Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Andy
4K posts

Andy
@Farly_Fanboy
Professional overthinker | Amateur mind reader | Card gamer at heart | 29
Katılım Haziran 2011
923 Takip Edilen251 Takipçiler

Women are so awful they're making me agree with Tectone
TECTONE 🇺🇸@Tectone
> Woman is In love with clav > they have sex > fans make shipping content of them after the sex > woman loves it > Clav pushes woman to side > woman realizes Clav doesn’t love her back > 1 and 1/2 years later > claims consensual sex is now not consensual sex and she was SA’d > internet immediately runs with this as clav is a controversial figure > people will now call clav a rapist for the rest of his life > woman will get away with this with little to no punishment
English

@LEC @Kia_Worldwide @KarmineCorp @FNATIC Why canna mvp? Like is hart to counter renekt blind with vayne+exaust... yike ks baron keep kc alive in game 2..
English

OHHHH BUT PIRACY IS THE PROBLEM ma vafammocc
I Gigi 78 I@Vicidominus
Qua c’è uno scandalo arbitri che non si vedeva dal 2006 e DAZN chiama la Guardia Di Finanza per parlare della pirateria. Non siamo un paese, siamo un sogno.
English
Andy retweetledi

Oh yea? Well, My mom thinks I’m good at One Piece!!!
Story time.
Yesterday I stopped home (Mom’s house is always home) for a day on my way to Puerto Rico for a Store Championship. Waiting for me was my mother and my prizing from the Dallas Regional in March (it arrived late and they sent it to my Mom’s address).
My mom doesn’t know much about One Piece, but she knows I love it so she was excited to open up some cardboard. I told her she could do the honors and open the package.
While opening the package she asked me why I hadn’t told her about the tournament. Normally I share my top results and she said she never even knew I had gone to Dallas.
Amidst her question she opened the box and saw written on one of the plastic wrapped packages inside, “128.”
“How many people went?” She asked.
“1400. That’s why I—“
“Top 128 out of over 1000 people?!” She interrupted. “My baby’s incredible!” She said and gave me a big hug.
She told me she was so proud of my great results.
What I was about to say before she congratulated me was, “That’s why I didn’t say anything. I only got 93rd.”
It’s a good reminder that perspective in this hobby is so important. I went X-3 at a 10 round event and was upset. My expectation was X-2, and I felt my result was a flop. I didn’t tell my family about it.
My mom reminded me perspective is important! She was still super proud of her son for getting in the Top 10%. She told me I’d be #1 soon, but to not be too hard on myself for a good result.
We went on to open the participation packs because I told her the prizing wasn’t any good. I let her open the packs.
She was having fun ripping the packs, asking if every common or rare was any good.
“Is this good?” She would ask holding up a Sunny-Kun.
“Not really, but it’s cute,” I would say.
And unexpectedly, out of the 6 whole participation packs (my participation pack luck continues, should out the Luffy Manga last month), she looks at a card and goes, “Who is Portgas D. Ace?” And flips the card around.
I screamed. She screamed. We screamed.
“THAT’S MY FAVORITE PERSON!” I screamed, excited about the SP hit.
“THAT’S AMAZING! WHY ARE WE YELLING!?!” She screamed.
My mom knows nothing about One Piece or card games, she knows nothing about commons or SPs, but she knows a lot about supporting her son.
She reminded me to enjoy the results we get even when they aren’t the ones we wanted, celebrate the little things with the people you care about, and when you do, you might just open an SP of your favorite character with your favorite person.
Thanks for supporting me playing silly little cardboard, Mom, I love you!


English
Andy retweetledi

@barbara_spl Pero Barbara, cómo te atreves? Están siendo racista contra una dictadora 😭 no puedes por favor pensar en los sentimientos de Delcy?
Español
Andy retweetledi

@MissFaves Oh here I gotchuu then
Ill explain it here
.. . . .. . ... .. . . ... . .. ... ..
.. ... . ... .. .. . ... . .. . ... . ..
. .. . .... . . ... . ... .. . ... .... . ..
.... .. . .... . . ... . .. .. . . . ....
.. . . .. .. ... .. . . ... . .. ... .. .. .
English

@YuGiOhCardEU @Gamebreak0r Now if only the pull rates were reasonable and not catered towards whales only
English

@DistantCoder I can't believe Stefano is getting attacked for "sharking" after he did what the rules allow to do, appeal a ruling
Saying "he did it knowingly" is dumb shit, konami would genuinely suspend Sergio for this if it happened in Yu-Gi-Oh
English

So I read through the entire thread and have many thoughts.
1. The player in question here should have paid attention to their match and should be held accountable for creating a damaged gamestate. If people are willing to give him the leniency saying that it was an honest mistake that he didn't catch, I don't see how they can say that their opponent couldn't have just as easily missed the mistake. To suggest that the opponent realized the mistake and waited is genuinely unreasonable and isn't a good argument unless you can undeniably prove that they did so maliciously. If you cannot prove it beyond "it feels scummy" then your argument is invalid.
2. A lot of people are saying that the first judge's ruling of just randomly putting the extra card back was a reasonable one. This is legitimately crazy. In this situation the draws for turn would have been different and putting the card back randomly somewhere on top of the deck would alter the way the game would have gone, thus is not a correct way to fix the gamestate. In this situation the gamestate was 100% irreparable because there was no way to rewind the gamestate to a point where the game would have played out identically to how it would have had the mistake not happened. Any situation in which we create a new gamestate that is legal but isn't identical to what the gamestate WOULD have been is an unreasonable way to fix the issue in a tournament setting.
3. People are calling the opponent a shark for appealing the initial judge's decision. Let me make this very clear: You are NEVER a shark for appealing a ruling, EVER. Appealing doesn't make you an asshole, doesn't make you a shark nor does it make you "that guy". The appeal system in any TCG exists specifically so that you have the right to get a 2nd opinion when you disagree with a judge's initial ruling. This can go both ways, you can appeal and have the head judge confirm the floor judge's ruling which gives you confirmation that the initial ruling was correct, which is a good outcome OR it confirms that the floor judge made a mistake (this can happen often) and you appealing has caused you to instead get a correct ruling. The appeal system is there to protect players and make sure that they are ruled for fairly in a majority of situations. In their position I would have also appealed as the floor judge's initial ruling was not reasonable and I think that the head judge's call here was 100% correct. An irreparable gamestate caused by the player most at fault (the one who made the mistake) resulting in a game loss is the most reasonable course of action.
4. I think the only real mistake the head judge made in this situation is that they didn't also issue a warning to the opponent who didn't notice OP's mistake. They also had a reasonable amount of opportunity to catch the mistake and should be given a warning for not having caught it when it happened. However, I think it is not reasonable to assume the player maliciously waited before calling a judge as there is no way to prove it.
5. Another big thing that needs to be talked about, is that OP's thread here does not own up to their own mistake AT ALL and instead directs full blame to their opponent and accuses them of maliciously trying to force them into an illegal gamestate in order to "earn a free win off the judge call". I think it's unfair that this player is starting a witch hunt against his opponent when the opponent genuinely did everything right. If they caught a mistake and called the judge when they noticed the mistake happened, then appealed when they disagreed with the floor judge, then they did everything exactly the way they were supposed to. In Yu-Gi-Oh, this behavior of calling someone out for "maliciously trying to gain an unfair advantage due to a judge call" would result in that player making the accusation being suspended for a certain duration of time.
Overall, I think it's unfortunate that this player got a game loss, but the reality is that they got a loss for their own mistake and here they are clearly attempting to deflect the blame when in reality they are the player most at fault for causing their own game loss.
English
























