Hugo Stephens

20.7K posts

Hugo Stephens

Hugo Stephens

@FarseerUK

Old but not obsolete

England Katılım Mayıs 2015
1.6K Takip Edilen1.1K Takipçiler
Hugo Stephens
Hugo Stephens@FarseerUK·
@KEdge23 @grizzly712 For once we are agreed on something: I think an alliance with the useless Tories would be a disaster for Reform. Anyway: talk of alliances before the election is premature. Its afterwards with the possibility of power that will make an alliance seem attractive...
English
0
0
0
4
Kevin Edger
Kevin Edger@KEdge23·
Kemi Badenoch very clear here. There will be NO deal with Reform in any general election. Good for her. Reform doesn’t have clear policies, they keep changing their mind from one month to the next. Kemi is spot on, they’re not serious. Vote Conservative.
English
213
79
558
31.3K
Bass player
Bass player@BrexitBassist·
Anyone else remember Jamboree Bags?
Bass player tweet media
English
53
14
511
7.7K
Hugo Stephens retweetledi
Amanda Craig
Amanda Craig@AmandaPCraig·
I hope all Britons who loathe racism will RT this in the light of the vile attacks on British Jews.
Amanda Craig tweet media
English
121
1.4K
2.3K
28.8K
Hugo Stephens retweetledi
Liza Rosen
Liza Rosen@LizaRosen0000·
Pass it on!
Liza Rosen tweet media
English
164
1.8K
5.4K
37.4K
Hugo Stephens retweetledi
Vivid.🇮🇱
Vivid.🇮🇱@VividProwess·
Pass it on if you feel the same.
Vivid.🇮🇱 tweet media
English
405
5.3K
16.1K
118.6K
Bella Wallersteiner 🇺🇦
Bella Wallersteiner 🇺🇦@BellaWallerstei·
V frustrating but have had to defer my ultra Jurassic challenge due to re-occurring low back injury. Frustrating esp after other race was cancelled in Feb due to floods. Going to focus on pilates & strength so ready for marathon in June. Thank you for all your support as ever!
English
19
1
175
6.4K
Hugo Stephens
Hugo Stephens@FarseerUK·
You are missing the point. Mandelson's appointment exposes the rot at the heart of this Government and the PM's complete lack of judgement and dishonesty. People do care about that
Paul Embery@PaulEmbery

I agree. Mandelson's behaviour was scandalous, but the amount of time that those in the SW1 bubble are devoting to the tedious business of how he was appointed shows just how skewed their priorities are. Most voters don't give a damn about this bureaucratic 'process' stuff.

English
0
0
0
12
Hugo Stephens
Hugo Stephens@FarseerUK·
Ms Rayner should not enter into a pact with Burnham unless it is she who is leader and he as deputy. Burnham has repeatedly shown that he has no leadership skills whilst (love her or hate her) she does
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧@JChimirie66677

The Olive Branch. The Hostage. The Calculation. On the most damaging day of his premiership, Keir Starmer found time for one more act of self-preservation. While 335 Labour MPs were voting to protect him from an independent ethics inquiry, he was privately offering Angela Rayner a return to Cabinet. The timing tells you everything about his priorities. The offer has nothing to do with strengthening the government. The Telegraph's own reporting makes the calculation explicit. A Cabinet post would effectively bar Rayner from challenging Starmer for several months without appearing cynical to her supporters. He is not offering her a job because she is the best person for any ministerial role. He is offering her a job to neutralise her as a leadership threat. The olive branch is a pair of handcuffs. Rayner resigned in September 2025 after the Prime Minister's independent ethics adviser found she had not met the highest possible standards of proper conduct following a stamp duty scandal involving an underpayment of £40,000 on an £800,000 flat in Hove. The property arrangement involved NHS compensation money held in trust for her disabled son. HMRC is still investigating her tax affairs. Starmer's offer of a Cabinet return is reportedly contingent on that investigation being closed in her favour. A government that has spent weeks insisting on proper process in the Mandelson affair is preparing to return to Cabinet a minister whose comeback depends on a tax investigation concluding favourably. The consistency is striking. The wider leadership picture is no more reassuring. Wes Streeting is among those being discussed as a potential successor. Streeting, as Health Secretary, gave instructions in October 2024 to press ahead with transferring half a million GP records to Biobank despite objections from GPs and privacy campaigners, at precisely the moment Chinese access to that data was under active security service scrutiny. The Biobank breach this week, the 198th known exposure of that data since last summer, occurred on his watch and against warnings he chose to override. His connection to Mandelson runs deeper than ministerial proximity. Streeting was among the figures in the network around Mandelson that shaped the culture in which the Washington appointment was conceived. Replacing one compromised figure with another is not renewal. And the Burnham and Rayner pact being discussed adds a further dimension. A Blair-Brown style arrangement in which Rayner supports Burnham's leadership bid in exchange for eventually succeeding him is the politics of the machine room, not the national interest. The question of what Britain needs from its next Prime Minister, clarity on China, accountability for the decisions documented in the Mandelson affair, a genuine reckoning with the network of relationships that placed a failed vetting candidate in Washington with Strap Three clearance - is not being asked by any of the figures positioning themselves for the succession. Starmer survived Tuesday. He whipped his MPs to vote against an independent inquiry into his own conduct. He secured Rayner's vote by dangling a Cabinet job. He watched his own ambassador's candid assessment of his political mortality leak to the Financial Times on the same evening. Sir Christian Turner described him as touch and go. Fifteen of his own MPs defied the whip. More than fifty abstained. The offer to Rayner is not a sign of strength. A Prime Minister confident in his position does not need to buy his former deputy's loyalty. He earns it. What Starmer is doing is managing his survival one transaction at a time, placing party before country at every juncture, and hoping the arithmetic holds long enough for the story to move on.

English
0
0
0
25
Will Kingston
Will Kingston@WillKingston·
This isn’t just a British problem. If you compare the politicians in the Anglosphere today to 30 (or 100) years ago, they’re almost all objectively weaker. How do we get better people into politics? 👇
Allison Pearson@AllisonPearson

We have the most unpopular Prime Minister in history. A strange soulless man, a Process drone enlivened only by his own sanctimonious. Yet, Starmer is Labour’s best candidate for the job. How did Britain sink that low?

English
99
29
545
27K
Hugo Stephens
Hugo Stephens@FarseerUK·
Unlikely as the memory of what happened to the Tories after they got rid of Boris Johnson will be haunting them. And Starmer cannot call an election if he does not command a majority in the Commons: the King will first se if anyone else can do so
Pat Condell@patcondell

Labour MPs are going to try and get rid of Starmer. He’s absolutely toxic now. If he acts true to form he’ll call a snap general election just to spite them, and most of them will lose their seats.

English
0
0
0
13
Hugo Stephens
Hugo Stephens@FarseerUK·
@weymarplanet 52 years ago. Before the limited overs format became popular. Players were more reserved, and technique was vital to play at test level. Played in real white flannels with proper caps . No helmets back then
English
0
0
0
8
WeymarOnCricket
WeymarOnCricket@weymarplanet·
Genuine question: When did you actually start watching cricket? And be honest—is the game as appealing to you now as it was back then? Between the shift in formats and the change in how it’s played, what’s the biggest difference for you? Let's talk. 🏏
English
109
1
32
9.9K