erel vanono

@gill_kyle Totally agree, but if this is the case don’t you think that TUI solutions like Claude code would be better in that case ?

overall I guess probably the right call, I don't use the Cursor IDE hardly anymore and the apps that manage a lot of parallelism are probably increasingly where people are moving

The new cursor is.... Codex? 🤨

@vivoplt The only advantage I see for cursor is its autocomplete. But other then that Claude code is main tool for my work

be honest, which AI tool is best for coding?

Is cursor 3 worth the hype to come back from Claude code ? Sorry but I am thinking that my workflow is so dependent on git worktrees and using heavy gui seems to me to slow

Why “agent” mode is decided to be the way to go for modern dev experience ? It seems like that only cursor deliver value across the different interfaces devs using solution where beside generating code devs also editing and reviewing code Other solutions that you can suggest?

@ThePrimeagen BTW copilot is not even close to supermaven

@ThePrimeagen Totally agree. I don’t understand how there aren’t alternatives product to supermaven that will be agnostic to different delevoper tools (vscode, nvim etc.) and different AI models

i am using supermaven again and i have something to say about this whole AI thing. I think as a group (swe) we rushed so fast into Agents when inline autocomplete + actual skills is crazy. A good autocomplete that is fast like supermaven actually makes marked proficiency gains, while saving me from cognitive debt that comes from agents. With agents you reach a point where you must fully rely on their output and your grip on the codebase slips. Its insane how good cursor Tab is. Seriously, I think we had something that genuinely makes improvement to ones code ability (if you have it). Truly acts as a multiplier, and we left it in the dust because it is not sexy. hurts me on the inside.

Is there anything close to the experience of cursor autocomplete in nvim ? This is the only reason that I moved to cursor And I missing so much for my nvim setup

@mattpocockuk Such a good take, I really believe that right quality PRD’s and manage documentation are key to thrive in SW in the AI era

At this point I'd buy a $500 course on writing great PRD's

@ForrestPKnight The real lazy ones don’t use Lazygit they just using git aliases like git status = gst

Y'all keep saying Lazygit this, Lazygit that. But what’s lazier than just typing the command in the terminal?

Is Claude’s coding capability worth it on the Pro plan, or are the real benefits only noticeable with the Max plan and Claude Opus? I tried the Pro plan with Claude 4 Sonnet, but it didn’t feel significantly better than Cursor’s $20 plan.

@levelsio macos finder is the worst

I still believe the Windows File Explorer is superior to MacOS's weird Finder

@FatherPhi from cost perspective Claude code isn't more expensive?

Just last night I had it run for over 7 minutes straight solving a super tedious but easy code change, almost 40 tool calls, cursor would’ve stopped at 25

after .5 seconds of using Claude Code

@ThePrimeagen The market really need paid AI solution for terminal experience.

please Cursor, keep supermaven alive and update it regularly. i'll pay you money i'll get a tattoo of it on my body i'll tell my friends about it i'll tweet about it i'll make yt videos about it i need it i need it i want it pls pls pls kthxbai

@trashh_dev rebase for clean git tree

“why do you rebase instead of merge?”

I’ve been using Cursor’s background agent, and it’s been a game changer for my workflow. It’s not perfect for complex tasks, but for straightforward ones, it’s amazing. I just delegate the easy stuff while working on a feature and within minutes, I get a PR to my side branch🚀

@sinore69 Not sure this actually reduces verbosity. The whole point of try/catch in other languages is to group multiple method calls under one error handler. Doing that here feels more verbose, not less Maybe I am missing your intentions in that case

Go team has officially stopped considering new syntax proposals for error handling if err != nil is here to stay. What’s your take on a try/catch style syntax that doesn't change behavior, just reduces verbosity? #golang #programming

@thdxr My concern is that, as far as I understand, they’re using SQLite to query context for the LLM. I’m not sure that’s enough to deliver an experience comparable to other available IDEs. I’d really like to see a product like this backed by a proper backend

this looks so good

@thdxr I have an idea let’s write book about the new field, maybe “clean AI” would be good name 😂

yeah we need to invent a brand new field that focuses on organizing lots of code in ways that have hierarchy and patterns that can be managed by intelligence that is limited eventually you might see people specializing in this field and companies hiring for it

@pnkj747 I believe Python is widely used in data science primarily because of NumPy, which provides high-performance mathematical operations and supports many essential features required by these models. Most modern ML and AI frameworks are built on top of NumPy

If Python is so slow, why is it used in AI and data science everywhere?🤔

@typedfemale Why modern languages are ditching inheritance 😂

become terrifying to work with