Andy

3.6K posts

Andy banner
Andy

Andy

@ErgoEcho

neuron in the noösphere. @ErgoEcho.bsky.social

sfba 🌈 Katılım Mart 2020
376 Takip Edilen368 Takipçiler
Andy retweetledi
Mathelirium
Mathelirium@mathelirium·
Now that you have a clear idea of what a Hamiltonian System is, we can finally begin Statistical Mechanics. Lecture 1 Take something as ordinary as a gas in a box. Try to describe it microscopically and the amount of information blows up almost immediately. Every particle has a position and a momentum. In 3D, that gives three numbers for position and three for momentum. So, each particle contributes six numbers. For N particles, the exact state of the whole system is one point in a 6N-dimensional Phase Space. If we collect all positions into q and all momenta into p, then the full microscopic state is written as (q,p) This is one point in that enormous Phase Space. For any realistic system, 6N is so large that following this exact point directly is hopeless. The system is still in one precise microstate, but that description is too detailed to be useful. So Statistical Mechanics changes what we track. Instead of one exact microstate, we work with a density over possible microstates: ρ(q,p,t) What does that mean? It does not mean the system is physically spread out across Phase Space. The system is still in one actual microstate. The density tells us how our description is distributed over the microstates consistent with what we know. Therefore, the first move in Statistical Mechanics is this: We replace one exact but inaccessible trajectory by a density on Phase Space. Now, if the microscopic state moves in time, how should this density move? To answer that, go back to Mechanics. Suppose the system is Hamiltonian, with Hamiltonian H(q,p) Then the equations of motion are dqᵢ/dt = ∂H/∂pᵢ dpᵢ/dt = -∂H/∂qᵢ These equations move one exact point in Phase Space. So, if our state is now a density over many possible points, that density must move with the same flow. The Math Breakdown We describe the microscopic state by canonical coordinates (q,p) = (q₁, …, qₙ, p₁, …, pₙ) and our uncertainty by a Phase-Space density ρ(q,p,t) normalized so that ∫ ρ(q,p,t) dq dp = 1 This says the system must be somewhere in Phase Space. Now, ask the central question. If points in Phase Space move by Hamilton’s equations, what equation must ρ satisfy? The basic idea is conservation. Probability should not be created or destroyed as it moves through Phase Space. Therefore, ρ satisfies a continuity equation. Take a tiny region in Phase Space. The amount of probability inside it can only change if probability flows in or out. The Phase-Space velocity field is v = (q̇,ṗ) with q̇ᵢ = ∂H/∂pᵢ ṗᵢ = -∂H/∂qᵢ Thus, the continuity equation is ∂ρ/∂t + ∇·(ρv) = 0 Write that out: ∂ρ/∂t + Σᵢ ∂/∂qᵢ (ρ q̇ᵢ) + Σᵢ ∂/∂pᵢ (ρ ṗᵢ) = 0 Expand with the product rule: ∂ρ/∂t + Σᵢ q̇ᵢ ∂ρ/∂qᵢ + Σᵢ ṗᵢ ∂ρ/∂pᵢ + ρ Σᵢ ( ∂q̇ᵢ/∂qᵢ + ∂ṗᵢ/∂pᵢ ) = 0 Now, use Hamilton’s equations again: ∂q̇ᵢ/∂qᵢ = ∂²H/(∂qᵢ ∂pᵢ) ∂ṗᵢ/∂pᵢ = -∂²H/(∂pᵢ ∂qᵢ) These cancel, so Σᵢ ( ∂q̇ᵢ/∂qᵢ + ∂ṗᵢ/∂pᵢ ) = 0 That is, Hamiltonian flow is divergence-free in Phase Space, and the continuity equation becomes ∂ρ/∂t + Σᵢ q̇ᵢ ∂ρ/∂qᵢ + Σᵢ ṗᵢ ∂ρ/∂pᵢ = 0 This is the so-called Liouville’s Equation. In plain language it means that the density ρ is not created or destroyed. It is carried along by the microscopic dynamics. The flow can stretch it, bend it, and fold it into complicated shapes, but it does not compress or dilute Phase-Space volume in the Hamiltonian sense. Thats why people often say Phase-Space probability behaves like an incompressible fluid. Equivalently, we note that along a trajectory generated by Hamilton’s equations, dρ/dt = 0 So if you move with the flow, the density attached to that moving Phase-Space element stays constant. Therefore, the real foundation of Lecture 1 is this: Before Equilibrium, before Temperature, before Entropy, Statistical Mechanics first tells you how uncertainty itself is transported by Mechanics.
English
12
72
573
27.6K
Andy
Andy@ErgoEcho·
@TVachaW how much does this have to do with the fact that's it's monogamous vs the fact that it's long term?
English
1
0
2
304
Vacha
Vacha@TVachaW·
Not to diminish polyamory in any way, but one of the great benefits of monogamy I've found is that it serves as a powerful alchemical container on a spiritual path. For me, committing to a monogamous relationship has been a key part of transmuting lust into love within the foundations of my psyche. Before getting into this relationship 6 years or so ago, I used to sleep around a lot and be in a lot of situationships. What I found was that this meant the novel part of any sexual encounter was largely the novel energy and physicality of the new person. Which created a tendency towards lust as the driver for sex. Whereas, in a longterm monogamous relationship, whenever we have sex, the novel aspect is the increase in love, the further depth of our bond and the accumulation of shared experiences. Deeper love becomes the novelty factor and love becomes the driver for sex. I do find that (for me) new and deeper pleasures open up this way too. In Buddhism, they talk about two types of pleasure: piti and sukha. Piti is a more bubbly, restless, tingly pleasure. Whereas sukha is a more peaceful, smooth, warm-hearted pleasure. I find that as my monogamous relationship grows I still experience all the piti-adjascent pleasure sexually, but also feel ever more types and depths of sukha-adjascent pleasure. The monogamous aspect has a function, as it stops my libidinous energy leaking out into other less developed containers. This forces the search for novelty and new depth to seek fulfilment within the monogamous container. And this is what allows that container to become alchemical: The accumulation that takes place within it creates the pressure that facilitates the alchemical transformation. In this way, the relationship becomes a vessel for transmuting lust into love, which to me is a deeply spiritual pursuit. NOTE: This is not a culture war post. Highlighting some benefits to monagamous relationships does not imply that polyamorous relationships don't have their own corresponding benefits.
Yikes is my catchphrase@big_yyikes

“do you have any kinks?” yeah, I’m into monogamy

English
12
33
594
47.8K
Captain Pleasure, Andrés Gómez Emilsson
Also on the table: - Participate in psychophysics research (sober experiments) - Create a Light-Sound-Body Vibration soundtrack together - Design a new meditation technique and try it on as a group - Glass Bead Game challenge - semi-competitive 1/2 competition, 1/2 cooperative - where we create a multi-sensory mandala and challenge each other to maximize its interestingness and valence at once - Visualize thought and emotion and how they interact with systems of coupled oscillators - A fun game where we use body vibration and proximity mapping to speed-friend as a collective (e.g. you get more vibrationally consonant as a gradient as you find the physical spot that maximizes a metric of psychological compatibility with each other) - Write a story together, to turn into a kind of Qualia Revelation to spark great inspiration and exotic conceptual phenomenology - Literally sit down and work on a peer reviewed paper together and try to publish with as many authors as we can while ensuring we're correctly tracking everyone's contributions (one paper per meetup would be a dream) What else? ;-)
English
2
1
10
733
Captain Pleasure, Andrés Gómez Emilsson
Which of these activities/themes would make you more likely to want to attend a QRI (Qualia Research Institute meetup? Feel free to suggest more for the July in-person Bay Area gathering we'll have :-)
English
14
1
17
1.6K
Andy
Andy@ErgoEcho·
@d33v33d0 it's like asking a human being how many front vowels there are in "strawberry"
English
0
0
0
88
Andy
Andy@ErgoEcho·
@CameronCorduroy what's crazy is that neither the republican nor democratic presidential primaries award extra delegates to swing states
English
0
0
1
967
Cameron 🇺🇸 🗽🦅
Cameron 🇺🇸 🗽🦅@CameronCorduroy·
an extremely potent midwit test is whenever people brainlessly copy-paste Senate justifications onto conversations about the Electoral College the EC doesn't reward small states or rural states, it rewards whatever states happen to have a 50/50 partisan split
English
33
57
1.5K
46.3K
maro
maro@ProofofMaro·
Never forget they tried to convince you crystals aren’t magic
maro tweet media
English
27
60
381
6.9K
Andy
Andy@ErgoEcho·
@yoavgo it's more interesting to machine learning researchers than mathematicians
English
2
0
9
4.6K
(((ل()(ل() 'yoav))))👾
is the EML result surprising or even interesting to mathematicians? it gives me vibes of some triviality that one would give undergrads to prove in the first problem in a homework problem set rather than "a big thing", but then again i am terrible at judging these things and it might actually be incredibly hard. so which is it?
English
61
7
221
49.3K
Chris Blattman
Chris Blattman@cblatts·
We had the opposite experience: 1. My wife kept her last name. 2. When we had her firstborn daughter, my wife suggested she take her last name. I thought that was fine. 3. When we had my son, he took my last name because why not? 4. No idea what these administrative challenges are, but we never encountered them. 5. My only worry was that maybe it would be harder to take kids across international borders by myself, so my daughter has my last name as a middle name and my son has my wife's last name as a middle name. Because who cares about middle names? 6. Literally no one at a school, airport, or wherever has ever made this an issue, let alone even ask the question why the kids have different last names. And at least a dozen countries. It has literally never come up.
Lyman Stone 石來民 🦬🦬🦬@lymanstoneky

I think what this position misses is: 1) Kids are gonna have a surname 2) Having the whole household share a surname really is useful for a whole lot of purposes and parents who don't share surnames with their kids often face administrative challenges 3) Making up a new surname for the whole household breaks ties with *both* sides of the family and also most people see it as kinda cringe 4) So it's either his or hers or hyphens 5) Hyphens are fine, many countries do that, but they do make it literally impossible to write your full surname on many documents for many name combos, so you're back at having a name that creates recurrent administrative problems 6) So the lowest-friction solution really is his or hers 7) There's no fundamental reason it has to be his, but either way somebody is gonna give. You can argue it should be the man, but the only argument for that is matriarchy, which is no more compelling than patriarchy. 8) On the other hand the argument for "this is just the convention, don't sweat it too much" is fairly strong

English
57
45
1.5K
329.9K
Andy retweetledi
jasmine
jasmine@jazziquest·
meditation: it’s not what you think
English
2
3
31
3.4K
Ryan Moulton
Ryan Moulton@moultano·
Every time I get into a back and forth with utilitarians I have to point out that aggregation fns other than Sum exist. Consider Sum(x)/(1+Sum(x)). Math doesn't have any requirement that shrimp utility be linear in shrimp, nor have a global upper bound.
Ryan Moulton tweet media
English
14
6
271
21.6K
Andy retweetledi
Jonathan Gorard
Jonathan Gorard@getjonwithit·
So we finally reach a cobordism ∞-functor between cobordism ∞-categories: one encoding hypersurfaces and their spacetime transformations, the other encoding spaces of quantum states and their unitary transformations. In QFT, this functor is called the "path integral". (17/20)
English
2
4
77
5.4K
Andy
Andy@ErgoEcho·
@sariverse I would rather have a late text sooner without an apology than the late text later with an apology. I do not care about the apology, I do care about moving the conversation forward
English
0
0
0
572
sarina
sarina@sariverse·
i think the prospect of having to apologize for not answering ‘fast’ enough makes me avoid texts for way longer. like why do i have to go on an apology tour bc i like to live in the Moment
English
19
575
8K
172.1K
Andy
Andy@ErgoEcho·
@robin_j_brooks @joequant Google search AI? I'm sorry but this tweet of yours significantly decreases my confidence in you and all the institutions noted in your bio.
English
1
1
50
1.8K
Robin Brooks
Robin Brooks@robin_j_brooks·
@joequant Here's what Google AI says about your claim. It does not back up what you are saying. Further, yesterday you claimed the spike in Nauru's imports from China was due to diplomatic relations. Your story changes every day. It sounds to me like you're just spreading misinformation...
Robin Brooks tweet media
English
70
0
37
83.3K
Joequant
Joequant@joequant·
When you have a theory about something, it's worth spending some time digging and finding out if you are right. So I spent an hour digging the data, and it looks like Nauru isn't *transshipping* Chinese goods, but rather they just bought a fleet of tuna ships.
Robin Brooks@robin_j_brooks

China today released June trade data. Its exports to Nauru - the third smallest country in the world after the Vatican and Monaco - are up 6000% from a year ago. A symptom of how powerfully US tariffs are hitting China, pushing a flood of Chinese exports to everywhere else...

English
49
257
3.7K
252.9K
Andy
Andy@ErgoEcho·
@CELTIChistorian @plasticolicious @derekinyourdms @sandinistaoliva if you get a loan and pay the minimum forever, you have essentially allowed someone else to use you as a savings account that pays out interest. a loan is the exact same phenomenon as a savings account mirrored from the perspective of the consumer. money costs money
English
1
0
0
13
That radical social work chick
That radical social work chick@sandinistaoliva·
So is anyone freaking out about student loans or are we just ignoring it since everything else is terrible?
English
2.8K
6.3K
129.8K
9.5M
RomeoStevens
RomeoStevens@RomeoStevens76·
Did intelligence emerge as an evolutionary arms race between blame and excuses?
English
3
1
30
1.3K
Noah Smith 🐇🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼
British people like to tell themselves that no matter how bad things get, at least they're governed better than the United States. But this is wrong. It's complete cope. The United States is governed much better than Britain.
Hunter📈🌈📊@StatisticUrban

The UK and US used to be much, much more similar in terms of economic output and prosperity per person. In But from 2008 on, a large gap started opening, and from 2020 on it's become more like a vast chasm. Now, US GDP per capita is *40%* higher than the UK's.

English
171
161
2.5K
202.7K