Andrew Bisharat

One of the things I’m most proud of with our film is that it humanizes a group of people who are reliably dehumanized. Seeing that humanity is more important than ever right now. Anyone can watch Resistance Climbing on @reelrock for free! 🇵🇸 watch.reelrocktour.com/videos/rr17-re…

@AssalRad This reminds me when Graeme Wood at the Atlantic wrote that children can be legally killed

Let me guess, when the US and Israel attack them?

Abby Martin drops a devastating truth bomb: Every poll shows overwhelming support among Israeli Jews for the genocide and starvation campaign. She says the society is too far gone and calls for total global isolation and BDS against the settler colonial state.

@SameerahMunshi @malesh842833 It was in Palestine for generations

My family is made up of both Christians and Muslims. We love each other and respect each other's faith. If you look past the propaganda, you'll see that this is the default.

@PollTracker2024 These talking are so boring and easily refuted. And as a Palestinian they’re deeply offensive and dehumanizing. I hope this man’s political career turns to dog shit

The Hill: Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro on his support for Israel: “For those who begin by suggesting Israel doesn’t have the right to exist as a Jewish state, I think that is a recipe for permanent war. I want to see peace in the region.” “I also do think it’s sort of interesting that you’ve got 46 nations around the world where the majority religion is Islam, 23 of them recognize Islam as the official state religion. One has the official state religion of Judaism, and that’s the one we keep talking about here.”

I’m trying to avoid posting for Lent, but I want to be clear about my position, as it seems we may be on the brink of decisions of historic consequence: The US & Israel were the ones who launched a sneak attack against Iran. Trump himself compared it to the attack on Pearl Harbor. We opened the war with an attack that killed nearly 200 little girls at school. If the Japanese had done that at Pearl Harbor, it would still be on page one of every history book recounting the attack to this day. To then punish the civilian population of Iran by destroying power and water infrastructure, which can only be intended to cause mass civilian suffering and death, simply because they have not capitulated, is a war crime of the highest order. Soldiers, sailors, and airmen are under no obligation to follow such an order, and shame on any officer who orders them to do so.

I thank God every day for Tucker Carlson who is educating millions of Americans about Israel on a daily basis. I don't care why he does it. If it's a grift, more people should be grifting. What are you liberal shits doing to stop war and genocide?

@RealCandaceO I strongly believe Israel wanted us to bomb this school, and likely deceived us into doing so, just so they wouldn’t have to be alone in their sadistic slaughter of children.

We murdered 250 Iranian school girls absent any imminent threat or provocation. We did it because Bibi and neocons want world war 3, followed by Rothschild banking installed in Iran. Currently debt-slavery is illegal. The Epstein class wants everyone worldwide enslaved by usury.

@optisues Nope

BREAKING: Kamala Harris is speculated to be angling for another presidential bid in 2028. Do you support her?

@dash_eats Because Israelis are the bad guys

Why are they doing this???

🚨Israel tortured a baby, burned him with cigarettes, pierced his skin with a nail, held him hostage for 10 hours, all in front of his father to pressure the dad into a false confession! Not even demonic would describe this barbaric, savage, monstrous, psychotic behaviour!

@emilykschrader You haven’t spent much time learning about the history of Palestine, have you? This goes on every day and has been for 100 years, before this fake colonial state declared its “independence” whatever that means

What kind of hateful bigot gets up in the middle of a war when ballistic missiles are flying and says ‘I have an idea! Let’s go burn homes and cars of Palestinians’ WTF? These people are disgusting, this is terrorism, and I hope they rot in prison.

Just went to a group screening of Andrew Bisharat's Resistance Climbing in Palo Alto, CA - ~50 attendees; everyone was really moved/inspired. Highly recommend.

Right now, 1:45am local time, settler militias are raiding more than 9 Palestinian villages in the occupied West Bank. From Bethlehem all the way to Nablus, settler pograms are happening everywhere. This began at 12am local time and has not yet stopped 1:45am 3/22/26.

@uhshanti @mattlieb Name one mainstream media figure or Democrat asking these questions

“why is Tucker the only one saying the obvious?” he isn’t by a long shot. plenty of people saying the obvious without his odious Western supremacism attached, but the Respectable Center only want to platform their left-punching comrades on the right so here we are

Major pogrom taking place in the West Bank as I write.

@WesternLensman 😂

They’re attempting to turn their anchors into on-air podcasters Things are getting desperate over at CNN

The "right to exist" of a state has no basis in international law and no precedent in diplomatic practice. Simply put, a state's right to exist does not exist. If Israel nevertheless proclaims a "right to exist", the only reasonable basis for the existence of such a right is that it is a universal one, equally applicable to every other state at the time it was first raised, and particularly applicable to those whose legitimacy, like that of Israel, was also challenged. If it is a right that applies to Israel alone, it is not and cannot be a right. It bears recalling that there were at least two other states that had a similar claim to a "right to exist" when Israel first invented it, on the grounds that their legitimacy and continued existence were also challenged: Rhodesia and the USSR. Yet neither the Soviet Union nor Rhodesia claimed a "right to exist". Nobody and no other state ever claimed either of them had an inherent right to exist, or claimed any fundamental rights would be violated if these states ceased to exist and disappeared from the map. In the case of Rhodesia, there was in fact an international consensus that it cease to exist. This succeeded and Rhodesia was replaced by Zimbabwe, to universal acclaim. It is also important to recognize that Israel's claims of a "right to exist" have nothing to do with achieving a peaceful resolution of the Question of Palestine, and are fundamentally about preventing one. Israel's "right to exist" was first raised precisely because the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), recognized by the international community as the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people, appeared to be amenable to accepting earlier demands by the United States in exchange for recognition of its mere existence: PLO acceptance of United Nations Security Council resolutions 242 and 338, renunciation of armed force, and recognition of Israel. The demand of a "right to exist" was proclaimed by Israel precisely in order to prevent Western recognition of the PLO, and in the expectation that the PLO would reject it out of hand as an unacceptable absurdity. Needless to say, Washington and its Western partners eagerly embraced the Israeli innovation, and never required Israel to define the borders within which the entity was supposed to enjoy a right to exist. When the PLO formally accepted Israel's "right to exist" in the context of the 1993 Oslo Accords, it was careful not to formulate it as an absolute right: "The PLO recognizes the right of the State of Israel to exist in peace and security". Palestinian negotiators had wanted to add "within the 5 June 1967 borders", but this was categorically rejected by Israel. It was made unambiguously clear that addition of this clause would have made agreement impossible. Israel demanded and the PLO accepted the above formulation, but it changed absolutely nothing. Several years later, Israel began demanding that the Palestinian not only recognize its "right to exist" but recognize "Israel's right to exist as a Jewish state". It once again did so on the presumption that this would be embraced by its Western sponsors and allies but that the Palestinians would reject the absurdity of this innovation. Israel's objective was to make negotiations and thus a diplomatic settlement impossible, and to ensure that the Palestinians rather than Israel were held responsible for the stalemate. It largely worked, as Western leaders and "mediators" once again embraced the Israeli demand and tried to pressure the Palestinians to accept it. I would not expect Tucker Carlson to be aware of this history. I would however expect Zanny Minton Beddoes, the Editor-in-Chief of The Economist, to be at least generally familiar with the issue, particularly since she made a point of interrogating Carlson about it. Yet, once again, when it comes to Israel, journalists believe themselves perfectly entitled to be zany, and virtually always get away with it.

They know this which is why Zionists demand everyone parrot this pledge about a “right to exist” under the threat of being labeled antisemitic if you don’t. No one is buying this shit anymore.

3. This is the only country you ever hear ask this question—because they know their entire history is a fake, tenuous constructed narrative. The Zionists never had a moral right to steal Palestine.

Three points: 1. Israel is the only country that has never defined its borders and refuses to do so—*where* it exists, leaving alone its *right* to do so, is never defined by anyone who asks this question.