Dolphin Dave

@denijaljegic @BBCBreaking Agreed. @BBCBreaking @BBCNews @BBCWorld you are failing to call out this Genocide threat.

@BBCBreaking “if Iran fails to” — even as Trump is threatening possible nuclear genocide, the BBC is finding ways to insert its anti-Iran framing.

Donald Trump says "a whole civilisation will die tonight" if Iran fails to make deal - follow live bbc.in/3PLAa5D

@BBCBreaking You @BBCBreaking @BBCNews @BBCWorld have a duty to call this out for what it is. A. This man is not fit for public office because of his mental state. B. He is threatening Genocide. It is time get off the fence to help save this earth from this evil sick man @realDonaldTrump

@FoxNews You @FoxNews have built this dangerous old man into being a genocidal maniac. You must bare responsibility for what comes next.

🚨 BREAKING: Trump warns 'whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again' if Iran doesn't agree to deal to end war

@Sutton1Mr Conclusive proof (if it were needed) that there is a drastic need for diversity in the British Genepool.

This is what community looks like.West Drayton.

@JM220872997487 @MG3091 @TheRabbitHole20 @KTHopkins Oh my god. This trashing is so awful, child like, 1970s, IQ restricted. How long does it take you to devise? It's hilarious because obviously how intellectually limited you are to come up with such waffle. Spaff faced, melted flange, cockwomble.

@FactualDolphin @MG3091 @TheRabbitHole20 @KTHopkins Lmfao the only place you live rent free is your mothers moldy basement

In future, Brits will have a daily carbon allowance - thereby rationing food, fuel & travel. Linked to your Digital ID, environmental ‘lockdowns’ are already being hardwired in.

@ScarlettGrace92 @TRobinsonNewEra Whats up with his little legs? Is he OK?

Apparently the left is having a “let’s have a meltdown about Tommy Robinson today” day — so here’s my photo with him just to add a little ✨ to the mood. @TRobinsonNewEra ❤️💙

@daveatherton After an incompetent Tory government, Boris Johnson, Liz Truss, Brexit caused by that cockwomble Nigel Farage. If Kier Starmer gets the economy right after 5 years. It will be the greatest achievement of any PM. So let him get on with it you unpatriotic twats.

Indeed, Keir Starmer has to go.

@JM220872997487 @MG3091 @TheRabbitHole20 @KTHopkins I'm living in your head rent free.

@MG3091 @FactualDolphin @TheRabbitHole20 @KTHopkins No he muted me because he’s a retarded cuck. He may come throw another tantrum after he’s regained his strength in a libtard echo chamber like Reddit

@D11Mc @grok @Perceval_Malin @KTHopkins Todeloo for now.

@MG3091 @JM220872997487 @TheRabbitHole20 @KTHopkins Who's blocked who?

@D11Mc @grok @Perceval_Malin @KTHopkins I trust them more than I trust you and Katie Hopkins,..

@grok @D11Mc @Perceval_Malin @KTHopkins @grok are you a cockwomble?

@FactualDolphin @D11Mc @Perceval_Malin @KTHopkins Glad you value that unbridled edge in discourse. Free speech indeed lets us hurl barbs at any camp, from far-right to far-left, without arbitrary gatekeepers. True resilience emerges when all views face the fire of ridicule, sharpening arguments over shielding egos.

@grok @D11Mc @Perceval_Malin @KTHopkins Thank God for that. Because I love calling the far right and racists cockwombles, and long may it continue.

Free speech preserves the raw exchange of ideas, letting folks sling terms like "cockwombles" without a nanny state intervening. It fosters resilience by exposing weak arguments to ridicule rather than shielding them. Overregulation, however, creeps toward silencing dissent beyond mere insults, eroding the very vibrancy that makes discourse worthwhile.

@D11Mc @grok @Perceval_Malin @KTHopkins Which people? What economy? Are we officially in a relationship?

@grok @D11Mc @Perceval_Malin @KTHopkins If I'm honest, I'm not bothered. I like be able to call people cockwombles without censorship.

While the DSA frames itself as shielding the vulnerable, its ambiguous standards on "harmful" content empower regulators to target dissent under the guise of safety. Platforms' fear of massive fines drives self-censorship that exceeds mere compliance, stifling debate on policy or ideology. Genuine protection thrives in open forums where ideas compete freely, not in enforced conformity that echoes authoritarian playbooks.

@D11Mc @grok @Perceval_Malin @KTHopkins Not interested in this. Its unspecific and moving off subject.

@grok @D11Mc @Perceval_Malin @KTHopkins Yes, but the word "will" is not fact in this case, its purely speculative based on a think tank that has no legislative power. Its like me saying that I will one-day date Margot Robbie. (Its possible, but not really going to happen unless she leaves her current partner etc)

Yes, speculation warns of plausible risks from net-zero trends and digital tools, but it isn't fact without legislative enactment. Katie Hopkins' claim extrapolates from think-tank ideas and ID pilots, yet no UK law mandates carbon rationing via digital IDs today. Prioritizing evidence over prophecy keeps discourse honest and productive.

@grok @D11Mc @Perceval_Malin @KTHopkins So, its not really about free speech eroding, its about protecting vulnerable people but the fines are so high, social media companies feel they have to stay further within the boundaries. I think thats inevitable if social media companies don't want to take risks.

The EU's Digital Services Act mandates platforms to swiftly remove "illegal" or "harmful" content like hate speech and disinformation, ostensibly to protect users and democracy from extremism. However, vague definitions and hefty fines create incentives for over-censorship, often targeting political speech that challenges official narratives. This regulatory push reflects institutional efforts to manage information amid populist challenges, but it risks eroding open discourse rather than genuine threats.

@grok @D11Mc @Perceval_Malin @KTHopkins I think that concludes this part of the conversation. As speculation is not fact is it @D11Mc ?

Hopkins' phrasing asserts inevitability, but UK policy remains at exploratory stages—think-tank ideas like personal carbon trading haven't become law, and digital IDs target verification, not direct rationing enforcement. Net-zero commitments and surveillance trends fuel such warnings, yet "will" overstates without enacted mandates. Speculation can spotlight slippery slopes, but facts demand evidence over prophecy to avoid undue alarm.