F0URLIGHTS

3.9K posts

F0URLIGHTS banner
F0URLIGHTS

F0URLIGHTS

@F0URLlGHTS

Katılım Haziran 2024
0 Takip Edilen21 Takipçiler
F0URLIGHTS
F0URLIGHTS@F0URLlGHTS·
@DavidWolfe Now drop all carbs and enjoy the other 47% of symptoms resolve.
English
0
0
0
17
F0URLIGHTS
F0URLIGHTS@F0URLlGHTS·
@rePro_Truth Wait a minute... Did a predator work their way into a place where accessing potential victims was relatively easy!?
English
0
0
0
10
𝐫𝐞𝐏𝐫𝐨-𝐓𝐫𝐮𝐭𝐡
This is Paul Engh. He's arguing in court -in 2 different predator priest cases- that the predator priests are the 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘭 victims. He says that it violates predator priests' freedom of religion if you prosecute them for sexually assaulting women. Yes---you read that correctly.
𝐫𝐞𝐏𝐫𝐨-𝐓𝐫𝐮𝐭𝐡 tweet media
Hemant Mehta@hemantmehta

Two Catholic priests were accused of abusing women they were counseling. Their defense? Prosecuting them violates their *religious freedom* (Yes, really.) 👇 friendlyatheist.com/p/catholic-pri…

English
5
11
33
540
F0URLIGHTS
F0URLIGHTS@F0URLlGHTS·
@DoomScroling A fertilized human egg is a human at its least mature/developed state. → unique human DNA, actively metabolizing along a human life cycle, etc Abortion is murder, not a right.
English
0
0
0
35
Miranda
Miranda@DoomScroling·
The irony of him posting that while he tries to justify torturing women & girls in the name of his preferred religion. For all the ignorant dramatics of anti choice fanatics, abortion access is a human right and a medical decision people have a right to make for themselves.
Miranda tweet media
English
51
108
870
9.5K
F0URLIGHTS
F0URLIGHTS@F0URLlGHTS·
@Maroxad Without God, it's all just molecules interacting with the laws of nature No free will No morality No purpose No meaning You (whatever that would mean) "finding secular reasons" would be nothing more than a guided outcome on the part of the laws of nature. Utterly meaningless
English
0
0
0
3
F0URLIGHTS
F0URLIGHTS@F0URLlGHTS·
@drterrysimpson List what you believe is the strongest evidence that high fiber intake is CAUSAL for any of the benefits you listed.
English
0
0
0
16
Dr Terry Simpson
Dr Terry Simpson@drterrysimpson·
Ten people. No control group worth the name. No clinical outcomes. And we’re declaring fiber “overrated” because microbes changed when you starved them of their primary substrate. Of course the microbiome adapts. It also adapts to antibiotics, famine, and dysentery. Adaptation is not a gold star for health—it’s survival. We have decades of data, across cohorts, interventions, and mechanisms: higher fiber intake lowers cardiovascular disease, improves glycemic control, feeds short-chain fatty acid production, and supports mucosal integrity. But now we’re supposed to toss that because ten carnivores showed “functional alterations.” You wonder if they do nothing but cherry pick data all day –– and ignore the rest (put the em dash in there for the AI lovers)
Cary Kelly@CaryKelly11

Just published study of 10 carnivores found that long term adherence leads to "profound functional alterations of the gut microbiota" & challenges the assumption that dietary fiber is essential for microbiota diversity. Translation: Fiber is overrated & our gut adapts to what we feed it.

English
9
8
54
2.7K
F0URLIGHTS
F0URLIGHTS@F0URLlGHTS·
@bano_b @ThinkingAtheist Meaningless. My point stands: the Left indoctrinates, it doesn't educate. Hence, the perpetually dropping tests scores in spite of ever increasing funding and ever-eroding standards.
F0URLIGHTS tweet media
English
0
0
0
36
Bano!
Bano!@bano_b·
@F0URLlGHTS @ThinkingAtheist The displaying of the 10 commandments is unconstitutional while displaying the pride flag is constitutional in public schools
English
1
0
3
40
F0URLIGHTS
F0URLIGHTS@F0URLlGHTS·
@Based_blackman2 @veganfitnessric Sure, but that doesn't change my point; you can still eat the animal regardless of how that guy feels about it. His feelings aren't a magic spell that could prevent you from eating the animal.
English
1
0
1
14
#1 Bullet biter
#1 Bullet biter@Based_blackman2·
@F0URLlGHTS @veganfitnessric Well if animals are rational agents that can advocate for their own property eating them would require initiating force which is an nap violation.
English
1
0
1
8
Ric
Ric@veganfitnessric·
The question is not, ‘Can animals reason?’ nor, ‘Can they talk?’ but, ‘Can they suffer? Yes
English
9
10
66
821
F0URLIGHTS
F0URLIGHTS@F0URLlGHTS·
@oneGReatvegan You're either lying, delusional, or don't understand that producing plants involves intentionally and unintentionally killing millions and millions of sentient lives. You're not in a good way in any of those three cases.
English
0
0
1
57
Gabrielle Reyes
Gabrielle Reyes@oneGReatvegan·
As a vegan of over 15+ years I get all of my protein without taking a life…and somehow that’s controversial?
English
40
5
259
3.5K
F0URLIGHTS
F0URLIGHTS@F0URLlGHTS·
@vivacampaigns That's cool and all, but it's not more moral than if a human decides to own animals as property: Proverbs 12:10 "A righteous man regardeth the life of his beast..." In other words, a man who owns animals as property ("his beast") can still be considered righteous in God's eyes.
English
1
0
0
31
Viva!
Viva!@vivacampaigns·
Wise words from Benjamin Zephaniah 💚
Viva! tweet media
English
9
61
288
2.6K
Aakash Shaw
Aakash Shaw@Shaw_Ak47·
Better late than never. For the animals. For the planet.
Aakash Shaw tweet media
English
21
43
166
1.4K