The Mark of the Beast
4.2K posts






The dishonesty of Stephanopoulos' interview is striking. He says 10 times that Trump was found 'liable for rape' in the E Jean Carroll case. He says that the jury found Trump 'liable for rape.' In fact, the jury specifically found Trump *not* liable for rape. It found him liable for 'sexual abuse.' The judge later tried to spin the decision, citing laws that did not apply, to argue that the jury 'implicitly' found Trump liable for rape. In the absence of an actual jury finding of rape, the judge guessed that the jury's decision 'necessarily implies' rape. Stephanopoulos, in spite of the jury's written finding, on 10 occasions said Trump had been found legally liable for rape. Why not just be accurate and say Trump was found liable for sexual abuse? Does anyone think that sounds *good*? Did ABC think it would be letting Trump off easy by accurately citing the jury's verdict? I've written several times that I think the case should never have been brought. But it is a fact that Trump was found liable for sexual abuse. It's also a fact that he was not found liable for rape. PS: If you want to read the judge's spin, it's here: storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…



Tuberville says Britt’s delivery was good: “She was picked as a housewife, not just a senator, somebody who sees it from a different perspective…I mean, she did what she was asked to do. I thought she did a good job. And it's hard when you've never done anything like that.”












"This is infuriating in so many ways" -- Kayleigh McEnany is big mad about Trump being ranked as the worst president in history




Tucker is excited that the Russians have figured out a way to keep homeless people from taking shopping carts.












