Anthony C. Lopez

1.1K posts

Anthony C. Lopez banner
Anthony C. Lopez

Anthony C. Lopez

@EvoPolitics

Associate Professor - Washington State University. Evolution | Psychology | War

Portland, OR Katılım Şubat 2019
437 Takip Edilen272 Takipçiler
Anthony C. Lopez retweetledi
Richard Fontaine
Richard Fontaine@RHFontaine·
Most foreign policy issues are difficult and complicated. Greenland isn’t one of them. Let’s have a look at seven points: 1. The U.S. needs Greenland for its own defense - Golden Dome, radars, basing. ▶️ The United States can do virtually anything it'd like in Greenland, security-wise, without taking possession of it. The 1951 Greenland Defense Agreement, which was renewed in 2004, allows the United States to build bases there, station troops, and more. 2. Greenland is about to fall into the hands of Russia and China, and the U.S. can’t let that happen. ▶️ The U.S. once had 10,000 U.S. troops in Greenland; now there are around 200. If there is an imminent threat of Chinese or Russian takeover (there isn’t), perhaps start by increasing that number? 3. Russian and Chinese ships are swarming Greenland and the Danes can’t fend them off. ▶️ If Russian and Chinese ships are really menacing the island, the U.S. Navy could sail around it right now en masse. It isn’t. 4. The U.S. needs to own Greenland because "you don't defend leases." Even if Denmark allows full access, there’s a difference between owning and renting. ▶️ This is the No One Washes a Rental Car theory of international relations. In reality, the United States is committed to defending many allies whose territory it does not own. Trump himself defended Israel just last year. The whole point of alliances is mutual defense of one another's territory. That doesn't require seizing it.  5. The Danes are bad allies, so they should hand over Greenland. ▶️ Denmark has been a model ally. Not so long ago, Danes fought for America’s defense rather than the other way around. Among 40-plus allies and partners in Afghanistan, Denmark lost the most soldiers as a percentage of its population. Our allies defended the U.S., which, by the way, none of them owns. 6. This is the new Manifest Destiny. We’re an expansionist, frontier people. Greenland should, one way or the other, join the ever-growing Republic. ▶️ The post-1945 order is predicated a prohibition against conquest. Countries don’t acquire the territory of another without their consent. Iraq doesn’t get Kuwait, Russia can’t have Ukraine, Canada won’t be the 51st state, and the U.S. doesn’t compel Greenland to join. We’ve seen a world before in which conquest abounds. It’s the law of the jungle. 7. This isn’t real, just some fun administration trolling of the ever-nervous Europeans. ▶️ It is at a minimum a major distraction from real issues the transatlantic allies should focus on: Russia, Ukraine, Iran, China. Prodding allies to distrust our word and intentions does not amount to good policy. Most foreign policy issues are difficult and complicated. Greenland isn’t one of them. The sooner this manufactured crisis fades, the better.
English
215
1.2K
3.9K
480.3K
Dr Kareem Carr
Dr Kareem Carr@kareem_carr·
This is a real figure taken from a research article in a Nature journal. This is insane.
Dr Kareem Carr tweet media
English
214
283
3.6K
328.2K
Happy Researchers
Happy Researchers@hapyresearchers·
Offend a PhD with a single tweet.
English
174
29
343
82.7K
Anthony C. Lopez retweetledi
Laura Edelson
Laura Edelson@LauraEdelson2·
Let's talk about the Facebook Election studies that came out yesterday! Contrary to the headlines, there are interesting findings here that show the polarizing impact of FBs algorithms both on what content users see *and on their behavior*. TL;DR 'Wired to Split' is right. 1/15
Laura Edelson tweet media
English
8
146
395
155.2K
Anthony C. Lopez retweetledi
David Schönholzer
David Schönholzer@davidfromterra·
Why did humans form state societies, and why in such peculiar places like Mesopotamia, Mesoamerica, and China? Were they coerced by elites or warlords, or did they cooperate to provide public goods and trade? @pieterwfrancois and I investigate & arrive at surprising conclusions.
David Schönholzer tweet media
English
5
78
321
77.2K
Anthony C. Lopez retweetledi
Jessica Weeks
Jessica Weeks@jessicalpweeks·
Without a global authority to enforce alliances like NATO, it's crucial to know whether/how much joining matters to people in the countries that would be called on to defend the new ally. Our surveys of 13 countries show huge effects of joining (w Mike Tomz and @KCBansak)
PNAS Nexus@PNASNexus

Residents of NATO countries are much more likely to support defending Bosnia, Finland, Georgia or Sweden militarily from Russian invasion if the targeted country is a member of NATO, according to a survey of 14K voters in 13 NATO countries. In PNAS Nexus: ow.ly/gZjH50Pgbp0

English
3
14
67
17.7K
Anthony C. Lopez retweetledi
Michael Kofman
Michael Kofman@KofmanMichael·
A few thoughts on Prigozhin's armed insurrection/mutiny/rebellion. For now it appears over. Wagner seems to be standing down, and leaving Rostov for LNR. Prigozhin launched a mutiny that ultimately challenged Putin’s power, and the system. Thread. 1/
English
128
1.4K
6.5K
3.8M
Anthony C. Lopez retweetledi
Julia Ioffe
Julia Ioffe@juliaioffe·
First rule of being a dictator: don’t let anyone else have an army.
English
106
772
7.2K
390.4K
Anthony C. Lopez retweetledi
Matt Fuhrmann
Matt Fuhrmann@mcfuhrmann·
Two pieces of professional news: 1. My book "Influence Without Arms: The New Logic of Nuclear Deterrence" will be published by Cambridge UP in 2024! It's about countries that have the technology to build nuclear weapons but haven't, like Japan, and how they shape int'l politics
English
10
13
114
12.1K
Anthony C. Lopez retweetledi
Will
Will@Evolving_Moloch·
“I asked him how long it took him to eat a man. “That depends”, was the answer, “if he is a personal enemy or not…that makes a lot of difference. If he is a personal enemy, I eat him all myself; but if he is only an ordinary capture I allow my wife and family to partake.””
Will tweet mediaWill tweet mediaWill tweet mediaWill tweet media
English
4
24
125
19.6K
Anthony C. Lopez retweetledi
David Schmitt
David Schmitt@PsychoSchmitt·
How Can Sex Differences Be Evolved and Culturally Variable? Beware the "Toxic Tetrad" of Misunderstanding Evolved Sex Differences psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/sexual…
English
0
19
47
10K
Anthony C. Lopez retweetledi
Steven Pinker
Steven Pinker@sapinker·
Speaking of the noble savage myth, Thomson & Halstead's review "How Violent was the Pre-Agricultural World?", updating the empirical picture since Better Angels (2011), is now available on @SSRN papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
English
1
27
133
65.9K