Raghav Awasthi

49K posts

Raghav Awasthi

Raghav Awasthi

@ExecutiveListX

lawyer interests include media law, arbitration, banking and property law. Collect reported judgements like trophies and bench press more than 250 pounds.

New Delhi Katılım Ekim 2012
8.2K Takip Edilen17.3K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Raghav Awasthi
Raghav Awasthi@ExecutiveListX·
Reps with 225 lbs! Tom Brady does around 10 odd I reached 7 ! Not bad for a professional lawyer and father of three ! Video missed the first rep
English
1
0
13
1.4K
Raghav Awasthi
Raghav Awasthi@ExecutiveListX·
@TweetinderKaul He started tucking his thumb horizontally under the ball ! Worked for Akram because his arm action was freakishly quick and he had bigger shoulders too ! Nakal ke liye akal etc etc !
English
0
0
0
275
Raghav Awasthi
Raghav Awasthi@ExecutiveListX·
Sama the British recruited my Brahmin ancestors in greater numbers and they also fought a lot of battles inter alia in the Crimean War. They were all vegetarians and so am I!
Sama Hoole@SamaHoole

The Rajputs were the warrior caste of northern and western India, and for approximately seven centuries: from roughly the 7th century CE through to the Mughal period and beyond, they were among the most militarily capable fighting forces on the subcontinent. Their diet was not complicated. Rajput warriors ate meat. Game, specifically. Hunting was not merely recreation in Rajput culture: it was considered fundamental military training and a marker of warrior identity. Wild boar, deer, and birds were consumed regularly. Domesticated animals were also eaten, with less restriction on beef than most accounts of Indian dietary history would suggest, particularly in the earlier period. They drank large quantities of milk. Fresh, fermented as lassi, churned as butter, clarified as ghee. The dairy intake of a Rajput warrior was substantial in a way that would not surprise anyone who has read the preceding pages of this newsletter. The Rajput physical type, described by contemporaries, Mughal miniature painters, and later British military assessors with consistent specificity, was characterised by height, breadth of shoulder, and physical robustness unusual in a largely grain-eating subcontinent. When the British Indian Army recruited in the 19th and early 20th centuries, they classified certain populations as "martial races": people considered to produce superior soldiers. The Rajputs featured prominently on that list. So did the Punjabis, the Gurkhas, the Sikhs. The British military observers who generated these "martial race" classifications were, frankly, doing something racist: constructing a pseudo-biological framework for something that was actually cultural and dietary. But embedded in the racism was an accurate observation: certain populations produced taller, stronger, more physically capable soldiers. Those populations were, consistently, the ones that ate more animal protein. The "martial race" theory attributed this to blood. The actual explanation was food.

English
0
0
3
550
Harish Puri 🇮🇳
Harish Puri 🇮🇳@harishbpuri·
@ExecutiveListX Raghav, except for that one innings against Pakistan where he hit some huge sixes, I can’t remember anything worthwhile that he did on the field…
English
1
0
1
33
Raghav Awasthi retweetledi
Anil Agarwal
Anil Agarwal@AnilAgarwal_Ved·
It is painful to see India face the adverse consequences of a war we have nothing to do with, particularly because of raw material security. We don’t have to import 90% of our oil, or 95% of our copper or 99.5% of our gold or any other metal resources. Mother Earth has given us the best geology. Last 40 years of practice in the minerals, metals and oil industry have taught me this. Now is the time, with this positive government, to give entrepreneurs freedom. At just 19, I came to Bombay from Bihar and built a company in this industry from scratch. Vedanta was able to acquire Hindustan Zinc and BALCO under a privatisation programme which was never completed. 26% and 49% stakes are still held by the government and not been transferred as per a predetermined agreement. Vedanta also acquired ONGC Oil and Gas asset via UK’s Cairn and Sesa Goa Iron ore from Japan’s Mitsui. In each one, the ambition and goal was to increase the production so much that India wouldn’t need to import but, in fact export. In Hindustan Zinc and BALCO, we succeeded. We increased zinc production 10 times, 20 times in aluminium. In the process, more than 1,000 companies have come up for processing this raw material. And Vedanta has contributed Rs 4.5 lakh crore to the exchequer in the last ten years. In oil and gas, our vision is to produce 1 million barrels per day. In iron ore, my vision is to produce 100 million tonnes, 33% of today’s production level. There are many more underperforming government assets that can perform the same way. Three or four decades ago, there was no know-how, no experts, no finance in this industry. It took a lot of determination. Vedanta raised 35 billion USD from abroad and invested in India. It brought experts and technology. Because of that, Hindustan Zinc can also produce silver and fertiliser, and we are working very hard to start producing critical minerals very soon, something we were told would never happen in India. Globally, only few very large companies engage in mining as it is very difficult without scale. Vedanta should be for India what Rio Tinto and BHP are for Australia or Vale is for Brazil. Other entrepreneurs and companies must create new Vedantas. Most of the advanced countries have become prosperous by developing natural resources, including oil and gas. In India, the system has to stop creating hurdles. It needs to take a long-term view, as this government is not revenue-minded but, production-minded. It must facilitate. Instead of notices and judicial activity, all businesses need to receive recognition and respect. Benefit of doubt should pass onto them. In India, we have economic heroes who can raise production equal to the biggest and best in the world. We should not allow tunnel vision or outdated mindset to keep us small and dependent. Some may remember the case of Rio Tinto which had invested in a diamond mine in Madhya Pradesh. It could have made India a global hub for diamond production, but they exited because of a complex, interfering and discouraging system. The most important thing is trust. Keep the system simple, keep regulation limited and you eliminate the root cause of wrongdoing. We should have self-certification instead of lengthy approvals and clearances. The Government issues the rulebook and entrepreneurs strictly comply, subject to audit. Constant enquiry and interference only discourage enterprise. Also, the mindset of discrimination between public sector and private sector should change. This year my family had the biggest tragedy. It was heartening to hear the words of the Prime Minister who said, “You must stay strong and continue to do work which is important for India.” That is the motivation of my life. I have the blessings of my grandfather and grandmother, who spent 40 years in Vrindavan in a small hut, in Manav Seva Sangh with their guruji, Swami Sharnanand Ji Maharaj. They always advised me, if you have wealth, you must use it for society. If you don’t have wealth, you must always help society with your hand. We all are willing to work hard, take risks and ensure that India becomes self-sufficient. The system should encourage us to deliver for our society and nation; this will eradicate unemployment and encourage women empowerment. This sector has given the maximum revenue to the exchequer in India and in the world for nation-building. It will help in making our country a developed nation, as envisioned by our Prime Minister. Let’s make India & Indians proud.
Anil Agarwal tweet media
English
275
1.3K
4.8K
364.4K
Raghav Awasthi
Raghav Awasthi@ExecutiveListX·
@michaelscottfc Don't understand why babar is in Pakistans t20 team but abdullah shafique is not !
English
0
0
0
71
Raghav Awasthi retweetledi
ranvir jas
ranvir jas@ranvir20·
@ExecutiveListX Pakistan cricket has gone downhill post 26/11 attack. We have isolated them, no India tours - no monies except ocassional matches in tournaments. NO IPL exposure.. They were still ok till mid 2015-17 because they had older vintage players of excellent skill then
English
0
1
0
97
Raghav Awasthi
Raghav Awasthi@ExecutiveListX·
Promoted by him, their cricket has been quite universally mediocre ! Think of the bcci as i h c l. And imagine them going up against let us say ashoka hotel !
English
0
0
1
41
Raghav Awasthi
Raghav Awasthi@ExecutiveListX·
Department and is heavily politicized as a result. It works like a public sector undertaking and the bitter truth is that even though in the 50s and 60s they were kind of like the plucky Afghans of that era, if one excludes the Imran Khan years and those of the players
English
1
0
1
44
Raghav Awasthi
Raghav Awasthi@ExecutiveListX·
And more importantly the cricket board was barely solvent. What we forget is that although our board was not the behemoth it is today even in the 80s when the team was relatively mediocre it was formidable. Pakistan crickets problem is different. Essentially it is a govt
English
1
0
1
42
Raghav Awasthi
Raghav Awasthi@ExecutiveListX·
I am not even so sure if it is a function of the economy although in today's day and age it does play a major part. The 1996 wc was won basically by a team of semi professional cricketers from Sri Lanka. The country was then just slightly more prosperous than India
Gabbar@GabbbarSingh

After watching a lot of Pakistani cricket analysis shows this World cup. My analysis is this: You may have noticed, an open admission by a lot of Pakistani ex-players that India is a much better team, which totally deserved to win. Which may appear gracious, barring few sour pusses like Mohd Amir. This also belies the supremacist delusion a lot of madrasa educated commoners have, it suddenly comes to fore the next time India plays Pakistan. The “Aghaa-ji” jingoism returns. Maybe it’s performative. But it’s there. But the common refrain from TV always is - Pakistani cricket is not run well, there is a direct dig at management & selection. It seems every ex-player wants a job with PCB. Given there is no vacancy at IPL. Every analysis is like a Job application. Then they get those jobs. Pakistan team loses again. Those guys are back on TV hot seats, saying “system kharab hai” Ask Ramiz Raza. Junta both sides get to enjoy 2x matches. One to watch (where your team is playing) and the other to Hate-watch (where your neighbor is playing) The bottomline is - The Talent pool is mediocre. You can try out numerous permutations & combinations, it will still give you mediocre results. It’s a function of investment in cricket. Which is a function of your economy. Sad.

English
2
0
4
581
Raghav Awasthi retweetledi
Narendra Modi
Narendra Modi@narendramodi·
Champions! Congratulations to the Indian team on winning the ICC Men’s T20 World Cup! This remarkable triumph reflects exceptional skills, determination and teamwork. They have shown outstanding grit through the tournament. This victory has filled every Indian heart with pride and joy. Well done, Team India!
English
6.1K
34.4K
257.5K
19.3M
Raghav Awasthi retweetledi
Arnab Ray
Arnab Ray@greatbong·
Waiting for Sharada Ugra’s 7000 word “pinnacle of sports journalism” piece ruing how muscular Hindu patriarchal nationalism has reduced men’s cricket to a no-contest, RTed by Pakistani accounts, daniel86cricket, Dhurv Rathee AI fiesta users….
English
21
248
1.3K
39.2K
Raghav Awasthi
Raghav Awasthi@ExecutiveListX·
To them. There were separate gates too. Even now when one sees Zak Crawleys batting stats one wonders what the reason is for his persistence in the English test team except for the fact that his dad is a multimillionaire
English
0
0
0
44
Raghav Awasthi
Raghav Awasthi@ExecutiveListX·
Is why it evolved in such a way that one could participate irrespective of one's level of athleticism or age. There is a bit of a cruel class element to it too. Batters till the time of Jack Hobbs were mostly amateurs who paid village blacksmiths and yeomen farmers to bowl
English
1
0
0
48
Raghav Awasthi
Raghav Awasthi@ExecutiveListX·
Agreed. And except perhaps New Zealand during the summer months, cricket is not a mass sport in any other country except those in the subcontinent. In England it is a countryside pastime very much even today! The original form of the game was village v village which
Somnath Mukherjee@somnath1978

Eng produces many more elite athletes than India, and even more elite cricketers as % of aspirant population. @bhogleharsha 's forgotten Stat 101 frm IIMA (maybe that small place on Sabarmati has too little maths😎😎).

English
1
0
2
532