vapor’ > go to balcony > take a deep breath of sovereign, non-aligned air > taste the sulphur > cough up a black glob > stare at it > it looks vaguely like a map of Akhand Bharat > tears stream down my face (mostly from the nitrogen dioxide, but also patriotism) > Global Index: Rejected > Lungs: Congested > Nation: Protected > mfw I successfully rejected Western imperialism by reducing my life expectancy by 10 years
Press Trust of India@PTI_News

STORY | India sets its own air standards; global rankings not official: Govt The government on Thursday told Parliament that global air quality rankings cited by various organisations are not conducted by any official authority and that the World Health Organisation's (WHO) air quality guidelines serve only as advisory values, not binding standards. Responding to a question in the Rajya Sabha on India's position in global indices such as IQAir's World Air Quality Ranking, the WHO Global Air Quality Database, the Environmental Performance Index (EPI) and the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) metrics, the Environment Ministry said no official country-wise pollution ranking is carried out worldwide. Minister of State for Environment Kirti Vardhan Singh said the WHO's guidelines are meant to help countries set their own standards, taking into account geography, environmental conditions, background levels and national circumstances. READ: ptinews.com/story/national…

English
226
2.5K
21K
931.8K
Enugras retweetledi
near
near@nearcyan·
doing code review on the 10,000 lines claude code wrote
English
142
828
14K
376.9K
Enugras retweetledi
QBgami
QBgami@QBgami·
Max Brosmer 126 YDS / 0 TD / 4 INT No QBgami. That stat line has happened 1 time before, by Tommy Thompson on Nov 5, 1950.
English
81
316
17.3K
1.4M
Enugras retweetledi
vas
vas@vasuman·
Gemini 3.0 just refactored my entire codebase in one call. 25 tool invocations. 3,000+ new lines. 12 brand new files. It modularized everything. Broke up monoliths. Cleaned up spaghetti. None of it worked. But boy was it beautiful.
vas tweet media
English
965
1.3K
28.7K
1.4M
Enugras retweetledi
amrit
amrit@amritwt·
what did i just read bro
amrit tweet media
English
829
2.7K
53.7K
2.9M
Enugras retweetledi
Can Vardar
Can Vardar@icanvardar·
this is the way
Can Vardar tweet media
English
164
1K
12.3K
322.3K