FOMO WORLDWIDE, INC.

@AmazingEyes1122 67

No one has found the number in the box so far What number do you see? LEVEL- VERY HARD WINNER takes $800 ends in 24 hours

$SRXH Telegram: Cross-asset regime intelligence. Real-time state change alerts from 200+ EventHorizonIQ sensors. VIX, Treasury, BTC, stablecoins, policy uncertainty, insider action, and more. eventhorizoniq.com t.me/EventHorizonIQ

@elonmuskPreke Her life

No hints No clue Just pure logic...! What's your answer!!!

@ItsNala Maybe Keeta or Sui

ETH is dead BTC is too slow SOL is filled with scammers XRP is for old people What’s the solution?

@KobeissiLetter There is a transformer bottleneck with long lead times and supply from mostly China and Germany so they need all localized power. Agreement doesn't need to be signed it is a must to build their own power plants unless they want to wait years for each facility to get on grid.

BREAKING: Amazon, Google, Meta, Microsoft, xAI, Oracle and OpenAI are set to sign an agreement with the Trump Administration to generate their own electricity supply for AI data centers, per Fox News. This includes: 1. Meeting with President Trump in March to sign the pledge 2. Companies will build, bring, or buy their own power supply for new AI data centers 3. Companies will agree to protect Americans from price hikes Trump is shifting attention to surging electricity costs.

@jimcramer Gaining on the downside. ---Mark Haines (RIP)

It's down enough

@Bitcoin_Teddy That's not revenue

Strategy says if #Bitcoin ends 2025 between $85,000 and $110,000, it expects fiscal 2025 revenue of about $7B to $9.5 billion, and net income of $5.5 billion to $6.3 billion.

@GuntherEagleman Yes

🚨Trump just posted this! Would you?

@AnitaArtx @AndreasGlandt @AriasJ132 @ArqRamonn @BlackStangBC @Chevabee @CekanderSt85990 @Gravitykoha @GospelOfGrace_1 @esard192767 12

Lots of people get it wrong Answer. Can you solve it?

@MikeFor44857211 @stonychambers That's is ridiculous this deal shouldn't go through

@stonychambers LOL Now the BTC/share does not matter for SMLR shareholders. What a joke !

Making sense of the $ASST $SMLR merger. What's with this 210% premium? Important to understand this is an all stock deal. The share prices should joined at the hip with a fixed exchange rate: 21.05 ASST = 1 SMLR This exchange rate was used, along with the closing prices on Friday, to compute the 210% premium you are seeing in headlines. It isn't a real premium because the deal is denominated in shares, not dollars. Deviations from this ~21:1 exchange rate reflects the following: - implied futures pricing discrepancies (see the options chains for each) - uncertainty on whether the deal closes - borrow rates for shorting Since we have neither an expected close time nor do we have other details, the market seems to be shrugging it off as "remote chance" or at least "immaterial until further notice". A similar stock for stock deal happened earlier this year with $CRWV buying $CORZ. The latest news on that seems to be a big CORZ shareholder revolting against the terms, calling out management for acting against shareholder interests to secure a big $200M payday. Blockspace Media covered it here: blockspace.media/insight/two-se… -- What about the math? Does it make sense to buy SMLR instead of the BTC from the open market? The simple answer is that it might make sense if we consider that there's no way $ASST will be able to press a common ATM to easily get 5014 BTC (SMLR's stack). It would mean issuing about 17% of the market cap. Ofc you will also get frontrunning, so the amount of actual dilution will be significantly larger. The problem here is that to go from common stock to bitcoin, you have to hit the dollar orderbook twice: stock to dollar, dollar to BTC. At the sizes they are looking to do, the slippage is massive. The solution is to do an OTC-like move where we never touch the dollar orderbook and just do a deal in terms of stock. Hence the 21:1 exchange rate. The more complex answer is to consider transaction accretion for both companies. Accretion in Bitcoin is of course growth in BTC per share. 15 million SMLR shares -> 315 million ASST shares at the 21:1 exchange rate. There are 635 million current implied shares outstanding on ASST. This means there are 950 million shares after this transaction. At 950M post-deal ASST shares and 10,900 BTC total, BTC per ASST share = 10,900 / 950,000,000 ≈ 0.00001147 BTC (≈ 1,147 sats/share). --- To SMLR shareholders, it looks like… 15.0M SMLR shares and 5,014 BTC held: - Pre-deal BTC per SMLR share ≈ 5,014 / 15,000,000 = 0.00033427 BTC (≈ 33,427 sats). - After exchanging 1 SMLR → 21 ASST, BTC per original SMLR share = 21 × 1,147 = 24,087 sats → 28% lower BTC per share. --- To ASST shareholders, it looks like… - Pre-deal BTC per ASST share ≈ 5,886 / 635,000,000 = 927 sats - Post-deal 1,147 sats → 24% higher BTC per share --- So BTC per share for $SMLR is going down but BTC per share for $ASST is going up. This next part is important. Counterintuitive to the premium that ASST is seemingly paying, it is actually SMLR that is experiencing negative accretion. But in dollar terms, SMLR shareholders gain because of the massive dollar denominated implied premium (just look at SMLR stock price today). The transaction is therefore (arguably) a case of getting everyone what they want: - SMLR shareholders arguably don't care much about the bitcoin angle. They rejected the preferred stock authorization which basically stopped the playbook. They wanted dollar share price go up, and now they have it - ASST shareholders (theoretically) do care about BTC per share. This is a way to get big BTC Yield in one move without having to go through the ATM slippage - Strive lets SMLR shareholders bear the cost of slippage, in exchange for a higher SMLR dollar valuation The bigger joint stack sets up the next phase of the playbook. A larger collateral base enables more credit issuance at better terms. Perhaps the main unlock however, is SMLR's cash flowing business is theoretically a strong income stream to support credit issuance even without the collateral. SMLR wasn't going to put those assets to good use after that shareholder vote. This was a way to get those unaligned shareholders out so that the new entity can move forward with bitcoin.

@ElephantSignal A

🚨BREAKING: In a 5-4 decision, SCOTUS has struck down the Biden-Harris administration's rewrite of Title IX, which would have allowed men in women’s sports, bathrooms, locker rooms, dorms, and compelled speech. Do you support this decision? A. YES B. NO

@RedLineReportt 1 yes

🚨BREAKING: Stephen Miller, a senior Trump Advisor, is trying to exclude illegal aliens from the U.S. census, which removes House seats from Blue states like California, New York etc. Do you support excluding illegals from the U.S. census? 1. Hell Yes 2. No

$ALTS seeing continued action into after-hours trading today👀 🚨 At 4:32 pm today some 🐳 picked up $2.5M worth of $ALTS 👀 🤔Unusually large trade in $ALTS especially after-hours 🤔

$IGOT there is chance to save this company through tokenization of its stock and turnaround of its significant investment in $HMLA. Interested parties email HMLAtechnologies@gmail.com and when it's lined up expect to be contacted. In the meantime follow @HMLAtech and @VikPGrover

$IGOT $HMLA will attend themicrocapconference.com