Roy Dodd

For the same reasons...Republicans refuse to go to Black communities and compete. Redistricting is becoming easier... winning on MERIT gets farther away

@ScottJenningsKY 90% of Americans want DST to end. We are evenly split on whether living on natural time or putting another regional rule on all timekeeping devices is the better choice.

NOTE: President Trump recently endorsed making DST permanent, but last year called it a "50-50" issue: youtube.com/shorts/0UB0THt…

Bringing this up on the radio today - the debate over Daylight Savings Time (DST) vs Standard Time vs do nothing. What do you think? Vote and comment!

Last night, I made a simple request on X. I asked if anybody visiting Arlington National Cemetery for Memorial Day would stop by Alan’s grave and leave a photo for our family. What happened next honestly caught me off guard. By this afternoon, dozens of Americans from all walks of life had made the walk to Section 60 to visit SSG Alan W. Shaw. Veterans. Families. Complete strangers. People who had never met Alan, but chose to honor him anyway. For one day on social media, people put aside the constant noise and negativity and came together for something bigger than themselves. My notifications filled with photos, kind messages, prayers, and stories from people honoring not just Alan, but so many of our fallen heroes. I don’t think people fully understand what moments like this mean to Gold Star families. The fear is never just losing them. It’s losing them slowly over time as the world moves on and fewer people remember their name. But today showed me that Alan will never be forgotten. After years of watching social media reward some of the worst parts of humanity, today gave me a reminder that the good is still out there too. Thank you to every single person who stopped by to visit Alan today, said his name, shared his story, or took a moment to honor the fallen. This right here is the America Alan knew and loved enough to fight and die for. And today, y’all showed us all that it’s still here and it’s still worth fighting for. 🇺🇸

There is a way to fix this but the folks building AI and Robots are just going to do what they always do. We have 8 months or 2028 elections are owned by the “ONLY TWO AI COMPANIES, $35,000 YEARLY ROBOT TAX” folks win. Hear me now?

@PeterDiamandis SpaceX had achieved nothing of note after 3 years and was written off as dead after 6 years with 3 consecutive launch failures. But you may have noticed that things are different now.

What you say is true, but nonetheless our AI will be great. Whether it is the best remains to be seen, but I will never give up. Never. Space(XAI) is only 3 years old. That’s half the age of Anthropic and quarter the age of OpenAI. Let’s see where things stand 3 years from now.

I'm worried about @KeithOlbermann. He does not look well in this clip.

Election Day may be today - but I am full on continuing the fight in Congress and will continue to (here demanding water & electricity data on… data centers).

Screw the Palestinians. I don’t need to address your dumb allergy. I just wanted to say screw the Palestinians yet again.

Just incredible content. Repeating “We have the money. It’s just being stolen.” over and over again. Calling potholes “Bassholes” after disgraced LA mayor and firefleer Karen Bass. JIC!

Newsom's current "high-speed rail" plan in California: 1. Regular train from S.F. to Merced (1.5 hours) 2. High-speed rail from Merced to Bakersfield (1 hour) 3. Bus to L.A. (2 hours) You'll save ... half an hour! (On some days.) Cost: > $231 billion californiaglobe.com/fl/steve-hilto…

"I do high reps for functional strength." What you imagine: high reps make you better at carrying shopping, climbing stairs, lifting your kids, life in general. What actually happens: high reps make you better at high reps. Endurance is task-specific. Doing 30-rep leg extensions does not prepare you for hiking. Doing 25-rep curls does not prepare you for carrying anything. Real functional capacity has three parts, and high-rep lifting addresses none of them properly. What actually works: - Lift heavy for strength (4-6 reps) so submaximal tasks feel weightless - Walk, ruck, or cycle for the aerobic base that carries you through long days - Train the specific endurance you actually want That last one matters. If you want grip endurance, do hangs or farmer's carries. If you want leg endurance for hiking, hike with a weighted pack. If you want carrying capacity, carry things. The 200kg deadlifter doesn't notice the suitcase. The lifter doing 30-rep leg extensions still takes the lift because their legs are tired from sitting all day, not because they need more leg extensions. Strength as the base. Aerobic work for endurance. Specific work for specific demands. Three sets of 15 does none of these.

Good morning from our BetterFed Beef Families Giddy'Up 😊

Difference between Grok and Claude:

UPDATE: Whatever Happened To Joe Biden’s Stage 4 Cancer? | Noah, WLT Report I was wondering about something today…. Whatever happened to Joe Biden having Stage 4 bone cancer? Remember that? Remember when he suddenly needed a ton of sympathy so that President Trump would not prosecute an old 82 year old guy with bone cancer? I do. Look, I’m not saying he lied, but I am saying I’m asking the same question Susi is: Did Joe Biden actually have stage 4 cancer or not? Joe Biden never had stage 4 cancer did he? — Susi Swift (@susi815) May 24, 2026 Because it’s been a year and a half now and I haven’t heard much about it at all. And every time we see him, he doesn’t look worse, I’d say he looks better! I also remember this….I remember Scott Adams announcing at roughly the same time that he has the same kind of cancer Joe Biden has. Remember this? Scott Adams Makes Heartbreaking Announcement – “I Have The Same Cancer” Scott declined rapidly and died several months ago. Biden? By all accounts he looks healthy as a horse. And other than the couple of people who always email me saying "Wake up Noah, Biden was executed in GITMO in 2019" I would say he looks extremely alive and healthy to me. So....what happened? I don't have the answer for you, but I think it's worth starting to have this conversation. Be a shame if you helped me get this going viral.... To be completely fair, I asked Grok if this was a normal progression and it gave me this: Diagnosis Announcement It was announced on May 18, 2025 (with the diagnosis on May 16, 2025). Former President Joe Biden's office released a statement revealing he had been diagnosed with an aggressive form of prostate cancer (Gleason score 9/Grade Group 5) that had metastasized to the bone, classifying it as Stage 4. This followed urinary symptoms and discovery of a prostate nodule. The cancer was described as hormone-sensitive, which supports effective management through treatments like hormone therapy, though it is not considered curable once metastatic. Key Updates Since the Announcement Initial treatment (May–June 2025 onward): Biden began hormone therapy (described as a pill regimen). He spoke publicly at a Memorial Day event, saying the prognosis was good, he felt good, and he was optimistic. September 2025: He underwent Mohs surgery for skin cancer lesions on his head/forehead, leaving a visible scar/bandage in some photos. October 2025: He underwent a course of radiation therapy (plus ongoing hormone treatment) for the prostate cancer, completing it around mid-to-late October and "ringing the bell" to mark the milestone. He was reported as doing well afterward. Into 2026: He has remained active, including public appearances, speeches (e.g., in South Carolina and Nebraska in February), endorsements (e.g., in May 2026), and work on a memoir. Aides describe his condition as manageable; Jill Biden has noted he will live out his natural life with it. Some friends have expressed concerns about increased fatigue, but official updates project optimism. As of May 2026: (About one year post-diagnosis), he continues public and private activities without major new public health crises reported. Appearance and Expectations Biden has looked relatively stable in public photos and appearances since the diagnosis—smiling in family photos, speaking at events, and engaging in normal activities for an 83-year-old. Early post-diagnosis images (e.g., family graduation events) and later ones show him in suits, often with a positive expression, though some observers noted frailty or slower movement during radiation periods. Recent 2026 images depict him as an elderly man with typical age-related features (white hair, some visible skin changes/scars from prior procedures), but not dramatically deteriorated. Yes, it is plausible and expected that he could still look relatively good. Many men with hormone-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer respond well to modern treatments (hormone/androgen deprivation therapy, often combined with radiation or other agents), which can control the disease for years—often 5–10+ years in some cases, with good quality of life. Survival is highly variable and depends on response, overall health, and extent of spread; the 5-year relative survival for metastatic prostate cancer is around 30–40%, but many live longer due to advances. Side effects (fatigue, etc.) can occur, and some reports mention concerns from close allies, but hormone-sensitive cases frequently allow patients to maintain decent function and appearance for extended periods, especially with top-tier care. His case aligns with what experts described at the time: serious but manageable for the near-to-medium term. This is based on public reporting; individual health details can change, and private medical info isn't fully disclosed. Love to know what you think.... Before I go, here's what I told you back when the news first came out... See here: Here's How Long Joe Biden Has To Live Ok, perhaps I should rephrase that headline because that's actually always been a pet peeve of mine, when doctors tell someone how long they have to live. First of all, they're often wrong. They don't really know, that's why it's literally called "practicing medicine". They're just using their best guesses. But they're not God and they don't know how long any of us have to live. So with those caveats out of the way, I do have an update on Joe Biden's prognosis. First we have this recent photo of a big old nasty scar on the top of his head where they cut out a big patch of skin cancer: Biden, 82, spotted with massive scar on his head after getting skin cancer removed — as Jill goes to spin class — New York Post (@nypost) September 7, 2025 Skin cancer hardly seems the worst of his worries, however and it almost seems cruel cutting open his head when the rest of his body is riddled with cancer that has metastasized to the bone. Seems like bailing out the Titanic with a thimble. ... Surprisingly, the HuffPost thinks he could live 5-10 more years, which is much higher than my estimate, but here's what they say: Former President Joe Biden’s advanced prostate cancer diagnosis has generated several estimates of how long he could live ― and some suggest his cancer could have cut short his term in office had he been reelected. The 82-year-old’s cancer has spread to the bone, meaning it is metastatic and more severe because it is not localized. Dr. Matthew Smith of Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, who has led a research program on prostate cancer survivorship, told the Associated Press that men can anticipate to live with metastatic prostate cancer for four or five years. Dr. Sandy Srinivas, a medical oncologist at Stanford, had a similar take. Srinivas confirmed to ABC News in the Bay Area that while Biden’s condition is incurable, living another four or five years wouldn’t be out of the ordinary. Dr. Herbert Lepor, who specializes in urologic oncology at NYU Langone, offered a more optimistic range. He told Reuters that even patients with metastatic prostate cancer can survive “five to 10 years and beyond.” Read more: wltreport.com/2026/05/25/upd…

Suicidal Empathy Video - Produced by the Wonderful Team of @prageru (THE SAAD TRUTH_2034): youtu.be/ckh7XVrw0s8?si…

So you're ok with mentally ill people who can't handle their own needs being assaulted, raped, exploited, and not given the treatment they need? And drug addicts being killed with "harm reduction"? That's disgusting.

POPULATION TO CUT IN HALF BY 2064 FOUND IN NEW RESEARCH No it’s not your imagination, really bad ideas are culling humanity. They were wrong (or right—if you know) and now humanity is paying. This is the math that ends the debate. A single, elegant nonlinear equation forged in the physics of complex systems now fits the entire arc of human population from the Neolithic dawn 12,000 years ago through every slow expansion, every Malthusian trap, every industrial explosion, right up to today. It doesn’t just curve-fit; it unifies regimes that used to require separate theories: exponential, logistic, stretched, compressed, even the old von Foerster “doomsday” hyperbolic blow-up. And when that same equation is run forward under the one scenario the “limits to growth” priesthood has spent fifty years trying to engineer an abrupt drop in Earth’s effective carrying capacity the output is not gentle stabilization. It is a vertical knife-edge. Under a deliberately conservative assumption that carrying capacity collapses toward roughly two billion people (triggered by climate shocks, resource choke-points, conflict, or pandemic cascades), the model shows global population halving by 2064. From eight-plus billion to roughly four billion in barely more than a single human generation. Four billion human beings gone. Not redistributed. Not “reimagined.” Removed from existence by the unforgiving dynamics of a system that was already running near the edge. That is not a forecast the authors are selling. It is the mathematical demonstration of how violently sensitive our trajectory has become once the anti-growth ideology is allowed to bite into real carrying capacity. We have listened to the Malthusian collectivists for too long. The Club of Rome’s 1972 “Limits to Growth” computer runs, Ehrlich’s Population Bomb hysteria, the entire intellectual and institutional apparatus that followed they all preached the same sermon: Humanity is the problem, expansion is sin, the pie is fixed, therefore the only moral path is managed contraction, wealth redistribution, energy rationing, and the elevation of centralized control over human creativity. They were not merely wrong in their specific predictions (they were spectacularly wrong, repeatedly). They were wrong in their fundamental physics of the world. They treated carrying capacity as a static geological fact rather than what it actually is: a dynamic, expandable quantity that human ingenuity has multiplied by orders of magnitude every time we refused to accept limits. Nuclear power strangled in its cradle. Cheap, dense energy demonized instead of scaled. Agricultural and industrial revolutions in the developing world slowed by ideological export of Western degrowth theology. Innovation itself placed under permanent suspicion. The result is exactly the condition the model now flags as catastrophic: a population still large and still growing in momentum, but with the upward expansion of carrying capacity deliberately throttled or reversed. The collectivists sold this as prudence. It was civilizational self-sabotage. Now the cold mathematics of 12,000 years of real human history is telling us what happens when that sabotage finally meets physical reality. The crash is not a distant Malthusian equilibrium. It is a rapid, nonlinear culling. The same equation that explains why we escaped the old traps also shows why the new, self-imposed ones are far more dangerous: because we have removed the safety margin that previous generations built through sheer defiant growth. 1 of 2

Thank you, @ByronDonalds. Honored to be in the political trenches with you in Congress - let’s do this!