Mike

95 posts

Mike banner
Mike

Mike

@ExciteBike

Katılım Şubat 2026
90 Takip Edilen11 Takipçiler
Mike retweetledi
Anthony Pompliano 🌪
Anthony Pompliano 🌪@APompliano·
“eBay needs to be on Ozempic.” $GME $EBAY
English
107
298
2.1K
192.7K
Mike retweetledi
Ryan Cohen
Ryan Cohen@ryancohen·
🎯
Paul Branham@BoilerPaulie

Allow me to translate this letter from eBay for those who don’t speak legalese: Ryan, We got your unsolicited offer to buy eBay for $125/share (half cash, half stock) supported by your 5% economic interest in eBay. Our board, backed by the usual crew of bankers and lawyers who get paid either way, “thoroughly reviewed” it. We’re rejecting it. Not because the math doesn’t work. Not because the highly confident letter from TD Securities for up to $20B on top of your $9B+ cash pile is fake. None of that. We’re rejecting it because your entire approach to running a company is an existential threat to how we like to operate here. Here are the reasons we feel this way, and the things we considered before paying consultants to write this: 1) We’d rather keep milking eBay as a “standalone” cash cow than let you turn it into something bigger and better. 2) Sure, you’ve got real financing lined up and you “know people” with deep pockets, but we’re going to call it “uncertain” anyway so we don’t have to engage. 3) Your plan would actually force real long-term growth and profitability changes we’d rather not be held accountable for. 4) The debt we pretended you can’t even obtain, the operational integration and focus on seller satisfaction, and most importantly, putting someone like you in charge of the combined entity all sound like a nightmare for our current leadership structure because all of us would have zero job security. 5) The valuation math only looks bad if you ignore the 46% premium you’re offering our shareholders and the upside from fixing eBay the way you fixed GameStop, which we are choosing to do and hoping nobody notices. 6) And I hope we buried the lede far enough here: Your governance and executive incentives are completely incompatible with ours. You and your board take zero cash, no salary, no bonuses, no golden parachutes. You buy shares with your own money and only get paid if shareholders win. We, on the other hand, like our nice, reliable annual payouts regardless of whether the stock is flat or the company is just coasting. We’re not about to hand over our golden goose to a guy who eats only what he kills. Look, eBay is “strong” and “resilient” in the way every entrenched public company says it is while handing out eight-figure checks and perks to the C-suite. We’ve done the usual incremental stuff: tweaked the marketplace a bit, returned some capital, and we’d like to keep doing that without any cowboy from GameStop coming in and demanding actual skin-in-the-game accountability. Can you just leave us alone? Our team remains focused on protecting the current regime and delivering “value”… mostly to ourselves and our consultants. Thanks, but no thanks, Paul S. Pressler
Chairman of the Board, eBay
(And proud beneficiary of the status quo)

ART
536
1.5K
8.6K
623.5K
Mike retweetledi
Paul Branham
Paul Branham@BoilerPaulie·
Allow me to translate this letter from eBay for those who don’t speak legalese: Ryan, We got your unsolicited offer to buy eBay for $125/share (half cash, half stock) supported by your 5% economic interest in eBay. Our board, backed by the usual crew of bankers and lawyers who get paid either way, “thoroughly reviewed” it. We’re rejecting it. Not because the math doesn’t work. Not because the highly confident letter from TD Securities for up to $20B on top of your $9B+ cash pile is fake. None of that. We’re rejecting it because your entire approach to running a company is an existential threat to how we like to operate here. Here are the reasons we feel this way, and the things we considered before paying consultants to write this: 1) We’d rather keep milking eBay as a “standalone” cash cow than let you turn it into something bigger and better. 2) Sure, you’ve got real financing lined up and you “know people” with deep pockets, but we’re going to call it “uncertain” anyway so we don’t have to engage. 3) Your plan would actually force real long-term growth and profitability changes we’d rather not be held accountable for. 4) The debt we pretended you can’t even obtain, the operational integration and focus on seller satisfaction, and most importantly, putting someone like you in charge of the combined entity all sound like a nightmare for our current leadership structure because all of us would have zero job security. 5) The valuation math only looks bad if you ignore the 46% premium you’re offering our shareholders and the upside from fixing eBay the way you fixed GameStop, which we are choosing to do and hoping nobody notices. 6) And I hope we buried the lede far enough here: Your governance and executive incentives are completely incompatible with ours. You and your board take zero cash, no salary, no bonuses, no golden parachutes. You buy shares with your own money and only get paid if shareholders win. We, on the other hand, like our nice, reliable annual payouts regardless of whether the stock is flat or the company is just coasting. We’re not about to hand over our golden goose to a guy who eats only what he kills. Look, eBay is “strong” and “resilient” in the way every entrenched public company says it is while handing out eight-figure checks and perks to the C-suite. We’ve done the usual incremental stuff: tweaked the marketplace a bit, returned some capital, and we’d like to keep doing that without any cowboy from GameStop coming in and demanding actual skin-in-the-game accountability. Can you just leave us alone? Our team remains focused on protecting the current regime and delivering “value”… mostly to ourselves and our consultants. Thanks, but no thanks, Paul S. Pressler
Chairman of the Board, eBay
(And proud beneficiary of the status quo)
Paul Branham tweet media
English
281
968
5.4K
795.8K
Mike retweetledi
Reese Politics
Reese Politics@ReesePolitics·
eBay listed six reasons for declining GameStop's $55.5B proposal, most notably no. 6 essentially being Ryan Cohen's aversion to bloated executive compensation structures. That's telling. $GME
Reese Politics tweet media
English
81
92
1.1K
56.8K
Mike retweetledi
Stonkfather 🏴‍☠️
Stonkfather 🏴‍☠️@Stonkfather2021·
So the eBay board clearly believes the company is worth more than $125 a share Here’s a list of prices they’ve sold shares at in the past 12 months: $109 $103 $97 $92 $85 $79
GIF
English
67
252
1.8K
36.5K
Mike retweetledi
Ryan Cohen
Ryan Cohen@ryancohen·
only in corporate america 💩
Ryan Cohen tweet media
English
732
1.5K
8.3K
531.9K
Mike retweetledi
Ryan Cohen
Ryan Cohen@ryancohen·
you’d think with 2.4 billion in marketing spend, they could login to X
Ryan Cohen tweet media
English
553
1.3K
9.2K
325.1K
Mike retweetledi
Ryan Cohen
Ryan Cohen@ryancohen·
I have been suspended from eBay
Ryan Cohen tweet media
English
3.2K
2.9K
25.5K
8M
Mike retweetledi
GregisKitty
GregisKitty@GregIsKitty·
$GME GameStop okay I might be missing something here… But can’t stop thinking about something @ryancohen said yesterday… Let me begin by first saying Ryan Cohen is VERY careful with his words. Listen to this part of the interview. Ryan is using deal math that gets to a post-merger ownership of 60% eBay / 40% GameStop for existing shareholders. But at Friday’s closing stock price of $26.53, that math was 70:30 (see below) I don’t think Ryan meant this point as a hypothetical. Meaning I think the dilution math will ACTUALLY be 60:40. Which brings me to key point #1: This would mean Ryan is implying $GME stock will be at the price needed for 60:40 by the time the deal is finalized. Well, for ownership split to be 60:40… According to my math (disclaimer: I’m bad at math) that price is ~$40. Ryan also said he’s ready to GO on the transaction NOW. Which brings me to key point #2: This would mean GameStop is sitting on news. And Ryan is confident that news will send the stock to *drumroll please*… AT LEAST $40. That’s how he’s going to buy eBay. 50% cash, 50% stock. It’s on the website. In Ryan we trust. Moass is tomorrow.
GregisKitty@GregIsKitty

Is @ryancohen hinting to @TheRoaringKitty it’s TIME to return? Dilution math on $GME explained… GameStop proposed acquiring eBay at $125 per share for $56 billion. The consideration is structured as 50% cash + 50% GameStop common stock. Using Friday’s closing price of $26.53, the stock portion requires GME to issue ~1.046 billion new shares. Half in cash ($28 billion) Half in GameStop stock ($28 billion) $28B/$26.53= ~1.046 billion new shares issued GameStop currently has ~448.4 million shares outstanding. Post-transaction: ~1.494 billion shares total. Existing GameStop shareholders would now own approximately 30% of the combined company (down from 100%). This is standard dilution math from the 50/50 offer structure. THERE IS ONE WAY THIS MATH COULD CHANGE: If GameStop’s stock price RIPS before the final stock exchange ratio is set. Then 2 things happen: 1) DILUTION LESS SEVERE (the STRONGER the rip, the LESS shares issued) 2) The warrants WOULD likely come into play GameStop issued ~59 million warrants in October 2025 (1 warrant for every 10 shares held at that time): - Exercise price: $32 per share. - Warrants expire on October 30, 2026 This is 1 DAY AFTER NATIONAL CAT DAY… COHENcidence!!! If the stock rips above $32 before the eBay deal closes: Warrant holders can exercise them and pay GameStop $32 per share in cash. GameStop receives ~$2 billion in new cash for issuing ~59 million additional shares (some dilution here but still less severe). @TheRoaringKitty we may need a CATalyst 😼 “The more you deny me, the STRONGER I get.” The more GME price falls in meantime, the more shares Roaring Kitty can accumulate before returning. “There’s 2 of them talking”

English
82
119
1.7K
340K
Mike retweetledi
Ryan Cohen
Ryan Cohen@ryancohen·
on phone with customer support @eBay . please respond @eBay
Ryan Cohen tweet media
English
992
1.5K
11.5K
626.7K
Mike retweetledi
Salvatore Linteum
Salvatore Linteum@PhantomBlack699·
RYAN COHEN IS TROLLING EBAY BY SELLING ITEMS AND ATTACHING THE LETTER TO THE BOARD WITH THE PRODUCTS LMFAO
Salvatore Linteum tweet media
English
62
379
3K
97.1K
Mike retweetledi
Reese Politics
Reese Politics@ReesePolitics·
It couldn't be more obvious that Ryan Cohen was trolling CNBC. Look at the difference in his demeaner with Fox Business' Charles Payne. $GME
Reese Politics tweet media
English
134
210
2.5K
66.7K
Mike retweetledi
Ryan Cohen
Ryan Cohen@ryancohen·
The people running eBay bought $0 of stock in the open market in the last 5 years. eBay insiders sold more than $120M in the last 5 years.
English
1.1K
2.7K
15.2K
842.1K
Mike retweetledi
Dr. Michael T LoPiano
Dr. Michael T LoPiano@MichaelTLoPiano·
$GME Shares available to borrow just hit 0.
Dr. Michael T LoPiano tweet media
English
16
35
461
13.7K
Mike retweetledi
Kevin Malone
Kevin Malone@Malone_Wealth·
This interview was incredible. Cohen said multiple times that the offer was half cash half shares and they continously said that he only had $29B in cash so HOW COULD HE POSSIBLY BUY A COMPANY FOR $56B!?!? In my own head I said "umm because the other half is shares??" and CNBC could not put that math together. Then told him "The math doesn't math". Eventually leading to complete confusion on RC's side and him realizing that they brought him on to just try to make him look incompetent compared to all of the "finance pros here". Absolute shill-fest. @ryancohen
Kevin Malone tweet media
English
287
86
1.1K
361.9K