Fight for Mary
7.7K posts

Fight for Mary
@FightForMary
Read @Warnings1975 - Pray the Seven Sorrows Rosary! St. Catherine Emmerich, pray for us. St. Mary of Agreda, pray for us.

@NEMonarchist SSPX’s situation is completely different. If they proceed with consecrations on July 1st, we’ll be able to toast the declaration of their excommunications for Independence Day.

HARSH WORDS ABOUT LEFEBVRE AND THE 1988 CONSECRATIONS THEY SHOULD HAVE LISTENED TO THESE EXORCISMS AND STOOD UP NOW LOOK WHERE SSPX IS - NEITHER FISH NOR FOUL IN THE EYES OF GOD May 13, 1989 J: Let us take an example. An antipope sits on the throne in Rome and people think he is the true Pope...! So there are thousands of schisms in the Church, thousands of sects and charismatics, "Catholics" who are in fact Protestants, Lutherans; and then there are Catholics of Tradition according to Archbishop Lefebvre, and then those who separated from him because they wanted to remain faithful to the Pope, or rather the antipope, I should say, and still others who certainly wanted to follow Tradition to some extent, but who mix it with Roman clamor and vociferation, false Roman vociferation; and those who certainly follow Tradition, like the true and authentic priests of Ecône, but who are commanded from above, by their superiors and by certain people who are not well inspired. Archbishop Lefebvre certainly has his way and his rank, but when the priests of Ecône receive orders from ill-inspired superiors, it is not good, and it is not according to the Holy Spirit. ECONE SPLITS - SOME FOR JOHN PAUL II, SOME AGAINT It comes from the fact that they do not want to believe and accept what we demons must continually say or have already had to say, namely that John Paul II is nothing but a false pope, an impostor, a mercenary, and that the true Pope Paul VI is still alive. This comes from the fact that they certainly want to follow Tradition, but as Archbishop Lefebvre Paul II is only a false pope, an impostor, a mercenary, and that the true Pope Paul VI is still alive. This is because they certainly want to follow Tradition, but as Archbishop Lefebvre did last June... That is not in accordance with the Church! If they want to follow traditional discipline concerning the Magisterium by recognizing John Paul II as Pope, then they must not consecrate when he does not allow it. If those in Ecône recognize him as Pope, then what he ordered at that time cannot be wrong. So, if Archbishop Lefebvre thinks he must walk according to ecclesiastical law, the Church, and I don't know what else, he should have accepted that and obeyed. He would now be in disobedience to the Church, one might say, because he is not obeying the one he recognizes as Pope. If he recognizes him and says, "He is our Pope, etc.," then logically he should obey. He cannot recognize him as pope and order other priests to mention him at Mass, etc., and on the other hand not obey him himself; that is paradoxical and double-edged. This is what Ecône has become. They blow two horns, two trumpets. That is why we cannot condemn those who have separated themselves from Ecône, because they hardly know what they should do. They think to themselves: "Why did we used to say that we must obey the Pope and that Rome is the Church, and on the other hand, Archbishop Lefebvre himself no longer obeys and consecrates four bishops whom, according to the Pope, according to the pseudo-pope, he should not have consecrated"? This must have troubled and confused them... Those in Ecône must now refrain from condemning and judging those who are separated from them as if they had defected, as if they had committed a grave injustice and were even on the path to Hell, when they themselves have committed an injustice and are neither in the full Will of God nor in the totality of Truth. These two positions are neither fish nor fowl, that is to say, Archbishop Lefebvre and those of Ecône certainly celebrate Holy Mass truly well and in a manner pleasing to God, but they have become too obstinate, too stubborn on certain points, so that it is no longer exactly the right path. Naturally, it is very difficult for them, in June and already in all the previous months, very difficult to overcome all the obstacles in order to remain on the path pleasing to God and to do what pleased Him. But they do not yet have infused knowledge, and the four cardinal virtues can disappear in them too if they do not do exactly what the Holy Spirit wants and commands. TORN APART BY WOLVES Certainly, they prayed and had others pray, and Archbishop Lefebvre thought carefully, but he was advised by dubious, false people. That is why this could happen. He did not believe that they were false, and thus a great deal of the light that he had before was taken from him. He allows himself to be advised too much by wolves, and thus the skin is stripped from the sheep down to the bone, so that now it is very difficult for them to continue to lead their Catholic Church as they should... First, their skin was stripped away, that is, when healthy members of Ecône were torn away and dismissed, even though they were good. But they did not believe it. And when you had to continue saying... Ah, I don't want to talk! Exorcist's incantations.


TRADITIONALISTS April 25, 1977 B: There are numbers of “traditionalists”, as many lay people as priests, who are full of self-righteousness, who are steeped in a kind of new phariseeism. They say, and sometimes they preach: “We are the good ones, we are the just, the rest are not worth much any more. We will go to Heaven.” That is pretty close to the sects: they say the same thing. Those up there (he points upward) do not like this behavior at all.. They do not love men very much who are righteous in their own eyes. But, to complete the picture, we must still say this: The priests who say: “It is better for you to stay at home rather than go to such Masses”, are making a mistake. If the Mass is degraded to that point where the priest himself no longer believes in the words of the Consecration, and no longer pronounces the words as they should be pronounced, if he no longer has the intention of consecrating, then the host is not consecrated, it is true... but, for all that, people can still pray in the church. I have to say this also: they are defrauded of Christ and of the fullness of the graces, it is true, but certain graces are still attached to it. Especially when good Christians, of deep faith, go to Mass and Communion full of devotion, with the intention of receiving Christ, then Heaven is fair enough not to say simply: “Because the priest is not doing things properly, there will be no graces here!” Those people nevertheless do receive certain graces. E: Do these people fulfill their duty to the Lord? B: If the people have the opportunity of going to a Mass of Saint Pius V, then Heaven prefers that, very much so. But if there is no other possibility, they may go to another Mass. After the Mass of Saint Pius V in Latin, the Tridentine Mass in the vernacular comes in second place, provided that it comprises the totality of the words of the Tridentine Mass as far as this is possible. Only after these, in third place, comes the New Mass. if they know very well that a kilometer further away, they would find a Mass of Saint Pius V, and if they say to themselves: “Bah! That, is too far away for me, I am not going to run over there!”; and if they know very well that that would be better, then we have a different situation. Then, they have lost out enormously through negligence. They should have gone that kilometer. Do you know (in a tearful voice) how far we would go, if we were still able to share in such great graces? Ah! We would travel to the ends of the earth, if we still had a chance! We do not wish to imply by this, that the other Masses are as good. We have already said enough about which Mass Those up there prefer (he points upward). We have to reveal the error which many priests are making. It is a fundamental error to instill into men that they must not go to any New Mass, that it comes from the devil, etc... That also is throwing the baby away with the bath-water, it is going to the opposite extreme. Never does such a condemnation have any place under the mantle of love of neighbor. In these circumstances there are modernists who have love of neighbor, who are sometimes better than such “traditionalists” who exalt themselves above others. And it should also be said that there are many “traditionalists” who are Pharisees. Otherwise, the modernists will think that all the “traditionalists” should be lumped together, that (all) the “traditionalists” are fanatics, rebellious fanatics, and will fight them with every means... Now we do not wish to speak any more (he grumbles). This is the way it is: Those up there (he points upward) love all their children, even if they have fallen into error. If, under the cloak of obedience, because they no longer know what they ought to do, they follow the opinions of. the bishops and the priests, then it is hardly their fault. If they act in all good faith, it will not be held to their account so strictly, although these circumstances are so frightful, frightful, frightful.


The Great Western Schism lasted 39 years. It began on 20 September 1378 (with the election of a rival anti-pope in Avignon after the election of the true Urban VI in Rome) and ended on 11 November 1417, when the Council of Constance elected Pope Martin V as the undisputed pope, resolving the crisis. 39 years. Less than one generation.


ABOUT THESE TEXTS Switzerland, 1975-1978











THE OLD RITES OR THE NEW RITES? E: In the name... tell us more: may the priests, should they, do they have the right to use the old rite in the administration of the Sacraments? Tell the truth and nothing but the truth! B: The old rite, complete and unabridged, is what they should use. The new rite is an invention of ours (he points downward) and of the freemasons, who have succeeded in manipulating the cardinals, and sometimes even the Pope, who did not become aware of it soon enough. There has been such a sell-out with all those Sacraments which have been changed. It is the result of our scheming, even for the Sacrament of the Sick.




THE TABERNACLE MUST BE WORTHY OF HIM WHO DWELLS THERE 🔥🔥🔥 J: The tabernacle should be in the center. What does it mean when, on entering a modern church, the first thing one has to do is search for the tabernacle? One does not know whether it is up front, at the back, or on the side. In many places now, the tabernacles make one ask whether it belongs to a fox terrier (loud laugh of wicked joy)... E: Tell the truth and nothing but the truth. Judas Iscariot, by order of the Blessed Virgin! J: ...or whether it is a safe (he can scarcely contain his mirth) E: Tell the truth, Judas Iscariot, nothing but the truth, by order of the Blessed Virgin! J: There are many people who make tabernacles, of a kind, out of iron; that would be good enough for railroad tracks which men step over or on which they tread. E: Tell the truth, nothing but the truth, in the name... J: A tabernacle...you understand me?...ought to be gilded! I must say that neither gold, nor the most precious stones, would be good enough to enclose what it encloses. This (a gilded tabernacle) would still be a long way from being worthy of what it contains. It is shameful - even we, down there, must acknowledge it - it is shameful to see the kinds of churches and tabernacles that people are building.








