
NorthernMiner
4.5K posts

NorthernMiner
@ExplainingBitc1
I save my wealth in #bitcoin and I will continue to stack #sats “forever, Laura forever.”



For anyone interested about the truth: Adam Back is absolutely, overtly and veritably lying about me *ever* supporting BIP110, or even being "a fence sitter" about it. I have always strongly, clearly and unequivocally opposed any similar fork proposal since the very earliest suggestions. I have always been, and remain, consistently opposed to: - using consensus rules to tackle specific types of onchain spam, - defensively addressing any kind of "illegal data" moral panic in any possible way (mempool policies included), - enforcing any controversial consensus change (including the ones I agree with, unlike this one) without clear full-ecosystem agreement. It's a bit unfortunate that a very influential voice in the industry is lying about me, since I have a smaller reach to debunk him. Maybe some of you can help me by spreading the correction. Thanks.


"Peter Thiel's 'Founders Fund' bankrolled Flock." ✅ FACT CHECK: TRUE! Before Flock became a multi-billion-dollar surveillance company, Peter Thiel's VC firm helped fund its growth. The cameras didn't appear overnight. Neither did the money behind them.



@MichaelDunwort1 “BIP110 has absolute zero chance of success, it’s DOA. Thats why I’m dedicating 18 hours of my life every single day for many months replying to everyone who thinks it’s a good idea and explaining to them that it’s not a good idea but it’s too complicated for them to understand.”



There are 110 things more dangerous to Bitcoin than spam. BIP 110 turns a spam dispute into a consensus change that would invalidate some currently valid, fee-paying transactions. That precedent is the danger. We should save our energy for threats that really matter. $BTC



There are 110 things more dangerous to Bitcoin than spam. BIP 110 turns a spam dispute into a consensus change that would invalidate some currently valid, fee-paying transactions. That precedent is the danger. We should save our energy for threats that really matter. $BTC





@IIICapital A couple of anonymous developers (Citrea) founded by deep state actor and intelligence agency op (Peter Thiel) rushing to change Bitcoin’s consensus (Core devs openly stated the Op_Return limit removal would only benefit Citrea) could also set a dangerous precedent. What to do?












