Firas Bu Hamdan

30.9K posts

Firas Bu Hamdan

Firas Bu Hamdan

@FirasHamda2

Katılım Mart 2013
82 Takip Edilen60 Takipçiler
Guy Incognito
Guy Incognito@Snaelincognito·
@initjean @Kama_Kamilia You do know that the natural gas reserves take a long time to be filled and can only be filled at a certain rate as we have access now, meaning we might not have enough for the next winter? Part of human intelligence is the ability to plan ahead, it's how we invented agriculture
English
1
0
0
12
Firas Bu Hamdan
Firas Bu Hamdan@FirasHamda2·
@NeedleNoodle411 @KareemRifai The status quo of California today is that it's not de facto separate like Taiwan is,and no one is trying to force Californians to change their status quo,learn to think:)
English
0
0
0
10
Firas Bu Hamdan
Firas Bu Hamdan@FirasHamda2·
@NeedleNoodle411 @KareemRifai Because the poll showed that the taiwanese don't want to change their status in order to live under the Chinese dictatorship:) Is california a separate country today? No:) Is the US a dictatorship? No:) So it's not the same,is it?:)
English
0
0
0
4
NeedleNoodle
NeedleNoodle@NeedleNoodle411·
@FirasHamda2 @KareemRifai You said you care about what the people in Taiwan want because a poll shows so. Then why do you suddenly not care about what the Californians want when polls show that they want to secede from USA? Instead, you cowardly say that Californian can “sort their issues by
English
2
0
0
10
Firas Bu Hamdan
Firas Bu Hamdan@FirasHamda2·
@Derimot_no @davidfrum The "testimony" of your woman didn't refute what I said:) So there was a battle,did I say that there was no battle?:) And the Ukrainians were the ones who destroyed it to make it inoperable by the Russians:)
English
0
0
0
3
David Frum
David Frum@davidfrum·
If you wonder why Europeans flinch from helping US in Gulf - in January, NATO allies were seriously preparing for a US sneak attack on Greenland, planning to blow up runways to prevent a Trump re-enactment of Putin's failed strike on Kyiv.
Orla Joelsen@OJoelsen

Denmark prepared for a possible U.S. attack: Flew blood supplies to Greenland and planned to blow up runways Key sources in Denmark and Europe are now revealing for the first time what happened during the most critical days, when Donald Trump threatened to take Greenland “the hard way.” When Danish soldiers were rapidly deployed to Greenland in January this year, they brought explosives with them. The plan was to destroy runways in Nuuk and Kangerlussuaq to prevent American military aircraft from landing troops on the island, should the U.S. president ultimately decide to seize Greenland by force. They also transported blood supplies from Danish blood banks so wounded personnel could be treated in case of combat. This is reported by DR, which over the past year has spoken with central sources in the Danish government, top military officers, and high-ranking officials and intelligence sources in Denmark, France, and Germany. All sources have played—and continue to play—key roles in the international crisis triggered by the United States’ demand for control over Greenland. Together, the sources describe an unprecedented year marked by sleepless nights. None of them had concrete intelligence of specific American attack plans against Greenland. Still, many feared in January that the historically important ally, the United States, could attack at any moment. At the same time, Denmark reached out to its European allies, leading to closer cooperation. “With the Greenland crisis, Europe realized once and for all that we must be able to handle our own security,” said a French senior official involved in the intense period. A rapid-response force consisting of Danish, French, German, Norwegian, and Swedish soldiers was first deployed to Nuuk and Kangerlussuaq. Shortly after, a main force followed, including: -Soldiers from the Danish Dragoon Regiment in Holstebro -Elite troops from the Jaeger Corps -French alpine troops trained for cold and mountainous warfare At the same time, Danish fighter jets and a French naval vessel were sent to the North Atlantic. According to several sources, the goal of having multinational troops on the ground was to ensure that any U.S. attempt to take Greenland would require a large-scale hostile action—thereby deterring such an attempt. “We have not been in such a situation since April 1940,” said a Danish defense source, referring to the days before Denmark’s occupation during World War II. Unlike in 1940, when Denmark chose not to resist militarily, the government and defense leadership this time decided—after extensive confidential discussions—to take the opposite approach: If the U.S. attempted an attack, Danish forces would be armed and ready to fight. Danish F-35 fighter jets deployed north were also fully armed. All this despite the understanding that Denmark could not realistically withstand a U.S. military attack. “The cost for the U.S. had to be raised. The U.S. would have to carry out a hostile act to take Greenland,” said a senior Danish defense source. Source: DR

English
542
2K
8.3K
525.4K
Derimot no
Derimot no@Derimot_no·
@FirasHamda2 @davidfrum The Russians forces did the mission. They succeded. They withdrew when the long convoy withdrew. The job was done. And no, we are not gone start a new topic. If you have nothing more to say regarding Hostomel, well then we are done.
English
1
0
0
6
Firas Bu Hamdan
Firas Bu Hamdan@FirasHamda2·
@Derimot_no @davidfrum How come the Russians aren't there if they "won"?:) And you didn't answer,what were the Russians doing in Irpin if they "weren't trying to take Kyiv"?:) We're still in the same topic:)
English
1
0
0
11
Derimot no
Derimot no@Derimot_no·
You are wrong. We saw the news on TV when it happened. Including a woman doing a stand-up in front of the destroyed Antonov 225. Saying (and we could hear) there are gunfights across the corner (of the building). Russian soldiers won the fight. The ukrainians lost. It's so cute of you to shift topic when you have run into the wall regarding Hostomel.
English
1
0
0
10
Firas Bu Hamdan
Firas Bu Hamdan@FirasHamda2·
@Derimot_no @davidfrum The Ukrainians destroyed it not the Russians 😂 Also,if that was the case,what were the Russians doing in bucha and Irpin?:)
English
1
0
0
10
Derimot no
Derimot no@Derimot_no·
@FirasHamda2 @davidfrum Your guess is wrong. Russian forces took the airport to destroy it. - To make a hinder for the Kiev-regime. They succeded in doing that.
English
1
0
0
5
Firas Bu Hamdan
Firas Bu Hamdan@FirasHamda2·
@Derimot_no @davidfrum I did,they wanted to use it as a bridge to Kyiv,that's why they were fighting there,for the same reason they took bucha and for the same reason they were fighting in Irpin:)
English
1
0
0
8
Maj elali
Maj elali@maj_elali·
@NiohBerg Lol that was all bullshit. Assad getting run out of syria has all lead to this. Israel attacking iran and Lebanon. With Assad still in Syria this wouldn't have happened.
English
1
0
5
140
𝐍𝐢𝐨𝐡 𝐁𝐞𝐫𝐠 🇮🇷 ✡︎
Remember when Bashar Assad fled Syria and they found toddlers who were born and raised in his prisons by raped female political prisoners? Imagine what horrors we will uncover in Iran when the regime finally falls...
𝐍𝐢𝐨𝐡 𝐁𝐞𝐫𝐠 🇮🇷 ✡︎ tweet media
English
173
2.7K
10.8K
100.7K
Derimot no
Derimot no@Derimot_no·
@FirasHamda2 @davidfrum No. But why didn't you guess the right answer? The right answer is this: The objective was to take out the airport. And they succeded.
English
1
0
0
7
yasmina
yasmina@ymatgem·
@FederalLebanon_ Just stop publishing this kind of people. Make them invisibles. No more publicity. We all know all about them. Just ignore them
English
2
0
1
12
Federal Lebanon
Federal Lebanon@FederalLebanon_·
"نحنا أهل بعلبك. منخزّق تيابنا كرمال حزب الله." بحسب الايديولوجيا اللبنانويّة، هذا الرجل "احتلال إيراني"، ولا ضرورة كي تنتظم علاقتنا معه لأكثر من اللامركزيّة الإداريّة.
العربية
10
12
97
6.9K
Derimot no
Derimot no@Derimot_no·
@FirasHamda2 @davidfrum The answer to that is something that we have said earlier to day. But for you in the back: To take out the airport. As they succeded in doing.
English
1
0
0
6
Firas Bu Hamdan
Firas Bu Hamdan@FirasHamda2·
@abu_taam44516 يا زلمي باول تغريدة انبسطنا هلق رجعت زعلتنا ليش يا زلمي؟
العربية
0
0
0
78
د. ضياء أبو طعام
د. ضياء أبو طعام@abu_taam44516·
بعد اتصالات معي حول حالة #علي_برو توضح أنه لم يتعرض للضرب وأنه يحظى بمعاملة لائقة، أصبحت متأكداً أن قضية علي دخلت في نفق الكيد السياسي والتشفي الظالم طالما أن أمثال شارل جبور ورامي نعيم والمسؤولين عن الأخبار في محطة mtv لم تتم محسابتهم على جرائم موصوفة وواضحة في زمن الحرب.
د. ضياء أبو طعام@abu_taam44516

بحسب وكيل الناشط والزميل #علي_برو: تعرض علي برو للضرب المبرح على أيدي عناصر #فرع_المعلومات مباشرة بعيد التوقيف وأثناء التحقيق. إن الكيدية السياسية تطعن بالعدالة وتضرب نزاهة التحقيق، لذا ندعو لجنة حماية الصحفيين @CPJAsia للتدخل والضغط على الحكومة اللبنانية لحماية سلامة علي.

العربية
69
68
349
32.4K
Firas Bu Hamdan
Firas Bu Hamdan@FirasHamda2·
@Derimot_no @davidfrum "what were they doing there" is a rhetorical question in my part,I wanted to hear from you "what were they doing there" in your opinion?:)
English
1
0
0
4
Derimot no
Derimot no@Derimot_no·
OK, since you refuse to answer our question, we must assume that the answer would have been "yes". (Meaning that you knew about the fact that Russian forces took Hostomel). And when this is the case, then it make no sense asking "why were the Russian soldiers there?", since you obvioulsy know the anser yourself.
English
1
0
0
3
Derimot no
Derimot no@Derimot_no·
@FirasHamda2 @davidfrum Don't slide away: Before today, did you not know about the fact that Russian forces took Hostomel?
English
1
0
0
5
Firas Bu Hamdan
Firas Bu Hamdan@FirasHamda2·
@Derimot_no @davidfrum If I made the case that the Russians were trying to take Kyiv,would I be making the case that they're not in hostomel?:)
English
1
0
0
7
Derimot no
Derimot no@Derimot_no·
@FirasHamda2 @davidfrum We are not avoiding anything. But before we answer, you must answer our question: Did you hear about Russian forces at Hostomel for the fist time today? Because our response will not be the same if you say "yes" contra if you say "no".
English
1
0
0
9
Derimot no
Derimot no@Derimot_no·
Our question came because you wrote this: "what were they doing there?" So, if this is not news for you, your question is not a necessery question. But, if you didn't know this before today, then your question is understandable. So, what is it, did you know about this before today?
English
1
0
0
7